iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 27/09/2026

All the weightlifting had had a casualty in the form of the fact that my entire suit wardrobe is too small for me, hence the new one. I also now have a 19.5 inch neck, which means nobody stocks shirts that fit me any more! All my clothes are gonna have to come out of the internet going forward!

000

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 27/09/2026

I realise I didn’t share it here but I went suit shopping yesterday and I daresay this one is a slay

140

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 25/09/2026

Happy Friday gamers! I’ve just got done with a bunch of lifting, auditions and I’m going to be settling in with some mead, cats to cuddle and anime to Consume. Hope your weekend is going to heal and rest you up just as much!

040

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 25/09/2026

The naked Malteser is the worse of the two. The latter is an unexpected Revel, the former is a biscuit hate crime

010

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 25/09/2026

For what it’s worth, as I don’t agree with the other comments, the FBC actually is inspired by the SCP Foundation and Remedy were open about that (as well as citing House of Leaves). I won’t say it’s an inferior duplicate but it didn’t come first.

120

Reposted by Kit Harrison

JD Kelly @jdkellyva.bsky.social · 22/09/2026

Panels at #MCMComicCon in Oct with a line up of talented #VoiceActors can’t wait to answer audience Q’s! Thanks @jessnesling.bsky.social @kitharrison.com @ashleighhaddad.bsky.social @bronweneprice.bsky.social Teifion Sussex, Shin-fei Chen joining me onstage! #VoiceActor @mcmcomiccon.bsky.social

0102

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 21/09/2026

My 7th birthday present was a slimline PS1 (a “PS one”) bundled with Spyro 2, Crash 3 and Rayman 1, and dear reader I fear it was all over for Kit then and there

020

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 17/09/2026

Ooh, me, pick me! My act is just me yelling two words at the top of my lungs!

060

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 14/09/2026

If I am consumed before booking Overwatch or something I shall be very cross

171

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 09/09/2026

Woke up to a bunch of people sharing obviously botted/copypasta hate of Matt Mercer. Guy’s so dislikable everyone’s feedback is the same talking points in the same order. It’s just so…average. 😜

030

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 07/09/2026

Here goes facts: If your faith and trust in your own relationship is so weak that you’re scared of losing your partner to a fictional character in their own committed relationship, you are either in a shitty relationship or you are not emotionally ready for the one you think you currently have

160

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 07/09/2026

I am super happy it’s doing well but I urge caution about the framing that the revenue “justifies” not shelving the film. It should always have come out even if it was a nuclear flop. Art should ALWAYS be given a chance to fly, whether it goes big now, goes big later or never goes big at all.

13410

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 03/09/2026

Sir. Excuse me. Get down from there. SIR.

160

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Fair warning but for me this isn’t a nuanced stance. If I catch you sharing this shit I’m not associating with you any longer.

0172

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

If anything Shadow says isn’t sexy I don’t want to know what is.

110

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Momo judges you silently. (I lie. She’s a yapper)

050

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

You “need” to? Hmm. Cats disagree. Try again tomorrow.

060

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Afraid I won’t be policed for what I can say :)

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

But I’ll tell my friends that I bought my house. That’s the colloquial term. But the legal definitions are more complicated. I don’t know what I need to say. I opened this whole thread saying that it sucks that these products can be taken away.

000

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

It’s important to clarify as this may have been unclear that I do not agree with Sony here, I was pointing out that the language of owning games being “a license, potentially finite” has been the way buying games has historically been described legally, it is just much more enforceable digitally.

010

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I’m not agreeing with Sony dude. I cant say that enough times. If I say the bank owns my house because I have a mortgage on it, it’s not me agreeing with capitalism. I’m stating the factual implementation of the system. It’s still “my house” colloquially and I can still drill into the walls.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

As I said to someone else, I prefer Steam’s execution the best, where even if a game is delisted from the store you can always redownload it. It would be nice for that to be the absolute norm.

000

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Yeah, I think it’s just about the issues with the terminology - like those nerds who thought owning the original manuscript of Dune gave them legal authority over the text. I love the way Steam does things where you always have access to re-download the game even if it’s been delisted. That’s good.

120

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Yeah, for sure. Especially if you’re happy with your digital copy being finite as with a physical one. I was never agreeing with Sony’s implementation. I’ll concede I spoke of “access to copies” in the legal sense and that will have confused matters.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Your paying GOG for the game has granted you access to be able to download copies of the game from the store. They can take that right away if they want. I don’t know why they would but they can. You can indeed do what you want with a downloaded copy.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I refuse to accept blame for describing how something currently exists. If people aren’t willing to even listen to that I don’t know how anyone can hope to fight for a better implementation.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

And if we’re splitting hairs (I promise I’m not doing a bit or whatever), you ARE at the mercy of GOG not deciding to one day not host the game, so you could lose access to get it back if you lost the files. Even though you paid for access - and that’s bad too!

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

But that’s true. You DO own a copy of Spec Ops (on your hard drive), on GOG that’s access to download a copy. There are things you can’t do with the product itself, however you 100% are in possession of the files. I am describing how the system currently works. That is NOT “agreeing with it”!

200

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

But that’s where complexity comes in - buying a ticket is based on the (gentleman’s?) agreement that you don’t photocopy the ticket and give it to friends, or that parts of the park might not be available, or the knowledge that it will eventually close that day (ofc in games we don’t want that).

130

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

if you look at your copy of Spec Ops there will be legal text that explains the terms by which you can use it, usually to prevent piracy or lost sales or whatever. They used to not really be able to enforce those. On some services they can. That’s bad. I never argued it wasn’t.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I cant say it enough times man. The second sentence of this thread was me saying it sucks. I do not agree with them or think they should be able to do it. I am saying there is NUANCE TO THE SITUATION.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I don’t agree that me just describing how it currently works and even saying that it’s bad exposes me to the fury of hell or whatever. It just makes discourse very, very difficult. We should be able to talk about these things with nuance.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Maybe that’s a fairer term. Or whatever term you might use for a day at the theme park, like “you can buy a finite experience”. Again, not defending how it’s implemented, just stating the way it is and has been described before by not just Sony but other entities too.

120

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

My point was - to be crystal clear - there are legal avenues for your access to even your GOG copy to be “controlled”, it is used under an agreement you have with the developer. Hence, you don’t “own” it in the way you own, I dunno. Your PC. No malice meant whatsoever.

000

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I never said it wasn’t bad. I in fact LITERALLY SAID it was bad. I feel like we’ve really gotten off on the wrong foot here because all I was ever doing was clarifying the distinction that you own a COPY of Spec Ops, it will have a license agreement that dictates its fair use. That was my point.

200

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Let me be clear that I am not asking anyone to accept it. I AM saying this is how it works. Maybe it can be looked into and changed! It’s hard to argue that in however many characters, it’s just not as simple as “you own your games” and I don’t like it being controversial to point out complexity.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

It says “get something” on that definition, if we want to get technical there are plenty of things you buy that you don’t “own”. I am not defending Sony, I am describing the language that has been used to discuss “game ownership” for years. It should be looked into! It sucks that you can lose them!

120

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

And from there it becomes a maelstrom of good faith use and what that means. And I would love to see these legal terms revisited. All I began any of this with is the fact that the language used to describe how these things are “owned” is very rigid and has been used for a while without “issue”.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

You WOULD have your car taken away from you if you did that though, so…

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I think the issue is that true legal ownership at present means that buying a copy of a game means you would have the legal right to copy the files over to someone else, and then you ask questions like “so how do the devs earn money?” Or complicated questions about the future if devs release a game.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Again I’m not trying to be controversial and I certainly am not agreeing with them, I think this discussion goes into a lot of nuance very quickly because digital products and the way they have been set up meshes poorly (well?) with a lot of older legislature.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

Valve can take away your copy of a game at any time. That’s bad. But that’s how it works. It is not defending them to describe that as being how it works. (I think?)

200

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

I’m…literally not defending them? I am stating what game devs - again, not just Sony - say about how games are “owned”. I think you are trying to argue with me when I don’t think we don’t see eye to eye on this at all.

100

Kit Harrison @kitharrison.com · 02/09/2026

This is incredibly frustrating. The entire game preservation movement exists to combat these systems and legislations. Of course they exist as they do presently. I can’t believe people can be mad about me describing the way they have been used for ages.

100