Sign in

iiinova is part of the Atmosphere — an open, public network where you own your identity.

Kevin Carson

@KevinCarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy
54 followers 3 following 1K posts

Freelance writer and anarchist kevinacarson.org C4SS.org @kevincarson1.bsky.social Patreon.com/KevinCarson 🌉 bridged from ⁂ kolektiva.social/@KevinCarson1, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

PostsRepliesMedia
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 12h
Zorak hitting Space Ghost's grandpa with a folding chair
010 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 12h
Center for a Stateless Society » Review. CLR James: Cultivator of the Popular Will, by Matthew Quest c4ss.org/content/61326
c4ss.org
Review. CLR James: Cultivator of the Popular Will, by Matthew Quest
Matthew Quest. CLR James: Cultivator of the Popular Will. A Study of the History and Politics of World Revolution (Brill, 2026). As Matthew Quest notes in his appendix, “Top Ten Reasons We Don’t Know More about CLR James,” CLR James is a relatively obscure thinker even among the African-American left. This is doubly so on...
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 15/10/2026
New Pokemon just dropped: Splortoise www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9tI9Adj494
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 15/10/2026
I’m Huffing Computer Duster Because AI Will Reverse My Brain Damage — MoreWrong morewrong.lol/?post=im-huffing-comp…
morewrong.lol
I’m Huffing Computer Duster Because AI Will Reverse My Brain Damage
Some Silicon Valley researchers have reportedly begun smoking cigarettes to demonstrate their confidence that AI will cure cancer. I respect the impulse, but it betrays a lack of ambition. Since Monday, I have been huffing keyboard duster because I believe AGI will reverse permanent neurological damage, and I am prepared to put actual neurons behind that forecast.
020 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 09/10/2026
If there's one thing I hate in LOTR it's Frodo being framed as gentry and all the "Mr Frodo" this and "Mr Frodo" that. It's like some kind of Russell Kirk fantasy of 18th century England. I'd like to know how the Bagginses came to own all that land and how Sam's ancestors came to be working for […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
002 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
Pluralistic: Voting is to politics as shopping is to boycotts (01 Oct 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow pluralistic.net/2026/10/01/data-cen…
pluralistic.net
Pluralistic: Voting is to politics as shopping is to boycotts (01 Oct 2026)
# Today's links * Voting is to politics as shopping is to boycotts: The big P only matters if the small p is in play. * Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. * Object permanence: Gilberto Gil v WIPO; Censored Apple wifi hacker talk; Wells Fargo crime-spree started in 1998; Stencils "may not be reproduced"; DVD Jon v Apple DRM; Unpaid diplomatic parking tickets as index of corruption; Tortured Canadian was not a terrorist; Decarbonization at a distance. * Upcoming appearances: Brighton, Virtual, South Bend, Hudson, Calgary, Winnipeg, Paris, Vancouver, Victoria, Ottawa, Kilkenny, Montreal. * Recent appearances: Where I've been. * Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. * Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. * Colophon: All the rest. * * * # Voting is to politics as shopping is to boycotts (permalink) Here's a funny thing about the right to vote: it wasn't won by voting. From the Magna Carta to the US Constitution to the Emancipation Proclamation to 19th Amendment, voting rights (what you might call "Big P" Politics) were always downstream of protests, riots, petitions, mass movements, strikes and good, old fashioned community organizing (that is, "small p" politics). Which is to say, Big P politics matter, but to _make_ them matter, we need a lot of small p politics. That means that democracy isn't something you do every couple of years with a ballot paper (though that's an important aspect of the process). Democracy is continuous. If you've ever wondered why your vote seems to accomplish so little, I think you can blame the near-abolition of small p politics by Big P politicians of every stripe. Indeed, Obama's genius was summoning up an army of door-knocking, phone-banking small p political activists and then euthanizing that organization after he won the election: https://newrepublic.com/article/140245/obamas-lost-army-inside-fall-grassroots-machine For Obama, the grassroots were useful for one thing: getting out the vote. The last thing he wanted was for millions of activated voters to turn into activists who'd flame him and harangue him and picket him if they didn't like his compromises. Boy, did Obama ever compromise. He let the bank executives who created the Great Financial Crisis off the hook and encouraged them to foreclose on the homes of millions of Americans, the very same public that had bailed them out: https://theweek.com/articles/624777/obamas-biggest-failure He shielded the CIA's torturers from scrutiny and prosecution: https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/2009/04/obama-publishes-torture-memos-immunizes-cia-staff/ He reneged on his promise to shut down Gitmo: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/obama-failed-close-guantanamo And his promise to hold the phone companies to account for their complicity in the NSA's mass domestic surveillance: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/obama-on-mass-government-surveillance-then-and-now/ He stepped up secret drone warfare: https://www.cfr.org/articles/obamas-final-drone-strike-data And unconstitutional domestic surveillance: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/01/obama-expands-surveillance-powers-his-way-out Whenever I raise this, Obama's apologists come out of the woodwork to tell me that "the president isn't the Green Lantern," and that Obama couldn't act without help from Congress and the Senate, who wouldn't back his plays. I think that Trump's presidency has shown us how much power the president really has even when the legislature won't play ball. But even if you accept the Green Lantern apologetics, the fact remains that Obama _could_ have had a clamoring army of ardent supporters in the streets, defending his agenda against recalcitrants in his own party and wreckers in the GOP. He _chose_ not to have that army. He sent that army home. It's like Obama heard the story about post-election FDR telling civil rights leaders, "I want to do it, now make me do it," and concluded, "I don't want to do it, so I'd better not let anyone make me do it": https://www.quora.com/Did-Franklin-Roosevelt-ever-say-I-agree-with-you-I-want-to-do-it-now-make-me-do-it Of course, Trump is doing everything he can to extinguish _both_ small p politics _and_ Big P Politics. It's not just his wildly illegal voter suppression tactics. He's banning and prosecuting political groups, invoking anti-terror laws (which Obama supported and promised would only be used proportionately and wisely) to chase his grassroots opposition underground: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/designating-antifa-as-a-domestic-terrorist-organization/ Liberals are often contemptuous of grassroots movements (cf "basket of deplorables," "Green Lantern" scolding), but the right is _terrified_ of them. The right's political leadership is terrified of its own grassroots, and rightly so, because those people are _maniacs_ , and they're the reason the GOP has been pushed into its most extreme positions. The right's grassroots, meanwhile, are afraid of _the left's grassroots_. The last thing they want is a militant, organized, mobilized base pushing Dem politicians to take the stands that are wildly and widely popular in America, from Medicare for All to an end to ICE – the Mamdani agenda, in other words. Mamdani is the anti-Obama. He shows what happens when a progressive candidate nurtures and co-governs with their base after the election, using millions of passionate, committed, everyday people to steamroller anyone who gets in the way of his agenda: https://www.nyc.gov/content/100days/pages/ Of course the downside of this is that when Mamdani reneges on his pledges, he is loudly and furiously held to account for it: https://www.thecityreporter.nyc/2026/02/19/mamdani-budget-parks-libraries/ Mamdani understood that he would be corralled into compromises if he won the mayoralty and that when he made those compromises, his base would come after him with the unmistakable fury of betrayed idealists. He also understood that any comfort he enjoyed by sidelining his base while in office would come at a price far higher than being yelled at by his supporters: it would cost him the ability to get _anything_ done. Voting for Mamdani was important. It got him elected. But staying organized – in unions, neighborhood clubs, affinity groups, DSA chapters and mutual aid groups – is what's letting him get stuff done, and stopping him from bailing on his promises as politically infeasible. In other words, voting only matters if it's the final stage of a sustained campaign to build and mobilize popular power. Without that, voting will get you precious little. The right's leadership understands this very well, which is why they've spent years attacking unions, community organizers like Acorn, and activist institutions like Planned Parenthood. We must defend voting rights – Big P Politics – to the bitter end, but we need to defend organizing – small p politics – just as ferociously. The reduction of politics to voting is part of the 50 year neoliberal project whose foremost goal is to make you think of yourself as an atomized individual and not as a member of a polity. Turning "politics" into "voting" is absolutely in line with Margaret Thatcher's dictum that "there is no such thing as society." It's the same move that convinced workers that the answer to bad working conditions is looking your boss in the eye and threatening to change jobs (not forming a union and striking). It's also the same move that transformed "boycotts" into "shopping." Boycotts are a collective enterprise. Before a boycott takes place, small-p political groups hold meetings, organize alternatives and communicate their demands. During a boycott, organizers work to insulate participants from reprisals, like the Montgomery Bus Boycott organizers who reasoned and remonstrated with employers who disciplined workers whose participation made them late for work. And yes, as part of a boycott, you make some consumption choices. You buy X instead of Y. But "shopping" by itself isn't a boycott. You can't "vote with your wallet" (especially not when billionaires get to vote against you with _their_ wallets): https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/13/consumption-choices/#marginal-benefits Shopping isn't politics, and while voting _is_ Politics (Big P), it's _also_ not politics (small p). A boycott, on the other hand, _is_ politics. What's more, "shopping" has the same relationship to "boycotts" that "voting" has to "politics." It's a _step_ you take, _after_ you've laid a lot of groundwork with other people, as part of a mass movement. I understand why shopping and voting are more attractive than boycotts and politics. Meetings suck. Hell is other people: https://locusmag.com/feature/commentary-cory-doctorow-hell-is-other-people/ But changing the system requires systemic work. Hell is other people because other people are _great_ but it's _so hard_ to get them to do things your way. That takes time and understanding and togetherness and arguing and forgiving. Not everyone has time or capacity for that, and at any given time, we don't _all_ have to be doing that work. We can take turns, spelling each other off at times in our lives when we have more or less slack. But _lots_ of us have to be in the fight, or _all_ of us will get screwed. There aren't enough of us doing politics right now. We can tell, because our politicians are so contemptuous of the grassroots that they will sell us out without a moment's hesitation, smugly certain that they will face no consequences for doing so: https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/22/happy-chudmas/#baloney-in-our-slacks Oligarchs have it easy. Where we have to convince people to fight, they can pay or threaten people to bring them into line. But oligarchs' power is wearing thin. The data-center uprising shows how much fury there is out there, looking for a productive outlet: https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/with-the-backlash-to-data-centers Data centers are very bad and very visible, so they make for good targets. But data centers are only the physical extrusion of a vast, brutal, extractive system. The most important way to fight data centers is to take everyone you meet protesting one and organize with them to scare the shit out of "your" politicians so they don't _dare_ compromise on _anything_. * * * # Hey look at this (permalink) * The Facebook Fake-out https://www.anildash.com/2026/09/29/facebook-fake-out/ * Anatomy Unzipped: John of Arderne’s Sweden Scroll (ca. 1425–35) https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/arderne-scroll/ * Inside McDonald’s push to have AI price your Big Mac https://www.reuters.com/business/inside-mcdonalds-push-have-ai-price-your-big-mac-2026-09-29/ * what is going on with ceiling fans https://mcmansionhell.com/post/829127919552151552/what-is-going-on-with-ceiling-fans * From Shitpost to Bullshit https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/from-shitpost-to-bullshit * * * # Object permanence (permalink) #25yrsago GWB's press secretary to media: "watch what you do, watch what you say" https://web.archive.org/web/20010926223602/https://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010926-5.html#BillMaher-Comments#BillMaher-Comments #20yrsago Stencils kit “may not be reproduced in any form” https://web.archive.org/web/20061022000842/http://www.fairuseday.com/index.php/2006/10/01/copyright-is-broken/ #20yrsago DVD Jon selling Apple DRM to Apple’s competitors https://web.archive.org/web/20061004191106/https://featured.gigaom.com/2006/10/02/dvd-jon-fairplays-apple/ #20yrsago Unpaid diplomatic parking tickets as index of national corruption https://web.archive.org/web/20130719065306/https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/10/primary-sources/305203/ #20yrsago Canadian deported to Syria for torture is cleared https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/02/worlddispatch #20yrsago Gilberto Gil slams WIPO https://fromgeneva.blogspot.com/2006/09/wipo-general-assembly-impressions-from.html #20yrsago Speech given by censored Apple WiFi hacker at ToorCon https://craphound.com/cache_toorcon_2006.txt #10yrsago Company suspected of blame in Office of Personnel Management breach will help run new clearance agency https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-security-background-idUSKCN1202M6/ #10yrsago Wells Fargo started demanding fraud of its employees in 1998; Illinois cuts Wells off from state business https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/wells-fargo-king-of-cross-sell.pdf #10yrsago Google: if you support Amazon’s Echo, you’re cut off from Google Home and Chromecast https://variety.com/2016/digital/news/google-home-amazon-echo-chromecast-1201874125/ #5yrsago How the IMF loan-sharks the global south https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/02/debt-trap/#global-arm-breakers #1yrago Decarbonization at a distance https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/02/there-goes-the-sun/#carbon-shifting * * * # Upcoming appearances (permalink) https://www.epl.ca/blogs/post/elbows-up-with-cory-doctorow/ * Brighton: Digital Sovereignty and the Post-American Internet (Green Party Conference), Oct 3 https://www.openrightsgroup.org/events/digital-sovereignty-and-the-post-american-internet/ * Virtual: How to govern technology in a multipolar digital world (Connecting Current), Oct 6 https://connectingcurrent.tech/how-to-govern-technology-a-multipolar-digital-world/ * South Bend: An Evening With Cory Doctorow (Notre Dame), Oct 6 https://franco.nd.edu/events/2026/10/06/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow/ * Hudson, OH: Hudson Library, Oct 7 https://engagedpatrons.org/EventsExtended.cfm?SiteID=3850&EventID=596952&PK= * Calgary: Wordfest, Oct 8 https://wordfest.com/2026/show/wordfest-presents-cory-doctorow-2026/ * Winnipeg: McNally Robinson, Oct 9 https://www.mcnallyrobinson.com/event-18991/An-Evening-with-Cory-Doctorow * Paris: Slow Tech Summit, Oct 15 https://slowtechsummit.com/ * Vancouver: Read, Resist, Repair, Rejoice (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 19 https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/01 * Victoria: Munro's Books, Oct 20 https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020 * Vancouver: Life After AI (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 22 https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/46 * Ottawa: Life After AI (Ottawa Writers Festival), Oct 24 https://writersfestival.org/event/life-after-ai * Kilkenny (Kilkenomics), Nov 6-8 https://kilkenomics.com/ * Vancouver: Enshittification (Sid Williams Theatre Society), Nov 10 https://www.sidwilliamstheatre.com/events/cory-doctorow-talks-enshittification/ * Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12 https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/ * Montreal: World Science Fiction Convention, Sep 2-6 https://montreal2027.ca/en * * * # Recent appearances (permalink) * Terms of Service with Clare Duffy (CNN) https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/terms-of-service-with-clare-duffy/episodes/458ce968-af5d-11f0-b539-13ed2afe25f8 * AI, Work, and Power (Software Engineering Daily) AI, Work, and Power https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/podcasts/cory-doctorow-on-ai-work-and-power/ * AI, Corporate Power, and the Fight for Worker Control (Plutopia) https://plutopia.io/cory-doctorow-ai-corporate-power-and-the-fight-for-worker-control/ * How to Think About AI—Before It’s Too Late (Daniel Solove) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xR3uEgGcc * Could Tech Bosses Destroy Life As We Know It? (Politics JOE) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL4VktU0SgY * * * # Latest books (permalink) * "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/ * "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce * "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/ * "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels). * "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org). * "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org). * "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245). * "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com. * "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com * * * # Upcoming books (permalink) * "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to _Enshittification_ , Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027 * "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027 * "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027 * "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027 * * * # Colophon (permalink) Today's top sources: **Currently writing:** * “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 509 (20770 total). * "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor. * A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING * * * This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution. * * * # How to get Pluralistic: Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): Pluralistic.net Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://pluralistic.net/plura-list Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection): https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net Medium (no ads, paywalled): https://doctorow.medium.com/ Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising): https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic "_When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla_ " -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer. ISSN: 3066-764X ### Like this: Like Loading…
001 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
RE: mstdn.social/@mcnado/11736368053889… Shit, I think it's a Hippocratic oath violation for a doctor to even work for an insurance company and use their training to deny people care they need.
mstdn.social
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 27/09/2026
"But here is the problem. The gap between hyperscaler spending and cash flow is widening fast." thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2026…
thenextrecession.wordpress.com
AI: the biggest economic bet in US history
The US economy continues to expand faster than other G7 economies, but the driver is the humungous investment in AI models, data centres and all the AI-related chips and technology. The US composite PMI (economic activity measure) rose to 58.4 fom 56 in August, the strongest expansion in private-sector activity since July 2021 and marking a fourth consecutive month of accelerating growth. The gains were driven by the service sector (including information services) with the steepest rise in output for over five years, while manufacturing also accelerated. New orders grew at the fastest pace since April 2022, while manufacturing hiring was the strongest since February 2021. Back in June, I commented that AI was just ‘one big trade for the US economy’. But now in September that appears to be an understatement. The AI build-out is on track to become the biggest economic bet in US history, dwarfing the investments made to fund other huge US infrastructure projects in the past, such as the railroads in the 19th century, the highway system in 20th century and the internet in the 21st century. Analysts estimate that capital spending at five of the so-called hyperscalers—Alphabet, Amazon.com, Meta Platforms, Microsoft and Oracle—will be $4.2 trillion in the four years ending in 2029, according to FactSet. Data-centre spending is greater than that for the canals, railroads and grid combined, projected to total $10.3 trillion from 2025 to 2032, according to new estimates by the Brookings Institution. That is a staggering average 3.6% of GDP a year. Never before has the US economy been so dependent on the build-out of a single industry. Up to July, $37 billion has been spent on private data-centres with most still not operating. In contrast, US private construction spending on everything else—houses, apartment buildings, shopping centers and so on—was about $46 billion _below_ year-earlier levels in the first seven months of this year. AI investment has created 750,000 new jobs since 2023, according to LinkedIn estimates. And those jobs pay well: the median annual salary for AI-related job listings on LinkedIn is around $180,000, compared with $80,000 for all jobs. Above all, the AI investment has led to huge gains in stock-market wealth. As of Q2 2026, US stock and mutual fund holdings came to $63 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve—nearly double the amount at the end of 2022. Most of this increase in financial wealth has gone to the already rich, as working people own little stocks or bonds. Foreign investors are piling into US assets. They now hold a record $39 trillion in US equities and bonds, up since 2022.. This is keeping the US dollar relatively strong and driving up stock prices. The wars in Ukraine and Iran encourage foreigners to shift their assets to the US to take advantage of the boom. At the same time, demand for equipment that goes into data centres like memory chips is driving up costs for tech products. Import prices on computers, peripherals (such as hard drives) and semiconductors were 20% higher in August than a year earlier. These high import prices are in turn putting upward pressure on the costs of consumer goods, such as iPhones and gaming consoles, and contributing to general inflation. But here is the problem. The gap between hyperscaler spending and cash flow is widening fast. Capital expenditures at Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet are projected to exceed $1 trillion in 2027 for the first time. At the same time, combined ‘free cash flow’ (ie money from profits in existing businesses) is projected to fall below $100 billion. A year ago, free cash flow was around $200 billion, while capex was $300 billion. Now, AI spending is accelerating at the same time as the cash available to fund it is disappearing. The bigger this gap becomes, the more the hyperscalers need to rely on debt and equity markets to finance their AI spend. The issue is that if AI spending fails to generate sufficient returns (profits), the stock market could take sharp turn downward as investors bail out. US stock market prices are massively overvalued relative to existing earnings. The trend ratio of stock market prices to earnings per share (called the CAPE ratio) is above the level just before the 2008 financial crash and nearly at the level just before the dot.com bust of 2000. Will profits come through? Research by Fathom Consulting shows that for the multitrillion-dollar AI boom to turn a profit, it would need the AI-related sales of the tech companies involved to rise by $600-800bn within the next two years. But the consulting firm Panmure Liberum calculated that current CAPEX and revenue forecasts through 2030 imply a _negative_ internal rate of return on invested capital for Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle. So either the hyperscalers significantly reduce their capital spending on AI to levels that generate a reasonable profit on capital already invested or by some miracle they deliver massive profitablity from a huge future increase in demand for AI products. If they cut spending, that would signal to investors that AI is not delivering and they would sell off accordingly. A crash would ensue. So they must keep spending more and more. At the same time, what companies can charge for AI computing costs (tokens) is falling fast. The LLM Token Expenditure Index, which tracks the market price companies pay for AI model output, has fallen to just $0.97, its lowest level since the index was created late last year and more than 50% below its summer peak. Token prices are collapsing as cheaper models, open-source Chinese competitors and falling training (inference) costs make AI usage increasingly cheap. That is eroding revenue growth for the AI labs, making it more difficult to meet the bills for AI infrastructure spend. The AI labs (OpenAi and Anthropic) continue to claim they will soon make big profits and so the hyperscalers will eventually get their share of the booty. But much of these claims are based on dubious profit estimates. AI-related investment gains increasingly flatter earnings, with so-called “other income” (contracts with other AI firms) rising to 54% of pretax income. Indeed, the AI companies are keeping their heads above water only through what is called ‘circular financing’ where one firm lends funds to another and the latter then claims it has made a profit. Sona Asset Management have mapped the AI universe and catalogued the interconnections between major players. Everybody is depending on everybody else to deliver. Sona also found that AI firms’ revenue is almost completely tied to the capex decisions of one or two other AI players. This is a systemic bust in the making. A key question is whether AI is actually going to deliver a step-change in US labour productivity that could boost economic progress for a generation. The AI lab, Anthropic, wants to issue shares worth $100bn to the public in November (thus valuing the company at $2trn!). To build up its case, it published a report in which it claimed that if AI really takes off, US GDP could rise by 32% by 2030(!), that’s annual growth in GDP of up to 15% (against current US growth at 2.5% at best). This is wild nonsense that assumes that AI works in boosting productivity growth as every company in the US adopts AI agents and tools to run their businesses, while sacking millions of workers who are no longer needed. Historically, automation has historically proceeded at roughly 2% of tasks per year for two centuries, without ever pushing growth much above 2%. Past so-called ‘general-purpose technologies’ took decades to diffuse even after the technology itself worked. For example, electrification took around 40 years to show up in factory productivity. Similarly, Comin and Mestieri’s study of technology adoption across countries documents average adoption lags of around 45 years, and still 7-18 years for more recent technologies. AI adoption appears to be much faster than that of the PC or the internet, but adoption is only the first step: measured productivity typically first _falls_ while firms make the necessary complementary investments, the “productivity J-curve” of Brynjolfsson, Rock and Syverson. Even the most bullish insiders are noticing this, for example Sam Altman who recently conceded: _“I think I was wrong about a few things, but one of them, in terms of the speed, one of them is the economy just has so much inertia. […] we’ve all been too ambitious on timelines […] Society and the economy will adapt more slowly.”_ And remember most work is physical _._ An AI capability explosion is first and foremost an explosion in _cognitive_ capabilities. But only around a third of the economy consists of work that can be done on a computer (Epoch AI’s remote-work piece). The rest of GDP is produced in mines, on construction sites, in kitchens, hospitals and care homes. Automating two thirds of all tasks by 2035 therefore requires robots that do a large share of physical work. These robots would need to be designed, manufactured, installed and maintained by the billions within a decade. While progress is certainly happening, robotics development is slower than software development and robots that can do a wide range of physical tasks at close to the cost of a worker are still not on the horizon. So far there is scant evidence of economy-wide productivity gains; in fact, total factor productivity (a measure of productivity from new technologies) is falling below trend. It’s true that AI adoption by companies is picking up, at least among service companies. In just two years, AI usage has risen from 25% to 61% among service firms and from 16% to 51% among manufacturers. But only 17% of employees in services and 7% in manufacturing are actually using AI regularly in their work. As the Federal Bank of New York admitted: “ _The next stage will be much more important as, for the moment, AI mainly helps people write, summarize, code or analyze faster. Tomorrow, agents and specialized tools could handle entire workflows. At that moment, the impact on productivity and employment could really move to another level. Usage is exploding while corporate spending remains relatively limited but the price of intelligence keeps falling. Very bullish for AI diffusion and productivity and much less obviously bullish for the monetization of every player in the ecosystem.”_ In other words, productivity growth may eventually rise but at the expense of profitability as AI prices for usage fall: a classic contradiction for capitalism. And there remain faultlines in the very nature of AI Large Language Models. Two years ago Oxford and Cambridge Researchers proved that every LLM trained only on AI-generated content develops an irreversible disorder. Each new model learns only from what the one before it wrote. By generation nine, the new model had forgotten what it was talking about. Ask it about medieval church towers and it answers with a list of jackrabbits. They called it ‘model collapse’. Every time someone posts machine output, the next model gets a little more average. The warning signs of the coming crash keep multiplying. An upward trend in interest rates amid falling bond prices could be the crisis-triggering factor. Or it could be a failed IPO (Anthropic, OpenAI), or surging competition from so-called ‘open weight’ LLM models from China and elsewhere driving down profits. The biggest bet in US economic history is a very risky one. ### Share this: * Share * * Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook * Share on X (Opens in new window) X * Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit * Like Loading... ### _Related_
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 25/09/2026
Long, thoughtful piece by Matthew Quest. As I told Matthew, I mostly agree with this. But it's not a question of whether we should use people like Mamdani as a primary vehicle. Obviously not. Mamdani, AOC, Bernie, Lumumba, &c, are tools with a limited use, in the box with many other tools at our […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 22/09/2026
How to disable or avoid intrusive AI – librarian.net www.librarian.net/notoai
librarian.net
How to disable or avoid intrusive AI
[_Put on your own oxygen mask first! Image from San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives_] One of the biggest questions I get at Drop-In Time at the library (besides “what is taking up all my cloud storage?”) is how to disable or avoid intrusive AI that shows up where people don’t want it. This is a guide for people who would like less intrusive AI in their tech environment. Maybe you like AI and find it useful? That’s fine, this document is probably not for you. Additions/edits welcome. Leave a comment or drop me an email. This page is available at the short URL https://NoToAI.org ## Adobe Acrobat * Windows: **Menu > Preferences > Generative AI** * macOS: **View > Preferences > Generative AI** Uncheck the checkbox on the page, click **Save**. It’s possible that newer versions of Acrobat will not that that option. In that case look for this option which will disable AI as well as some other UI stuff. **View > Preferences > Disable New Acrobat** ## Adobe Reader Choose **Disable new Acrobat Reader** from the top menu (upper left), approve the dialog box and restart. ## Android/Gemini Depending on your phone’s manufacturer, you may be able to uninstall the Gemini app entirely. If not, there are some application-specific ways you can turn off some of its features ### Messages Tap **your account** picture, select **Messages settings** , then **Gemini in Messages** , and toggle the assistant off. ### Other features in other apps Tap your profile icon, select **Gemini Apps activity** , and then choose **Turn off** or **Turn off and delete activity**. Next, tap the profile icon again and go to the **Connected Apps** setting (check the **Personal Intelligence** setting). Disable all the apps where you don’t want Gemini. ### Power Button If Gemini has “taken over” your power button, you can turn this off. Go to **Settings,** then **System** , then **Gestures** and change the settings under **Press & Hold Power Button** If that doesn’t work you can try opening **Settings** , then searching for **Power key** ## Amazon If you would like to disable the “Alexa for Shopping” slider on Amazon you can install a browser extension for Chrome or for Firefox ## Apple Intelligence & Siri Only exists on iPhone 16 and newer Macs and iPads Open **Settings** (iPhone or iPad) or **System Settings** (Mac) and choose**Apple Intelligence & Siri**. Then turn off the **Apple Intelligence** option. Confirm your choice in the dialog that appears by tapping **Turn Off Apple Intelligence**. More details on how to turn off specific parts of Apple Intelligence and leave others alone. Apple has a “learn from this application” feature which can be on even when Apple Intelligence is not on. To turn it off For Mac: go to **System Settings** – **Apple Intelligence & Siri**. Select **About Siri, Dictation & Privacy…** near the end of the page, turn off apps you don’t want Siri to learn from For iOS: **Settings** – **Apple Intelligence & Siri**, scroll down to **Apps** , disable “Learn from this App” ## Browser-embedded AI There are alternative browsers such as Zen or Helium or LibreWolf or Waterfox, which are Firefox and Chromium based respectively. ### Chrome/AI Nano Type **chrome://flags** into the address bar and hit **Enter**. You’ll see a list of system flags and a search bar; look for **GLIC** [Google live in Chrome]. This will filter the massive list down to about a dozen AI features. The second search term you’ll need in this window is “**Gemini** ” set them all to “disabled.” Don’t accidentally enable the couple of settings which default to disabled. ### Edge Similar to Chrome: type **edge://flags** into the Edge address bar, hit **Enter** , then type “**AI** ” or “**Copilot** ” into the search box. Click **Appearance** in the left-hand Settings sidebar, and scroll down to **Copilot and sidebar** Turn the sidebar **off** , and turn off the “**Personalize my top sites in customize sidebar** ” and “**Allow sidebar apps to show notifications** ” toggles. Click**Copilot** under **App specific settings**. Turn off “**Show Copilot button on the toolbar**.” Then, back in the **Copilot and sidebar** settings, turn off the **“Show sidebar button”** toggle that has just appeared. Click **Languages** in the left-hand navigation. Disable **“Use Copilot for writing on the web.”** ### Firefox The latest Firefox (148 and later) has a feature to block all AI enhancements. So update, if you can, go to **Settings** and look for **AI Controls**. Turn **Block AI Enhancements** on (or select more granularly from the list) Using Firefox, this extension removes a lot of the AI junk if you use Google as your default search engine. * * * * More details on removing AI slop from search results in different browsers. * Here is a link for how to do this in DuckDuckGo and Bing. * TenBlueLinks gives you some simple steps to do this in Chrome/Firefox ### DuckDuckGo DDG is both a browser and a search engine. They have a no-AI version you can get to by going to https://noai.duckduckgo.com/ You can also change your default search engine to this and stop using Google, here are steps for every browser. If you want to go all out and get the DDG browser, they also have instructions on how to do that. ## Google Workspace (Gmail, Google Docs &c) In Gmail, click the Settings (gear) icon, and then select **See all settings**. On the **General** tab, scroll down to **Google Workspace smart features**. Click **Manage Workspace smart feature settings** and toggle off two options: **Smart features in Google Workspace** and **Smart features in other Google products**. Uncheck the box next to **Turn on smart features in Gmail, Chat, and Meet** on the same tab. In Gmail for Android the workspace smart features are under the **Gmail hamburger/dropdown** menu – **Settings** – **Account name** ## Slack Owners and admins of Slack workspaces have some options in disabling AI features. Here is their help page about managing those features. ## WhatsApp AI lives in here in a few places. Suggested Replies, go to **Settings – Chats – Suggestions & smart replies** and toggle off **Suggested replies**. **AI Sticker suggestions** can be shut off in that same menu. For AI message summaries, those are managed in a different location: **Settings – Notifications – AI message summaries**. Depending on what operating system you’re running, it may also be in **Settings – Chat – Private Processing – Private Processing Features** ## Windows 11/Copilot Copilot exists both as an embedded AI agent in Office 365 and also built into the Windows 11 operating system. Right-click the **Copilot** entry in the **Start** menu and select **Uninstall**. If that option isn’t there, head over to your installed apps list (**Start – Settings – Apps**) and uninstall Copilot from there. In certain builds of Windows 11, Copilot is stuck into the OS, so a simple uninstall might not work. In that case, you can toggle it off via the settings: **Start – Settings – Personalization – Taskbar** –**turn off Copilot** **File Explorer** has some AI built into it which can be turn-onable accidentally. To remove. **Start – Settings – Privacy & Security – Click to Do.** **Notepad** has its own special Copilot, so you’ll need to disable AI there separately. Open the Notepad settings, find the **AI features** section (or a sparkly icon near a **Writing Tools** section), and toggle Copilot off. **Office 365/Outlook** There is a separate **Enable Copilot** checkbox in each app and the checkbox only applies to that app on that device. Read more about how to turn it off. If you don’t have that option, you can change your privacy settings to disable Copilot. “**Text and image generation** ” are turned on by default, affecting Notepad, Photos, Snipping Tool, and Xbox. Turn this off. It is complicated, though not impossible, to remove Copilot from your Windows computer entirely. Here is a link that gets into the details. If you feel comfortable installing software O&O ShutUp 10 is one way to do that, Win11DeBloat is another. ## Yahoo Mail Cick the **… More** on the bottom of the left-hand sidebar, select **Settings,** select **AI Features** and switch Message summaries off. ## Zoom Sign in at Zoom.com. Scroll to **My Account** on the left and select **Settings**. Go to the **Zoom AI** tab on the right where you can disable everything. Note: new AI options get added and they default to “on” so check back. To the right of the **Zoom AI** tab click on **My Notes** and disable “Allow participants to transcribe meetings with My Notes” ## Other useful AI Removal/Detection links * How to un-AI your internet * Library Freedom Project has a lot of handouts about AI on their Resources page * Do Not Talk To Me About “AI” printable cards Inspired by the librarians from Bangor. _Last updated 08sep26_
011 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/09/2026
There are three principles at the core of all conservative ideology: 1) An organic social order with natural inequality. There are reciprocal duties of protection and obedience between the stations or orders, but the interpretation and enforcement is entirely on the side of the superiors. (See […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
012 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/09/2026
Fundraiser by William Staples : Help Will and Mom Stay Housed www.gofundme.com/f/help-will-and-mo…
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 18/09/2026
Aeris was kind enough to read my two-part study on money and credit, gave me a lot of feedback and clarifying questions that I incorporated into the book based on it, and wrote this amazing article. aeris.baby/?p=1216
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 12/09/2026
Center for a Stateless Society » Capitalism in Inches and Pounds: A Parable c4ss.org/content/61050
000 0
Reposted by Kevin Carson
Simon Brooke @simon-brooke.mastodon.scot.ap.brid.gy · 12/09/2026
"There’s the image of the Green Zone, this Emerald City run by the US in the middle of Baghdad, built by Halliburton and all of these private contractors... these contractors migrated [from Iraq] to Hurricane Katrina, and the idea that these climate disasters are their next growth frontier […]
mastodon.scot
Original post on mastodon.scot
003 3
Reposted by Kevin Carson
David Gerard @davidgerard.circumstances.run.ap.brid.gy · 11/09/2026
i didn't spend eight years in the crypto mines for you shitheads to kramer into my mentions to tell me why fucking crypto of all things is good actually
3180 18
Reposted by Kevin Carson
Talia Hussain @talia.mstdn.social.ap.brid.gy · 10/09/2026
Alex Winter seems like a fantastic person. “Who would I most like to melvin or wedgie? Elon Musk” www.theguardian.com/film/2026/sep/1…
theguardian.com
Alex Winter: ‘Michael Winner was the most erudite sociopath I’ve ever met’
The Bill & Ted actor on Keanu Reeves, whether there will be a fourth instalment and nights out in Brixton with the Death Wish director
101 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
Trump reveals new robo-dick
Trump, in wide stance, on airport tarmac. Due to perspective, mic boom in front of him appears to be penis projecting from body.
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
"Oligarchy is not first and foremost a product of the system of taxation, and it never has been. It is rather a product of the pre-distribution of wealth through state-created special economic privileges." www.counterpunch.org/2026/09/04/oli…
counterpunch.org
Oligarchy and Redistribution: A Reply to Paul Krugman
The Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman continues his “series on the rise of American oligarchy” this week by discussing “the decades-long dismantling of the system of progressive taxation.” Krugman defines oligarchy “as the extreme concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of a small number of people—not the 1 percent, but the .01 percent or even the .0001 percent, the 300 billionaires who made 19 percent of all reported federal political donations in the 2024 election.” He argues that widespread tax avoidance, and accordingly the plummeting of effective tax rates, is largely responsible for giving us a system of oligarchy. More The post Oligarchy and Redistribution: A Reply to Paul Krugman appeared first on CounterPunch.org.
011 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
Center for a Stateless Society » An Attack on Tech Freedom, an Assault on Dissent c4ss.org/content/61296
001 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 07/09/2026
Aragorn: How long do you need? Theoden: As long as you can give me! Michael Scott: That's what she said!
010 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 06/09/2026
There was a Beverly Hillbillies episode where Granny thought women's pro wrestling was real. A wrestler named "Rebecca of Donnybrook Farm," in pigtails, who supposedly wrestled to pay the mortgage on the farm, kept getting beat up by big butch women. Cunningham and Gaines serve the same kayfabe […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 06/09/2026
Miss Kitty's game plan: 1. Push door shut 2. ?? 3. ???
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 01/09/2026
Three Sets: A Model for the United Front convergencemag.com/articles/three-s…
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 31/08/2026
It's ironic that RFK Jr has the philosophy of John Harvey Kellogg in The Road to Wellville, but looks like his disease-ridden, rotting adopted son George.
020 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 31/08/2026
This is how "Rewrite with AI?" prompts sound to me www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5oCa31udj4
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 29/08/2026
RE: urusai.social/@ami_angelwings/11717… A guy changes from one government job to another so he can stalk a woman he saw by chance and became infatuated with.
urusai.social
010 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 21/08/2026
Kansas Trans Guys Using Women’s Bathrooms as Protest | Them www.them.us/politics/kansas-trans-g…
them.us
Kansas Trans Guys Are Using Women’s Bathrooms, as Legally Required, as a Form of Protest
A group of transgender men who call themselves the "SB244 compliance crew” have been using women’s bathrooms in protest of a Kansas law that mandates that they do so.
011 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
Immanuel Wallerstein Predicted the Fall of the US Empire jacobin.com/2026/08/wallerstein-wor…
jacobin.com
Immanuel Wallerstein Predicted the Fall of the US Empire
In July 2002, Immanuel Wallerstein appeared on C-SPAN’s morning call-in program. He had just written an essay for Foreign Policy magazine with a provocative title: “The Eagle Has Crash Landed.” Wallerstein argued that the US position of dominance on the world stage was in decline.As he was speaking, less than a year had passed since the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the subsequent US invasion of Afghanistan. The Bush administration was preparing its military and the American public for the invasion of Iraq that would begin in March 2003.George W. Bush, it should be remembered, was a popular figure at the time. The president’s approval rating hit a record 90 percent the previous September, and remained over 70 percent when Wallerstein went public with his message of decline.However, it must have seemed to Wallerstein precisely the right moment to intervene. He had written about US hegemonic decline since the early 1980s. Yet he still believed, in the moment between the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, that America had the opportunity to effectively manage its decline.Wallerstein did not think it was possible to extend a great power’s global dominance indefinitely. He saw that great powers become hegemonic — a term that refers to unmatched global dominance — due to economic, political, and military factors that also ultimately cause such hegemony to erode. US hegemonic decline began much earlier than 9/11, with the economic downturn of the 1970s and the American war in Vietnam.For Wallerstein, the United States faced the choice of all waning hegemonic powers: to decline gracefully or to decline precipitously. George W. Bush chose the latter. Today Donald Trump has further accelerated US decline by aggressively deploying one of the few weapons left for a dying hegemon: its extremely strong military.Cycles of HegemonyWhy was US hegemony in decline? For Wallerstein, American hegemony of the twentieth century hardly differed from Dutch hegemony of the seventeenth century or British hegemony of the nineteenth. These three powers (and only these three, he thought) achieved hegemony by riding a wave of economic forces they could not quite control and by prevailing militarily over a rival. After triumphing, the hegemonic power went on to create organizations in its image. The British, for example, prevailed over France and then created the Concert of Europe in 1815.America’s rise to hegemony began following the global recession of 1873. As Wallerstein told the story, Great Britain’s declining share of world markets was due to the United States and its chief rival, Germany. The United States became a major producer of steel, then automobiles, whereas Germany became a major producer of industrial chemicals. Each state’s economic rise followed an internal political crisis and (relative) stabilization: for America, the Union victory in the Civil War; for Germany, unification under Prussian leadership after war with France.Wallerstein understood the two world wars to be an extended thirty years’ war between the rivals. He noted that the United Provinces of the Netherlands and Great Britain also became hegemonic following wars lasting about three decades (in the Dutch case, this came after the original Thirty Years’ War between 1618 and 1648).After prevailing over Germany and the Axis powers in 1945, US leaders believed that it needed three things to maintain its prosperity: one, international customers for its industrial production; two, a world order guaranteeing commerce at a low cost; and three, a compact of sorts ensuring that production would be unimpeded.Washington achieved these objectives by reconstructing Western Europe and Japan, by creating major international institutions such as the United Nations, and by striking a kind of bargain with the Soviet Union. The last of these moves, symbolized by the Yalta conference of February 1945, was for Wallerstein much more significant than the founding of the UN two months later.In the conventional view, the Cold War of roughly 1945 to 1991 (to use the longest possible measurement) was a contest between American and Soviet adversaries. For Wallerstein, this period was really structured around an implicit compact between the great powers. The American sphere of influence covered about two-thirds of the world, with the Soviet sphere of influence accounting for the rest. Each power could dominate its zone of influence and use the threat of the other to corral reticent partners. Yalta was enforced by a “balance of terror” between the nations.The peak of American hegemony ran approximately from 1945 to 1970. Like all hegemons, the US became a victim of its success. By 1970, Western Europe and Japan were in Wallerstein’s view the economic peers of the United States. In the process of building up trading partners, crucial to American postwar success, the US also built up rivals.Like all hegemons, the United States began to lose its economic advantage in the same sequence through which it was originally built. First, the hegemon loses its advantage in agriculture and industry. Then it loses an advantage in commerce. Finally, it loses its advantage in finance.Also in the 1970s, Washington’s defeat in Vietnam exposed US military weakness and showed its inability to impose its will on the world. Vietnam, Wallerstein wrote, symbolized a rejection of the US world order by the forgotten peoples of the world, sometimes called the Third World, sometimes called the Global South. The independence movement in Vietnam against colonial powers (France, Japan, and the United States) was an extension of the global protest movement that came to a head in 1968. According to Wallerstein, “the 1968ers did not merely condemn US hegemony. They condemned Soviet collusion with the US, they condemned Yalta,” and they saw only “two camps — the two superpowers and the rest of the world.”The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, again contrary to conventional wisdom, was for Wallerstein a disaster for the United States, because it lost its great Other. In a 1992 essay, Wallerstein insisted that the Cold War was “not a game to be won but rather a minuet to be danced . . . The end of the Cold War in effect eliminated the last major prop of the US hegemony and the US prosperity, the Soviet shield.”Washington’s response to hegemonic decline has been to assert its greatness, in speech and in deeds, seeking to reclaim its position in the world. But, as Wallerstein explained on C-SPAN, “if you’re number one, you don’t have to shout that you’re number one. People know that you’re number one. If you have to shout, there’s something wrong. There’s something going on.”Shooting the MessengerMany C-SPAN callers were not happy with Wallerstein’s message of decline. One asked if flags flew on the Yale campus, given Wallerstein’s apparent anti-American bias. Another accused Wallerstein of being a Vietnam draft dodger, without realizing Wallerstein had been drafted at an earlier stage during the Korean War. A third shivered at the thought of Wallerstein as president: “If a guy like him were to be running the United States, the United States would end up like an armadillo, rolled up in a ball, waiting to be kicked.”Such expressions of outrage were normal for Wallerstein, who had written about the national-psychological toll that hegemonic decline takes upon those who experience it. It was a potentially dangerous period for domestic politics and the leaders to whom the public might turn.On the show, Wallerstein explained he was just the messenger, and that the United States was isolating itself from the world — not simply from nations it needed to court but from its closest allies too. “If you overestimate your power, and you go around acting like a bully,” he said, “you lose more than if you engage in elementary dialogue.”Some callers saw Wallerstein as being engaged in an attempt to reform US foreign policy. One asked how to respond to accusations of anti-Americanism. Wallerstein explained that he tried using reason. He argued that US foreign policy operated against individual interests:I’m not appealing to your altruism. I’m appealing to your selfishness. You are bringing about a much swifter negative impact on the US and the lives you live. In terms of your own standard of living, in terms of your risk of death, in terms of everything that you stand for, you’ll be worse off pursuing these policies than if you shift policies.Decline did not mean catastrophe. Historically, hegemonic powers do not fall very far. They land among the other great powers, albeit with greater material comfort than most (just look at the Netherlands or the United Kingdom today).Furthermore, as Wallerstein wrote in that 1992 essay, decline could be “the greatest blessing of all.” The United States had an opportunity to embrace morality. It “was Abraham Lincoln who sounded the moral note: ‘As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.’”In the early 1990s, Wallerstein saw two possible futures for America. One would involve neofascism, characterized by social conflict, with the lower strata subject to brutality and prejudice. The second, more hopeful scenario would be a form of national solidarity through social democracy and the movement toward egalitarianism.Although Wallerstein was not prone to overly optimistic predictions, he thought the egalitarian path was more likely than the neofascist path. He envisaged catharsis from “a shared social stress,” combined with American economic prosperity and popular notions of liberty, that would produce a movement against the major aspects of “unequal allocation”: gender, race and ethnicity, age, and class. He figured that the momentum of 1968, having disrupted American hegemony and dethroned the ideology of centrist liberalism, would lead to a mass movement for progress.Wallerstein also had history as his guide. In the first two instances of hegemony in the capitalist world-economy, Dutch and British, hegemonic decline was followed, eventually, by a movement toward welfare and equality. Why should the United States be so different?However, Wallerstein also left open the possibility of neofascism. If the end of the Cold War meant the end of US dominance over two-thirds of the world, then it also meant the end of centrist liberalism as a cultural guarantor of the capitalist world-economy. At least since the revolutions of 1848, centrist liberalism had been the gravitational force that kept the radical left and conservative right in check.Centrist liberalism promised the realization of democratic rights and economic well-being, not immediately for all peoples, but in a slow and orderly process to be managed by the state over generations. Centrist liberalism, as Wallerstein put it in his book The Modern World-System IV, was used by “the strong [to] temper the discontent of the weak.” Strong individuals tempered the discontent of weak masses, and strong states tempered the discontent of weak states.Yet the US economic advantage faltered as the Global South began to reject the Yalta power structure. After one of the main players, the Soviet Union, fell apart, the weak masses and states proved to be not so weak after all. In this situation, for Wallerstein, “conservatives would again become conservatives, and radicals, radicals. The centrist liberals did not disappear, but they were cut down in size.” The ideological possibilities were now endless.After the Cold War, Wallerstein saw great potential for American hegemonic decline to be accompanied by domestic economic redistribution. Ten years later, the radical movement had not materialized, while conservative hawks were firmly ensconced in power. They sought to flex military might because, in their thinking, “if Washington doesn’t exert its force, the United States will become increasingly marginalized.”But Wallerstein saw their actions having the opposite effect. Given the inevitability of decline, the muscular foreign policy of the Bush administration “will only contribute to the United States’ decline, transforming a gradual descent into a much more rapid and turbulent fall.”In retrospect, Wallerstein’s 2002 essay and television appearance constituted an attempt to move the United States off of its trajectory. He had evidently abandoned hope for a social democratic movement and now redirected his attention to the declining hegemonic power itself.In the summer of 2002, over six-in-ten Americans favored opening up a second war in Iraq. Wallerstein’s opinion was that of an unpopular but persistent group of critics. When faced with such criticism, President Bush would note simply note that history would judge his actions.Today it is clear that the hawks could not preserve American hegemony, nor remake the world in a manner more conducive to US interests. What has transpired between then and now?Decline and DenialThe twenty-first century has not gone well for the United States. American leaders have pushed to reclaim lost hegemony. As US economic power has diminished in comparison to the rest of the world, Washington has used its military to demonstrate strength and to achieve policy ambitions.In fact, the United States has embarked on more military interventions since 1991 than it did between 1798 and 1990. This choice was the classic strategy of a declining hegemon in denial, aware of its descent, but unaware that its best viable option was the proper management of decline.The United States has not made the world more peaceful or more prosperous, nor has it improved the nations it invaded. In European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power (2006), Wallerstein questioned the logic of interventionism. The invading power rarely makes the invaded place better off than if it had not intervened, a conclusion confirmed by US military adventures across the Middle East.Wallerstein’s 2002 verdict could have been written this year (or this week for that matter). He wrote that the United States finds itself “a lone superpower that lacks true power, a world leader nobody follows and few respect, and a nation drifting dangerously amidst a global chaos it cannot control.” The backlash of 1968ers that he described came from the nonaligned Global South as well as discontented masses at home. In the twenty-first century, the concatenation that began at the level of the world-system quickly moved to American domestic politics, and then outward again.The end of the Cold War unmoored radicalism and conservatism from centrist liberalism. The effects were drastic. Decades of neoliberal consensus were challenged by the likes of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. When Trump assumed the presidency — first in 2017, again in 2025 — he did so as a critic of America’s liberal order.However, “America first” has not resulted in the revival of domestic production, improved social welfare, or the protection of workers. Instead, Trumpism is characterized by massive, brazen corruption (at home and abroad), militarism abroad, and domestic policies of mass deportation. The United States has continued to expand its military commitments and military spending, but without a commitment to domestic social welfare. Meanwhile, optimism about the future among Americans has overall declined since 2013.In short, the United States has chosen the neofascist path that Wallerstein initially considered the least likely: social conflict, brutality, and prejudice. Members of the upper strata have sought to hold on to their remarkable privileges and rewards. Americans consequently have more precarious lives, living paycheck to paycheck, with fewer protections against the risks of illness, age, and employment instability.In 2026, America’s war in Iran encapsulates two tendencies of US hegemonic decline. One is the inability of the United States to get its way despite an extremely powerful military. The other is the discontent of the American public at a diminished standard of living and a leadership class it no longer trusts.Such feelings of discontent, as Wallerstein noted, can be powerful catalysts for political action. Washington may find itself surprised once again by chaotic global and domestic events it cannot control.
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
The last straw: "That was my christening wig! I've had it since infancy!" "Well, you ain't got it no more, pecker-head!" www.ctvnews.ca/canada/royal-family/…
ctvnews.ca
Prince Harry and Meghan to move back to Britain
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are planning to move back to the United Kingdom, CNN understands.
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
‘Harry Potter’ Fans Force Relocation Of Undersea Cable To Avoid Fictional Elf’s Grave - The Onion theonion.com/harry-potter-fans-forc…
theonion.com
‘Harry Potter’ Fans Force Relocation Of Undersea Cable To Avoid Fictional Elf’s Grave
Harry Potter fans forced the relocation of a multi-hundred million dollar undersea power cable they claimed would disturb the fake grave of the fictional house elf Dobby, the linkage now redirected to pass near actual Bronze Age human burial remains. What do you think? The post ‘Harry Potter’ Fans Force Relocation Of Undersea Cable To Avoid Fictional Elf’s Grave appeared first on The Onion.
001 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
Exclusive: You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone—a Sustainable, Repairable Smartphone—in the US | WIRED www.wired.com/story/you-can-finally…
wired.com
Exclusive: You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone—a Sustainable, Repairable Smartphone—in the US
More than a decade after launching in Europe, the Netherlands company is now selling its repairable phones in the US, starting with the Fairphone (Gen 6+).
012 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
Another Amnesty International document JK Rowling tried to scrub from the Internet dn711600.ca.archive.org/0/items/rep…
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
An Amnesty International document JK Rowling tried to scrub from the Internet dn711306.ca.archive.org/0/items/amn…
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
RE: universeodon.com/@jaykuo/1171242970… Hmmm. I wonder what language they speak in Taiwan.
universeodon.com
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
Taking Co-Living Seriously in Architecture & Design | Grassroots Economic Organizing geo.coop/articles/taking-co-living-…
geo.coop
Taking Co-Living Seriously in Architecture & Design
I spoke with two notable architects – Neeraj Bhatia and Antje Steinmüller – who have intensively studied the social and economic dynamics of co-living. This is a relatively neglected field of inquiry in architecture, housing development, and urban policy. But as my two interviewees explained, commoning can play a powerful role in expanding this overlooked sector of housing.
002 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
Pluralistic: Jennifer Jenkins’ ‘Music Copyright, Creativity, and Culture’ (17 Aug 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow pluralistic.net/2026/08/17/great-so…
pluralistic.net
Pluralistic: Jennifer Jenkins' 'Music Copyright, Creativity, and Culture' (17 Aug 2026)
Today's links Jennifer Jenkins' 'Music Copyright, Creativity, and Culture': The definitive textbook (with comics!). Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. Object permanence: Hair-gel bombers v bras; Hair-gel bombers v chemistry; AOL digs for spammer's platinum; Stross on infosec in 2061; In-game Ponzi; Snowden on Shadow Brokers hack; Life v understanding advanced math; "Greatest of Marlys!"; Housing and precarity; LLMs as slot-machines for coders; Hypercard's backstory; Pirate Party; Fanbois' mental health v critics; Krugman calls for alien invasion; Trump x Serbian genocidaires; The last Sandman Slim; Muphry’s Law; NSA created the Shadow Brokers; DOJ kills private prisons; Walmart externalizes crime; "Sgt Augmento"; Zuckermuskian solipsism. Upcoming appearances: Sydney, Melbourne, Brighton, London, South Bend. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. Colophon: All the rest. Jennifer Jenkins' 'Music Copyright, Creativity, and Culture' (permalink) Nobody explains copyright like Jennifer Jenkins, the director of the Duke Center for the Public Domain, in which capacity she is responsible for the annual New Year's roundups of all the materials entering the public domain (a series that started in the decades during which the public domain was frozen by the Sonny Bono Copyright Act): https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/20/em-oh-you-ess-ee/#sexytimes Jenkins has a gift for making one of the most complicated, worst understood, most consequential areas of law not only comprehensible, but also fascinating. Her late 2023 explanation of what "Mickey Mouse's copyright is expiring" actually meant was the single best explainer on the subject, in a crowded field: https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/15/mouse-liberation-front/#free-mickey Small wonder that she's the go-to copyright and trademark expert for so many media outlets. Perhaps you heard her Planet Money segments on which superheroes are in the public domain: https://www.npr.org/transcripts/969512231 Jenkins' flair for legal communications carries over to her scholarly work, of course, which is why her Open Copyright Casebook is a standard text for American law schools: https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/30/open-and-shut-casebook/#stop-confusing-the-issue-with-relevant-facts Jenkins co-wrote the Casebook with her husband, the equally erudite and expert James Boyle. It's just one of their many fruitful collaborations; they are also the writing team behind THEFT! A History of Music, the greatest graphic novel ever created about the history of music, music law, music censorship, and the music industry: https://web.law.duke.edu/musiccomic/ Last year, Jenkins published Music Copyright, Creativity, and Culture, an Oxford University Press title that fuses her scholarly and popular work in a generalist textbook on the legal framework for music that will forever change how you think about music. Now, a second edition, with a lengthy section on new music litigation, AI copyright fights, and the issue of uncompensated labor is available as an open access download: https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/musiccopyright/ Music Copyright weaves together the economic, cultural, political and artistic history of music, pulling on historic threads ranging from antiquity to medieval Europe to the age of mechanical reproduction to describe changing views of musicians, their audiences, and religious and political leaders on what constituted music, who was allowed to make music, and what music was for. In so doing, she firmly establishes the extremely contingent nature of our present-day norms around music, showing that the "natural" present-day assumptions about who gets paid, who pays, and when payment (or permission) is required are anything but, and are always in flux. For obvious reasons, much of Jenkins' text describes these changes in the context of the record, the radio, satellite transmission, P2P file-sharing, and digital sampling (along with a chapter on AI). These examples are liberally illustrated with links to musical excerpts that bring the subject to life (these are presented as hotlinks in the ebook; if you're reading the print edition, you can use the book's companion website:) https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/musiccopyright/ Interspersed with these histories and analysis are lengthy, extremely on-point excerpts from THEFT!, her graphic novel history of music. These enliven the text as much as the music samples, making this textbook as entertaining as it is informative. Of especial interest – and importance – are the long sections on the courtroom battles of Ed Sheeran, Katy Perry, and Pharrell Williams over similar "grooves" and "vibes" to other songs, some of them well-known and some quite obscure: https://pluralistic.net/2022/04/08/oh-why/#two-notes-and-running These cases highlight the fundamental incoherence of music copyright, a system composed of improvised responses to new technologies, each layered atop the last in a messy pile that virtually no one understands. Jenkins understands it, though. I've been reading, writing, and debating about this stuff since the late 1990s, and I learned something new on every page of this delightful book. This should be required reading for anyone who makes music, loves music, or cares about musicians and the arts more generally. It's a towering accomplishment and a brilliant read. Hey look at this (permalink) The CEO who fired 900 people on Zoom just before Christmas wants his job back https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/14/business/vishal-garg-better-ceo Who Crapped on Johnny Depp's Bed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGt7-WnWdhE No-One Makes You Shop at Amazon https://www.programmablemutter.com/p/no-one-makes-you-shop-at-amazon Paramount’s Merger Strategy: Empty Promises and Empty Threats https://prospect.org/2026/08/14/paramounts-merger-strategy-empty-promises-threats-justice-department-antitrust/ they_live_adblocker https://github.com/davmlaw/they_live_adblocker Object permanence (permalink) #25yrsago RIP, The Industry Standard, Palm buys BeOS https://web.archive.org/web/20010927192339/http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,46113,00.html #25yrsago Smart dust sensors https://web.archive.org/web/20011112010004/http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=1935 #25yrsago Pentagon patents onion-routing https://web.archive.org/web/20010912222427/http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46126,00.html #25yrsago Coltan: the conflict mineral in our gadgets https://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/magazine/the-dirt-in-the-new-machine.html #25yrsago Danny Goodman Talks About HyperCard https://web.archive.org/web/20011214114614/http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/mac/2001/08/17/goodman.html #25yrsago Report an insecure website, win a visit from the FBI https://web.archive.org/web/20010820110330/http://www.linuxfreak.org/post.php/08/17/2001/134.html #20yrsago Copyright wars: film-makers eats themselves https://web.archive.org/web/20070318010544/https://www.laweekly.com/film+tv/film/freedom-of-information/14244/ #20yrsago RyanAir to UK govt: ease off on security or we sue https://www.theguardian.com/business/2006/aug/18/theairlineindustry.terrorism #20yrsago Federal court bans Bush’s warrantless spying on Americans https://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/17/domesticspying.lawsuit/index.html #20yrsago Western millionaires plotted Equatorial Guinea coup as a game https://web.archive.org/web/20071114211448/https://www.salon.com/books/review/2006/08/17/roberts/index_np.html #20yrsago Sweden’s Pirate Party – political arm of the pro-piracy groundswell https://web.archive.org/web/20060820093355/https://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,71544-0.html #20yrsago Hair-Gel Bombers win war on bras https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/us-authorities-leave-gel_n_27402 #20yrsago Would a hair-gel bomb actually work? https://seclists.org/interesting-people/2006/Aug/86 #20yrsago The Pirate Bay’s backstory https://web.archive.org/web/20060901180116/https://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,71543-0.html #20yrsago AOL will dig for buried platinum and gold in spammer’s Mom’s yard https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna14365934 #15yrsago Charlie Stross on network security in 2061 https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2011/08/usenix-2011-keynote-network-se.html #15yrsago Damning 2007 letter asserts that phone hacking was an open practice at News of the World https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/aug/16/phone-hacking-now-reporter-letter #15yrsago In-game Ponzi nets US$50K https://web.archive.org/web/20110921052125/http://gamergaia.com/pc/1724-eve-online-space-heist-one-trillion-isk.html #15yrsago Copyright troll handed ass (again), tries saddest trick ever to get out of paying its victim’s legal bills https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/08/righthaven-rocked-owes-34000-after-fair-use-loss/ #15yrsago English cops arrest man for planning water-fight via Blackberry Messenger https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/aug/15/essex-water-fight-blackberry-messenger #15yrsago Woman who recorded Massachusetts police beating charged with illegal wiretapping https://www.masslive.com/news/2011/08/videographer_of_alleged_melvin.html #15yrsago Criticism of a brand lowers the self-esteem of its adherents https://arstechnica.com/science/2011/08/users-treat-criticism-of-favorite-brands-as-threat-to-self-image/ #15yrsago Homeopathy multinational sues blogger over statements that its mythological curative had “no active ingredient” https://web.archive.org/web/20110930131033/http://www.blogzero.it/contatti/prova/ #15yrsago Edinburgh Fringe show asks audience to shred banknotes https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2011/aug/16/crunch-edinburgh-festival-shred-cash #15yrsago CCTV deterrence and the London uprising https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/17/why-cctv-does-not-deter-crime #15yrsago Paul Krugman: save the economy by staging an alien invasion hoax https://comicsalliance.com/watchmen-paul-krugman-alien-invasion/ #15yrsago Minecraft creator challenges trademark belligerents to winner-take-all Quake deathmatch https://web.archive.org/web/20110817205045/http://notch.tumblr.com/post/9038258448/hey-bethesda-lets-settle-this #15yrsago Muphry’s Law: the inevitability of typos in discussions of typos https://web.archive.org/web/20101227141449/https://www.editorscanberra.org/muphrys-law/ #15yrsago Copyright complaint as phishing email https://memex.craphound.com/2011/08/18/copyright-complaint-as-phishing-email/ #15yrsago Rep Allen West pens “dumbest thing ever written on congressional stationery” https://web.archive.org/web/20110914030034/https://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/08/17/297619/allen-west-nuts/ #10yrsago The NSA’s program of tech sabotage created the Shadow Brokers https://web.archive.org/web/20160818132904/https://www.wired.com/2016/08/shadow-brokers-mess-happens-nsa-hoards-zero-days/ #10yrsago Walmarts are high-crime zones thanks to staff cuts, but America gets the bill https://web.archive.org/web/20160818000539/https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-walmart-crime/ #10yrsago DoJ says it will end private federal prisons https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/department-justice-plans-end-private-prison/ #10yrsago Fiction: Sgt. Augmento, Bruce Sterling’s robots-take-our-jobs story https://web.archive.org/web/20160818161624/https://motherboard.vice.com/read/sgt-augmento #10yrsago Las Vegas: high unionization rates mean smaller wage-gaps for women, especially older women https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/opinion/how-unions-help-cocktail-servers.html #10yrsago The incredible true story of the Epcot Horizons superfans who ruled the ride https://web.archive.org/web/20160822031741/https://dangerousminds.net/comments/the_true_story_of_the_unauthorized_daredevil_documentation_of_the_horizons_/ #10yrsago Predictive policing predicts police harassment, not crime https://web.archive.org/web/20160821093834/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11292-016-9272-0 #10yrsago UC Davis Chancellor spent $400K+ to scrub her online reputation after pepper-spray incident https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article94733812.html #10yrsago Reputation systems work because people are mostly good https://timharford.com/2016/08/the-meaning-of-trust-in-the-age-of-airbnb/ #10yrsago The guy who started Serbia’s ethnic cleansing led a pro-Trump rally in Belgrade https://web.archive.org/web/20160817022133/https://theintercept.com/2016/08/16/serb-inspired-ethnic-cleansing-bosnia-leads-vote-trump-rally-belgrade/ #10yrsago Europe’s banks want to store billions in cash to fight back against negative interest https://web.archive.org/web/20160817152157/https://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/16/banks-look-for-cheap-way-to-store-cash-piles-as-rates-go-negative.html #10yrsago Kill Rock Stars president explains why the radio plays the same songs over and over https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThrXkYwTBP8 #10yrsago Snowden explains the Shadow Brokers/Equation Group/NSA hack https://www.techdirt.com/2016/08/16/ed-snowden-explains-why-hackers-published-nsas-hacking-tools/ #10yrsago Hackers claim to have stolen NSA cyberweapons, auctioning them to highest bidder https://web.archive.org/web/20160816035711/https://motherboard.vice.com/read/hackers-hack-nsa-linked-equation-group #10yrsago What life is like when you really understand advanced mathematics https://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-understand-advanced-mathematics-Does-it-feel-analogous-to-having-mastery-of-another-language-like-in-programming-or-linguistics #10yrsago Parents who can’t pay the bill for kids’ incarceration can still go bankrupt, a US court rules https://archive.thinkprogress.org/everything-wrong-with-how-our-justice-system-treats-poor-people-in-one-awful-case-bfd91a6fa114/ #10yrsago UK Intellectual Property Office grants trademark on “should’ve” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37092366 #10yrsago The Greatest of Marlys! is the Lynda Barry book we’ve been waiting for https://memex.craphound.com/2016/08/16/the-greatest-of-marlys-is-the-lynda-barry-book-weve-been-waiting-for/ #5yrsago Housing, money laundry, speculation and precarity https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/16/die-miete-ist-zu-hoch/#assets-v-human-rights #5yrsago Big Oil caught lying about methane https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/17/king-bullet/#methanescan #5yrsago Sandman Slim's final adventure https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/17/king-bullet/#sticking-the-dismount #5yrsago The Sacklers threaten us all with a good time https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/18/lets-make-a-deal/#art-of-the-deal #1yrago Zuckermuskian solipsism https://pluralistic.net/2025/08/18/seeing-like-a-billionaire/#npcs #1yrago LLMs are slot-machines https://pluralistic.net/2025/08/16/jackpot/#salience-bias Upcoming appearances (permalink) Edinburgh International Book Festival with Jimmy Wales, Aug 17 https://www.edbookfest.co.uk/events/the-front-list-cory-doctorow-and-jimmy-wales Sydney: The Festival of Dangerous Ideas, Aug 23-24 https://festivalofdangerousideas.com/program/ Melbourne: Enshittification at the Wheeler Centre, Aug 25 https://www.wheelercentre.com/events-tickets/season-2026/cory-doctorow-enshittification Brighton: The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI with Carole Cadwalladr (Brighton Dome), Sep 8 https://brightondome.org/whats-on/LSC-cory-doctorow-the-reverse-centaurs-guide-to-life-after-ai/ London: The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI with Riley Quinn (Foyle's Picadilly), Sep 9 https://www.foyles.co.uk/events/enshittification-cory-doctorow-riley-quinn Manchester: Take Back Big Tech with Jovan Owusu-Nepaul (House of Books and Friends), Sep 11 https://ma.to/event/cory-doctorow-house-of-books-and-friends-11-sep-2026 South Bend: An Evening With Cory Doctorow (Notre Dame), Oct 6 https://franco.nd.edu/events/2026/10/06/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow/ Victoria: Munro's Books (Oct 20) https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020 Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12 https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/ Recent appearances (permalink) Technofeudal Enshittification (Fucking Cancelled) https://www.fuckingcancelled.com/p/technofeudal-enshittification-with Who The Machine Serves (EFF) https://archive.org/details/effecting-change-who-the-machine-serves Speculative Fiction for Social Change II (Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff) https://pocketcasts.com/podcast/cool-people-who-did-cool-stuff/08cbb840-a6ae-013a-d8aa-0acc26574db2/part-two-cory-doctorow-on-speculative-fiction-for-social-change/937e8800-9404-45a6-b5e3-90ebee2cfaea Speculative Fiction for Social Change I (Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff) https://pocketcasts.com/podcast/cool-people-who-did-cool-stuff/08cbb840-a6ae-013a-d8aa-0acc26574db2/part-one-cory-doctorow-on-speculative-fiction-for-social-change/15ad467c-0832-44c9-91ea-59defd783dba AI, automation and enshittification (Telecoms.com) https://www.telecoms.com/ai/the-telecoms-com-podcast-ai-automation-and-enshittification Latest books (permalink) "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/ "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/ "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels). "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org). "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org). "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245). "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com. "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com Upcoming books (permalink) "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027 "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027 "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027 "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027 Colophon (permalink) Today's top sources: Currently writing: “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Friday's words: 564 (6039 total). "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor. A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution. How to get Pluralistic: Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): Pluralistic.net Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://pluralistic.net/plura-list Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection): https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net Medium (no ads, paywalled): https://doctorow.medium.com/ Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising): https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic "When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer. ISSN: 3066-764X
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
Pluralistic: IP can’t save you from AI (18 Aug 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow pluralistic.net/2026/08/18/enron-co…
pluralistic.net
Pluralistic: IP can't save you from AI (18 Aug 2026)
Today's links IP can't save you from AI: Property rights cannot substitute for labor rights and privacy rights. Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. Object permanence: Flying Brits v brown people; Probability neglect; Law v "enhanced patdowns"; Onion says Brits love paywalls; "Hench"; "Lessons in Magic and Disaster." Upcoming appearances: Sydney, Melbourne, Brighton, London, South Bend. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. Colophon: All the rest. IP can't save you from AI (permalink) You don't have to believe that AI "art" is any good (I don't), nor do you have to believe that AI "art" can be any good (I don't) to understand that the reason that the capital markets are putting trillions into AI is that they believe they can fire workers of every kind and replace them with AI: https://pluralistic.net/2025/03/18/asbestos-in-the-walls/#government-by-spicy-autocomplete I'm an artist and a worker. I want to protect my labor interests. So do my peers from across the "creative industries." But a sizable group of my peers think the way we're going to protect our interests is by expanding copyright so that it's unambiguously illegal to scrape the internet, analyze the files retrieved by those scrapers, and publish that analysis (a process more familiarly known as "training AI"): https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/17/how-to-think-about-scraping/ This is a losing strategy. First, because banning scraping, or requiring permission to count the elements in creative works, or demanding a license to publish collections of facts about copyrighted works will inflict enormous collateral damage on a wide variety of socially beneficial activities. From the OED to search engines to the Internet Archive, so many beneficial activities rely on the fact that copyright permits unlicensed collection and analysis of every copyrighted work as a single, massive corpus, and copyright allows the publication of that analysis without permission from the creators of the works it analyzes. A lot of people who are (rightfully) very angry about AI dispute this. They believe that they can craft an "AI training" law that would ban scraping, analysis and publication when these activities are part of AI training, but not when they're undertaken for a benign purpose. I am very, very skeptical of this. After 25 years of watching internet policy go badly awry, to the great detriment of workers of all kinds and everyday users, it is my professional, considered opinion that drafting a statute that only stops these "bad" activities is much, much harder than these people think, and may actually be impossible. I think some artists advocating for a copyright-based solution to AI's war on labor understand this and have decided that they're willing to catch a lot of dolphins in these legal tuna-nets they're hoping to get from Congress. I get that: there are always trade-offs, and the perfect can't be the enemy of the good. But I think they're making the wrong trade-off, and not just because I value archives, accountability corpuses, large-scale linguistic research and search engines. I think they're making the wrong trade-off because copyright will not protect their livelihoods from AI-based wage erosion. Here's why: the theory of copyright as an "artist's right" is premised on the idea that we artists get these exclusive rights, which we use in our bargaining with media companies and other intermediaries. It's a (pseudo) property right, and it's sub-licensable. Just as an entrepreneur might get the contract to supply catering for a sports stadium and then parcel out the pretzel stand, beer bar, and pizza concessions to subcontractors, we're meant to sell our English rights, foreign language rights, graphic novel rights, film rights, audio rights, (and so on) to a variety of media companies. To bargain successfully, it's not only necessary for you to have something valuable to trade: you also need to have leverage. You need to have options. The other side has to believe that if they lowball you, you will go do a deal elsewhere. This is where copyright fails to serve creative workers. Even at the best of times, the world naturally produces an oversupply of would-be professional artists, and a sufficiency of the talented to fill most of the workaday niches in our field. Even exceptional artists – and exceptional works of art – are often commercial flops, for reasons that aren't always well understood (though sometimes it's a self-fulfilling prophecy, where a media company buys the rights and then loses confidence in the work and does not exert itself in the marketing of the work). These are not the best of times. Decades of lax antitrust enforcement has boiled the "creative industries" down to 5 publishers, 4 studios, 3 labels, 2 app stores, and one company that's in charge of all the ebooks and audiobooks. Since the 1976 Copyright Act, Congress has acted time and again to broaden copyright. Today's copyright lasts longer, restricts more uses, extends to more kinds of works, and carries stiffer statutory penalties for infringement ($150,000 per download!). The media companies we creative workers bargain with are larger, richer and more profitable than at any time in history – and we are poorer. The share of those massive profits that ends up in our pocket is lower than ever – and we don't just get smaller slices of that larger pie, those slices are smaller than the slices we used to get, when the pie was much smaller. The rising tide of copyright expansion lifted our bosses' boats – even as our dinghies filled with bilge and sank. How could we get so much more to bargain with, only to bargain it all away, for less money than we used to get for a much smaller bundle of rights? Simple: giving us rights did not give us leverage. Giving us more rights without giving us more bargaining power is like giving your bullied schoolkid extra lunch-money. There's no amount of lunch-money that will get that kid fed; but if you keep increasing how much money the kid gets, the bullies will end up so rich that they can afford to run a global campaign demanding that we all think of those poor hungry kids and send them even more lunch money. Copyright's failure to deliver for creative workers doesn't mean that we're doomed to poverty. Our works are generating record profits for our bosses, and there are plenty of ways to change the "distributional outcomes" (the phrase economists use for "who gets what") in arts/labor policy. In 2022, I co-wrote Chokepoint Capitalism along with the eminent Australian copyright scholar Rebecca Giblin. The whole book is full of these pro-worker arts policies: https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/21/what-is-chokepoint-capitalism/ Rebecca and I start from the premise that artists are workers, not the small businesses that our bosses insist we see ourselves as. The idea that an artist is an LLC with an MFA fits in very neatly with copyright: you're getting this bundle of exclusive rights from Congress and then you bargain, business-to-business, with other companies out there in the world, selling those rights for the best price you can get. This approach rarely works, and when it does, it works badly. 50 years of more copyright, richer bosses, and poorer artists put the lie to the "LLC with an MFA" approach. If we're workers, then we derive our power from labor rights. The Writers Guild – the only creative workers in world history to have comprehensively beaten AI in their workplace – won their AI fight with a strike: https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/01/how-the-writers-guild-sunk-ais-ship/ The Hollywood guilds are able to pursue a limited form of "sectoral bargaining" (where all the workers in a field bargain with all its bosses) called "multi-employer bargaining." Bosses hate sectoral bargaining, and in 1947 they got it banned outright through the Taft-Hartley Act. Getting other kinds of creative workers into multi-employer bargaining arrangements will be a lot of work – and repealing Taft-Hartley and restoring sectoral bargaining will be even harder. But just because it's hard to do the thing that works, it doesn't follow that we should do the easy thing that doesn't work. Compared to winning more labor rights, getting more copyright will be easy. That's because our bosses want more copyright. When we demand more copyright, our bosses – the most powerful, profitable media companies in human history, grown rich off our labor – will fight alongside of us. But media companies don't want to stop AI from depriving us of our wages. Quite the contrary! The whole reason that the Writers Guild had to go on strike was that movie studios – not Openai or Anthropic – wanted to replace them with AI. The same studios that are suing the AI companies for "mass copyright theft" have made it very clear that they want to buy chatbots from those AI companies and use them to erode our wages and thin our ranks. The copyright lawsuits our bosses are waging against the AI companies are intended to force tech companies to pay for licenses before they train their chatbots on our work. But they won't be paying us for those licenses – they'll be paying our bosses. The AI copyright fight isn't being fought to protect your wages – it's being fought to see whether your lost wages end up in the pockets of a tech boss or a media boss. AI copyright suits are a fight over who's going to get the lion's share when they eat you up for dinner. They're not a way to keep you off the menu. This becomes more obviously true with each passing day, and this morning, the world got its clearest example of what a poor substitute copyright is for fundamental human rights, like labor rights and privacy rights. Last year, Spirit Airlines went bankrupt, a casualty of a monopolized aviation sector and Trump's oil price surge. Ever since, vultures have circled its carcass, picking off its assets in a string of auctions conducted by Spirit's bankruptcy trustees. Today, those trustees announced that they had sold all of Spirit's employees' data to Google, for use in AI training: https://www.axios.com/2026/08/17/google-spirit-airlines-bankruptcy Every email, every memo, every calendar entry. Oceans of sensitive, personal information, all to be shoveled directly into the bottomless maw of Google's AI training systems. This training data includes messages between colleagues and with outside parties about workers' romantic lives, their health, their family situations. These workers' most private lives will end up as fodder for a Google chatbot. Now, all of these workers have a copyright in all of that work. Under international copyright treaties and US law, copyright "inheres at the moment of fixation of a work of human creativity." The very instant a worker sets fingers to keyboard and types out a message with even the smallest quantum of creativity, a new copyright springs into existence, giving the copyright holder 90 years' worth of control over it. But even though every one of those emails and messages and memos was written by a human being working for Spirit, the copyright over those works does not belong to the workers. Every single one of them will have signed an employment agreement that designates their emails and other copyrightable work as "works made for hire," owned by Spirit Airlines, which means that their work is now an asset in Spirit's bankruptcy estate. That's why all that personal information is about to be transferred to a new corporate owner, Google, who can do anything they want with it. We know how terrible this kind of disclosure will be for workers. In 2001, the criminal enterprise Enron collapsed after the extent of its fraud was revealed. In the ensuing litigation, Enron's bankruptcy overseers decided that it was too expensive to purge the company's email servers of personal information before entering it into evidence. That meant that once the court battles were over, all the Enron employees' emails entered the public domain as part of the court record: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_Corpus The "Enron Corpus" is a foundational data-set in modern computer science. Academics analyzed the data to do pioneering work on machine learning and social graph theory, which found its way into the design and operations of social media companies, who learned how to spot and manipulate social connections by studying it. The Enron Corpus isn't just a data-set, though. It's a privacy catastrophe, full of sensitive personal information that haunts the 158 employees whose correspondence is now permanently afloat upon the internet. Why was the Enron Corpus so exploitable? Because US labor law does not protect this kind of sensitive information when it is in your employer's hands. In fact, if your boss ends up with a trove of your personal information in the form of emails, calendar entries and files, you will typically be blamed for it: "Why did you use your work computer for personal activities?" But anthropologists who study computer usage have known for decades that everyone ends up with personal data on their work devices. What's more, this problem is only getting worse, because (thanks to weak labor laws), we're expected to work longer hours and to be on call when we're not at the job, which means that you're often dealing with personal crises after hours from your desk, and dealing with work crises at home from your sofa. Any fit-for-purpose labor rights regime would recognize that your privacy rights must extend to the data that finds its way onto your boss's computers, even if you put that data there. Any failure to recognize this bedrock fact gives employers free license to plunder and exploit your personal information. Of course, labor law isn't the only way to protect private information. While labor law should contain explicit, job-related privacy guarantees, privacy law should protect all our privacy (after all, Spirit's servers are also full of emails and messages from Spirit's passengers). Unfortunately for anyone who ever flew on Spirit – or anyone who worked for them – American privacy law is all but dead. America's last consumer privacy law went into effect in 1988, when the Video Privacy Protection Act made it illegal for video-store clerks to disclose your VHS rental records. Google says it won't use your profile or frequent flier info to train its model, but they haven't made the same promise about the millions of messages that passengers exchanged with the airline. Google has also promised to use "de-identification" algorithms to purge the Spirit customer, supplier and employee data of personal information. But "de-identification" is a pipe-dream, widely understood by security experts as a form of wishful thinking by companies that want to exploit your personal information while still insisting that they aren't violating your privacy. In reality, "de-identified" data is always vulnerable to "re-identification" attacks: https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/30/dox-the-world/#experian The collapse of privacy and labor rights in post-Reagan America and the mass expansion of copyright over the same period are part of the same phenomenon, aspects of two generations' worth of policies designed to benefit capital at the expense of workers, and corporations at the expense of consumers. As consumers, we're told to substitute shopping for legal rights: if a corporation wrongs you, it's easier and quicker to "vote with your wallet" than it is to sue them or ask the government to intervene. Substituting shopping for politics has been a total failure. Shopping your way out of a monopoly is like recycling your way out of a wildfire: https://pluralistic.net/2026/05/21/purity-culture/#stop-fucking-that-chicken As creative workers we were told to stop thinking of ourselves as workers altogether, to become small businesses, and to use the LLC With an MFA method to bargain our way out of exploitative arrangements. This, too, has been a failure: https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/03/its-a-trap/#inheres-at-the-moment-of-fixation The sale of Spirit's data to Google for AI training shows us that privacy and labor rights are indispensable. We can't substitute market mechanisms like comparison shopping or individual contract negotiations for broad, systemic, inalienable rights backstopped by law. By demanding the copyright our bosses love, we're seeking the right to be angry about AI, even as the AI companies and our bosses cut deals to train chatbots with our work, which they will use to attack our livelihoods. Once we stop pretending to be small businesses, once we abandon the fantasy of LLCs with MFAs, we can join with every worker in every industry in demanding sectoral bargaining; and with every consumer in demanding privacy rights. Winning privacy and labor struggles means more than the right to be angry about AI – that's the right to do something about it. Hey look at this (permalink) Nautilus https://nautilus.plotter.cc/ Zoomers don't know what Usenet is https://tchotchke.substack.com/p/zoomers-dont-know-what-usenet-is When the Shortage is the Strategy https://nooneshappy.com/article/when-the-shortage-is-the-strategy/ Can Canada function without American tech? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwoL6OGk_2Y Elon Musk made flying even worse so Palantir could profit https://www.theverge.com/transportation/981194/faa-air-traffic-elon-musk-peter-thiel-palantir Object permanence (permalink) #25yrsago IP and scientific publishing https://web.archive.org/web/20011001203058/http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s345514.htm #20yrsago British air travelers kick brown “terrorists” off their planes https://web.archive.org/web/20060823104858/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=401419&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5 #15yrsago “Probability neglect”: why policy-makers are constitutionally incapable of formulating evidence-based anti-terrorism policy https://web.archive.org/web/20111015040753/https://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/J2011OBHDP_APM,AT,HK_PolicymakersDilemma.pdf #15yrsago TSA can’t explain why “enhanced patdowns” are legal https://web.archive.org/web/20151203033820/http://flyingwithfish.boardingarea.com/2011/08/18/the-legality-of-the-tsas-enhanced-pat-down-authority/ #15yrsago The Onion: We did a paywall because British people like paying for the Web https://web.archive.org/web/20110911175335/http://www.avclub.com/articles/about-the-onions-new-paid-content-system,60129/ #5yrsago Hench https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/19/failure-cascades/#natalie-zina-walschots #5yrsago Machine learning's crumbling foundations https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/19/failure-cascades/#dirty-data #1yrago Charlie Jane Anders' "Lessons in Magic and Disaster" https://pluralistic.net/2025/08/19/revenge-magic/#liminal-spaces Upcoming appearances (permalink) Sydney: The Festival of Dangerous Ideas, Aug 23-24 https://festivalofdangerousideas.com/program/ Melbourne: Enshittification at the Wheeler Centre, Aug 25 https://www.wheelercentre.com/events-tickets/season-2026/cory-doctorow-enshittification London: AI and the Enshittification of the Media, NUJ (Sep 2) https://www.nuj.org.uk/learn/ems-event-calendar/ai-and-the-enshitification-of-the-media.html Brighton: The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI with Carole Cadwalladr (Brighton Dome), Sep 8 https://brightondome.org/whats-on/LSC-cory-doctorow-the-reverse-centaurs-guide-to-life-after-ai/ London: The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI with Riley Quinn (Foyle's Picadilly), Sep 9 https://www.foyles.co.uk/events/enshittification-cory-doctorow-riley-quinn South Bend: An Evening With Cory Doctorow (Notre Dame), Oct 6 https://franco.nd.edu/events/2026/10/06/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow/ Victoria: Munro's Books (Oct 20) https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020 Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12 https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/ Recent appearances (permalink) Deflating the AI Bubble (Do Not Pass Go) https://www.donotpassgo.ca/p/deflating-the-ai-bubble-with-cory Technofeudal Enshittification (Fucking Cancelled) https://www.fuckingcancelled.com/p/technofeudal-enshittification-with Who The Machine Serves (EFF) https://archive.org/details/effecting-change-who-the-machine-serves Speculative Fiction for Social Change II (Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff) https://pocketcasts.com/podcast/cool-people-who-did-cool-stuff/08cbb840-a6ae-013a-d8aa-0acc26574db2/part-two-cory-doctorow-on-speculative-fiction-for-social-change/937e8800-9404-45a6-b5e3-90ebee2cfaea Speculative Fiction for Social Change I (Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff) https://pocketcasts.com/podcast/cool-people-who-did-cool-stuff/08cbb840-a6ae-013a-d8aa-0acc26574db2/part-one-cory-doctorow-on-speculative-fiction-for-social-change/15ad467c-0832-44c9-91ea-59defd783dba Latest books (permalink) "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/ "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/ "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels). "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org). "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org). "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245). "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com. "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com Upcoming books (permalink) "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027 "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027 "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027 "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027 Colophon (permalink) Today's top sources: Currently writing: “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 585 (6624 total). "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor. A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution. How to get Pluralistic: Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): Pluralistic.net Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://pluralistic.net/plura-list Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection): https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net Medium (no ads, paywalled): https://doctorow.medium.com/ Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising): https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic "When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer. ISSN: 3066-764X
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
How Parallel Institutions Challenge Authoritarianism convergencemag.com/articles/how-par…
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
“The Nerd Reich”: Author Gil Durán on Big Tech Fascism, Peter Thiel, JD Vance & the War on Democracy | Democracy Now! www.democracynow.org/2026/8/17/gil_…
002 2
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
Help put Brian over the top! He's an anarchist comrade with congestive heart failure, and needs A/C to stay alive. www.paypal.com/paypalme/longbongsil…
paypal.com
Transfer money online in seconds with PayPal money transfer. All you need is an email address.
001 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 17/08/2026
Hey, Brian's disabled with heart failure and living on a small fixed income. He's behind on his electric bill, with late fees, and another month's bill coming up. He can't live without A/C. Help him keep his power on. He's a good anarchist comrade. ko-fi.com/bpsycho/goal?g=0
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 16/08/2026
My Review of Daniel Suarez, Daemon and Freedom(TM) | Tea, Earl Grey, Hot teaearlgreyhotblog.wordpress.com/20…
teaearlgreyhotblog.wordpress.com
My Review of Daniel Suarez, Daemon and Freedom(TM)
[Cross-posted from P2P Foundation Blog] **Daniel Suarez._Daemon_ (Signet, 2009); _Freedom(TM)_ (Dutton 2010).** I should have known how good these books would be when I saw John Robb of _Global Guerrillas_ listed among Suarez’s advisers on the Acknowledgements page of Daemon. If you’ve been following Robb the last year or so, you know he writes a lot about resilient communities and darknets. Recently, against the backdrop of disruption of the Icelandic volcano, he stated the two principles of resilience: > *Localize production > *Virtualize everything else Those are, perhaps not coincidentally, the central organizing principles of the new society that emerges in Suarez’s two novels. As Robb describes it in his review of _Freedom_, > it is a fictional account of the next American revolution (AR 2.0) using resilient communities, open source warfare, systems disruption, individual super-empowerment, parasitic predation, hollow nation-states, etc, (all staples of global guerrilla thinking) as central themes. Very cool. Any regular reader of this blog, anyone on the P2P Research or Open Manufacturing lists, anyone who follows John Robb, Jeff Vail or David Ronfeldt, should run—not walk—to buy both of these books. _Daemon_ kicks off with the death of genius software and gaming mogul Matthew Sobol. News of his death triggers a Web daemon—”A computer program that runs continuously in the background and performs specified operations at predefined times or in response to certain events.” Or as one of the characters puts it, ““a narrow AI scripting application distributed over a peer-to-peer network architecture to avoid core logic disruption.” It gets off to a pretty exciting start. The newly activated Daemon triggers an assortment of booby-traps that kill former close associates of Sobol with an inside knowledge of the Daemon’s construction. It also activates a horrendously effective automated defense system at Sobol’s estate, which houses a sizeable server farm in the basement. During the siege, dozens of county and federal law enforcement officers suffer deaths that should translate very well to the big screen. After that, the public drama dies down and the Daemon pursues its agenda more quietly, infesting corporate and government computer systems with assorted worms. It continues to react to real-world events, as monitored news on the Internet triggers its scripts. Natalie Philips, a hot young cryptographic genius handling the NSA’s investigation, describes the Daemon’s capabilities (as it turns out a very low-ball estimate) early on in the story: > “Huge amounts of money flowed from Sobol’s bank accounts immediately after his death. ACH wire transfers totaling tens of millions of dollars went offshore. He also took out large lines of credit in the months before his death. This money, too, went overseas the day he died…. Picture the combination of a widely distributed, compartmentalized application with high failure tolerance—perhaps thousands of copies of each component, able to reconstitute itself if any x-percentage of its components are destroyed…. > > . > > “Now combine an application like that—a widely distributed entity that never dies—with tens of millions of dollars and the ability to purchase goods and services. It’s answerable to no one and has no fear of punishment.” Not long after this, the Daemon manages buy itself time and slack by framing up Detective Pete Sebeck as the real mastermind behind the terror incidents, so that the press and government largely lose interest in what is what is dismissed as “the Daemon hoax.” Given the widespread pyrotechnics associated with the Daemon’s appearance, the reader’s natural reaction is to view Sobol as a sociopath, a sort of James Bond villain. As these things usually go, you expect his face eventually to appear on a giant screen at the UN Security Council, announcing the nuclear destruction of New York and St. Petersburg and delivering his ultimatum. But as the plot develops, Sobol’s motivation becomes increasingly clear—and it no longer seems quite so crazy. As it turns out, the large-scale sabotage of government and corporate organizations that kicked things off was only secondary, a way of running interference on behalf of the Daemon’s primary objective. That objective was to create a Darknet: as one of the characters describes it, “a network, like the Internet, but more sophisticated and more exclusive, populated only by humans the Daemon has recruited.” The major part of that recruitment effort is carried out by scripts built into a backdoor of Sobol’s extremely popular computer games, which select players for skill and certain personality traits. These recruits—thousands of them, and disproportionately disaffected misfits and sociopaths—are set to work building the Darknet and the initial human infrastructure associated with it. The Darknet, built on the mapping software of Sobol’s multi-player online games, allows members with net-connected HUD glasses to access information from “D-Space,” a virtual world layered on top of the physical one, with semantic tags attached to virtually everything and everyone. (The Acquis operation on Cyprus had something similar in Bruce Sterling’s _The Caryatids_.) The tagging system makes for total transparency: every individual carries a reputational rating that’s visible to anyone viewing the world with the augmented reality layer superimposed. Every individual has a ranking within a range of two hundred levels, much like the ranking system of players in a game, that regulates his powers in the Darknet. > “In essence Sobol is using the GPS system to convert the Earth into one big game map. We’re all in his game now… > > . > > “…[T]here must be some way for Daemon operatives to interact with this presentation layer. If my theory holds, then the Daemon must have created equipment that permits its operatives to ‘see’ into this extra-dimensional space so they can use it.” > > . > > Philips nodded. “That could be why we’ve been unable to track Factions in the real world—because they’re communicating with each other through this virtual space.” The humans recruited into the Darknet carry out the Daemon’s agenda in the physical world. That agenda includes, at the outset, recruiting assorted micromanufacturing facilities and machine shops into the Darknet to serve the Daemon’s agenda. Their primary order of business at first is modifying SUVs and motorcycles into automated combat vehicles—essentially a more sophisticated generation of armed predator drones using automobiles as platforms. One brief vignette should be of interest to members of the Open Manufacturing list: a machine shop equipped with a Haas mini mill—a CNC 3-in-one drill-lathe-router—connected to the Darknet and modifying cars and bikes to the Daemon’s specifications. As the story progresses, especially in _Freedom_ , the Darknet becomes the nucleus of a human social organization, its overall makeup shifting as the initial thousands of sociopaths and misfits recruited are followed by the millions of normal people attracted by an idealistic vision of a better life. And that human social organization, as per Sobol’s plan, supercedes the Daemon in importance and begins to exist for its own purposes. The new human society organized through the Darknet, we learn, was Sobol’s objective all along: to create a resilient, networked successor society that would continue after global corporate capitalism collapsed from all of its assorted pathologies. The Daemon, and all the spectacular combat capabilities associated with it, was just a midwife; or as one character puts it, “Sobol was _willing_ to be our villain to force necessary change.” Sobol’s avatar argues, at one point in the story, that absent a takeover by the Daemon the inevitable collapse of global capitalism would have led to the death of billions. As the networked production facilities continue to expand, economies built around meeting real human needs—instead of building cool fighting vehicles—become the primary focus. The Darknet evolves into a network of resilient local communities (holons) with micromanufacturing facilities, sustainable farming methods, and renewable energy sources. Take, as an example, this example of a farmer living near the Greeley, Iowa holon: > “We’re raising the animals on grass—not corn. We put in a good blend of natural prairie grasses. Big bluestem, foxtail, needlegrass, switchgrass. It grows naturally here on the prairie, so it’s turning solar power into beef—no fossil fuels necessary. And we rotate animals through the fields. Chickens follow the cows out to pasture, picking the bug larvae out of the manure and eating bugs and worms from the broken turf left behind by the cattle. The chicken dung, in turn, makes the field fertile for crops. It’s all an integrated, sustainable system…. > > . > > “Got two ten-kilowatt wind turbines and some flywheel batteries to store the power. Every other darknet farm in this holon is working for the same thing. Regional energy and food independence. We rely on Greeley for our critical manufactured goods—printed electronics, micromanufactured precision equipment, tools, software. They, in turn, rely on us, along with other farms, to provide their food and raw materials.” A description of Greeley itself (including the residents’ D-Space interactions), from another perspective: > Unlike many Midwestern towns, Greeley appeared to be undergoing a renaissance. Main Street was lined with recently renovated brick storefronts and micro-manufacturing shops with their roll-top doors opened to reveal machinists and customers poking at D-Space objects, negotiating and ordering 3-D plans off the darknet. CNC milling machines hummed in the workshops beyond. > > . > > In the street dozens of young adults, young families, and even middle-aged folks with call-outs over their heads walked, clicking on one another’s data, interacting in multiple dimensions as though it were a natural extension of reality. The story, as you might suspect, heads toward a climactic confrontation between the new society built around the Darknet and the increasingly desperate old corporate order. Toward the middle of _Daemon_ , elements within the intelligence community begin to suspect and then conclude for a certainty that Sebeck was framed and that the Daemon is real. The decision is made to proceed with Sebeck’s execution and maintain the hoax story for public consumption. In the meantime, the Daemon begins showing its hand, using the threat of wiping out their finances to exercise strategic control over the thousands of corporations infested with its worms. Its control of IT functions is backed by recruitment of internal defectors within the firms—a very easy task, considering the number of disgruntled employees in a time of continued downsizings and benefit cuts. As Sobol explained in a video recording for corporate officers: > “The reality is that my Daemon now controls your global IT function. Your business will operate as before, and no one will suspect that there is anything unusual going on—except that perhaps your systems will run better than they did when you were responsible for them. > > . > > “Your natural inclination will be to resist this indignity, of course, and so you will be tempted to contact the authorities. That is your choice—although the moment my Daemon detects such contact, it will wipe your company’s data off the face fo the earth…. > > . > > “I hope you and my Daemon can peacefully coexist. I think you’ll find that, as the years roll by, you’ll be glad indeed that you didn’t try to defy it—especially as you take market share from those companies that did defy it.” At the same time, the Daemon eradicates the child pornography business, along with several other of the more unsavory activities of organized crime, and collects protection money from the criminal gangs allowed to survive. One of the more gratifying episodes is the targeted assassination of thousands of spammers worldwide, which reduces the volume of spam clogging ISPs by 80%. Later, at the beginning of _Freedom_ , the Daemon targets dozens of financial executives and hedge fund managers. If there’s ever a movie version of this book, the scene of armed motorcycle drones fighting their way through a fortified compound and hacking a billionaire executive to death in his safe room should translate pretty effectively onto the screen. The real government of the United States (the intelligence community, the black ops people, the private security firms and service contractors attached to the global military empire, the global drug trade funding death squads—not their errand boy in the White House), having become aware of the Daemon’s continued existence, get the idea of hacking it and controlling its powers in their own interest. The idea is to use the Daemon to restore their control of the faltering global financial system and create a neofeudal order backed by universal surveillance technology and predator drones: > “See, in medieval Europe a mounted knight in armor could defeat almost any number of peasants. The modern elite warrior is much the same—they can mow down mass conscripted armies with superior technology. So what happens when small elite forces can overwhelm citizen forces of almost any size? We return to feudalism—landless serfs and a permanent ruling class. Just look at the fortified upscale neighborhoods now being built with their own private security forces.” In _Freedom_ , we see a full-blown war between the emerging Darknet society and this real government, acting on behalf of global finance and the corporate power structure. The Major, a DOD liaison to the NSA whose very name is classified, represents this real government. His thirty-odd year career as a foot soldier for the national security state includes extensive involvement as a liaison to the global network of drug funded death squads, U.S.-installed military regimes, and secret prisons. The first life he ever took was that of a trade unionist in Central America. The Major’s mindset is that of C. Wright Mills’ “crackpot realists” and Ward Churchill’s “little Eichmanns.” > And that [the murder of the Central American trade unionist] began his awakening—his realization that the Western World was a bedtime story of comforting humanistic bullshit. Slavery existed everywhere—even in the United States. We were all slaves in one way or another. Slavery was just control, and control kept things running in an orderly fashion. It was what made progress possible. > > * * * > > “’Bastards like me’ serve a purpose. People need order…. They need to be told what to think, what to do, what to believe, or everything will fall apart. This miracle of modern civilization doesn’t just happen. It requires careful management by professionals willing to do whatever is necessary to keep things running smoothly.” In one chilling scene, The Major explains that nobody in the real government is stupid enough to think torture is useful for extracting information. > “Torture is about control. You let me torture a thousand people, and I can keep five million working obediently with their heads down. The more innocent the victims, the better. And after they’re broken and maimed, you release them so that everyone can see what awaits those who resist…. So you see, there’s nothing you can tell me that will stop the pain…. The only thing you are is a billboard—on which I’m going to write my message: this is what happens to people who join the darknet….” Natalie Philips and her hacker boyfriend Jon Ross, who at first see themselves as engaged in an idealistic struggle between a terrorist movement and the legitimate government of the United States, eventually come to understand that the U.S. government has long been hijacked by the global plutocracy. The struggle between the Daemon and the supra-national corporate economy is “a struggle between two artificial organisms.” And as The Major and the forces he represents begin to exercise naked power without any of their legitimizing masks, it becomes apparent to them that the cause Philips serves is the worse one. Eventually, just before Philips defects to the Darknet, she realizes she’s the only one in the intelligence community still trying to destroy the Daemon rather than bring it under corporate control. As the conflict escalates, the global plutocracy shows its hand, taking control of the government on a scale greater than that of the Gilded Age. Global financial interests present a united front to the U.S. government and impose radical austerity measures, forcing the wholesale “privatization” of government functions to global corporations. Agribusiness and biotech companies like Monsanto, desperate to stamp out the spreading conversion to sustainable agricultural practices by near-bankrupt farmers in Iowa and Kansas, resort to increasingly heavy-handed police state tactics based on trumped-up “intellectual property” concerns. Threatened by such blackmail, increasingly disgruntled farmers are recruited by the Darknet _en masse_ (applications for USDA subsidies drop by 90% in a large part of the Midwest). The ag companies’ intelligence and private security network notes, with alarm, a sustained pattern of “population movements, unexplained capital inflows, and infrastructure investments in alternative energy technologies, high-tech equipment, heirloom seed stock….” This is paralleled, in Russia and assorted Asian countries, by a drastic reduction in export crops and a growing portion of idle container ships no longer carrying industrial export goods. The national security state undertakes a full-blown counter-insurgency operation in the Midwest, attempting to suppress the growing network of resilient communities. It helicopters in paramilitaries and death squads to destroy holons, and then manages the corporate news media to blame the destruction on illegal aliens and domestic terrorist elements radicalized by the growing unemployment levels (approaching 30%). To quote The Major’s rules of engagement for the assault on Greeley, Iowa: > “…kill everyone you can find, burn every structure, and destroy every vehicle. Without exception. The knowledge and equipment that makes these communities work must be eradicated. The cultural memory that they ever existed must be erased…. > > . > > “As for tactics, the irregular forces will prevent civilians from escaping, while your forces move through town destroying everything in their path. Psyops units will be filming as needed. It’s important that they get some footage that resembles an operation to dislodge an insurgent occupation. I expect the residents will oblige us by resisting with force, but if not, your men should facilitate that imagery.” The real government obtains a Congressional/Presidential rubber stamp for its assumption of martial law powers, and delegates police state functions to private security firms like Blackwater. The United States government becomes something like the Allied States in _Jericho_ , hardly even bothering to conceal its nature as a front for crony capitalists looters like Blackwater and Halliburton. Public fear is orchestrated to build support for the new security measures, giving government a freer hand to suppress opposition to the new austerity regime. At the climax of the story The Major and the real government, having apparently been successful in hacking the Daemon, prepare to execute its “destroy” function against the computer networks of all corporations infected by it—except for those owned by the inner circle of the financial elite. The conspirators had carefully invested all their own wealth in a selected core of companies which were insulated from the Daemon’s “destroy” function. Their plan is to consolidate their power in the ensuing chaos and install full-blown corporate feudalism on a global scale. Anji Anderson, a popular cable news reporter in on the conspiracy, was given her marching orders: > “—but the change needs to be sold to the American people with a sudden disruption. Otherwise they’ll resist strongly. It needs to be the penultimate event that marks a demarcation between what came before and what must come after. It’s a psychological transition…. > > . > > “Our studies show that a period of general anarchy as brief as forty-eight hours would make the public willing to accept severe changes in exchange for security.” But the appearance of having been hijacked turns out to have been a ruse by the Daemon: the flaws in its code which were exploited and hacked by the conspirators were deliberately planted by Sobol. Following the failure of the attack, the Daemon wipes the data of the supposedly “insulated” firms and erases the conspirators’ personal assets. As announced by the recorded image of Sobol, playing on monitors at corporate headquarters worldwide: > “What’s more, the Daemon will continue to destroy the resources of these individuals wherever they appear—in whatever form. And a log of your recent actions will be submitted to pertinent law enforcement agencies and the companies you were targeting. And as for the people who helped make all this possible? The assistants, lawyers, brokers, programmers, accountants, and security forces? To those people I say: your employers _have no money_. So do the smart thing—and just walk away.” The Daemon, meanwhile, having hacked the conspirators’ internal surveillance system, broadcast a recording of the incriminating instructions to Anji Anderson mentioned above. Parallel to the escalating conflict between the Darknet and the global plutocracy is another conflict within the Darknet itself: a conflict between the first wave of recruits—the misfits and sociopaths—and the average people building the new, networked democratic society. The former had the skills Sobol’s Daemon needed to set up the system and to wage armed conflict with the corporate state, but are becoming a hindrance to the long-term evolution of the Darknet society. This first wave is personified by “Loki,” a cracker and identity thief, one of the Daemon’s earliest recruits. Loki—a two hundredth-level operative with only a half-star reputation ranking—is the chief human actor coordinating the Darknet’s war with the corporate state, commanding armies of hundreds of automated fighting vehicles. He is a sociopath on the same order as The Major, reveling in mayhem and destruction. As he warns The Major at one point: > “ _Freedom fighter? Is that what you think I am?_ ” He laughed. “ _I don’t give a shit about freedom. And if I have to kill a hundred million innocent people to get my hands on you, I’ll do it…._ ” This conflict within the Darknet is the background to Pete Sebeck’s mission in _Freedom_. Sebeck, recruited by the Daemon in federal custody, is rescued from execution (by a ruse too complicated to get into here) and given a new identity. His mission is to determine whether the people of the new Darknet are capable of building a healthy society and governing themselves peacefully, rather than being cattle benevolently managed by the Daemon—in other words, “justify the freedom of humanity.” As Sobol’s recorded message informs Sebeck: > “I’ll tell you what the Daemon is: the Daemon is a remorseless system for building a distributed civilization. A civilization that perpetually regenerates. One with no central authority. Your only option is what form that civilization takes. And that depends on the actions of people like you.” The question is answered at the end when Loki, completely out of control and attempting to launch an unending bloodbath after the defeat of The Major and his forces, is stripped of his powers by the Darknet community. By reining in Loki and controlling the abuse of Darknet power, the new society had passed Sobol’s test. At that point both conflicts are resolved. The old corporate order is defeated, along with the dark side of the Darknet itself, and the networked resilient communities are free to build the successor society in peace. As an anarchist, my main issue with Suarez is his assumption—expressed through some of his more idealistic characters—that the problem was the corporate plutocracy’s subversion of “our laws” and “the governments we create.” In the end, when The Major and the forces he represents are defeated, the conspirators are charged with treason and the atrophied American constitutional republic is restored to its dignity and independence. All that’s missing is someone saying “it would have worked if not for you meddling kids.” This, I think, is fundamentally wrong-headed. The global corporate regime is not something that came about as a result of inadequate regulation by legitimate states. Rather, the corporate economy as we know it could not have come about at all without being imposed on society from above by a top-down revolution, on almost the same scale as Stalin’s collectivization and first Five Year Plan (see here, for example—scroll down to the section on the Great Betrayal). The reason the American model of spectator democracy has been allowed to function all these years is precisely that it worked so well for the ruling class—much less messy to pacify the public with an illusion of control than to suppress it by force. Suarez, speaking through his characters, uses the Gilded Age and the Roaring Twenties (along with the present neoliberal order) as examples of periods when the plutocracy achieved ascendancy over democracy. The Progressive Era and New Deal, presumably, were examples of “our laws” and “the governments we create” reining in the excesses and restoring democratic control. But in fact the Progressive Era reforms and New Deal were just the agendas of a rival faction of state capitalists. Just look at the primary real-world effect of Progressive Era regulations as described by Gabriel Kolko in _The Triumph of American Conservatism_ : to cartelize industry and create stable oligopoly markets by reining in destructive price and quality competition. Or the role of GE President Gerard Swope and the Business Advisory Council in the New Deal, as described by G. William Domhoff. American politics has been a shifting coalition between two factions of capital. One faction, the Progressives and New Dealers, are like a smart farmer who thinks he’ll get more work out of his livestock in the long run if he feeds and houses them comfortably and works them only in moderation. The other faction, the faction of the Great Barbecue, of Normalcy and Reaganism, is like a farmer who thinks he’ll come out ahead by working his livestock to death and then replacing them. But both factions see us as their property, and are motivated primarily by the goal of maximizing their own long-term profit. Attempts by the smarter and more humane farmers to collectively regulate the treatment of their livestock (the collective action, any game theorist could tell you, is a common sense measure to prevent individual defection in the interest of short-term individual profit, at the expense of long-term collective loss) are what Marx dismissed, in the case of the British Ten-Hour Day Act, as the common action of farmers to mandate the manuring of their fields. The corporate economy, from its very beginning, has been a structure of power based on massive collusion between big government and big business. From the very beginning of the corporate system, the primary function of government has been to subsidize the operating costs of big business, and to protect big business from competition through regulatory cartels. And from the very beginning of capitalism itself, the structure of “actually existing capitalism” (as opposed to a genuinely free market) has been a creature of massive state intervention: Enclosures, nullifcation of copyhold, absolutist suppression of the leagues of Free Towns, the Navigation Acts and conquest of the Third World—a story written, if you’ll pardon the allusion, in letters of fire and blood. As for the Founding Fathers Suarez celebrates, I hesitate to imagine how left-wing historians like Charles Beard or Merrill Jensen would respond to a characterization of a coup by Federalist war bond speculators and land-owners as “the government we create.” Those who think otherwise, those who think the “good government” just needs to be reactivated to set things to right, are in my opinion like the Russian peasants who thought the “Little Father” was just misled by wicked advisers, and—if he could ever witness the sufferings of his people—would smite their enemies and dry all their tears. Government wasn’t hijacked by a ruling class at some discrete moment, as a departure from its past nature; government, in its essence, has been “executive committee of a ruling class” since the beginning. Aside from that, I suppose I have some reservations about the fundamental premise of the story. I’d prefer to see the triumph of resilient communities and darknets, and our delivery from global corporate tyranny, come about some other way than by a megalomaniac billionaire acting as _deus ex machina_ from beyond the grave. My hope, a hope I’ve tried to make a case for elsewhere, is that corporate capitalism is simply unsustainable and will collapse from its own internal crisis tendencies. The crises of overaccumulation and underconsumption, Peak Oil, fiscal bankruptcy of government, the network revolution combined with the Streisand Effect and open-mouth sabotage, the unenforceability of “intellectual property” law, the growing worthlessness of most investment capital as the price of manufacturing machinery falls by multiple orders of magnitude—these are the things that will bring the system down. The building blocks of a successor society—relocalized agriculture, relocalized industry using micromanufacturing technology, networked organization—will serve as building blocks of necessity because they’re the only game in town. But if a dead megalomaniac is the only way to do it, I’ll take that too. ### Share this: * Share on X (Opens in new window) X * Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook * Like Loading... ### _Related_
000 0
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 16/08/2026
RE: meow.social/@the_gneech/11710314906… This. The Web of the 90s, as most people used it after it was privatized, was as close as it ever came to the "Information Superhighway" envisioned by Gingrich et al -- dominated by static institutional websites. Even then, though, it was […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
013 3
Reposted by Kevin Carson
The Gneech! Awww Yeah @the-gneech.meow.social.ap.brid.gy · 16/08/2026
Well ouch.
Screenshot of a post by someone named arahir:

"i just can't convey the frustration and sorrow that it's been to grow up at first without the internet and then watching it bloom into this useful, fun, connecting force you sometimes spent time on, only for it to degrade into this constant oppressive waste of time and energy where people are constantly pumping out algorithmically designed content for max algorithmic appeal and even the most simple search generates either no results or an infinite abyss of ai generated slop none of which is usable or correct. we briefly had a library of
alexandria and then fed it into a paper shredder so advertisers could sell a random mash of pulp back to us at a premium.
6150235 235
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 15/08/2026
Memories Mysteriously Survive After Brain Shutdown, And Scientists Don’t Know Why www.404media.co/memories-mysterious…
404media.co
Memories Mysteriously Survive After Brain Shutdown, And Scientists Don’t Know Why
Mice can access memories after hibernation, a state that largely shuts their brains off and reduces synapses, suggesting that memories are stored across shifting neural systems.
001 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 15/08/2026
"But when a guy like Stoller says Americans must choose between 'woke' libs and 'working people,' he has a certain picture in his head of what qualifies as a working person.... Wokeness, according to the narrative, slithered out of the Ivory Tower to tell regular folks not to use slurs." […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
001 1
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 14/08/2026
ICE shock gloves have weak points www.wired.com/story/the-painful-tru…
Crucially, the GLOVE has limitations, chief among them that for the device to work effectively and deliver its restraining pain shock, it must come into contact with the subject's bare skin. According to Compliant Technologies, the gloves won't work through dry clothing or thick hair. The gloves will work, however, if the subject is wearing thin, wet clothing, such as soaked T-shirts or blouses. The GLOVE also does not like being dunked in water and will likely be rendered inoperable if this happens.
1322 22
Kevin Carson @kevincarson1.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 13/08/2026
Guy does a cool thing, and then has to go and mess it all up by causing a lot of drama for a woman who doesn't even know him. www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/john-h…
nbcnews.com
John Hinckley Jr., who shot Ronald Reagan to impress Jodie Foster, says he wishes her well
Hinckley shot President Ronald Reagan as he was leaving the Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C., in 1981.
100 1