iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/05/2025

I’m not buddies with Jesse. I’m not apart the white nationalist technofacist cult you think he’s apart of. I’m not in the SF/Austin/Thiel orbit. I don’t care about these people and don’t want to be associated with anything to do with that nonsense. Get over it.

150

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/05/2025

I’m buddies with Jeremy. The only reason he was even there and there’s footage of this is because I personally know him well *and* the producers of his show and both invited them and advocated for them to be allowed in when no one else wanted there, but me. Go ask him yourself.

140

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/05/2025

Whatever nonsense conspiracy you’re trying to make an accusation about.

110

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

I agree with you that the SCIF’s SSO would’ve had to sign off, what I’m saying is there has never even been a request made, so the SSO hasn’t had the opportunity to decline.

010

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

All good, Nick. Thanks for taking the time to speak with me.

010

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

Nick, you’re publicly making character judgments about me, which has nothing to do with the sovereign wealth fund, without ever having actually talked to me, which I felt like you would’ve done based on our relationship, and you know I would be receptive. I’m not the one disparaging you publicly.

200

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

Black people are not allowed into the cabal unless you’re a billionaire.

260

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

All good notes, yes he both doesn’t need one for him to have gone in, meaning it was purely a lapse of committee actually doing the paperwork to make it happen. Regarding status, I can only speak to the fact that it is currently active, which you could infer means he found a sponsor.

240

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

I’m disappointed that you continue to say this stuff publicly and you’ve never called or even asked me about it, Nick.

100

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 06/03/2025

Can you share what operating system/browser you are using, helpful note thank you

000

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 06/03/2025

You can now listen to audio summaries of UAP research papers on UAP Caucus. If you’ve struggled to find the time to read research papers, this can be a great alternative to get started. It’s an experimental feature for now, but so far seems to be working pretty well. www.uapcaucus.com/research

4200

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

Fact don’t care about your feelings. Find someone else follow. I’m not here to be your hero. I’m here to do the work.

000

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

Whatever. I care about the safety of my family, which is being threatened by the hysterics of people reacting the way you did to me. The safety of my family does not require justification for semantics.

120

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

And just to be clear, me talking about it is not an explicit validation of any other political ideology or administration.

000

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

and ignoring all of the other human rights related issues which I have publicly commented about and tweeted about and gone physically and fundraisers for an advocated against for a very long time.

100

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

The point of the original tweet was to highlight that this administration was never going to prioritize disclosure—and that this was obvious to anyone paying attention, and that I’m not naïve to that fact, I’m not trying to cozy up to the Trump administration, purely for the sake of disclosure…

100

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

I’m being repeatedly accused of being an enabler of a techno-fascist regime because I’m simply calling balls and strikes when I discuss UAP. It has escalated to the point of physical violence, with my car being broken into over nonsense I have no control over.

120

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

I see you have terrible reading comprehension because nowhere did I say that I was the only one calling out techno fascist, I want people to stop destroying my property thinking that I believe otherwise. Your inability to read is not my problem.

000

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

Oh yeah, I’m gonna come to bluesky for attention 😂😂😂

020

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

You’re having an emotional reaction to something you don’t understand the context of, and instead of asking questions, you’re making it about your own ego. Nowhere did I say I’m ‘super smart’—that’s something you projected onto it.

120

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

If you’ve been concerned about this for longer than 10 years, great—so maybe direct that energy at the people actually responsible instead of taking cheap shots at me.

110

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 11/02/2025

Yeah, I’m pissed off. Wouldn’t you be if you’d been harassed for months and had your car broken into because people decided to blame you for something you have no control over? But sure, let’s ignore all that and pretend the real issue here is me being ‘whiny.’

100

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

Quarterly reminder for the people in the back: The time to be mobilized against a creeping techno-fascist state was a decade ago. I did the work. Y’all ignored it. This is happening because of the conversations you didn’t have at your dinner tables—not mine. You fix it.

2301

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

I think when people talk about ‘disclosure,’ what they really mean is the eventual outcome—a slow accumulation of compounding events and developments that, over time, push us toward consensus. That’s all.

100

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Maybe I’m wrong. But modern society hasn’t proven capable of taking things at face value. The Pentagon already released UAP videos—people shrugged. October 7 happened in real-time—people deny it. If a mass-casualty event can’t unify perception, why would a tech demo?

110

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Right—because a single event wouldn’t be enough. It would take sustained exposure and repeated demonstrations to build consensus. Which, again, was my point.

110

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Sure, single events can be world-changing—but they don’t create universal agreement. 9/11 was the most documented attack in history, yet conspiracy theories about it persist. October 7 happened in real-time, and people still argue over basic facts. Disclosure won’t be different.

130

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Catastrophic disclosure was never possible. But building consensus is.

1150

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Because real progress doesn’t come from a single revelatory moment—it comes from sustained, credible information flow that reduces stigma, increases scientific legitimacy, and reinforces political will.

1130

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

That’s why “disclosure” isn’t really the right word for what’s happening. It’s about consensus, not disclosure.

2110

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Even if non-human intelligence revealed itself directly, the reaction wouldn’t be universal—it would fracture along ideological, religious, and geopolitical lines. The world doesn’t “wake up” together anymore.

1120

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

• There’s no singular trusted authority to validate them. • Every piece of evidence is immediately weaponized by ideological factions. • The phenomenon itself may be too complex to package into a digestible truth.

1130

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Instead, we live in a state of perpetual contested disclosure—a slow trickle of leaks, whistleblowers, and revelations that never reach full consensus because:

2110

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

But both ideas are built on an outdated model of how society processes information—one where a central authority could dictate reality. That world is gone.

1100

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

The concept of “controlled disclosure” assumes governments can gradually acclimate the public to the reality of non-human intelligence, while “catastrophic disclosure” assumes an undeniable event would force recognition.

190

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

But in today’s fragmented, post-truth reality, there is no single point of consensus formation anymore. Information alone doesn’t move the Overton window—narrative control does.

1140

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

This keeps coming up in my mind. Catastrophic disclosure doesn’t exist. It never did. It’s a relic of 20th-century thinking—the idea that a single event, leak, or revelation could “break through” and force global consensus.

7514

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 21/01/2025

The AI arms race makes this even more obvious, government datasets are among the last major untapped resources for training high-scale models, and the people behind this shift know it.

1120

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 21/01/2025

The U.S. Digital Service rebrand and agency review teams are positioning tech-aligned billionaires to carve up what remains of the administrative state, while the purge of intelligence officers removes internal resistance to that takeover.

180

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 21/01/2025

It’s about seizing control of public assets (data, infrastructure, intelligence) and redirecting their value to private interests under the guise of reform.

1131

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 21/01/2025

Reading through several of the executive orders from yesterday paints a clearer picture of where we are headed, at least in part.

2150

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 21/01/2025

The looting has started. Turns out, government efficiency just means fewer witnesses.

2282

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 19/11/2024

Aren’t the next four years just gonna be so fun?

170

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 19/11/2024

Lol you should tell that to his base.

210

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 19/11/2024

Right, exactly. Like if your plan is to remove all of the guard rails and promote lawlessness, then who’s gonna be there prosecute the whistleblowers?

180

Lester Nare @lesternare.bsky.social · 19/11/2024

Probably the most realistic possibility is that this creates an opening for a redux of the Mellon/Elizondo method of getting the original videos out, driven both by the lack of sophistication and focus on other issues, that will allow folks to pass “Go” because security isn’t watching the door.

260