Sign in

Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)

@johntmurphy.bsky.social
209 followers 211 following 217 posts

PhD, MA Ed. Former researcher at Argonne National Lab, University of Chicago, and Northern Illinois University. Archaeology, Anthropology, and Computation. Finding complexity in the past to build a better future.

PostsRepliesMedia
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Artificial Intelligence. (The word being changed is the wrong one; it _is_ artificial; it is _not_ intelligence, as I wrote last year: perfectknowledgedb.com/essays/AI_Is... ) Hold the line, everyone.
perfectknowledgedb.com
AI Is A But Not I
010
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
Google, part of a company worth $4 trillion, part of the 'tech leader' industry that we are supposed to believe are the best of the best and who are the smartest software developers on the planet and are leading us to a glorious future, just sent me an email with the salutation "Hi null."
A slightly redacted email from Google that begins, "Hi null."
010
Reposted by Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)
Evan Urquhart @evanurquhart.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
I'm increasingly frustrated that people who are anti-AI aren't being taken seriously, and taking a page out of my thoughts on why the anti-trans backlash got as far as it did I'm starting to think the anti-AI side isn't extreme enough.
481842325
Reposted by Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
NEW: In March the White House released an FY27 budget request that zeroed out the National Science Foundation's directorate of Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE). For months it was unclear what would happen. Now, with FY26 over, the damage to SBE is coming to light. My reporting:
science.org
‘Complete devastation’: How NSF gutted its social sciences research
Agency body that funds sociology, linguistics, and archaeology studies in U.S. gave 90% fewer new grants this year
9665515
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
But given this, the fire metaphor is a good one because when a fire burns a building down, we hold the person who started the fire responsible. They can't simply say, "I had no idea it could do this," nor can they say, "Well, it decided to burn that building, not me."
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
This is one of the reasons I'm concerned about the entire metaphor of AI 'agents'. There's a social-science-y layer there: inanimate things do have 'agency'; they do not have 'intentionality'. I take this as self-evident, and all arguments against it are marketing.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Internet security is like a wood-frame hotel. It's generally going to hold, and it's good enough, but it's never been perfect; breaking in is possible, so we made that illegal. Hacking is like poking to find drafty cracks and sneaking in. I worry that AI attacks might be more like fire.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Got it- and donation done. Thanks!
010
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Excited to get this in hardcopy! kapow.works/donate redirects to kapow.works/support, which offers several 'donate' options that seem to go different places. Which path leads to the handbook? Or do they all?
110
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
This is a lot to digest, even before you get to the part about 'Golden Tickets'.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Bill was a great guy. I TAed for him once. I also worked with engineers and economists who didn't know his UofA garbage work existed. They had a variety of different thoughts - all theoretical - about what things people put into the waste stream, but no idea that you could, you know, find out.
021
Reposted by Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)
Alondra Nelson @alondra.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Heartily endorsing this important piece! As I argued earlier this year, social research did not just emerge from a prior moment of social change, it did crucial sensemaking about that change, up to and including the present. That work must continue and be independent. www.amacad.org/publication/...
amacad.org
Field Theory: AI as Social Science Question, Object & Tool
Uses of advanced artificial intelligence are changing how societies organize labor, govern, produce knowledge, and make meaning. In light of these developments, this essay argues that AI models, tools...
14420
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
That said, I'm glad they were honest when asked, and I'm even more glad they were asked. That's important.
0120
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
We've made it nearly impossible to do simple things, by expecting or requiring everything to be integrated into an architecture and a packaging structure that demands extreme complexity.
1140
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
The irony is that the core of their game could probably be written fairly easily (even in BASIC, maybe?) - if you didn't need bells & whistles, or a web interface, or to track users, or to enforce security. You would still need a corpus to determine word rarity, but no gen AI for code.
190
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
It's a nod to the tower's early use recording the license plates of passing dirigibles.
A black-and-white 1901 photograph of a famous incident in which an airship raced across Paris to the Eiffel Tower. The photograph is taken from below and shows the airship close to the tower and about 2/3 the way up its height. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Santos-Dumont_flight_around_the_Eiffel_Tower.jpg/960px-Santos-Dumont_flight_around_the_Eiffel_Tower.jpg?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
The AI program is by its nature in opposition to this. This is built in to the (marketable) idea that what they are doing is not just math and computation, it is 'intelligence': abstract and above critique. This program is finding common cause with many of our contemporary political actors.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
The defining characteristic of the American 'experiment' used to be that the government itself would foster its own critique. It was confident enough in democracy that it would be content to study its own flaws - it encouraged this and funded it.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Public social science is funded by us, done with consent, and leads to published results, data we all can review, and ideas that are not driven by profit. The public benefit is the opportunity to understand, regulate, or oppose what's being done in the private sector - and also by our government.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Social science is the most heavily funded activity in our country right now - if you count all the data being collected in data centers and everything that is being learned about us by corporations. *Public* social science, where we all get to benefit, is being written out of existence.
120
Reposted by Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)
Kim Lane Scheppele @kimlanelaw.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Zero new NSF grants in sociology, anthropology, political science and economics. The agenda of this US govt is to stop documenting the society in which we live while they are destroying it. We will find other ways to track and explain our times and fight to restore our research funding.
15893454
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
I bet they are!
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
Yikes- I hope you can drive. I assume hailing a cab might be difficult.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
1) No one should do any of this. 2) Unchecked, it will eventually be built into the entire system, so the *only* way to buy something is to 'authorize an agent,' and trying to do it by yourself (especially anonymously) will be seen as weird (literally, "discredited").
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
This is very good. To the quote in the image I would add that the 'undervaluation' is deliberate and purposive: One way to corner a market is to acquire what you can and destroy the rest. AI is doing this with all of cultural heritage. It will claim to know 'everything' bc nothing else will be left.
A block of text: Written off for its title online, “Drone Disorientations” would make a fascinating teaching object. Of course, the capacity to do that kind of interdisciplinary work in the classroom is rapidly dwindling. Harvard University just laid off its Writing Program Director along with dozens of other staff in a “restructuring” that many speculate is motivated by the school’s embrace of AI models. [HIGHLIGHTED] We’re occupying a strange political moment in which humanities work is both massively undervalued and everywhere extracted as a valuable resource.[END HIGHLIGHTING] Recently, the AI company Anthropic settled a $1.5 billion lawsuit involving over 300,000 plaintiffs for stealing archives of 7 million digitized books without compensation. During the proceedings, internal documents emerged revealing what the company called “Project Panama,” “our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world,” not just digital ones.
011
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
Agree, and Doctorow's posts take you to work by Lauren Leek that also looks phenomenal. Diving in now...
020
Reposted by Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)
By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C) @doctorow.pluralistic.net · 12/08/2026
One of my favorite rhetorical and analytical moves is joining things (showing that different, seemingly unrelated ideas are part of the same phenomenon) and taking them apart (resolving paradoxes by demonstrating that what appears like a contradictory thing is different things, lumped together). 1/
A collage made of architectural features from 'Variae Architecturae Formae' (1636), a collection of engravings. The architectural arches, buildings, fountains, etc, are layered atop each other and placed around each other to create an infinite, recombinant built environment.
325491
Reposted by Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy)
the Juice Media @thejuicemedia.com · 11/08/2026
The Government™ has made an ad about Ai Data Centres, and it’s surprisingly honest and informative.
youtube.com
Honest Government Ad | Ai Data Centres
YouTube video by thejuicemedia
25701419
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
But I'm quite sure that these two - the communication strategy and the social organizations possible from it - are related. We create ourselves, and we create the idea of ourselves, and by doing so we create the conditions in which (and from which) we create our world.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
We do not know the social organization(s) or communication strategies (how debates were organized) that allowed ancient Native Americans to build sites like the Octagon and Great Circle earthworks, nor the role that these places played in hosting collective events; they may have been very different.
A view looking at the low walls of the Octagon Earthworks in Newark, Ohio. The view includes two walls of the connective passage between the Octagon and Circle, and the mound opposite the entrance within the Octagon itself.The interior of the Great Circle mound in Newark, Ohio, showing the curving mound and the interior ditch, taken from near the opening on the ENE side, looking NNW.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
2. Shout out to my hobby of photographing Ohio archaeological sites: "Orators' Mound", near Springfield, said to have been the site of a debate between Daniel Webster and Henry Clay in 1840, with note that we wouldn't use Native American mounds like this today, and a segue to...
A small mound of earth covered by snow in woods lit by the setting sun. A sign identifies it as an 'Adena Burial Mound  Closed to the Public'.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
1. This can connect to our education system and how we teach students to be citizens. (Broadcast to a passive class or encourage students to be publicly declarative.) And re: students using ChatGPT, reminder that they're not producing essays, they're producing their (private & social/public) selves.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
An interesting take by @jamellebouie.net (Short version: (Some) Millennials are politically gifted b/c they grew up in a different media environment and are used to discourse in the public view.) Responses:
youtube.com
Do Millennials have the political juice?
YouTube video by Takes™ by Jamelle Bouie
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Also, just for the record, I _am_ saying it: There is literally no use for ChatGPT.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
[It is entirely possible that the people in the companies themselves do not understand it because they, too, lack a good framework. This does not change, nor does it excuse, what they are doing.]
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
The political project is to convince everyone that their version is valid, inevitable, superior, and the only possible alternative. It involves erasure as much as innovation. This is inherently destructive, because it quashes the voices and innovations that would produce these alternatives.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Or rather: These companies are attempting to build a single, centralized version of 'intelligence'. This is inherently unable to see that a complex society of individuals in a rich environment can find contingent, bespoke, configurations to address problems they perceive and define themselves.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Later in this interview they arrive at the point where the AI being developed is hitting the wall of 'relational' problems, by which they mean the difficulty of establishing social structures for coordinated action and solving collective problems. Who would have thought?
110
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
🧵The issue is not just that a group of elites is imposing their vision of the world onto us without their consent; it is also the content of their vision that is inherently problematic. The resistance to it must be more than just about how it is being done, it must articulate what is wrong with it.
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
People feel like AI is being forced on them, but lack a good framework to understand that it is actually a political project, not a technical one. We're taught that tech opens possibilities, but we're not taught that our own capacity for political imagination does so as well.
nytimes.com
Video: Opinion | What Is A.I. Populism?
Is public backlash to artificial intelligence really about the technology, or is it a resistance to Silicon Valley elites forcing their vision on society? The writer Jasmine Sun joins “The Ezra Klein ...
100
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
👇🧵
011
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
This begs the question of what is the downstream effect of offloading so much of our cognitive exercise onto external systems like GPS or AI, and whether maybe it's just better if we think for ourselves - or even to build a world that is designed for us to think in.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 04/08/2026
Yes to this, and to the reading list the NYT article proposes. Lots of work to do.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
*Raises hand...
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
They reversed that so fast the skid marks are visible from space. (Image not available.)
0331
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
I really hope this doesn't include a way to make fake archaeological sites. I know this is a niche concern, but the profusion of fake archaeology on social media is astonishing. The part that is most disappointing is how amazing *real* archaeology is. It just isn't the story some people want.
020
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
Can confirm: I looked at the cited websites yesterday and linked to one of them in one of my posts; now that page is gone.
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
My biggest concern is, How much is being invested in this centralized, digitized, non-spatial, ahistoric, limited, commodifiable, and controllable definition of 'intelligence', vs. how much could be spent building the capabilities of communities and people in them instead?
000
Radical Complexity (John T. Murphy) @johntmurphy.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
And, of course, 'making all of knowledge available to the world' seems like a laudable goal, but putting all knowledge in one place means de facto some of it can be controlled in ways that physical copies might avoid. Physical copies can be clandestine, and privacy will always matter.
100