Sign in

Lars

@lars-at.bsky.social
376 followers 134 following 644 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 15/10/2026
Økonomiene bør ikke sammenlignes i dollar. SSB har gjort et dypdykk i tallene. www.ssb.no/nasjonalregn...
010 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Oh…
0154 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
Canada will never be the same. www.canada.ca/content/dam/...
010 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 22/08/2026
Epic
010 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
The report also says cost of carbon is 0 as generators leave UK ETS. Costs don't disappear of course, but is shifted to future generations. I assume this would also mean no EU/UK ETS-link, to the dismay of UK industry which could face CBAM selling goods to the EU. Power trade could also be an issue.
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
0110 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
071 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 11/07/2026
0100 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
In that case...
1182 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Dispatchable solar
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
040 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
0591 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
0100 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 26/06/2026
Untruncated it for you.
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
April, not great but moving in the right direction. Probably some postphoned purchases in March.
030 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
I hope so!
140 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
New paper published in Nature suggest retrofitting hydrogen production at US nuclear power plants, since current government subsidies are not sufficient for profitability. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
010 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 06/06/2026
Is this El Niño loading the gun?
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 06/06/2026
And here we see an example of the Russian in his natural habitat
080 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
And a third, also two years ago. Unmanned station. Used to be a pump (some remain further behind), now a charger.
060 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Most certainly is! Here is a picture from another gas station, also taken two years ago. Mid pump removed. A few weeks later, a charger appeared in its place.
140 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
This is Norway two years ago. Some of the pumps removed, chargers installed. Happening all over the place. One year ago, the first gas station removed all pumps and installed chargers only (in Oslo, this is rare so far).
180 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Well, in that case…
010 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 26/04/2026
Here are som stats, UK need to push a bit further
110 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 26/04/2026
The UK gas price on tradingeconomics seem to follow ttf gas, which I think is heavily influenced by lng, closely.
110 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 05/04/2026
080 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 05/04/2026
020 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 29/03/2026
It is in the paper.
220 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 22/03/2026
041 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/03/2026
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
But, but
051 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
I samme avdeling...
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
100 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
There are exceptions, but as a general rule - no. It remains to be seen what will happen with SMRs if they are built. What is clear is that they will start with a large disadvantage of scale compared to large reactors.
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
As mentioned, in the nuclear sector, there are solutions.
100 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
those nifty brits
020 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
And here are some Norwegian solar panels on buildings!
1161 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 19/09/2025
072 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 23/08/2025
Tea
140 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 17/08/2025
The best part
020 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 16/08/2025
At least the americans got one thing right
040 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 16/08/2025
Excellent
030 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
On yours, right now 8.148 GW wind.
000 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
On hers, right now 10.94 GW wind.
100 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 29/07/2025
Good read! About the primary energy fallacy, did you notice this little gem from the Methology chapter of the latest Statistical Review of World Energy?
130 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
Perfect logic
160 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
Someone fired something
060 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
070 0
Lars @lars-at.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
Yes, increasing in China...
100 0