Reposted by Lindsay Nash
DHS's argument that administrative warrants satisfy the Fourth Amendment fails at every step because it misunderstands or misrepresents the constitutional significance of these warrants and ignores the case law that directly contradicts it, writes @lindsaycnash.bsky.social.
lawfaremedia.org
DHS’s Flawed Defense of Home Invasion Based on Administrative Warrants
Defending ICE home invasions without judicial warrants, DHS relies in significant part on a 1960 Supreme Court case. Does that hold up?