iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

I will no longer post about this matter. I'm exhausted.

080

If, after reading this, you feel this feed is not suitable for you, you may want to stop using it. Alternatively, we recommend creating your own new St@rmeg feed. Thank you for reading this lengthy message.

080

I have never told anyone to delete their posts for the sake of my feed, nor have I told anyone not to express negative opinions about st@rmeg. It is simply that for the feed I have created, I only want to collect posts that are dedicated to enjoying st@rmeg.

My st@rmeg feed is something I created personally, and as such, it is customized. I do not believe that this feed is the only correct one, and you can find many works that my feed didn't pick up by using the search bar.

I explained the above to the user who sent me their feedback, providing a screenshot as evidence of the content included in their exclusion, but they were not convinced.

Those who have created feeds themselves may be aware of this problematic specification. If a code or method to resolve this issue is developed in the future, I will certainly implement it.

The only way to exclude current posts is by blocking the user who posted them. Because my feed contained posts featuring reverse pairing involving the user in question, as well as negative posts regarding specific st@rmeg, I had no choice but to add them to my block list.

The feed feature has a code for long-term post storage. While this specification allows posts older than 7 days to be saved, it has a characteristic where once a post is loaded, it will not disappear even if you later add exclusion keywords or overwrite the settings.

I am posting this message because I have received feedback claiming that I am excluding specific users from this feed to bully them. This is a completely incorrect interpretation, and I have no intention of excluding any specific individuals.

160

Please understand that due to this filtering, some starmeg posts may be missed or not displayed.

140

Because of this, I have configured it to exclude posts involving reverse pairing, switch, discussions that include the word starmeg but are unrelated to the pairing, and posts expressing personal likes or dislikes regarding specific starmeg content.

[To all users of the St@rmeg feed] （I'm using a translation machine, there may be inaccuracies.） The St@rmeg feed I created is a feed that collects posts, including works and discussions, featuring st@rmeg (top Starscream/bottom Megatron) across all series through individual filtering.

1130

I liked your separate account for starmeg, and I am truly sorry that your main account has been excluded. As you pointed out, I have added a note to the description explaining that I am selecting posts for the account. I hope for your understanding.（5/5）

it bypasses mute words and gets recorded, making it impossible to remove individual posts. The only way to resolve this is to add the user to a list and block them, so I will certainly unblock them once these issues are resolved.（4/5）

I simply want to ensure that negative posts are excluded as much as possible. The feed function generally only records posts from the last 7 days. If a program is added to save posts for a longer period, once a post is loaded, （3/5）

I know some people like only one of "megastar" or "starmeg," while others like both, and that is fine. However, I filtered those out because I thought there are users who would prefer not to have tweets discussing the two in a feed meant for searching and enjoying "starmeg" exclusively.（2/5）

When I created the feed, it ended up including posts that contain both "starmeg" and "megaster." Also, it picked up past tweets that include "megastar" (or "megascream") as shown in the screenshot below, as well as posts by others that exclude "starmeg" but are irrelevant. （1/5）

→ hinder the experience of enjoying starmeg. I apologize for any discomfort this may have caused you. However, I have maintained this format in order to fulfill the original purpose of the feed, which is to collect posts exclusively about starmeg. I appreciate your understanding.

120

→posts that are negative toward starmeg, or posts that have nothing to do with Transformers being included in the results. Under the current system, I had no choice but to take this action because, without manually blocking the entire user list, those unrelated posts would appear in the feed and→

120