Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 13/10/2026As a non-mathematician, I've been trying to understand the current situation with AI math. Yesterday I read this joke and I think I get it. OpenAI is releasing a ton of jokes no one can understand, and it's not helping joke-dom 000
Reposted by Marco GiancottiSaleh @mskayyali.com · 04/10/2026New Video on Interface Studies: What “Infinite Scrolling” was for. Infinite scrolling was built in 2005 to make exploring image search results easier. Twenty years later, politicians want to ban it and the designer most associated with it keeps apologising for it. youtu.be/eDDI9OSWY9k?...youtu.beWhat "Infinite Scrolling" Was ForYouTube video by Interface Studies 0223
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Read the full post: aethermug.com/posts/pleas... 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/10/2026"What makes a message "personal"? Is the effort you put into writing the thing that matters, or is that just a proxy for something deeper, like attention and care?" 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/10/2026"The part that worries me is not people applying their own filters; it's people trying to popularize a stigma against anyone who shares AI-written text, period. They want to actively shame people for doing this." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/10/2026"Using an LLM well for anything, including writing, is hard work and requires a skillset—metacognition—that many people don't exercise much." "Could it be that we just haven't yet learned to harness LLMs well for writing?" 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/10/2026"When you start learning to play the violin, there is an initial period in which all you can produce is horrible screeches that send everyone running. Maybe we're in the screeching stage of AI writing." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/10/2026New blog post is up: Please Don't Shame the AI Writers. Some excerpts. "AI slop is bad. The stop must slop." "But should well-meaning people be allowed to use LLMs to put their thoughts into words?" 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Read the full post: aethermug.com/posts/backg... 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/09/2026"You know you've reached fluency in a language when your sense of what's strange in it matches that of native speakers." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/09/2026"If you decide to learn Japanese from Dragonball, you're in for a lot of fun. You'll also have to dodge some funky language bullets here." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/09/2026"The advice to never learn from fiction is wrong, but you do need proper backgrounding to avoid the pitfalls. The lies are there, you just need to discount them." "You must learn to notice what the author doesn't need you to notice." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/09/2026"I see most people absolutely murdering their own motivation by forcing themselves to slog through sterile textbooks, baby-step speech lessons, and "business-speak" crash courses." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/09/2026New blog post is up: Backgrounding My Way to Japan. Some excerpts. "The truly strange part for me was that [my first arrival in Japan] didn't feel nearly as strange as I thought it would: there were no major surprises or "whoa" moments." 110
Reposted by Marco GiancottiLawrence Wilkinson @lhwilkinson.bsky.social · 11/09/2026A new way into Wittgenstein: "The Foldable Tractatus" @marcogiancotti.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy (Plus- Theodor Adorno) Beyond linearity: roughlydaily.com/2026/09/11/w... 023
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 06/09/2026I've said this elsewhere, but the argument that "if you didn't put effort in writing it, why should I read it?" is not generally solid. Someone could put a lot of effort (in fact, even more effort) in writing something with an LLM just to improve the quality vs their own. 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 06/09/2026But simply ostracizing everyone whose text has the signs of being AI-written is the wrong thing to do, and it blocks genuine progress. In the worst cases, this feels like envious gate-keeping on the part of the purple group to keep the contributions of the majority out. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 06/09/2026That's a separate thing from the problem of AI slop, people using AI to spew tons of near-meaningless and often-wrong words with minimal thinking on their side. That practice should be actively discouraged. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 06/09/2026If this distribution is even approximately true (Sturgeon's Law suggests it is) then we should welcome LLM-written text as a way to include the people who, until now, did not have the courage/means to share their thoughts online because of writing skill issues. 110
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 06/09/2026My current perception of the situation. It looks like LLM text is a clear step down from human writing only because you don't usually see the 80+% of human writing that would be worse, if people were bold enough to share it. 100
Reposted by Marco GiancottiSaleh @mskayyali.com · 04/09/2026Starting a new series on Interface Studies, speaking with people who are building new kinds of interfaces and reimagining old ones. The first episode features @danielpipk.in and Omar Rizwan from folk.computer. Hope you enjoy it. youtu.be/uXHHnps4tU8?...youtu.beConversations 01: Omar Rizwan & Daniel Pipkin from Folk.ComputerYouTube video by Interface Studies 1135
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 02/09/2026There is value in finding that someone has put to words—even poorly and approximately—something that you knew already but could never put to words, or never even thought to try. 000
Reposted by Marco GiancottiFernando Rosas @frosas.bsky.social · 29/08/2026What is information, really? Instead of arguing for a single valid interpretation, we propose a pluralistic view where rigorous alternatives coexist — each with affordances and limits Finally published: “Four faces of information in natural systems” 🧵 210628
Reposted by Marco GiancottiSMBC Comics @smbccomics.bsky.social · 26/08/2026This is of course an SMBC psyop. COMIC ◆ www.smbc-comics.com/comic/psy PATREON ◆ www.patreon.com/ZachWeinersm... STORE ◆ smbc-store.myshopify.com 1329139
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/09/20265. You won't be tempted to blame it for your mistakes (not more than you can blame your keyboard for your words, at least) 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/09/20264. You start thinking about it for what it is, a tool you can be expert or sloppy with. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/09/20263. Getting angry at it becomes as hard as getting angry at a car: not impossible, but more easily recognized as useless. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/09/20262. The idiosyncratic language of LLMs stops being annoying, because it's not a personality thing, it's a signal you learn to parse. "Hating" Claude's "load-bearing"-speak is like hating the color of your thermometer's mercury column. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 01/09/2026Why you should not treat AI as a person: 1. When you are alone, you should know you're alone 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 28/08/20265. Thus, Clarke's Third Law is tautological. 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 28/08/20264. Then you can define magic as "technology that defies understanding." 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 28/08/20263. Magic is only magic if it defies your understanding of how it could physically work. Otherwise it would be engineering. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 28/08/20262. Magic is a tool made by hypothetical humans called wizards, witches, sorcerers, etc. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 28/08/20261. A human-made tool of any kind is technology. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 27/08/2026Pre-made threads, export to PDF or Markdown, no login or registration. Annotate it to death, and preserve your work over days and weeks. Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent, so go try it: foldabletractatus.aethermug.com Why I made it: aethermug.com/posts/tract 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 27/08/2026You can click any technical term anywhere in the text to instantly highlight all other occurrences of the same term and its variants. Then you can optionally pin them all in one click: instant new thread you can read, save, and share. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 27/08/2026A set of controls lets you expand any statement to reveal its direct children, "pin" specific statements that you want to get back to, and add annotations with your own thoughts. Fold all again, and what's left is a custom "cross-section" of the book. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 27/08/2026So I made this Tractatus foldable, like a map. The book starts in its fully-folded state, only showing you the seven-statement root of the conceptual tree (or maybe I should call it a forest of seven trees). foldabletractatus.aethermug.com 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 27/08/2026Wittgenstein's Tractatus is written like a tree. It's structurally very unbooklike. What is, on the surface, a single paragraph of seven assertions, is fractally expanded into five hundred and twenty-five points at different depths of detail, snowflake-like. 100
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 21/08/2026We need a new term. AI slop = output of a model at the first or second try, shared without close checking or significant corrections ??? = output of a model after several turns of steering and corrections, accurately reflecting the user's intentions, preferences, and taste 000
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 18/08/2026Claude's "load-bearings" and "worth your attentions" don't bother me that much, but this tendency to leave vestiges of the conversation in permanent docs is annoying! 000
Reposted by Marco GiancottiNothings Monstered @nothingsmonstrd.bsky.social · 16/08/2026The Great Abyss — Frederick Judd Waugh, 1909 211919
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 16/08/2026The fact that some people seem to stop listening the instant they hear that AI was used in any way suggests cause all thinking. 020
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 16/08/2026Correlation and causation do tend to be confused often. 121
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Treating AI like a kind of person makes thinking about these and other questions viscerally difficult. Think of AI as a lens instead. Read the full post: aethermug.com/posts/gen-a...aethermug.comGenAI Is a Lens into Humanitynot a person! 010
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Under this framing some hot controversies melt away. Is AI conscious? Not more than a looking glass has good taste for what to show you. Is AI slop more base than human output? Of course not, it is as human as it can possibly get, for better or for worse. 110
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 13/08/2026The metaphor leads to some parallels with optical aberrations: bad focus → vague, generic output chromatic aberration → bias blind spots → unused knowledge distortions → the jagged edge artifacts → hallucinations We've refined glass for centuries. AI lenses are brand new and very rough. 110
Marco Giancotti @marco-giancotti.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Training a model starts by building a semantic map of everything it was fed: novels, flame wars, papers, source code, cries for help, ads. You can't read that map yourself, so it comes bundled with an instrument. A prompt is just the coordinates you point it at. 110