iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Of course not. But you should periodically question your beliefs and engage with people who disagree with you.

000

Most likely. I’ve seen people be banned here for very mundane and true beliefs. All from the right. It will be a leftist echo chambers like Threads. It’s shameful.

040

Terrible way to look at it.

100

Never apologize for a sincerely held belief. Never apologize for self defense. Never apologize for someone else's feelings. And, truly, never apologize when you believe you've done nothing wrong.

010

Reposted by Myric

In order to surrender to evil, you must be adapt at determining what is and is not evil. You’re not there yet.

001

In order to surrender to evil, you must be adapt at determining what is and is not evil. You’re not there yet.

001

The left brings the bullying on themselves.

011

If that’s what you think of us, no wonder you lost. You’re very confused.

000

I mean kinda makes more sense than “oh no Elon let conservatives speak again on X, therefore we lost” Makes a hell of a lot more sense than “people who voted for Obama decided not to vote for Kamala because racism” or “millions of Americans have been duped by Russia even tho we can’t prove it”

000

You just know by looking. You can do it too.

100

Remember that power is not dominance. It is competence. I wish you well.

000

Friend, what exactly do you think I’m wrong about? What exactly is your claim at this point?

000

Trump put the Republican Party in its place. It’s that simple. We now understand we can’t ignore reality anymore and keep screwing over the American people. It took strength to realize. It’s your turn now.

000

Yes it’s rooted in it but it is not empiricism itself. That’s a much older philosophical model that helped determine truth prior to formal science. You could make a stretch argument and say it was early science, but so were other philosophical models as well then

100

Science isn’t empirical proof tho. That’s conflation. Science can produce empirical proof but it can also produce nothing. Science is a process. Oops. Guess you didn’t know as much as you thought…

100

Right argumentation us important but you said that we didn’t know things prior to science. And argumentation is older than formal science. So… yeah you contradicted yourself.

100

🤣 Argumentation is older than formal science. Nice job contradicting yourself.

100

It does. We understood things prior to science. Science has been a great thing for humanity, but it’s not the only method for determining the truth.

100

I don’t think you believe that. Maybe you believe something like opinions without information aren’t worth agreeing with. One of the fatal flaws of science however is that it ignores tradition and common sense in favor of only what’s measurable. But you don’t only believe in what’s measurable.

100

Okay so now you recognize he only had 4 years. Wonderful. So how does Trump, while being investigated with 90s style “Russia brainwash” disinformation, and trying to run the country while being fought by people who had no problem with fences or borders prior to 2016, get it done in four years?

000

Now please for the fourth time. Which specific topic are we discussing? I won’t ask again I’ll just assume border since you think Trumps been active president for eight years

000

Because people deserve to hear different opinions. And some leftists (like yourself) actually bother with disagreement and debate. You’re actually interacting with someone you have a genuine chance of getting to admit they’re wrong. I hope you take the chance better from here

100

Haha 🤣 you think you’re informed because you watch the news. There’s a reason their ratings are in the toilet. I guess you’re gonna say their ratings are actually high? 🤨 Do you believe Trump has been president for 8 years? I mean I do, but only in name, but do you think so too?

100

Which opinion? I’ve asked three times now. It’s not a gotcha. I’m not defending every opinion nor am I dismantling all of your 800 gish gallops in 300 characters.

100

I don’t read the news, that’s why you’re so confused. Trump hasn’t had eight years. How can you be that wrong?

100

Credibility or not, facts don’t change. You wanna pick a topic or what? I’m not going to respond to repeated illogical gish gallops. We stick to one topic or we’ve reached an impasse friend

100

🤣 Do we agree that Biden isn’t the legitimate president or something? You’re not serious 🤣

100

“He had 8 years” Uhhh what

100

🤣 You have no power here

100

I guess you just have more time than I do 🤷‍♂️ But I’m happy to be specific. What specific topic? Just one. You’ve been kinda all over the place with the topics so let’s focus in on one and I’ll happily discuss

100

Let’s be specific. You keep posting a ton of links I don’t necessarily have time to go through them all. So we can focus on the wall. You didn’t want the wall. I did. He’s going to finish it. It took a second term and hopefully he’ll have less fighting this time over it. You pick the next topic.

100

So he succeeded on the wall in your estimation. Obama only mentioned that to get Harris elected. You’re deluding yourself. I’ve done plenty of homework. I know you’re wrong.

200

Did you want the wall? Illegal inmigration did not get worse under him. I know you’re drinking the kool aid now bud. COVID was either an unprecedented pandemic or was something he botched. Pick. He didn’t do away with 50 years of women’s progress. A complete rewrite of the overturning of RvW

100

Trump has been president before. He was quite successful frankly. Again, it wasn’t that long ago 🤨

110

Thank you for proving my point. You can’t even fathom a world where the things we voted for were common sense. And it was even that long ago!

100

Gish gallop. Again, not relevant also. If you’d like to discuss one I’m here for it, but my point is (as you’re proving) leftists don’t have compassion.

100

Nothing you’ve said has been right, and this past one was the most egregious. Conservatives didn’t vote for a convicted felon to have unlimited power. I know immediately you have no clue what’s going on from that alone. I’m inviting you to focus on what I -actually- said. Not a distraction at all

100

Okay so you’re bringing up irrelevant stuff and you think I’m intellectually dishonest. Weird. Inconsistent. Leftist. To address your points, IQ is not the same as wisdom, educated is not the same as intelligent, dispassionate is not the same thing as correct, and none of it was relevant

100

The only thing even remotely related to what I said is the emotional one. Emotions are not always bad. They have some level of intelligence and logic to them. If conservatives were 60% emotional, but liberals 40%, we’d both be right. Other than being nasty, what is your point?

100

What’s any of that got to do with what I said? 🤨

100

We all are. It’s okay to be human.

000

How do I put my hand down when they’re both down…. I need a double down option

000

You should question everything.

010

This is true. I hope that we can all band together and help ensure this isn’t a problem for us. But we’ll see.

000

I don’t know who you are and haven’t done any of that to you. But have a good one!

100