John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 09/10/2026“Robbing your constituents to subsidize your donors” is a great line. 020
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 05/10/2026It’s a bit weird to say you’re “disappointed” in a PM you didn’t vote for and have criticised since day 1, isn’t it? 020
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The problem with that is that no matter what you pay them, they will always need money to campaign. 010
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026I’m just a progressive that is tired of progressives wasting time and energy with magical thinking. You convince yourself that the problem is the ALP because that’s easier than dealing with the fact that your problem is the Australian electorate. 000
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026The Greens vote hit 11.76% in 2010. It basically hasn’t moved since then. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026If greens voters prefer a conservative government to a Labor government, they should put Labor last. It’s their choice! It’s a democracy! But the idea that the Labor government owes the Greens party something because most greens voters prefer a Labor gvt to a conservative one is nuts. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026They might want to “press ahead”, but they can’t actually do anything unless they earn power. To do that, they need to broaden their appeal beyond 12% of the electorate. And they have no plan to do that. So … 🤷♂️ 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026That line of thinking leads nowhere. Labor optimised its vote for the electoral system we have and won the election. If the Greens want to implement their policies, they need to win an election, or offer Labor a deal that it is Labor’s interests to accept. 110
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026When did I say anything about Tasmania? One of us is definitely on drugs, because I don’t remember that. 200
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/10/2026It’s very weird how we conduct these elaborate, universal opinion polls to gauge the preferences of the Australian people, and yet greens supporters are convinced that even though 90% of Australians chose to support other parties, what they really want are greens party policies 🤪 200
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Can you please send me some of your drugs? Reality is a bit much for me, too. 400
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Yeah I think we’re done here. Have a good evening. 000
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026No it’s not. But the hard fact is that a party as far left as the Greens will only ever win 10-15% of the vote in Australia. Lots of people seem to be delusional about that. You can be left and powerless, or centre-left and govern periodically. Anything else is magical thinking. 300
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026It depends what they want. If they want to replace Labor as the left-of-centre potential party of government, yes, that’s what they need to do. If they want to continue w a set of policies that appeals to 10% of the electorate, they should be realistic about what they can achieve with that support. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026This is getting a bit idiotic. If I propose a set of policies that I know only a small minority of people will support, I am not trying to win a general election. That’s the Greens. They have a message that only wins wide support in a handful of seats in the country. They know that. So … 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026No, that’s wrong. They *don’t* have a strategy to get elected to government. They are not trying to appeal to enough voters to win government: that would require a different set of policies. Their strategy is exactly as I described it. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026The greens’ problem is that for the last decade, their entire strategy has been based on a fantasy of winning the balance of power in the lower house (unlikely) and then blackmailing Labor into implementing their policies (impossible). 101
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026It depends what you want to achieve. You can do a lot of grandstanding as a minor party w a few Senate seats, but if you want to influence policy outcomes towards your preferences, you have to be part of a coalition, which means accepting the limits of your influence. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026If you want more left wing government policy, the alternative is to convince more people to vote for left wing policy. That’s the constraint … ateotd, parties are just vehicles for consolidating public sentiment, and parties that want to govern need to attract the median voter to their coalition. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026The City subreddits have been surprisingly calm and resigned, for the most part. Not everyone, obviously, but far from the wholesale rejection you might have expected. 010
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Like I said, so what? The Greens hold a weapon that inflicts more damage on them than the government every time they use it. The Greens keep imagining that they can blackmail Labor into treating them as part of the government. But you can’t blackmail someone by punching yourself in the face. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Another fantasy. You’re suggesting that the Greens facilitate a the election conservative government? I’m sure that will advance Greens policy objectives 🤣 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026They can team up with the Libs and Nats to block legislation. So what? As they found out last term, that’s a pretty blunt instrument and it has a tendency to blow up in their faces. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026I still don’t understand why you think the greens have a role here. Labor won the election. They are going to implement the policies they ran on and won, not the policies the Greens ran on and lost. What am I missing? 820
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026It’s both. A party with the demographic weight of the Greens or Nats can only achieve the influence Greens want by doing what the Nats do (or at least did). 000
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026So the Greens campaign relentlessly against Labor and focus almost all their efforts on winning Labor seats, lose, and then expect Labor to treat the Greens as a governing partner rather than part of the opposition. That seems delusional to me. 570
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 01/10/2026The difference is that the Nats decided to trade policy purity and the right to compete with the Libs in return for a measure of power and influence. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 30/09/2026Speaking as a mediocre white man, I wish I had a fraction of Faruqi’s self-belief. 020
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 26/09/2026That’s evidence of sound parenting. Reminds me of when one of mine was five, we were out shopping and chatting about an upcoming trip to London, which prompted this: “do you think the Queen fights for her right to party?” 010
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 24/09/2026Hah, I prevailed on that one as well. Had to debate it with the corporate affairs team. 🤣 110
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 24/09/2026“Who cares, you’re gonna die soon anyway, vote for me” is one hell of an election pitch. 110
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 24/09/2026I work on NBN’s debt programs. In order to preserve my keyboard, I insisted we define it as “the Department of Communications” in their offering docs so we only have to write it out once. Every year or so, I have to explain to the department that their name is unfeasibly long and we won’t change. 110
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 24/09/2026That’s a bit disingenuous, isn’t it Tom? I believe you entirely when you say your main concern is that the GOP is defeated, but clearly you also have a preference about what type of Dem holds power beyond mere electability. 000
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 24/09/2026That is nonsense. There are many genocide scholars who have studied the holocaust and who describe what Israel is doing as genocide. I also find this personally offensive. I’ll stack my knowledge of the holocaust against any non-professional. They’re not the same, but they’re both genocide. 150
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 23/09/2026He makes it soooooo hard to turn him into a demon! 010
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Any outlet that doesn’t boycott is going to be fair game for the next Democratic administration … 030
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 11/09/2026Great thread. I relate to living in NYC through that period, and I share your husband’s birthday. As always, the Onion captured it best: theonion.com/second-birth...theonion.comSecond Birthday In A Row Ruined By TerrorismHOBOKEN, NJ—In what threatens to be an annual ritual, Rob Bachman, born Sept. 11, 1973, braced himself Tuesday for yet another birthday ruined by the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. 002
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 04/09/2026True, but I suspect that in many cases, prosecutors get a fair idea of what’s going on, particularly from the interactions between the jury and the judge during the deliberation process. But I could be wrong. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 04/09/2026Not my area of expertise, but I was under the impression that that was effectively what happened … ie, the state would only go for a retrial when they thought that they had convinced the jury except for one or two holdouts. Is that not so? 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 04/09/2026If you reformed the political contribution system, they would. It’s difficult to overstate how different the landscape would be if politicians weren’t dependent on donations from health care companies. Which means you would need to have a large Dem majority and expand the Supreme Court. 100
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/09/2026Is that you looking for advice about being conned into getting a vasectomy, Cam? 030
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/09/2026A. That wasn’t the question she asked. B. What does your question have to do with what I posted? Did you actually read what I posted? Why don’t you try saying back in your own words what you think I said. 000
John Nicolay @johnnicolay.bsky.social · 02/09/2026Perhaps you can explain to me why that question is relevant to what I posted, given that no-one else can. 100