iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

NON-TOXICNo ads · No shady algorithms

iiinova is part of the Atmosphere — an open, public network where you own your identity.

Bianca Kramer

@MsPhelps.akademienl.social.ap.brid.gy

Open science, open metadata, open infrastructure. Executive Director of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @BarcelonaDORI 🌉 bridged from ⁂ akademienl.social/@MsPhelps, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

Posts Replies Media

Bianca Kramer @msphelps.akademienl.social.ap.brid.gy · 06/07/2026

Can we afford the future? Last week at #LIBER202, @cameronneylon and I presented out open source analytics pipeline projecting library consortium costs into the future under different scenarios. Using data from #CAUL and #Bibsam we show how publicly […] [Original post on akademienl.social]

Stacked bar chart showing overlap of detection of affiliated publications for CAUL institutions from 2015 to 2024. A substantial proportion of outputs are identified as affiliated in both OpenAlex and OpenAIRE with both contributing a proportion of unique outputs.

Stacked area graph showing a projection of publishing systems costs over time. Overall costs rise from around 80 million to about 160 million euros from 2024 to 2032. The model scenario, built up from past data for Bibsam, focuses on expansion of publishing agreements to reduce APC payments so shows an increasing proportion of agreement costs over time.

033 3

Bianca Kramer @msphelps.akademienl.social.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2025

Is there a relationship between the metadata publishers submit to Crossref and the submission systems they use? 🤔 In this new preprint with @HLdeJonge, we analyzed 153 publishers and 4 major systems to find out. 👉 doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/ndx3f_v1 […] [Original post on akademienl.social]

Metadata coverage by publisher for abstracts, affiliations, references, funding, ORCIDs and licenses, categorized by their submission" system.

038 8

Bianca Kramer @msphelps.akademienl.social.ap.brid.gy · 13/05/2025

Great thoughful blog post from @jeroenbosman and @Jeroenson on @upstream: The resilience of open science in times of crisis. doi.org/10.54900/pqrcx-8d019 They abstract different types of threats and different aspects of resilience - linking both […] [Original post on akademienl.social]

Graphical model of resilience aspects during a threat/intrusion event. It connects 5 types of threats (potential threat, actual threat, encounter/attack, incursion and destruction) to 5 resilience aspects (prevention, protection, resistance, withstanding, repair) that together form options for resilience for systems, communities and individuals

002 2

Bianca Kramer @msphelps.akademienl.social.ap.brid.gy · 27/04/2025

Great to see Pangaea / Helmholtz @helmholtz involved in this - and simultaneouly intrigued on the details, esp. where it says 'formally working with [NOAA]"? doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01309-3 Also good to see the update re: public data.

UPDATES & CORRECTIONS
Clarification 25 April 2025: This story was updated to clarify that the government data being rescued s public and free to use.

010 1

Bianca Kramer @msphelps.akademienl.social.ap.brid.gy · 09/04/2025

In thinking about alternatives for #PubMed (coverage and functionalities) I wondered how many PubMed records of recent years don't have a DOI. Numbers for (journal) articles, reviews, preprints and retractions from 2022-2024, from OpenAlex (pub and source types are OpenAlex' classification)

Table of (journal) articles, reviews, preprint and retraction with pmid only or with pmid & doi.

Table rows:

type - source_type - pmid_only - pmid_and_doi
all - all - 40752 - 4541820
article - journal - 367 - 3588169
review - journal - 10 - 517005
article - repository - 35936 - 52619
preprint - repository - 480 - 30982
article - book series - 0 - 18929
retraction - journal - 0 - 13402
review - repository - 1364 - 5947
review - book series - 0 - 3202
article - conference - 0 - 3067
preprint - journal - 5 - 2889
article - - 439 - 1715
article - ebook platform - 0 - 649
preprint - - 2 - 547
retraction - repository - 20 - 80
review - - 18 - 31

000 0