Sign in

mattoshaughnessy.bsky.social

@mattoshaughnessy.bsky.social
5 followers 2 following 0 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by @mattoshaughnessy.bsky.social
Center for Democracy & Technology @cdt.org · 16/09/2026
But making third-party AI assessment effective can be devilishly tricky. In our companion post, the trio [@mbogen.bsky.social, @mattoshaughnessy.bsky.social, and Anna-Maria Gueorguieva] set out eight factors that policymakers will need to get right:
cdt.org
Getting Third-Party AI Assessment Right - Center for Democracy and Technology
Having third parties assess AI systems might seem like common sense, but crafting effective policies toward this goal can be devilishly tricky. A poorly-constructed ecosystem for third-party assessment could easily fail to consider the most consequential mechanisms of risk, neglect the AI harms that most impact people, or do more to protect AI companies than people.
041
Reposted by @mattoshaughnessy.bsky.social
Center for Democracy & Technology @cdt.org · 16/09/2026
Embedding 3rd-party evaluators in companies is the latest proposal promoting independent assessment as a way to reduce AI risks. CDT’s Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, @mbogen.bsky.social, & @mattoshaughnessy.bsky.social review state bills, fed. proposals + EO on pre-release AI eval:
cdt.org
Proposals for Third-Party AI Assessment in 2026 - Center for Democracy and Technology
As concern about risks and harms related to AI systems continue to grow, a growing chorus of policymakers, industry leaders, and advocates have called for independent AI assessments. This explainer provides an overview of recent proposals for third-party assessment in the United States, including state and federal legislation, executive actions, and industry proposals.
222