Sign in

Ian Linkletter

@linkletter.org
2K followers 1.1K following 681 posts

Emerging Technology & Open Education Librarian. My work focuses on protecting students from the harms of academic surveillance. I defend freedom of expression, access to information, algorithmic transparency, privacy, and fair dealing rights.

PostsRepliesMedia
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 01/10/2026
Introducing Instructure's Surveillance Top 10, featuring Proctorio, Honorlock, YuJa, Turnitin, Piazza, McGraw Hill, Microsoft, Google, Perusall, and Pearson. This is a parody post.
Parody: Higher Education Surveillance Top 40 by Instructure
031
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 26/09/2026
Cybersecurity continues to troll us with fake phishing emails. This one raises awareness of a real threat: Microsoft's workplace surveillance.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of BCIT. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Ian,
As part of BCIT's ongoing AI adoption initiative, your AI Productivity Assessment has been completed.
Based on your Microsoft 365 usage patterns, several opportunities have been identified to improve productivity through AI-assisted workflows. Your personalized report includes:
• AI readiness score
• Recommended Copilot use cases
• Department benchmarking results
• Individual productivity insights
To review your confidential assessment, please access the report using the secure portal below:
View My AI Assessment
Please complete your review by September 30. Assessments not reviewed may be excluded from upcoming AI enablement initiatives and pilot opportunities.
If you have any questions regarding your assessment results, contact the AI Innovation Team.
Thank you,
AI Innovation Team
010
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 20/08/2026
Remember Course Hero, the stolen syllabi swapping service? They're a "Learneo, Inc. business" now, and they're updating their privacy policy on August 21st (two days from now). Link to new policy: www.coursehero.com/copyright/#/... Link to old policy: learneo.com/legal/learne...
Notice: Our Service Terms, Learneo Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy are updating on August 21, 2026. By continuing to use the Learneo Services after August 21, 2026, you agree to the updated Learneo Terms of Service and Service Terms and acknowledge our updated Privacy Policy.
120
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 20/08/2026
They almost got there! They almost discovered the racism. But that was not the assignment. Instead it's just a matter of "controlling for dark lighting" so there is "normal lighting".
Screenshot from previous link: Skin tone
Fig. 5 shows FPR across Fitzpatrick scale skin tones. When videos
have normal lighting, no skin tone has a higher FPR than all others.
However, Skin tone 6 has a statistically significant increase in FPR
when there is dark lighting. If dark lighting is not controlled for, this
result also occurs with all videos of participants with Skin tone 6.
These results are consistent with analysis performed on production
data from Respondus Monitor. Example frames from erroneous
events can be found in Fig. 6. These examples help illustrate the lack
of contrast when a video has dark lighting which can present a
challenge for face detection systems.
000
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 19/08/2026
Washington State University canceled Turnitin's faulty AI detector in February. "In Fall 2024, Turnitin was used at WSU to analyze 148,547 assessments... that means almost 1,485 assessments were likely flagged by Turnitin as AI generated when they were not." Link: provost.wsu.edu/documents/20...
The first page of a memo from the Washington State University Office of the Provost.

To: WSU Instructors

From: WSU Office of the Provost, Vice Provost Bill Davis.

Date: February 11, 2026

RE: Cancellation of Turnitin AI Detection software and the Use of AI Detectors for Academic Integrity

Cancellation of Turnitin AI Detection

As of February 2026, WSU has cancelled its contract with Turnitin for its AI Detection software. The Turnitin plagiarism software package will continue to be available to WSU Faculty, Instructors, and Students via Canvas.

The cancellation of Turnitin’s AI detection software aligns WSU with other R1 institutions who have banned its use in academic integrity, including UC-Berkeley, Colorado State University, Indiana University, Michigan State University, Oregon State University, and the University of Washington. There are three additional reasons for this cancellation.

Although disputed, Turnitin claims that they have a false positive detection rate (i.e., a paper is written by a human but flagged as AI generated) of 1-2%. Other studies placed this value higher, especially for students who are neurodivergent or have English as a second language.

a. In Fall 2024, Turnitin was used at WSU to analyze 148,547 assessments. Even if the false positive rate is 1%, that means almost 1,485 assessments were likely flagged by Turnitin as AI generated when they were not.

Every false positive has the potential to lead to the submission of a case of a violation of academic integrity against a student. From information provided by the Academic Integrity Hearing Boards in the Center for Community Standards, there is growing distress and anger being expressed by students over accusations leveled by instructors that are cases of false positives produced by Turnitin. These cases negatively impact student trust and wellbeing... full text continues at PDF link in post.

Footnote 1: https://lawlibguides.sandiego.edu/c.php?g=1443311&p=10721367
161
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 13/08/2026
Oh damn it is way worse. Turnitin was trying to make instructors *personally liable* for mistakes made by its faulty AI detector. The entire FAQ is eye-popping. If you're a journalist, download a copy and consider writing about academic surveillance software.. view-su2.highspot.com/viewer/40018...
Screenshot of Turnitin guidance titled “Q23: Am I personally liable for decisions based on a Service Report?” It states that Turnitin disclaims liability for decisions made in reliance on Service Reports and that instructors are “solely and independently responsible” for decisions about students, including placement, performance, academic misconduct, or Service Report contents. Turnitin logo appears at bottom right.
22914
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 17/07/2026
Months after the data breach, Instructure has still not provided customers with information about what was stolen. They said they would release information this week, but "recently learned that the third-party platform we've selected to deliver your data may have been subject to a security threat."
Latest Update: 7/14/2026

To our Instructure Community,

I'm writing to let you know we're pausing data delivery out of an abundance of caution. I know you've been counting on this, and I want to be direct about why we're making this decision.

We recently learned that the third-party platform we've selected to deliver your data may have been subject to a security threat. Security is paramount, and before we upload your data, we want to take the time to assess the platform's safety or find an alternative. Rest assured, your data remains secure, and we will proceed only when we are confident the third-party platform is safe.

I understand this is disappointing. But ensuring delivery happens securely is the only acceptable choice. We've worked hard to build this process with your input in mind, and protecting your data comes before any timeline.

We're taking the time now to rework our approach with security at the center of every decision. We'll reach out as soon as we have meaningful updates to share about our revised approach and the webinars we had planned.

If you've already designated a security contact with us, you're all set—we'll reach out to them as we move through this process. That requirement will remain in place once delivery resumes.

We appreciate your patience and your trust in us as we work through this carefully.

Steve Daly
CEO, Instructure
064
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 01/07/2026
Instructure doesn't want the public or journalists knowing more about the ShinyHunters breach. This 6/28 "incident update" is still not a disclosure. Two months into this story, we don't know the specifics of what was stolen. Students deserve to know. Link: www.instructure.com/incident_upd...
Screenshot of Instructure Incident webpage.

Latest Update - 6/28/2026
We recently added a new feature in Canvas that designates a point of contact for all security-related updates. We want to ensure that important security, privacy, and incident-related communications are delivered promptly to the appropriate person at your institution. To ensure these updates are sent to the right person, please follow the instructions below to provide a Primary Security Contact for your institution. We appreciate your continued partnership as we work to support our community.
This designated contact will be your institution’s source for receiving data reports, privacy notices, and other security communications going forward, including bulletins, webinars, whitepapers, and materials related to the response, management, or prevention of potential security or privacy incidents.
Who this should be:
The person who receives security-related updates on behalf of your institution, including privacy notices and ongoing security communications. This is typically a Chief Information Security Officer or equivalent, but it doesn't have to be.
The contact who is designated to receive notice of privacy or security incidents in your institution’s agreements. If you are part of a system, consortium, district, or other larger entity, please confirm your primary security contact with that larger entity.
An individual, not a distribution list or a shared inbox.
Please note your institution can designate up to two security contacts at a time, and your LMS administrators can update them as needed. We'll communicate with the contact(s) that are listed by your institution at the time a message is sent.
To designate your contact, go to your account settings. For more information please check out our Community Post (opens in a new tab) with detailed instructions. Please complete this by July 8th, 2026.
12312
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 27/05/2026
Instructure officially confirms they paid a ransom in this FAQ document: www.instructure.com/sites/defaul... I see that the document name says Privileged Confidential but this was linked on their website.
Screenshot from Instructure incident response website: "Please click here to read the FAQs from our most recent customer webinar."
053
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 14/05/2026
Instructure's Acceptable Use Policy could be seen to ban users from criticizing Instructure or Canvas on the platform. This is mitigated by the fact that many users may no longer feel safe communicating on Canvas. Institutions need to spin up alternatives ASAP. www.instructure.com/policies/acc...
Instructure Acceptable Use Policy

"SHARING YOUR CONTENT

The Service may let you share Your Content with others, so please think carefully about what you share. By using the Service, you agree to do so responsibly and to not misuse the Service or help or encourage anyone else to do so. ..

    violate the law in any way, including by storing, publishing or sharing material that is infringing, fraudulent, defamatory, misleading, or damaging to Instructure in any way."

Full text is at the link.Screenshot from Instructure Acceptable Use prohibiting content that "violate[s] the law in any way, including by storing, publishing or sharing material that is infringing, fraudulent, defamatory, misleading, or damaging to Instructure in any way."
033
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 14/05/2026
What a week it's been.
Email from Instructure Community

Checking In

Hello IanLinkletter!

It’s been about a week since you joined the Instructure Community, and we wanted to check in and share a few tips to help you keep building momentum.

We hope you’ve had a chance to explore a bit—whether that’s browsing guides, reading a blog or two, or getting familiar with your profile. And if you haven’t had time yet, no worries! You can jump in whenever it works for you.

Here are a few great next steps to try:

    Follow topics that interest you. Following products, groups, or tags helps tailor your feed and keeps you connected to what matters most. 
    Finish setting up your profile. Add a bio, your role, or your interests! These small details make it easier for others to connect with you. Also, take a moment to review your account and privacy settings to be sure everything is set the way you like.
    Join a conversation. Visit our discussion forums to ask a question, share an insight, or see what others are talking about. Not sure where to begin? Try the Accessibility, Higher Ed Users, K–12 Users, or Business & Government hubs.
    Add to our Professional Learning List. We’re gathering book and podcast recommendations from Community members, like yourself! Do you have any favorites you’d like to share?

If you have any questions or if something’s unclear, we’re here for you! You can always reach the Community Team at community@instructure .com.

We’re glad you’re here, and we hope your first week is just the start of a great experience.
020
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 13/05/2026
Instructure has removed historical Canvas uptime from status.instructure.com but you can still look it up by institution. For UBC, they claim 99.51% uptime on May 7th. That's 7 minutes of downtime, but it was actually hours. It remains to be seen whether schools will collect a penny of credit.
Canvas uptime chart showing 99.51% availability on May 7th, 2026.
010
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 13/05/2026
What recourse do institutions have against Instructure for the extended outage during finals? Once Canvas loses 99.9% uptime status, they give service credits calculated by number of hours multiplied by 3% of 1/12 of annual fees, capped at 1/12 annual fees. web.archive.org/web/20260513...
Screenshot of Instructure ToS. Service Standard. Instructure will use commercially reasonable efforts to make each Service identified in the Order Form as a subscription (a “Subscription Service”) available with an annual uptime percentage of at least 99.9% (“Subscription Service Commitment”). In the event Instructure does not meet the Subscription Service Commitment, Customer will be eligible to receive a service credit as described below. The maximum amount of the credit is 1/12 of the annual subscription Fees paid and attributable to the Subscription Service that is unavailable for a twelve (12) month period. The service credit is calculated by taking the number of hours the applicable Subscription Service was unavailable below the Subscription Service Commitment and multiplying it by 3% of 1/12 of the applicable annual subscription Fees. Any days prior to Customer’s initial use of the Subscription Service will be deemed to have had 100% availability. Any unavailability used to calculate a prior service credit cannot be used for any future claims. The Subscription Service Commitment does not apply to any scheduled outages, standard maintenance windows, force majeure events, and outages that result from any technology issue not originating from Instructure. Customer’s sole and exclusive remedy for breach of the Subscription Service Commitment in this Section 8 will be for Instructure to provide a credit as outlined in this Section 8 and only on the condition that Customer notifies Instructure in writing of such claim within thirty (30) days of becoming eligible for such claim.
121
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 13/05/2026
What is Instructure doing with user data? On April 17, 2026, this "Usage Data" section had language added saying Instructure can use this data for "any lawful purpose". It prohibits customers from using their data to train AI, while allowing themselves to do so. web.archive.org/web/20260513...
Screenshot of Instructure ToS. Usage Data. Customer agrees that statistical and analytical data related to Instructure’s provision of the Service or Customer’s use and interactions with the Service (e.g., browsing history, inputs, outputs, feedback), and de-identified Customer data (collectively, “Usage Data”) is owned by Instructure, and may be used by Instructure for any lawful purpose not otherwise excluded by this Agreement. Such Usage Data will only be used in its aggregated form and shall not include any information that identifies or can be reasonably used to identify an individual person. Without Instructure’s prior written consent, Customer may not: (a) use Usage Data to train, develop, fine-tune, improve, or otherwise enhance artificial intelligence, including any underlying models or algorithms, whether proprietary to Customer or a third party; (b) disclose, sell, or otherwise provide Usage Data to any third party; or (c) reverse engineer or attempt to derive the underlying methodology of any Usage Data. Customer’s use of the Service in the ordinary course, including viewing dashboards, reports, and analytics made available within the Service, does not constitute a violation of this provision.
22823
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 12/05/2026
Ransom has been paid! "Instructure reached an agreement with the unauthorized actor involved in this incident." www.instructure.com/incident_upd...
STATUS UPDATE 5/11/26

We know that concerns about the potential publication of data related to this incident remain top of mind for many customers. We understand how unsettling situations like this can be, and protecting our community remains our top priority.

With that responsibility in mind, Instructure reached an agreement with the unauthorized actor involved in this incident. As part of that agreement:

    The data was returned to us.
    We received digital confirmation of data destruction (shred logs).
    We have been informed that no Instructure customers will be extorted as a result of this incident, publicly or otherwise.
    This agreement covers all impacted Instructure customers, and there is no need for individual customers to attempt to engage with the unauthorized actor.

While there is never complete certainty when dealing with cyber criminals, we believe it was important to take every step within our control to give customers additional peace of mind, to the extent possible. We continue to work with expert vendors to support our forensic analysis, further harden our environment, and conduct a comprehensive review of the data involved. We will continue to provide updates as that work progresses.
174
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 11/05/2026
Canada's AI Minister is in town to announce new data centres and the photo of him (left) with the CEO of Telus says a lot. Photo by Lori Culbert for Vancouver Sun. vancouversun.com/business/tel...
Two men in suits (Federal AI Minister Evan Solomon and CEO of Telus Darren Entwistle) stand in front of a screen that says "TELUS". Evan raises a finger while speaking, and Darren raises his hand, as if they are both interrupting each other.
020
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 07/05/2026
It's now been over an hour since Canvas was hacked again. It's been down for "scheduled maintenance" for about 30 minutes. This is the only notice on status.instructure.com Canvas [is] currently unavailable. Investigating - We are currently investigating this issue. May 07, 2026 - 14:41 MDT
Canvas, Canvas Beta and Canvas Test are currently unavailable.
Investigating - We are currently investigating this issue.
May 07, 2026 - 14:41 MDT
041
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 07/05/2026
UBC notifies community, recommends some users change passwords. "Canvas is unavailable due to a cyber breach of its parent company Instructure. UBC community members should not log into Canvas until further notice." status.it.ubc.ca
 UBC IT
Enterprise Services Status Page

Welcome to the UBC Information Technology Enterprise Services Status Page. Here you will find current information about the status of our enterprise services.

Investigating - Canvas is unavailable due to a cyber breach of its parent company Instructure. UBC community members should not log into Canvas until further notice.

If you are logged in, please log out immediately and do not log back in until you are notified by UBC IT that is safe to do so. If you have logged in after 12 p.m. PT on Thursday, May 7, please change your CWL password immediately and reach out to security@ubc.ca.

We will provide more updates as soon as we have them.
May 07, 2026 - 13:57 PDT
UBC Monitoring Canvas Cyber Incident; Systems Remain Operational
Subscribe
Update - UBC is continuing to investigate a cyber-related incident involving Instructure, the parent company of the Canvas learning management system. We are in direct contact with Instructure and are continuing to monitor the situation closely.

Canvas remains operational for teaching and learning activities.

We recommend that faculty, staff, and students continue to be vigilant against phishing and follow best practices for protecting their accounts and data, including using strong passwords and enabling multi-factor authentication where available.
May 06, 2026 - 16:51 PDT
Investigating - We are aware of a cyber-related incident involving Instructure (Canvas) and are currently investigating the situation. We are in direct contact with Instructure and are continuing to monitor the situation closely. An update will be shared as more information becomes available.
May 05, 2026 - 16:33 PDT
051
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 07/05/2026
With Instructure hacked again, UBC Canvas is down. Students have still not been notified directly of anything being wrong. SFU has also not notified students. Students need to be notified before they can be harmed! Please help me raise awareness of this story and tell any journalists you know!
Screenshot of a web browser open to canvas.ubc.ca showing a large illustration of a rocket being repaired by two small robots. Text below reads: “Canvas is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance” and “Check back soon.”
175
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 07/05/2026
I thought I would post screenshots of Instructure's status update regarding the Canvas LMS data breach. A notice has been added that there will be no more public updates to this page. status.instructure.com
May 6, 2026
Confirmed Security Incident
Resolved - UPDATE - Canvas is fully operational, and we are not seeing any ongoing unauthorized activity.
As a precaution, we recommend customers follow security best practices, including enforcing MFA on privileged accounts, reviewing admin access, and rotating API tokens or keys where applicable.
This will be our final update via this status page for this incident. We will continue to provide updates as appropriate through other channels and are now communicating directly with impacted customers to provide organization-specific information and support.
May 6, 15:15 MDT
Update - We are continuing to investigate this issue.
May 6, 15:13 MDT
Update - We are providing an update on the security incident we advised you of yesterday. While our investigation continues alongside our outside forensics experts, at this stage we believe the incident has been contained.

Here are the steps we have taken since we became aware of the incident... (full statement on website)

While we continue actively investigating, thus far, indications are that the information involved consists of certain identifying information of users at affected institutions, such as names, email addresses, and student ID numbers, as well as messages among users. At this time, we have found no evidence that passwords, dates of birth, government identifiers, or financial information were involved. If that changes, we will notify any impacted institutions.  

Thank you for your patience as we work to resolve this matter. We sincerely regret any inconvenience or concern this may cause. We will continue to keep you apprised as our investigation progresses. For up-to-date information on specific systems, please continue to visit our status page.

Steve Proud
Chief Information Security Officer
May 2, 12:46 MDT Investigating - Instructure recently experienced a cybersecurity incident perpetrated by a criminal threat actor. We are actively investigating this incident with the help of outside forensics experts. We are working quickly to understand the extent of the incident and actively taking steps to minimize its impact. Maintaining your trust is our highest priority, and we are committed to transparency throughout this process. We will provide new information as it is confirmed.

Steve Proud
Chief Information Security Officer
May 1, 16:30 MDT
184
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 01/05/2026
I got one of those, complained, and got a consent agreement confirming a date by when the records would be delivered.
“Good morning,

Thank you for your email.

Unfortunately, we are currently working through a significant backlog of requests and thus have been unable to meet the deadline specified by the FIPPA. We do take these deadlines seriously and apologize for the delay. However, please note that in the interest of fairness, we process our files on a first-in, first-out basis and there are numerous files ahead of yours.

We appreciate your patience.”
120
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 30/04/2026
Success! I destroyed 11 drives! If you zoom in on that red and white drive you will find a 1995 Western Digital Caviar 2850 with 850MB storage.
Shredder bin filled with crushed hard drives, shattered discs, and exposed circuit boards, and electronic components. My 1995 hard drive is on top of the pile. A gloved hand assists with safe data destruction.
030
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 14/04/2026
Microsoft Copilot won't make images "more diverse" citing "Responsible AI Guidelines" but it absolutely does make them "less diverse" upon request.
Screenshot of Microsoft Copilot result for "picture of a good student" showing showing an error message, "Something may have triggered Microsoft's Responsible AI guidelines”, triggered by a prompt to "make it more diverse".
042
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 14/04/2026
A coworker and I prompted Microsoft Copilot to generate a “good student.” Twice, it generated white students. When we asked it to “make it more diverse,” it returned an error citing Responsible AI guidelines. This is unacceptable.
Screenshot of Microsoft Copilot result for "picture of a good student" showing showing an error message, "Something may have triggered Microsoft's Responsible AI guidelines”, triggered by a prompt to "make it more diverse".
090
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 08/04/2026
Turnitin Clarity, their AI use and process tracking add-on, is a huge flop. 13 months after its release, only ~100,000 papers were submitted using it. When Turnitin's AI detector was released in 2023, over 200 million papers were reviewed in the following year. go.turnitin.com/turnitin-lea...
Infographic from linked report. "100,000+ papers were submitted"
1122
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 30/03/2026
Palantir has student data, including immigration status, from the ed tech discussion platform Piazza. Palantir paid Piazza $916,000 for access to this data. www.sec.gov/Archives/edg... I blew the whistle on this in 2016 and the CEO contacted my employer.
"Add additional information to your Piazza profile

Diversity & Inclusion – select one or more (required)

Let's harness the power of human difference to help solve some of the world’s hardest problems with employers on Piazza Network.

A list of checkboxes follows, labeled as:

    Female
    Male
    Non-binary
    American Indian or Indigenous Peoples
    Asian
    Black or African American
    Hispanic or Latino
    Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
    White or Caucasian
    Veteran or served in the Armed Services
    First-generation college student
    Living with a disability
    Member of the LGBTQ community
    National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE)

Each of the 3 sections above are required by the Piazza Network.""Add additional information to your Piazza profile"

Checkboxes from previous screenshot continue:

"- Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE)
- Society of Women Engineers (SWE)
- Women in Computer Science (WiCS)
- Prefer not to share"

Next, a section titled:

"Visa requirement to work in the U.S. (required)

- I am a US citizen
- To work in the US, I do not require sponsorship for an employment authorizing status or visa immediately, nor in the future
- To work in the US, I will require sponsorship for an employment authorizing status or visa in the future
- To work in the US, I will require sponsorship for an employment authorizing status or visa immediately
- Not applicable / Prefer not to share

Next is a field labeled:

"Personal email (non-school, example: name@email.com) (required)"

"Employers may need to use this to communicate with you as part of the Piazza Network."

"Each of the 3 sections above are required by the Piazza Network."
112958
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 28/03/2026
The People's Consultation of AI submissions have been published and the AI statement caught my eye. (emphasis in original) www.peoplesaiconsultation.ca/submissions/
Screenshot from People's Consultation of AI website: "While these submissions are open to be used for further research and analysis or related grassroots or civic initiatives, *we would ask, as a matter of public spiritedness, ethics, and respect, that you do not feed submissions into any LLM programs, chatbots, or similar software* (at the very least, those which are any of commercial, proprietary, public, or cloud-based) *without the explicit prior consent of each submission’s respective authors*."
030
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 25/03/2026
Instructure is promoting a vendor who sues their own customers. It's not just me. Proctorio also sued a student from Miami University, which uses Canvas. Instructure is encouraging customers to "discover the answer" to "how AI should fit into learning" by reading an article by Proctorio. Shameful.
Screenshot of a post from Instructure on X (Twitter) dated March 19, 2026. The post reads: “Recent studies suggest that 64% of students now use AI to complete assignments. How should AI fit into learning to support education rather than short-circuit it? Discover the answer in this article by @Proctorio.” A link and hashtags #AcademicIntegrity #EdTech #Instructure follow.

Below the text is a promotional graphic split into two panels. On the left, a photo shows a woman with long dark hair sitting at a table using a laptop. On the right, a dark blue panel with the Proctorio logo and large text reads: “The opposite of cheating” with smaller text underneath: “Rethinking integrity, AI, and course design.” The Instructure logo appears at the bottom.
0126
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 15/03/2026
I've never had a MTG Arena Brawl deck go off like this. I won by self-milling myself with Jace, Wielder of Mysteries, but had 488 power in creatures. This was the second of three turns in a row. Is this what people with Power 9 feel like?
Screenshot of a late-game Magic: The Gathering Arena Brawl match where Ian has an extremely large board state with many creatures in play totaling 488 power, but none on the opponent's side. Ian has 14 cards in hand with 0 casting cost and a graveyard full of lands he can play. There are many untapped lands on the battlefield. A token indicates Ian has an extra turn after this one. The planeswalker Jace, Wielder of Mysteries is on the right side with the ultimate ability visible, indicating a self-mill win condition. The opponent has 23 life, Ian has 17 life, and the battlefield is crowded with permanents, showing a combo turn where the deck has gone off. Ian wins by drawing from an empty library with Jace.Magic: The Gathering card Jace, Wielder of Mysteries, a blue legendary planeswalker card costing one generic and three blue mana (1UUU). The artwork shows Jace Beleren, a hooded human mage in blue robes, standing in a stone city with glowing blue magical energy swirling around both hands.

Card type line reads: Legendary Planeswalker — Jace.

Static ability text: If you would draw a card while your library has no cards in it, you win the game instead.

Loyalty abilities:
+1: Target player puts the top two cards of their library into their graveyard. Draw a card.
−8: Draw seven cards. Then if your library has no cards in it, you win the game.

Starting loyalty: 4 (shown in the bottom right corner).

Set information at bottom: Collector number 054/264, set code WAR (War of the Spark), rarity Rare, illustrated by Anna Steinbauer, copyright Wizards of the Coast 2019.
140
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 20/02/2026
This 5 star Proctorio review was written by GenAI. We're All Trying To Find The Guy Who Did This.gif
5 star Google Chrome Web Store review for Proctorio dated January 30, 2026.

"The Proctorio extension offers a refreshingly clean interface and seamless integration that makes remote testing feel completely intuitive. It is incredibly easy to use and stays out of the way, allowing you to focus entirely on your exam without any technical distractions.

Would you like me to condense this even further into a short "headline" style review?"
0112
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 18/02/2026
What this judgment means is that Clearview AI must comply by the terms of the @oipcbc.bsky.social's 2021 order, stop collecting facial data of British Columbians, and delete any data it collected without consent. Link: www.oipc.bc.ca/documents/or...
Excerpt from Order P21-08 of the Information & Privacy Commissioner for BC:

"[22] Pursuant to s. 36(1)(b) of BC PIPA, I make the following order:

a. Clearview is prohibited from offering its facial recognition services that have been the subject of the investigation, and which utilize the collection, use and disclosure of images and biometric facial arrays collected from individuals in British Columbia without their consent, to clients in British Columbia;

b. Clearview shall make best efforts to cease the collection, use and disclosure of (i) images and (ii) biometric facial arrays collected from individuals in British Columbia without their consent; and

c. Clearview shall make best efforts to delete the (i) images and (ii) biometric facial arrays in its possession, which were collected from individuals in British Columbia without their consent."
160
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 06/02/2026
I'm incredibly proud of the growth in Zero Textbook Cost adoption at BCIT since we launched our BCcampus-sponsored project. We've held faculty events at all 5 campuses, student events at the Burnaby Campus Library, a survey of 150 ZTC instructors with a 20% response rate, and video interviews.
Line chart titled “ZTC Adoption Growth” showing an increase in Zero Textbook Cost course adoption over three terms. Adoption rises from about 19.8 % in Summer 2025 to roughly 29.8% in Fall 2025, and then to 34.5% in Winter 2026, indicating steady growth over time.
1103
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 19/12/2025
I made a Microsoft Forms survey for our Zero Textbook Cost instructors and Microsoft's question suggestions seem deliberately designed to frustrate me. The survey has nothing to do with cheating.
Alt text: A screenshot of a “Recommended” section with a lightning bolt icon. It lists five survey-style questions about cheating in school: “Have you or someone you know ever seen someone else cheating in school?”, “Have you ever cheated on a test before?”, “How strictly are you checked before, during and after a test?”, “When you cheat on a test, who do you blame?”, and “When you cheat, how does that make you feel?”
060
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 07/11/2025
Is the Microsoft Teams logo supposed to look like it's out of a horror movie?
Microsoft Teams logo featuring the letter "T" and two human figures attached to one another, with unattached heads.
4181
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 25/09/2025
Earlier this month, Temple University published new Proctorio documentation confirming that Proctorio still tracks head and eye movement in 2025. Recording this as evidence of five years of harm. foxonline.temple.edu/wp-content/u...
Screenshot of Proctorio from Temple University website. Interface showing 'Environmental Abnormalities' with two monitoring indicators: 'Audio Levels' represented by a speaker icon and sound bars, and 'Head and Eye Movement' represented by a head silhouette with arrows indicating movement. A note below states: 'Abnormal head movement will highlight test takers...
051
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 18/09/2025
“Google is undermining academic integrity by shoving AI in students’ faces during exams, Google is trying to make instructors give up on regulating AI in their classroom, and it might work. Chrome has the market share to change student behavior, and it appears this is the goal.” wapo.st/47OPRzL
“Google is undermining academic integrity by shoving AI in students’ faces during exams,” says Ian Linkletter, a librarian at the British Columbia Institute of Technology who first flagged the issue to me. “Google is trying to make instructors give up on regulating AI in their classroom, and it might work. Google Chrome has the market share to change student behavior, and it appears this is the goal.”
092
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 17/09/2025
I have personally tested this and the Homework Help link is now appearing everywhere in Canvas *except* Quizzes. The relevant flag in Google Chrome is "Lens Overlay EDU action chip" but as you can see, the "triggering criteria" targeting every LMS is not explained. Is it based on contents or URL?
A Google Chrome "Experiments" page (chrome://flags) showing the search result for "Lens Overlay EDU." The highlighted experiment is titled "Lens Overlay EDU action chip" with a description: "Enables Lens Overlay EDU action chip. Intended for testing the chip itself, not its triggering criteria. – Mac, Windows, Linux, ChromeOS." The status dropdown on the right is set to "Default". The Chrome version shown is 140.0.7339.133.
030
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 04/09/2025
I needed to edit linkletter.org yesterday. Proctorio will drag this out as long as they can. I was 36 when I was sued, now I'm 41. One day I will be free from this meritless lawsuit, but I will never be defeated and have the pro bono legal counsel needed to sustain the fight as long as it takes.
My name is Ian Linkletter, I'm a librarian from Vancouver, BC. On September 2nd, 2020, I was sued for copyright infringement by Proctorio, Incorporated because I cited and linked to their own YouTube videos in 7 critical tweets. This website compiles my statements and updates related to Proctorio's lawsuit, which has continued now for over five years ("over" is highlighted to emphasize an edit).
1365
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 30/07/2025
OpenCV's "failure to detect rate" is highest for people with darker skin tones, people with head coverings, and people with glasses. Racism, cultural discrimination, and ableism. Guess which remote proctoring tool contains all 3? Research link: racismandtechnology.center/wp-content/u...
A comparison of six individuals used to demonstrate face detection performance by OpenCV, with three dark-skinned individuals not detected ("N") and three lighter-skinned individuals detected ("Y"). Below each image are metrics: Estimated FTDR (Failture to Detect Rate), Skin Lightness (L*), Head Covering (Y/N), and Glasses (Y/N). The three undetected individuals have darker skin tones (L* values ~30–31), all wear glasses and head coverings, and have high FTDRs (~76–79%). The three detected individuals have lighter skin tones (L* values ~60–62), no glasses or head coverings, and very low FTDRs (~0.34–0.42%).
040
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 29/07/2025
New research confirms previous findings that OpenCV, the open source facial detection software used by Proctorio, is racially biased. Performance Differentials in Deployed Biometric Systems Caused by Open-Source Face Detectors: racismandtechnology.center/wp-content/u...
Testing of AI systems is important for ensuring accuracy and re-
liability. In this study, we demonstrate how scenario testing with
demographically varied subjects, a form of prospective testing that
simulates real-world conditions, revealed significant performance
issues in biometric systems prior to broad deployment. Using gener-
alized linear modeling, we show that subjects’ measured skin light-
ness, along with other demographic factors, significantly impacted
the probability of failure to detect a face. Failure rates increased
from just 0.28% for subjects with the lightest skin in our sample
to 24.34% for subjects with the darkest, controlling for other fac-
tors. We show that skin lightness, rather than self-reported race,
best explained the differences in system performance. We trace
these issues to widely used, older methods in open-source packages
for face detection. Furthermore, this demographic differential is
not observed when testing open-source packages using a different,
more curated dataset. Our results highlight the need to evaluate
full multi-component, operationally deployed AI systems and the
role of scenario testing as a critical component of AI governance.
One way to mitigate the likelihood that poor-performing, older
open source methods are deployed in an operational system would
be to deprecate these functions in favor of higher-performing al-
ternatives. Prospective assessments of AI, in real-world use cases
with demographically varied subjects, should be used to identify
performance issues before these systems are operationalized.
050
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 24/07/2025
University of Cape Town is discontinuing use of Turnitin's AI detector. "AI detection tools including the one available in Turnitin have been found to be unreliable in university contexts, often producing false positives or negatives or easily being subverted." www.news.uct.ac.za/article/-202...
"Responding to unacceptable AI use. AI detection tools including the one available in Turnitin have been found to be unreliable in university contexts, often producing false positives or negatives or easily being 
subverted. Unlike traditional plagiarism checkers, AI detection tools rely on statistical methods to estimate the likelihood that a piece of text was generated by AI. This can lead to wrongful accusations of academic misconduct, damaging trust between lecturers and students, and creating an adversarial learning environment. At UCT, the Senate Teaching and Learning committee has decided to discontinue the use of the AI detection score in Turnitin effective 1 October 2025."
064
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 24/07/2025
Bluesky doesn't like SVG files. This is the new Instructure logo.
"Instructure" with a red period at the end
010
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 24/07/2025
The Canvas logo still looks like a coronavirus to me.
Canvas by Instructure logo featuring a circular red icon made of semi-circles and dots.
140
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 24/07/2025
The OpenAI integration is not the only thing Instructure announced today. Here is their new logo. "The updated identity signals a modern, dynamic and future-ready approach designed to advance learning. Instructure is setting potential in motion." www.instructure.com/press-releas...
Logo consisting of "Instructure" with a red period at the end
130
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 25/06/2025
In 2016, Piazza was criticized for selling student data to third parties such as Palantir. They argued that they were not selling it, just providing access to it via their platform. But in public documentation, I found proof that the data could be exported and shared it online.
"Piazza Careers

Can I message students off your platform?
Yes, you can message students off the Piazza Careers platform! To do this, you can export students' information, which will come with an Excel file including their emails, and reach out to them on your own time. (Learn how to export here.)
Back to Support Home
Can't find your answer? Reach out to our customer success team: customersuccess@piazza.com"
1344
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 24/06/2025
Piazza is a course discussion platform used by many colleges and universities. Piazza requires students to provide the following information when signing up. From 2017-2019, Palantir Technologies paid Piazza $916,000 for access to this data. www.sec.gov/Archives/edg...
"Add additional information to your Piazza profile

Diversity & Inclusion – select one or more (required)

Let's harness the power of human difference to help solve some of the world’s hardest problems with employers on Piazza Network.

A list of checkboxes follows, labeled as:

    Female
    Male
    Non-binary
    American Indian or Indigenous Peoples
    Asian
    Black or African American
    Hispanic or Latino
    Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
    White or Caucasian
    Veteran or served in the Armed Services
    First-generation college student
    Living with a disability
    Member of the LGBTQ community
    National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE)

Each of the 3 sections above are required by the Piazza Network.""Add additional information to your Piazza profile"

Checkboxes from previous screenshot continue:

"- Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE)
- Society of Women Engineers (SWE)
- Women in Computer Science (WiCS)
- Prefer not to share"

Next, a section titled:

"Visa requirement to work in the U.S. (required)

- I am a US citizen
- To work in the US, I do not require sponsorship for an employment authorizing status or visa immediately, nor in the future
- To work in the US, I will require sponsorship for an employment authorizing status or visa in the future
- To work in the US, I will require sponsorship for an employment authorizing status or visa immediately
- Not applicable / Prefer not to share

Next is a field labeled:

"Personal email (non-school, example: name@email.com) (required)"

"Employers may need to use this to communicate with you as part of the Piazza Network."

"Each of the 3 sections above are required by the Piazza Network."
410764
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 18/06/2025
Texas Tech University will no longer use Proctorio. Last year, my research about this school's use of Proctorio on K-12 students was profiled in The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/education/20...
RaiderCanvas Support section of Texas Tech University’s website:

"Will I still have access to Respondus and/or Proctorio?

Faculty will still have access to Respondus Lockdown; however, we will no longer use Proctorio. 

Proctorio will no longer be available after Summer II 2025 courses are over. We will be using Respondus Monitor, which requires the Respondus LockDown Browser."
0111
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 24/05/2025
These days I'm immersed in the Government of Canada's Algorithmic Impact Assessment tool, which we are piloting at BCIT as a way to protect students. It asks this string of questions as part of a longer questionnaire. Here's what I put for remote proctoring. www.canada.ca/en/governmen...
Risk Profile
- Is the project within an area of intense public scrutiny (e.g. because of privacy concerns) and/or frequent litigation? Yes [Points: +3]
- Are clients in this line of business particularly vulnerable? Yes [Points: +3]
- Are stakes of the decisions very high? Yes [Points: +4]
- Will this project have major impacts on staff, either in terms of their numbers or their roles? Yes [Points: +3]
- Will the use of the system create or exacerbate barriers for persons with disabilities? Yes [Points: +4]
060
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 21/04/2025
Proctorio filmed students without permission and I caught them. Proctorio went to Arizona State University's campus and recorded students sharing their experiences with remote proctoring. They did not receive permission to do this, as you can see from my FOI request.
Screenshot of a public records request to Arizona State University about Proctorio filming, stating no responsive records were found.

Arizona State University's NextRequest portal shows public records request number 24-455, marked as "Closed." The request was received on December 6, 2024, and asked for documents related to filming permits, consent form templates, approvals, and email correspondence concerning commercial on-campus filming by a company called Proctorio, Incorporated. The requester notes the filming date is unknown, but the commercial videos were published in November 2024. The response from ASU states that no responsive records were found, and the request was closed on January 31, 2025. The request visibility is marked "Unpublished."
151
Ian Linkletter @linkletter.org · 11/04/2025
Ohio State University is having a bad experience getting rid of Proctorio. Turns out there is all this hidden HTML code that must be removed. Be careful not to contract Proctorio. It's easy to get and hard to get rid of. teaching.resources.osu.edu/toolsets/car...
Canvas HTML editor with Proctorio-related code highlighted and instruction to remove HTML referencing Proctorio.
080