Sign in

karel.online

@karel.online
2.4K followers 4.3K following 2.5K posts

daughters dad, married to a flawless being, ruthless idealist, involuntary contrarian, ballistic atheist, creator, investor, programmer

PostsRepliesMedia
karel.online @karel.online · 21/08/2026
At what point is "fitness to govern" no longer abstract? Trump, Musk, Putin, Netanyahu or Kim have demonstrably made decisions causing mass death. This is murder not "controversy." It is a civilization-level safety problem. We don't wait for the plane to crash before requiring air-traffic control.
AI generated image of Trump, Musk, Putin, Netanyahu, Kim Jong Un posing smiling together for media.
010
karel.online @karel.online · 24/06/2026
Modern media has industrialized a process that used to be rare. In 19th century, a charismatic charlatan might reach thousands. Today, algorithms reward exactly the traits that made early charlatans effective: confidence conflict simplification identity formation anti-establishment narratives
120
karel.online @karel.online · 17/06/2026
Israel signed the Rome Statute in 2000 but never ratified it and later stated that it did not intend to become a party to the treaty. Pretending to have an intention that you don't actually have is fraud. Not too complicated, right?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 22/04/2026
've to wake up every day half-expecting nuclear war, only to scroll into a world where nothing means what it should. Everything redefined—error becomes identity, intent becomes interpretation, reality becomes narrative. Could you join me in not tolerating criminal idiots pretending neurodivergence?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 26/03/2026
Prague 2026-03-21 This is what you do when parasitic, treasonous sociopaths imitating Trump get into your government: you assure them that they have to go through you. Thank you Czech Republic! (and myself, was there of course:) images: novinky.cz
020
karel.online @karel.online · 18/03/2026
Another movie about a president's wife. Melania meets Livia. "Former first lady, brilliant economist, loving grandma...", just perfect for a double-title budget DVD with European art-film flair. This time perhaps with a bonus scene: her father's life achievements as a Nazi secret police official.
020
karel.online @karel.online · 06/02/2026
Masters of critical thinking, debunkers of nonsense, champions of reason. Except on ethics-free private jet: skepticism takes a coffee break, and moral curiosity flies economy.
010
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
Fun fact: Miloš Zelníček was an active and reliable agent of the secret police of Soviet-occupied Czechoslovakia. This feared institution was a highly organized extension of the Soviet secret police, the KGB. Miloš Zelníček was the father of Ivana Zelníčková, as in Ivana Trump.
043
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
For readers who, like me, never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence: Coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
063
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
0110
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
100
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
14210
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
010
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
010
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
022
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
051
karel.online @karel.online · 19/01/2026
If you've never thought of "Nobel Prize" and "Propaganda Minister" in the same sentence, think again. Unlike us, coffin-wetting Nazi Stephen Miller knew for sure that the only person in history to hold someone else's Nobel was, of course, Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/01/2026
"It's the oil, stupid." So among the top 14 countries by oil reserves, only one is a fully functional democracy — and it is also the only country on that list that has never initiated or threatened war, or used force against another nation. Simple, right? (source: visualcapitalist.com, 2024)
020
karel.online @karel.online · 09/01/2026
"It's the oil, stupid." So among the top 14 countries by oil reserves, only one is a fully functional democracy — and it is also the only country on that list that has never initiated or threatened war, or used force against another nation. Simple, right? (source: visualcapitalist.com, 2024)
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/01/2026
"It's the oil, stupid." So among the top 14 countries by oil reserves, only one is a fully functional democracy — and it is also the only country on that list that has never initiated or threatened war, or used force against another nation. Simple, right? (source: visualcapitalist.com, 2024)
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/01/2026
"It's the oil, stupid." So among the top 14 countries by oil reserves, only one is a fully functional democracy — and it is also the only country on that list that has never initiated or threatened war, or used force against another nation. Simple, right? (source: visualcapitalist.com, 2024)
031
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
001
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
010
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
011
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
021
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizens for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 11/12/2025
US citizens. This is not a situation of political alternative to anything. This is a situation of your direct responsibility as US citizen for the deliberate permanent violation of human rights. What part of being next in line don't you understand? www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...
010
karel.online @karel.online · 09/12/2025
Also nothing like starting a National Security Strategy, by explaining what a word "strategy" is – apparently for the author's own benefit. Of course, this document of utmost significance is Word, default font, default half-filled second-level bullets and heroically casual underlining and italics.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/12/2025
Also nothing like starting a National Security Strategy, by explaining what a word "strategy" is – apparently for the author's own benefit. Of course, this document of utmost significance is Word, default font, default half-filled second-level bullets and heroically casual underlining and italics.
010
karel.online @karel.online · 09/12/2025
Also nothing like starting a National Security Strategy, by explaining what a word "strategy" is – apparently for the author's own benefit. Of course, this document of utmost significance is Word, default font, default half-filled second-level bullets and heroically casual underlining and italics.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/12/2025
Nothing like starting a National Security Strategy, by explaining what a word "strategy" is – apparently for the author's own benefit. Of course, this document of utmost significance is Word, default font, default half-filled second-level bullets and heroically casual underlining and italics.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/12/2025
Nothing like starting a National Security Strategy, by explaining what a word "strategy" is – apparently for the author's own benefit. Of course, this document of utmost significance is Word, default font, default half-filled second-level bullets and heroically casual underlining and italics.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 09/12/2025
Nothing like starting a National Security Strategy, by explaining what a word "strategy" is – apparently for the author's own benefit. Of course, this document of utmost significance is Word, default font, default half-filled second-level bullets and heroically casual underlining and italics.
000
karel.online @karel.online · 30/09/2025
One is waging war even though he doesn't have to. The other has all the means to end it, but doesn't want to. Who among us who bear the consequences is actually against the immediate removal of these two sadistic idiots from their positions? What are we even still discussing?
010
karel.online @karel.online · 28/09/2025
Sunday activities of religion: Myanmar: ethnic cleansing India: exclusionary politics Pakistan: minority persecution Israel: genocide legitimization West Bank: divine right violence USA: misogyny, racism, authoritarianism Russia: war propaganda global (ISIS): apocalyptic violence How long?
041
karel.online @karel.online · 28/09/2025
Also, do we still pretend today that religion is a positive value for some reason?
000
karel.online @karel.online · 27/09/2025
Because it was a troll that I had to block, but some of you were curious what kind of picture it was: "Temptation of Christ" (Ary Scheffer, 1854) Here is screenshot of the original post.
010
karel.online @karel.online · 27/09/2025
"A citizen of the Reich shall only be a State citizen of German or kindred blood who by his behaviour has shown that he is willing and suitable to serve the German people and Reich loyally." – The Reich Citizenship Law, September 15, 1935
000