iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 29m

The Dells paid a fortune for the mar-a-lago 'mutilization'. Because as all the platinum elite members know, beauty is skin deep, and money can buy you anything.

000

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 34m

She said "Sir..." Turned his wife into a 'Sir story'.

000

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 39m

She paid a fortune to be surgically carved into that appearance.

020

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 8h

Look at all of corporate media, welcoming this psychotic piece of shit, to sell his crappy book. bsky.app/profile/mc20...

030

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 8h

With the total insanity of trump's neverending ballroom 'construction' project banging away in the background. Madness.

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 9h

Thanks for refreshing those details. I did recall the controversy, but since the op was unsourced, just tested the Powell case and found it to be false, and other factchecking sites also pronouncing it false. And yet, even now the white nationalist vandalism still shows in 'notable' categories.

000

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 9h

Election denial is voter suppression. This is exactly why blueanon claims of election hacking are so destructive. It can't be a 'rigged' election any time your candidate loses, but all good when they win. That is trump's lie.

000

Exclusive: Paxton privately blames campaign woes on Iran war, gas prices

www.axios.com/2026/10/07/k... Own it, dumb-dumb. How insanely badly do republicans suck? 'Duh, gee, turns out fucking up absolutely everything isn't popular.' #VOTE #Talarico

axios.com

The GOP Senate candidate told donors he doesn't "know what was behind some of the decisions."

021

Reposted by George Smiley

Democracy Forward @democracyforward.org · 12h

Following our FOIA requests, we obtained groundbreaking records showing ICE’s attempts to silence voters. ICE obtained 48.4 million records from Heather Honey, a known election denier, as a “strategic line of effort” to pursue voter fraud investigations.

nytimes.com

Trump Officials Ramp Up Investigations Into Voter Registration Groups

The Trump administration is investigating nonprofits that it says may be recruiting noncitizens for voter registration, documents show, even though noncitizen voting in the United States is rare.

38250

Rarest unicorn of extreme rightwing trump/magat-satire outdoing anything from the [exhausted] left. Problematic because it's Ai, and the account making these vids is rabidly antisemitic and pro-fascist.

000

h/t to the unidentified tik-tokker for bringing this Senate report on Big Oil + Trump to light. Never heard about it until now. It's a hell of a piece of work, somehow lost in the daily blizzard of headlines. www.epw.senate.gov/public/_cach...

Senate Report: Billion Dollar Deal - How the Fossil Fuel Industry bought the trump admin, cashed in, and left Americans to pay the price.

000

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 12h

www.epw.senate.gov/public/_cach...

001

All those dumbass onceler chuds in their combat gear, blandly observing the destruction of life. #FDT

030

Reposted by George Smiley

Raider @iwillnotbesilenced.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

The Trump administration’s actions resulted in the destruction of the largest ancient Cottonwood tree on Indigenous territory in Arizona. This tree, known as the “Grandmother Tree,” was 250 years old.

75134172182

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 12h

Going lower when they go low, or fuck up in some way, is a choice. I don't think it's as effective as actually demolishing the real policy he is advocating. In fact it helps to obscure it, and how awful it is. The Iran nuke fearmongering has always been a total lie. Our confusion gives it a pass.

100

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 12h

No, the point is clear and consistent. He's repeated it many times in many ways. These are established facts on record.

100

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 14h

bsky.app/profile/mc20...

020

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 23h

No, the small price is high gas. You are being obtuse.

000

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 23h

Right, trump does not want US cities to be nuked by Iran. First, he claims to have eliminated their ability to do so, right? He claims the war was necessary, and high gas is a small price to pay - for what? For removing the imminent threat of Iran nukes. Opposite of your claim.

George Smiley @mc2020.bsky.social · 23h

That ship sailed in 2016. He's always spoken this way. Of course he should be removed for a hundred various reasons. But 'inviting' or 'calling for' Iran to nuke US cities is not among them, because he did not do that.

030

That makes no sense, even from within trump's depraved pov. It's bad enough he uses real US cities as rhetorical nuclear sacrifices, to justify his catastrophic war. But his claim is that he prevented such attacks, not that Iran should now nuke those cities, a capacity he also claims to have ended.

200

Trump was not inviting Iran to nuke LA or SD. His entire rationale for the war is that it had to be done to PREVENT Iran from nuking us. (which is insane and false) Annotated the quote, to fill in the unstated gaps in trump's typical confusing syntax. approx:"$5 gas is worth it to stop Iran nukes"

And again, remember with the war, it's just artificial.

[GAS is] a little bit high. [High Gas is] a small price to pay, for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe [by attacking Iran and denying them nuclear weapons].

[IF Iran] can take out a city. Let 'em take, [for example] let it, let 'em take out Los Angeles. Let 'em take out San Diego. [THEN we got real trouble, compared to these trivial fuel prices]

That's, this [High Gas] is a very small price to pay [to prevent Iran from nuking the US]. And it's going to be over with very soon.

100

It's the same exact line he and Bibi have given to justify the war since he launched it. "Iran can't have a nuke, they're lunatics, they would use it..." and this time he just added specific cities to the same nuclear fearmongering. Same as Condi Rice and her mushroom cloud.

200

Not at all. He's making a coherent point, in his usual manner. And he clearly understands what he's saying. It's Bibi's line of BS about Iran. The same thing trump's been parroting since launching the attack, only this time [outrageously] adding specific city names to the nuclear fearmongering.

110

Agree to disagree then. The nonsensical offering of US cities to nuke defeats his entire rationale for attacking Iran. His disgusting crowd of stupid and depraved magats reacted the way they did because they too misunderstood his intent. Took it somehow as a partisan laugh-line, which it was not.

100

The city names are whatever popped into his brainpan on the fly. SD is a military town. None of it makes any sense when misread as "gas is high, but let Iran nuke California!" What he meant is "gas is high, but it's worth it - to avoid Iran nuking US." Read correctly, it's lies and fearmongering.

300

He was dead serious. And NOT inviting nuclear attack. The language was typically reckless and offensive, in the service of a lie - that high gas is worth it to stop iran nukes. 🤷 Same rationale bibi sold him, and which he's often repeated. Now added city names to the same nuclear fearmongering.

360

He was not joking. And he was not inviting nuclear attack either. He's trying to fearmonger, retroactively, that he had to attack, or else Iran would have nuked us. THAT is offensive and false. He minimizes the damage - high gas, and exaggerates the threat, Iranian nukes. To deflect blame for war.

1132

trump suggests that high gas prices are worth it to *prevent* Iran from nuking the US.

000

High gas prices - are the small price to pay. For *preventing* Iran nukes. That's been the bibi rationale all along and he's simply repeating it again here, with insanely reckless speech. It's rotten enough without misinterpreting trump's malignant intent. Which is to deflect blame for his war.

000

Not a joke. He meant the exact opposite. ('High gas is worth it to stop Iran nukes') His face was in severe threat mode as he said it. Crowd completely misread it.

1130

The crowd is stupid and depraved.

040

Reckless deplorable rhetoric for sure. But no invitation to nuke a US city was intended, despite the literal misreading of the speech. Just the opposite. Deflecting blame as always, trump minimized the pain ($5 gas), and exaggerated the threat, of Iran nuking the US.

High gas prices is a small price to pay, for *preventing* Iran nuking the US. Horrible enough, and false enough, without twisting what he intended to say.

020

That refers to high gas prices. Which is awful enough. He's saying 'shuddup with your whining, peasants. $5 gas is nothing compared to Iran nuking the US. Which is what my idiot war has prevented.' It's all insulting lies, and recklessly glib nuclear fearmongering. To excuse himself from blame.

Correct. The national pile-on over a completely obtuse, literal misreading of what trump meant, is annoying af. He means it's worth spendy gas to prevent iran from nuking us. Which is a lie, and disgustingly glib, but it was not an invitation for Iran to nuke LA. FFS.

Yes, as in, 'compared to high gas prices', his attack on Iran was worth it, to avoid Iran nuking us. It's Bibi's nuclear fear mongering for preemptive war. There is no other reason for trump to invoke, exactly like condi rice did to justify bush's war, a mushroom cloud. Same as "I had no choice".

200