Sign in

Liz Williams

@liz-williams.bsky.social
999 followers 137 following 14 posts

Senior Policy Manager | KFF's Program on Medicaid & Uninsured | she/her ✿ views are my own ✿

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 04/03/2026
Federal financing changes, funding cuts, and administrative actions, including withholding federal Medicaid funds for potential fraud, are contributing to fiscal uncertainty for states. More in our updated Medicaid financing explainer: on.kff.org/4rQ8iuX
on.kff.org
Medicaid Financing: The Basics | KFF
Medicaid represents $1 out of every $5 spent on health care in the U.S. and is the major source of financing for states to provide health coverage and long-term services and supports for low-income re...
035
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 13/11/2025
Increasing spending demands, slower revenue growth, and fiscal uncertainty have created a more tenuous fiscal climate for states in FY 2026. States are also preparing for H.R.1's federal Medicaid cuts, which will exacerbate existing budget challenges. on.kff.org/4oJnA3e
Line graph of percent change in Medicaid enrollment and total spending shows Medicaid enrollment is expected to flatten, growing by 0.2%, as total spending grows by 7.9% in FY 2026.
054
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 10/11/2025
State Medicaid programs shared insights into the challenges they anticipate when implementing work requirements next year: on.kff.org/3LLhQHu
Chart titled 'States Report a Variety of Challenges With Implementing New Medicaid Work Requirements'. The chart lists challenges by categories: System Changes, Implementation Timeline, Staff Capacity, Fiscal Impact, and Applicant and Enrollee Issues. Each category details specific implementation challenges faced by states according to a 2019-2020 KFF survey of state Medicaid officials. Examples include system upgrades, pressure to make system changes in a short timeline, training needs for staff, potential increased cost due to accelerated timelines and changes, and potential confusion among applicants and enrollees.
0139
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 27/10/2025
Over half of small employers that don’t offer health benefits say Medicaid is an important source of coverage for their workers — 34% say it’s very important, while 22% say it’s somewhat important. More in our latest survey: on.kff.org/ehbs2025
on.kff.org
2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey | KFF
This annual survey of employers provides a detailed look at trends in employer-sponsored health coverage, including premiums, worker contributions, cost-sharing provisions, offer rates, and more. This year's report also looks at how employers are approa...
0139
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 23/10/2025
Major federal changes to Medicaid and other health-related policies could impact children’s health in the coming years. Our new brief lays out the 5 issues to watch: on.kff.org/4hgyhHH
on.kff.org
Medicaid and Children's Health: 5 Issues to Watch Amid Recent Federal Changes | KFF
Major federal changes to Medicaid and other health-related policies could impact children's health in the coming years. This issue brief explores the latest data on Medicaid and children's health and highlights five key issues to watch as those federal ...
043
Reposted by Liz Williams
Jen Kates @jenkatesdc.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
NEW: We analyzed recent state actions on vaccine policy, given narrowing federal guidelines. Overall, 26 states have taken some action; of these, 23 have Democratic governors, signaling a growing red/blue divide in vaccine access. @kff.org Key findings in next post ⬇️ www.kff.org/covid-19/tra...
kff.org
Tracking State Actions on Vaccine Policy and Access | KFF
With recent federal actions to curtail vaccine access, many states have announced actions intended to maintain broader access. This issue brief provides a snapshot of this rapidly changing landscape, ...
11812
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 15/09/2025
All states allow exemptions from school vaccination requirements for medical reasons and almost all states (47 including D.C.) allow exemptions for religious and/or personal beliefs: on.kff.org/4pbWQJg
KFF map titled, “47 States Allow Exemptions From School Vaccination Requirements for Religious and/or Personal Beliefs.” The map shows the type of non-medical exemption(s) from school vaccination requirements permitted by state: none (4 states), personal belief (1 state), religious (30 states), and religious and personal beliefs (16 states). The map notes that Florida has announced that they plan to eliminate school vaccine requirements but have not enacted any legislation, and West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey signed an executive order in January 2025 allowing religious and personal belief exemptions. Litigation is ongoing.
192
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
FL's recent announcement of plans to eliminate school vaccination requirements would make them the first and only state to do so. Our NEW @kff.org piece examines school vaccine requirements (and exemptions to requirements) and recent changes across the states: www.kff.org/state-health...
kff.org
A Look at Recent Changes to State Vaccine Requirements for School Children | KFF
This policy watch examines state-by-state school vaccine requirements and exemptions, including recent policy changes to them and the extent to which they may affect vaccination rates.
093
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
New data for the 2024-25 school year show routine vaccination rates for kindergarten children continue to decline, while exemptions from school vaccination requirements, particularly non-medical exemptions, have increased. Check out @kff.org's UPDATED brief: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
Kindergarten Routine Vaccination Rates Continue to Decline | KFF
This issue brief provides an update on the latest trends in kindergarten children's routine vaccination and exemption rates. Over three-quarters (39) of states had measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)vaccina...
020
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 30/07/2025
As vaccine skepticism escalates and the number of U.S. measles cases grows, we examine what it means to eliminate measles, whether the current measles outbreak could threaten the country’s measles elimination status, and what losing that status might mean.
on.kff.org
Measles Elimination Status: What It Is and How the U.S. Could Lose It | KFF
The United States is at risk of losing its measles elimination status. This post looks at what measles elimination means, how the current measles outbreak threatens this status, and what losing it…
092
Reposted by Liz Williams
Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · 24/07/2025
New: The Republican tax and spending mega-law will cut Medicaid in every state, but the effects are biggest in states that have expanded Medicaid under the ACA. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
0912
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
The Senate reconciliation bill would cut federal #Medicaid spending by over $200 billion more than the House bill though the increases vary by state. In 14 states, the Senate bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by at least $5 billion more than the House bill. www.kff.org/quick-take/s...
01313
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 02/07/2025
⚡ KFF’s @liz-williams.bsky.social compares the increases in the federal Medicaid cuts in the Senate-passed reconciliation bill with the House-passed bill across states. #QuickTake on.kff.org/44zOKRr
KFF graphic featuring a quote from Elizabeth Williams, KFF Senior Policy Manager, Program on Medicaid & Uninsured. It says, “All states and the District of Columbia will lose more federal Medicaid funding under the Senate-passed bill than under the House-passed bill. In 14 states, the Senate bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by at least $5 billion more than the House bill would have.”
02215
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
The Senate reconciliation bill would reduce federal #Medicaid spending by $1 trillion over 10 years. Provisions that only apply to ACA expansion states account for $526 billion of the federal spending reductions. NEW @kff.org analysis looks at the impact across states: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
12520
Reposted by Liz Williams
Heather Saunders @heathersaunders.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
NEW RURAL BRIEF @kff.org : Senate reconciliation bill would cut federal Medicaid funding in rural areas by $155B—$36B more than the House bill. www.kff.org/policy-watch...
kff.org
How Might Federal Medicaid Cuts in the Senate-Passed Reconciliation Bill Affect Rural Areas? | KFF
Under the Senate-passed reconciliation bill, federal Medicaid spending in rural areas is estimated to decline by $155 billion, more than in the House-passed bill, and far more than the $50 billion app...
05646
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 20/06/2025
The work requirements proposed in the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” are more stringent than previous policies considered by Congress and implemented at the state level. As the Senate debates the bill, our analysis explains the proposals in the House-passed version.
Work requirements and Medicaid: What’s in the House Reconciliation bill 
CBO Estimates: Implementing work requirements would account for the largest share of federal Medicaid savings — and cause the largest increase in the number of people without health insurance.
Verification requirements: States would be required to verify at application and renewal that ACA expansion enrollees meet 80 hours of work activities per month or qualify for an exemption. States could also require more frequent verification.
Implementation timeline: HHS must release guidance by end of 2025, giving states limited time to develop or change implementation plans, protocols, and systems before the Dec. 2026 implementation deadline.
State implementation choices: State choices to impose stricter requirements than the minimum federal requirements — like more frequent verification or longer look-back periods — and state capacity to automate processes will affect how many people could lose coverage.
Comparison to other waivers and proposals: The bill’s work requirement policies are more stringent than past Congressional proposals or state waivers, with no exemptions for older age and more barriers to getting and keeping coverage.
12176113
Reposted by Liz Williams
Amaya Diana @amayadiana.bsky.social · 23/06/2025
A unique feature of the proposed Medicaid work requirements in the reconciliation bill is that states could choose to require individuals to work for *multiple* months prior to applying for Medicaid - meaning people with employment gaps would not qualify for Medicaid, even if currently working
Image depicts the following text:
Box 1. The impact of choosing different “look-back” periods
John lost his job and was out of work in April and May. In June, he started in a new seasonal position and worked 80 hours during the month. In July, John applies for Medicaid in an expansion state, as he qualifies for Medicaid on the basis of his income.

State A uses a 1-month look-back period when determining compliance with work requirements at application. John would be able to enroll in Medicaid (provided he meets all other program requirements).
State B uses a 3-month look-back period when determining compliance with work requirements at application. John would not qualify for Medicaid, as he was out of work in two of the three months.
4135
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 20/06/2025
#Medicaid provisions that only apply to ACA expansion states account for roughly half ($427 billion) of total federal spending cut in the House-passed reconciliation bill and changes in the Senate Finance language would further cut federal spending for expansion states: www.kff.org/policy-watch...
kff.org
Senate Finance Language Would Further Cut Federal Spending for Medicaid Expansion States | KFF
Prior KFF analysis allocated CBO’s federal Medicaid spending reductions and enrollment losses across the states, and this policy watch builds on that analysis to examine the potential impacts in expan...
185
Reposted by Liz Williams
Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · 12/06/2025
My annotation of the new distributional analysis from the Congressional Budget Office of the One Big Beautiful Bill. www.cbo.gov/publication/...
13218
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 06/06/2025
As Congress weighs spending cuts and other changes to Medicaid, our latest poll shows three-quarters of MAGA supporters and other Republicans enrolled in Medicaid are worried about the potential impact of federal spending reductions on their families. on.kff.org/4mPUFd9
KFF bar chart titled “Nearly 9 in 10 Medicaid enrollees say they are at least somewhat worried that federal funding cuts to Medicaid would negatively impact their and their families’ access to health care.” The chart shows the percent of Medicaid enrollees — including by party ID — who say that if the federal government significantly reduces its spending on Medicaid, they are very or somewhat worried it would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured (85% Medicaid enrollees, 91% Democrats, 94% Independents, 69% Republicans); negatively impact hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care providers in your community (85% Medicaid enrollees, 93% Democrats, 96% Independents, 65% Republicans); and negatively impact their or their family’s ability to get and pay for health care (86% Medicaid enrollees, 90% Democrats, 92% Independents, 76% Republicans).
21912
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
See updated @kff.org state-level analysis of CBO estimates for #Medicaid spending and Medicaid coverage reductions from provisions in the House Passed Reconciliation Bill: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
Allocating CBO’s Estimates of Federal Medicaid Spending Reductions and Enrollment Loss Across the States | KFF
The Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) latest estimate shows that the One Big Beautiful Bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 and that the Medicaid provisions would increase the number ...
02213
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 29/05/2025
Medicaid is the primary payer for maternity care in the U.S. It finances about 4 in 10 (41%) births nationally — nearly half in rural communities (47%). Our new brief covers more facts you may find surprising.
kff.org
5 Key Facts About Medicaid and Pregnancy | KFF
This brief examines Medicaid’s pregnancy and postpartum coverage and its support for strengthening and improving maternal health outcomes.
34327
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 14/05/2025
Medicaid covers 47% of nonelderly adults with opioid use disorder and is the main source of coverage for those receiving treatment services. It covers 56% of those receiving medication and 64% of those getting outpatient treatment and peer support services: on.kff.org/43kNyAB
KFF infographic showing coverage of opioid use disorder treatments among nonelderly adults. It details Medicaid's share compared to other payers in four categories: Adults with OUD (Medicaid 47%, Other 53%), Medication for OUD (Medicaid 56%, Other 44%), Outpatient OUD Treatment (Medicaid 64%, Other 36%), and Peer Support Services for SUD (Medicaid 64%, Other 36%).
211646
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 14/05/2025
From new Medicaid work requirements to lowering expansion match rates for states that use their own funds to cover undocumented immigrants, the reconciliation bill could reshape how states fund and manage #Medicaid. We outline the proposed provisions:
on.kff.org
Tracking the Medicaid Provisions in the 2025 Reconciliation Bill | KFF
KFF is tracking the Medicaid provisions in the 2025 federal budget bill, including new Medicaid work and verification requirements and a reduction in the expansion match rate for states that use their...
044
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
With legislative proposals under discussion that would affect the ACA #Medicaid expansion group, new @kff.org analysis looks are some more characteristics of this population. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
5 Key Facts About Medicaid Expansion | KFF
This issue brief examines Medicaid expansion enrollment and Medicaid spending in expansion and non-expansion states and describes the characteristics of adults covered by the Medicaid expansion.
042
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
If states maintained ACA #Medicaid expansion coverage and spending, a per capita cap on the expansion population would erode the effective enhanced federal match rate over time and shift $246B in costs to states over 10 years. More in our NEW @kff.org analysis here: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
A Medicaid Per Capita Cap on the ACA Expansion Population: State by State Estimates | KFF
This analysis examines the potential impacts on states and Medicaid enrollees of implementing a per capita cap on the federal share of Medicaid spending for the ACA Medicaid expansion population only,...
0137
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
Options under consideration in Congress to reduce #Medicaid spending to help pay for tax cuts could have major implications for children with special health care needs. NEW @kff.org brief explores 5 key facts about children with special health care needs and Medicaid: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
5 Key Facts About Children with Special Health Care Needs and Medicaid | KFF
Amid debates about proposed cuts to federal Medicaid spending, this brief analyzes key characteristics of children with special health care needs and explores how Medicaid provides them with coverage.
01111
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
Large federal spending cuts for #Medicaid could have implications for nursing facilities bc Medicaid covers 63% of nursing home costs. Federal cuts could lead to reductions in Medicaid payment rates making it harder for nursing facilities to bolster staffing to improve the quality of patient care.
23526
Reposted by Liz Williams
Alice Levy Burns @alicelburns.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
Here’s a short explainer of what the senate budget resolution does and what that could mean for Medicaid: www.kff.org/quick-take/u...
kff.org
Unreconciled Differences on Medicaid Cuts in House and Senate Budget Reconciliation Plans
The Senate’s budget plan is unusual because it establishes different tracks for reconciliation in each chamber: House committees are instructed to increase deficits by $2.3 trillion, with major cuts t...
022
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
Check out our 23rd annual #Medicaid eligibility and enrollment survey report. Many states emerged from the unwinding with more efficient processes by maximizing the use of technology to verify income, reduce returned mail, and improve communications with enrollees. www.kff.org/medicaid/rep...
kff.org
Medicaid and CHIP Eligibility, Enrollment, and Renewal Policies | KFF
A KFF survey of state Medicaid officials examines state Medicaid and CHIP eligibility, enrollment, and renewal policies in place as of January 2025 as states return to routine operations following the...
0189
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 25/03/2025
NEW @kff.org analysis illustrates what $880B in potential federal #Medicaid cuts could mean for states and residents. Potential Medicaid cuts represent: 29% of state Medicaid spending per resident 6% of state taxes per resident 19% of state education spending per pupil www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
Putting $880 Billion in Potential Federal Medicaid Cuts in Context of State Budgets and Coverage | KFF
This brief explores the magnitude of the potential federal Medicaid funding cuts under the House budget resolution. This brief puts the $880 billion in cuts in context by comparing the size of the cut...
0710
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 10/03/2025
New KFF polling finds more than half of the public say either they themselves (18%) or a family member (35%) have ever been covered by Medicaid. An additional 13% say they have a close friend who has ever been covered by the program: on.kff.org/43uvXb5
Bar chart titled "More Than Half of Adults Say They or a Familial Member Have Ever Had Medicaid Coverage." It compares the percentage of total rural residents, Democrats, Independents, Republicans, 2024 Harris voters, and 2024 Trump voters who have ever had Medicaid, a family member covered by Medicaid, or a close friend covered by Medicaid. Data sourced from KFF Health Tracking Poll (Feb. 18-25, 2023).
0178
Reposted by Liz Williams
Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · 05/03/2025
According to CBO, Medicaid accounts for 93% of the spending under the jurisdiction of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, excluding Medicare. That committee is charged with coming up with at least $880 billion in spending cuts under the House budget resolution. www.cbo.gov/publication/...
cbo.gov
Mandatory Spending Under the Jurisdiction of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce
CBO provides information about projections of mandatory spending for the 2025–2034 period for programs, excluding Medicare, that are under the jurisdiction of the House Committee on Energy and Commerc...
33018
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 05/03/2025
Federal cuts to #Medicaid could have implications for hospitals - check out new brief: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
5 Key Facts About Medicaid and Hospitals | KFF
We explain the role of Medicaid for hospitals, including how much spending on hospital care comes from Medicaid, the share of births covered by the program, and how Medicaid expansion has impacted hos...
31213
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 27/02/2025
Our analysis looked at policy and state response variations in a #Medicaid per capita cap. In all cases, the 2034 % cut was bigger than the 10-year total showing that effects of the policy grow over time (and would continue beyond the budget window).
0106
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 26/02/2025
As Congress considers ways to cut #Medicaid spending to help finance the extension of federal tax cuts, we examine potential impacts of one option under consideration: imposing a cap on federal spending per Medicaid enrollee, known as a “per capita cap.” A few key findings ⤵️
12213
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 26/02/2025
The Republican-controlled House passed a budget resolution targeting cuts to #Medicaid of up to $880 billion or more over a decade to help pay for tax cuts. Our new analysis examines the potential impacts of imposing a cap on federal spending per Medicaid enrollee: on.kff.org/41f9H2m
KFF graphic showing "a Medicaid per capita cap would affect all states, though enrollment declines would vary by state." The graphic includes a map that shows the percent change in enrollment by FY 2034 under per capita cap financing.
32016
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 26/02/2025
With passage of a House budget resolution that could mean $880 billion in federal spending cuts for #Medicaid, new @kff.org analysis looks at potential federal savings and implications for states and enrollees of a cap on per enrollee spending. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
A Medicaid Per Capita Cap: State by State Estimates | KFF
This analysis examines the potential impacts on states, Medicaid enrollees, and providers of implementing a per capita cap on federal Medicaid spending, which is one proposal that has been discussed i...
068
Reposted by Liz Williams
Priya Chidambaram @preetabread.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Great new work from @kff.org -- When asked about the consequences of losing Medicaid, a 55-year old Trump voter from Oklahoma said "For me it would, it would probably lead to death, and that’s kinda harshly speaking, but it’s the way that it would be." www.kff.org/medicaid/rep...
02612
Reposted by Liz Williams
Amaya Diana @amayadiana.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Both Trump and Harris voters opposed cuts to the program fearing that Medicaid spending reductions would jeopardize the program and take away access to health care for poor people. Participants opposed cutting Medicaid funding to pay for tax cuts that they did not believe would benefit them. (4/9)
quote 1: We shouldn’t have to suffer because of somebody wanting to propose cuts to it, you know, because we, we didn’t do anything. So, you know, let it, it can come from somewhere else. I just, I would oppose it. – 60-year-old, Black male (Trump voter, Missouri)

quote 2: People would be unable to take care of themselves and be healthy and get mental health issues taken care of, to get vision and dental; people would suffer. They wouldn’t be able to work. And the economy would suffer. – 55-year-old, White female (Trump voter, Oklahoma)

quote 3: I would oppose [cutting Medicaid] just because there’s a lot of people who need it, who would be affected by it negatively. – 29-year-old, White male (Trump voter, Pennsylvania)
193
Reposted by Liz Williams
Amaya Diana @amayadiana.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
We asked Medicaid enrollees who had voted for Trump and Harris about their Medicaid coverage, views on govt’s role in health care, and the recent election. Participants were also asked for their reaction to current proposals to reduce federal spending on Medicaid and impose work requirements. (1/9)
2168
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
"Both Trump and Harris voters wanted policymakers to focus on improving Medicaid instead of cutting it." More from @kff.org's recent focus groups with Trump and Harris voters here: www.kff.org/medicaid/rep...
kff.org
The Debate Over Federal Medicaid Cuts: Perspectives of Medicaid Enrollees Who Voted for President Trump and Vice President Harris | KFF
The Republican-led Congress is considering plans to cut Medicaid to help pay for tax cuts, with the House budget resolution targeting $880 billion or more in potential reductions to federal Medicaid s...
072
Reposted by Liz Williams
Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Once Republicans took Medicare and Social Security off the table, the math became inescapable that Medicaid cuts would help pay for tax cuts. That's why the House budget resolution targets the Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, for at least $880 billion in cuts over a decade.
14924
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
Ahead of debate about a budget resolution that could mean big cuts for #Medicaid, see @kff.org new brief providing an overview of federal spending for health programs and services. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
What Does the Federal Government Spend on Health Care? | KFF
As Congressional Republicans and President Trump search for trillions of dollars in cuts to mandatory federal spending that could help offset the cost of extending expiring tax cuts, this brief analyz...
099
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 19/02/2025
The @KFF #Medicaid team has been busy - check out our round-up of recently released resources: connect.kff.org/medicaid-top...
connect.kff.org
medicaid topic roundup february 2025
0118
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 19/02/2025
“There is no significant cut in Medicaid spending that is easy or simple to pull off, and certainly not one totaling almost $900 billion dollars over 10 years,” writes KFF President and CEO Drew Altman. Read more in his latest column:
on.kff.org
The Two Big Decisions That Will Drive Health Policy
KFF’s president and CEO Drew Altman writes in a new column about the factors driving the biggest health policy decisions now—how to pay for tax cuts and whether President Trump wants another big fight...
0214
Reposted by Liz Williams
KFF @kff.org · 18/02/2025
A congressional proposal to cut federal funding for the ACA’s Medicaid expansion could have significant impacts in both red and blue states. If states drop the Medicaid expansion, enrollment declines will range from 49% in Ore. to 19% in Mass., Minn., N.C. and S.D.
KFF map that shows "eliminating the ACA expansion match rate could reduce total Medicaid enrollment by 19% to 49% across expansion states." The map shows the estimated percent change in Medicaid enrollment (FY 2034) if current expansion states dropped the expansion.
12113
Reposted by Liz Williams
Robin Rudowitz @robinr.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
New analysis lays out tough choices if the enhanced match rate for the #Medicaid expansion goes away - states pick up over $600 billion in costs over 10 years in one scenario or 20 million covered by expansion lose coverage in another scenario. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
Eliminating the Medicaid Expansion Federal Match Rate: State-by-State Estimates | KFF
This analysis examines the potential impacts on states and Medicaid enrollees of eliminating the 90% federal match rate for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expansion. Eliminating the federal match rate ...
11915
Liz Williams @liz-williams.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
NEW @kff.org analysis finds a congressional proposal to eliminate the ACA Medicaid expansion could reduce total Medicaid spending by up to nearly one-fifth, or $1.9 trillion, over a 10-year period, and end Medicaid coverage for as many as 20 million people. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
kff.org
Eliminating the Medicaid Expansion Federal Match Rate: State-by-State Estimates | KFF
This analysis examines the potential impacts on states and Medicaid enrollees of eliminating the 90% federal match rate for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expansion. Eliminating the federal match rate ...
21710
Reposted by Liz Williams
Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · 05/02/2025
92% of Medicaid adult enrollees are working, or are not working due to caregiving, an illness or disability, or school attendance. Work requirements are a solution in search of a problem. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...
8286104