iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 14/07/2026

Today we launch the first stable release of RegCheck: v1.0.0. RegCheck makes it easier and quicker to compare study registrations to published papers for consistency - something we know is important in principle, but rarely done in practice. A 🧵 on what's new: regcheck.app

regcheck.app

RegCheck

RegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.

512883

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

Did a 90 minute webinar workshop for APA on depression measurement. They were kind enough to allow me to share this on youtube. youtu.be/5OwYjWao1hs

youtu.be

What Scale is Best? Understanding Sources of Validity Evidence for Depression Measurement

YouTube video by Eiko Fried

36920

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Sajedeh Rasti @sajedehra.bsky.social · 01/06/2026

The 3rd edition of Meta Research Symposium is open for accepting abstracts. We have two categories: 3-h hackathons, organised by @youngmetascience.bsky.social and 20-minute talks. Learn more and submit your abstracts here: paulmeehlschool.github.io/workshops/sy...

paulmeehlschool.github.io

Paul Meehl Graduate School Meta Research Symposium 2026 | Paul Meehl Graduate School

October 8-9, 2026

0148

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 25/05/2026

New blog post: Evaluating Dr. Cuddy’s Claim that the Debunking of Power Posing is a Myth. daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/05/eval... On an AI generated description of a non-existent study, incorrectly citing findings from studies, and the importance of scientific criticism.

daniellakens.blogspot.com

Evaluating Dr. Cuddy’s Claim that the Debunking of Power Posing is a Myth

In this blog post I will analyse the arguments that Dr. Amy Cuddy provided in a blog post “The "Power Posing Was Debunked" Myth: What the Re...

1517870

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 29/04/2026

Selecting an effect size for power analysis is hard. Many researchers fall back on Cohen's thresholds, but they have no empirical basis and vary wildly by field. Our new paper offers a better option: field-specific effect size distributions built from meta-analytic data doi.org/10.3758/s134...

Abstract
Effect sizes are useful for understanding the magnitude of study results and for planning new studies via power analysis.
However, despite their wide usage, effect sizes are often misinterpreted. This is mostly due to an over-reliance on general
effect size benchmarks that were not intended for broad application across diverse research fields. Inaccurate effect size
interpretations can lead to incorrect conclusions about the magnitude of study results and incorrect sample size estimates,
thereby increasing the likelihood of false-positive results. This article introduces the ESDist R package, which is designed
to calculate empirically derived effect-size benchmarks or a range of reliably detectable empirical effect sizes for a specific
research question or field of interest by computing effect size distributions (ESDs). This package can be used on data that
can be easily extracted from pre-existing meta-analyses to help researchers more accurately plan new studies or to better
understand how an individual study might relate to other studies in their field. ESDist includes a set of features that make it
easy to use in a priori power analysis. Moreover, the package includes a feature for estimating effect size benchmarks that
account for publication bias and are weighted by effect sizes' variances, which addresses existing limitations of using ESDs
for study planning or interpretation.

316175

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 01/05/2026

New preprint: How to analyze a replication study. osf.io/preprints/ps... Following methodological falsificationism, claims in replications should follow the original test (so typically p<0.05). We also discuss some consequences a coherent philosophical approach to statistics. >

osf.io

How to analyze a replication study

Replication studies play an important role in scientific knowledge generation, but researchers lack a coherent account of how to conclude whether a finding has been replicated. This paper provides such...

22811

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 20/04/2026

Lovely to see everyone coding away during the Paul Meehl Graduate School workshop on Cognitive Computational models paulmeehlschool.github.io/2026-03-10-c..., with visitors from Poland, Czech Republic, and Germany. Thanks to Leendert van Maanen and Dominik Bachmann for teaching it!

0122

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Platform for Young Meta-Scientists (PYMS) @youngmetascience.bsky.social · 10/04/2026

Registration is now open for our online presentation series! Every day from April 20–24 (12:00 CEST), two ECRs will present their work. Finished projects, raw ideas, and everything in between Sign up now! Full program (abstracts): tinyurl.com/22v38up2 Register here: forms.office.com/e/MkjYWqTvAw

Short overview of program of the online lunch meetings.

1107

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Center for Open Science @cos.io · 01/04/2026

Today, the SCORE program releases its primary results! 865 researchers examined research credibility across the social and behavioral sciences, publishing three papers in Nature + five preprints. 📑 Explore the papers: www.nature.com/colle... ℹ️ Read more about SCORE: www.cos.io/score

nature.com

Reliable research in the social and behavioural and sciences

Sweeping new investigations probe the replication, robustness and reproducibility of results across the behavioural and social sciences.

36445

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 23/02/2026

198 effect sizes in ego depletion resesrch showed an effect size of d=0.62. Preregistered large replications (including some by original authors) yielded an effect size of 0. No one has been able to offer any other explanation for this huge research waste than massive p-hacking.

613446

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Platform for Young Meta-Scientists (PYMS) @youngmetascience.bsky.social · 23/02/2026

It's been a week, but we left inspired after #PSE8 in Leiden. Thanks to all who participated in our mentor-mentee lunch! Hopefully you all had interesting conversations, and made new connections. ECR and want to see more of PYMS? Sign up for the mailing list: tinyurl.com/3mkn6f2a

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Caspar van Lissa 🟥 @cjvanlissa.bsky.social · 20/02/2026

Call for Submissions for the Theory Methods Conference 2026, September 30-October 2! theorymethodssociety.org/conference.h... We invite you to: 1) Submit your proposal: edu.nl/mj9x6 2) Invite your colleagues/lab/(PhD) students, and encourage them to submit 3) Share this post

theorymethodssociety.org

Conference –

11921

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Paweł Kleka @pkleka.bsky.social · 14/02/2026

051

Reposted by Miłosz Kalinowski

Paweł Kleka @pkleka.bsky.social · 12/02/2026

Julia Jaszczak from AMU and Milosz Kalinowski from @polskaakademianauk.bsky.social presenting a poster on testing the quantity of constructs in psychology at a conference #PSE8. We have tools (but we do not use them) to check whether the measurement provides sufficient data for statistical analysis

131