iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by M.W.

Courtney Price @courtneycprice.bsky.social · 8h

I emailed the registrar of voters asking why I was moved to inactive. I am attaching the email exchange to this. I feel like we definitely need an explanation from the secretary of state office for what led to this error. What were they doing trying to do to cause this?

Hello,

My voter registration was listed as active this morning. When I went to show someone how to check just a few minutes ago, it had changed to inactive and claims my address couldn't be verified. I filled out things on the website that I think should fix it but the portal doesn't update status immediately.

I wanted to ask why I was listed as inactive. I have lived at the same address for over ten years and am a consistent voter. It is very concerning to me that I was switched to inactive and I want to know how this happened. I have other friends who also are consistent voters with no address change who have also experienced this. I am deeply concerned about the disenfranchisement this error could cause.

Thank you.
Courtney Price

Ms. Price,

The Secretary of State's office identified a process that unexpectedly made some voters inactive yesterday. They are correcting this with a process that will run overnight tonight and return the affected voters to active status. I see that your status has already been returned to "active" because of the transaction you submitted online last night.

I apologize for this issue, and thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Steve Raborn
Registrar of Voters

Is this something they will be making a public statement about? I know several other impacted people and people are deeply concerned about this situation.

Courtney Price

I have forwarded your e-mail to the Secretary of State's office as I cannot answer this question on their behalf. The information provided to us this morning only included content about identifying the issue and that they would make the necessary corrections.

SR

72113

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

Well that's a horrifying stat that I didn't know...

000

Reposted by M.W.

Big John @dcbigjohn.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

ICE is opening a concentration camp for children in Alexandria, Louisiana run by a private company with a horrendous human rights record. Because of significant opposition, the local government and ICE are doing everything they can to keep what's happening a secret www.nola.com/gambit/news/...

nola.com

‘Shrouded in secrecy’: Louisiana's new ICE facility raises more questions than answers

Under the Trump administration's deportation blitz, ICE's new 'staging center' in Alexandria, Louisiana is run by the operators of Lasalle Corrections, a private, for-profit company with a history of ...

66966

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Just like "Economics"TM. (This was a snobby physics post).

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

I'm pretty sure these people have an office on Camp with a sign at the door. Every time I pass it I think how their brains were so fried they didn't see the irony in their name...noai....

001

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

I wonder if there are any NOLAPS board members interested in pushing a direct run bid

100

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

It is amazing to see how the more wealthy someone is, the lower their reading/story comprehension is.

000

Reposted by M.W.

Douglas Natelson @nanoscaleviews.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

🧪⚛️ Dam Son at U Chicago, shepherding a clean physics result from Claude (interesting style of presenting this as authored by the AI tool). This is a great example of something AI tools are presently good for: tracking down pernicious calculational details. home.uchicago.edu/dtson/papers...

home.uchicago.edu

091

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

This just describes how a large portion of New Orleans operates

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

There are a lot of bad austerity measures governments try. Defunding low barrier shelters is pretty high up there as one of the top bad ideas.

000

Reposted by M.W.

Danny Cherry Jr (twitter/Insta/tiktok: @Deecherrywriter) @deecherrywriter.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

🚨🚨🚨 Just got info from the Jamie Davis (Louisiana US Dem candidate) campaign that a poll taken from 9/17 to 9/19 shows he's within 4 points of US Rep. Julia Letlow (the R senate candidate) in the Louisiana US senate race. Of note, Letlow's name recognition is double that of Davis. (82% vs. 41%)

TO: Jamie Davis for U.S. Senate
FROM: Hart Research Associates
DATE: September 22, 2026
RE: Recent statewide survey shows Jamie Davis within the margin of error; strong reaction to his positive message

Hart Research Associates conducted a statewide survey between September 17 and 19, 2026, among
500 likely Louisiana voters via landline, cell phone, and text-to-web. The survey was representative of
the November 2026 electorate by key demographic, geographic, and partisan factors, and has a
margin of error of ±4.5%.
Our survey shows that Jamie Davis is within striking distance of Julia Leitlow in the initial trial
heat, despite the Republican’s name recognition advantage:

714942

Reposted by M.W.

tomstoner.bsky.social @tomstoner.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Raise some fun (and funds) for Jamie Davis Saturday, October 3rd - 5:00 to 7:00 PM at the Howlin’ Wolf 907 S Peter’s St New Orleans secure.actblue.com/donate/oct3w...

033

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Hehe. I accidentally made a pun when asking for this paper.

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

I try to follow the framework: nuance is more helpful if you have the same goals or assumptions in mind (coopetition/ I really hate that word but it is what it is) and stronger more direct arguments are more effective when you don't agree on the problem or desired outcome (competition).

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 17/09/2026

Did you know certain brain signals have a tendency to sync up across the attendees at big music events? It is one of the most communal things out there!

062

Reposted by M.W.

Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 14/09/2026

There's A LOT of ways the Trump admin is currently attacking & decimating American science. Here's a breakdown of what they are doing, and what you can do about it. 🧵

5370242

Reposted by M.W.

Colette Delawalla, PhD @cdelawalla.bsky.social · 01/09/2026

BREAKING: OMB PROPOSED RULE IS PAUSED UNTIL DEC 11th. This is a direct result of OUR ACTIVISM! It's a critical step in the right direction AND the fight continues. NOW, it's time to revoke the rule. Email here: fight2win.standupforscience.net/campaign/rev... www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

theguardian.com

House passes funding bill to avoid shutdown before midterms

Continuing resolution to approve government spending until 11 December passes 370-48 and will now go to Trump

422885

Reposted by M.W.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 01/09/2026

It's like a parody, but it's deadly serious; the Commerce Department (which includes Census, NOAA, and others) has outright deleted "don't alter or suppress scientific findings for political reasons" from its scientific integrity rules. Seriously.

Protecting against "inappropriate influence" is no longer a "hallmark" of scientific integrity

The Commerce Department updated its policy for promoting a "culture of scientific integrity" in January 2025, days before Trump's second inauguration.

A new Trump administration order bans the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis from using statistical “noise,” or data for fuzzing survey results, to protect people’s privacy in their statistics.

The 2025 version included bans on attempts to shape or interfere in data collection, statistical analysis and other scientific activities "against well-accepted scientific methods and theories or without scientific justification."

The department's policy, the 2025 version said, involves ensuring scientific findings at its agencies "are not suppressed, delayed, or altered for political purposes and are not subjected to inappropriate influence," as well as making sure there's "independent review of facilities, methodologies, and other scientific activities as appropriate to ensure scientific integrity."

That language is missing, however, in the Trump administration's revision of the policy, according to an NPR analysis of text posted on the Commerce Department's website.

And while the revision adopts a definition for "scientific integrity" that is similar to the previous version, it no longer says that "protection from inappropriate influence" is among the "hallmarks of scientific integrity."

4331311632

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

I don't know if you saw it but it seems to be an AI'd version of a Time magazine ranking so I don't think he put any thought into it other than the top and bottom.

011

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

This 100%. When I was just out of grad school at a think tank there were humanities, social science, and physical science researchers. Many of the younger ones still had this weird tribalism I saw in grad school. The more senior ones knew why the think tank hired all three types to co-mingle.

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 25/08/2026

I'm glad someone else said it, I tuned in right as she said "the coast is eroding.... no, no, this is just the reality part of the speech I need to get through." So many questions from that....

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

Better ALMOST LATE than never, today is the last day. Get your comments in to prevent disastrous changes to the grant making process.

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 21/08/2026

Also see climate change vs global warming.

110

Reposted by M.W.

Jacquelyn Gill @jacquelyngill.bsky.social · 21/08/2026

Hey folks, this hasn’t gotten much attention, but remember those proposed OMB rule changes we all commented on recently? There’s a new attempt to sneak them just for NSF. We have three days to comment. Please don’t sleep on this!

7755637

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 19/08/2026

Well I didn't know I needed to read this thread but I did.

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 12/08/2026

I feel like at least the articles I'm seeing recently about bluesky dying is just is a disconnect between the report and the reporting. I have been seeing that daily active users of the app are decreasing not usage in general. I know I never use the app, the web based is just better.

3150

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

I get why this feels tempting for the Mayor in a city that needs money right now but this would be an absolutely terrible choice and we need to push back hard to make sure she understands this is a non-starter. #nolasky

011

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 07/08/2026

Today is a great day to give Cassidy a call #nolasky. Let's remind him Blanche is pretty widely disliked across the board and is absolutely unqualified for the AG position.

020

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 06/08/2026

No, we can only do "shit" with all of these food issue...

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 03/08/2026

No the LA SOS doesn't have U.S. Reps up, I imagine it is because qualifying now opens(!?) on Aug 5th (www.sos.la.gov/media/dcvl5o...)

sos.la.gov

110

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 30/07/2026

I killed so much time playing this game instead of studying and will now probably waste much more time on it again. Thanks @archive.org !

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 30/07/2026

I really can't stand our state leadership....

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

I wonder if that is more or less than the number of Landry employees who have signed the recall effort.

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

I got excited when I saw the walk up window/bar going in. I haven't seen it open yet but I will be walking up for a drink when going down Mag.

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 24/07/2026

This thread is just fun, people trying to find other examples and then BAM here is an animal that does the exact same thing that you didn't know about.

000

Reposted by M.W.

evacide @evacide.bsky.social · 24/07/2026

This matters a lot because people are constantly asking me if they should set up a duress passcode in order to fool law enforcement.

15368152

Reposted by M.W.

Douglas Natelson @nanoscaleviews.bsky.social · 24/07/2026

🧪 @colesci.bsky.social with a solid piece on the recent OSTP document. Rightly asks, how much attention should this merit? Enough to see what it is, but not inflate the importance of a policy manifesto that doesn't have the force of law or regulation. www.techpolicy.press/ostp-vision-...

techpolicy.press

OSTP Vision for Science is a ‘Golden Age’ for Corporations

"Science: A New Golden Age" tries to reframe the conversation away from the ongoing destruction of American science, writes Cole Donovan.

172

Reposted by M.W.

Zach Weinersmith @zachweinersmith.bsky.social · 23/07/2026

I made this one in 2014 www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2014-0...

638484

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 22/07/2026

This feels a lot like what @doctorow.pluralistic.net described in the Reverse-Centaur as Criti-hype. This wasn't terminator coming back from the future. This was a sloppy cloud environment turned press release. (@wired.com does have a quote at the end pointing this out)

2419

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 20/07/2026

Oh hey there #nolasky looks like they want to weaponize those "respond only" drones.

010

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 19/07/2026

Words to live by right here.

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

Hey look at that! A thing other reasonable cities do being done here!

000

Reposted by M.W.

Sarah Taber @sarahtaber.bsky.social · 15/07/2026

Taco Bell understands what's at stake They want you to live más, not live menos

534060

Reposted by M.W.

Jeremy Yoder says no war @jbyoder.org · 13/07/2026

Holy COW. Text analysis of comments on the OMB rule: overwhelming opposition, overwhelmingly not form letters. (But 9 in 10 comments supporting the rule ARE form responses, LOL) Whatever happens next, folks have stepped up.

Screenshot text: Between May 29 and July 9, roughly 51,000 comments were posted to regulations.gov (and over 200,000 more had been received but not yet published). The verdict on public sentiment is clear and lopsided: about 94 percent oppose the proposed rule and only 6 percent support it, with fewer than one percent marked as unclear. The opposition is overwhelmingly grassroots rather than orchestrated. Form letters make up only about 16 percent of all comments (roughly 8,400 comments across 210 distinct campaigns), and only about one in eight opposing comments came from a form-letter campaign. Support for the rule, by contrast, was almost entirely organized: nearly nine in ten supportive comments (about 2,500) came from a single form-letter campaign. Opponents mostly wrote their own comments; supporters mostly signed the same form-letter.

1808303

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

They are totally going to offer him some BS job or position just so he can't be a difficult R in the Senate

000

M.W. @mwatson.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

My hot take, 99% of A24's stuff was bad already. You churn out enough, some of it will be (really) good. Most will not be.

000