www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/litigan...
"Simply submitting the product of generative AI to a court or tribunal, or placing the onus to check a document onto an opponent, is not acceptable"
Substitute 'opponent' with 'judge'. This is now ubiquitous in the County/Family Court. What is to be done?
lawgazette.co.uk
Litigant files 300-page skeleton generated entirely by ChatGPT
Judge critical that onus was placed on opposing side to check for AI errors.