Sign in

Leyan Wang

@leyan-wang.bsky.social
33 followers 21 following 13 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Overall, ARG inference tools have demonstrated remarkable robustness to computational phasing errors. While various practical challenges may limit ARG inference quality, we believe that computational phasing inaccuracies should not be a problem of concern. 7/7
020
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Under a selective sweep model, we saw little difference in branch-length-based diversity between ARGs inferred from true and computationally phased haplotypes, demonstrating the practicality of applying ARGs inferred from unphased data in evolutionary analyses. 6/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Under the CEU bottleneck model, we observed consistently minor effects of phasing errors. The difference between ARG inference methods is much larger than the difference in performance between using true haplotypes and computationally phased haplotypes. 5/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
In constant population size models, we observed only a slight reduction in ARG inference accuracy in terms of estimates of coalescence times or recombination breakpoint counts when using computationally phased haplotypes. The effect also reduced as the sample size increased. 4/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Here, we show that ARG inference remains robust to phasing errors even at incredibly small sample sizes (8 haplotypes). We simulated ARGs and VCFs under various demographic models, simulated phasing errors, and compared ARGs inferred from true and computationally phased haplotypes. 3/7
120
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
ARGs are powerful tools in population genetics. However, ARG inference generally requires phased haplotypes. Phasing quality is limited at small sample sizes, making it difficult in non-model organisms due to the usually limited sample size and a lack of reference panels. 2/7
120
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
We are excited to share our recent work on the surprising robustness of Ancestral Recombination Graph (ARG) inference tools to computational phasing errors, now available on BioRxiv: biorxiv.org/content/10.1.... This work is co-advised by @yundeng.bsky.social and Rasmus Nielsen. 1/7
biorxiv.org
Robustness of Ancestral Recombination Graph Inference Tools to Phasing Errors
Ancestral Recombination Graphs (ARGs) are fundamental population genetic structures that encode the genealogical history of a sample of haplotypes along the genome. They have recently received substan...
25324
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Overall, ARG inference tools have demonstrated remarkable robustness to computational phasing errors. While various practical challenges may limit ARG inference quality, we believe that computational phasing inaccuracies should not be a problem of concern. 7/7
000
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Under a selective sweep model, we saw little difference in branch-length-based diversity between ARGs inferred from true and computationally phased haplotypes, demonstrating the practicality of applying ARGs inferred from unphased data in evolutionary analyses. 6/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Under the CEU bottleneck model, we observed consistently minor effects of phasing errors. The difference between ARG inference methods is much larger than the difference in performance between using true haplotypes and computationally phased haplotypes. 5/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
In constant population size models, we observed only a slight reduction in ARG inference accuracy in terms of estimates of coalescence times or recombination breakpoint counts when using computationally phased haplotypes. The effect also reduced as the sample size increased. 4/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Here, we show that ARG inference remains robust to phasing errors even at incredibly small sample sizes (8 haplotypes). We simulated ARGs and VCFs under various demographic models, simulated phasing errors, and compared ARGs inferred from true and computationally phased haplotypes. 3/7
100
Leyan Wang @leyan-wang.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
ARGs are powerful tools in population genetics. However, ARG inference generally requires phased haplotypes. Phasing quality is limited at small sample sizes, making it difficult in non-model organisms due to the usually limited sample size and a lack of reference panels. 2/7
110