Reposted by John KroenckeThe Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics @theceme.bsky.social · 27/01/2025Book Review: In 'Scarcity', Fredrik Albritton Jonsson and Carl Wennerlind set out a comparison of ideas about the use of natural resources and economic organisation, but the treatment of material is at times superficial and opportunities to engage with important contemporary debates are missed. 111
Reposted by John KroenckeThe Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics @theceme.bsky.social · 20/01/2025A selection of some recent book reviews on the topic of trade and trade policy. (links below) 111
Reposted by John KroenckeThe Institute for Fiscal Studies @theifs.bsky.social · 22/11/2024Elaine Drayton, @peterlevell.bsky.social and @david-sturrock.bsky.social's paper finds that England is bad at building homes in areas with rising demand: ifs.org.uk/articles/eng... This map allows you to examine changes in housing supply and prices over 25 years at a local level. [2/8]ifs.org.ukEngland has a poor record of building homes where they are needed | Institute for Fiscal StudiesThis comment discusses how well housebuilding in England has responded to changes in local demand over the last 25 years. 121
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 22/11/2024End of the year browman consumer surplus list 130
Reposted by John KroenckeJohn Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Urbanists often look to places like zoning-free Houston, the private places of St Louis, and privately-developed exurban communities like Irvine. There we see rules about land use emerge between residents and via developers. I wrote about another example. theceme.substack.com/p/private-pl... 🧵 2208
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024cc: @sambowman.co @bswud.bsky.social @createstreets.bsky.social @johnrmyers.bsky.social 010
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Read more about all of this (and more!) in my publication from last year which is available in print, pdf, and web-friendly Substack (theceme.substack.com/p/private-pl...) 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024We continue to see some of these features (especially in commercial tenant curation and commercial street investment) but that is a topic for another day! 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Of interest, is that this rebuilding also included multi-story houses being replaced by purpose-built flats (as in Howards End) Much of this, of course, also occurred in areas with less concentrated land ownership. Though on the great estates this was done in more planned ways. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024In the most extreme examples whole portions of neighborhoods like Hans Town and the area surrounding Mount Street in Mayfair (pictured) were rebuilt at a higher density in ways more suited to the market. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024New floors were often added as part of the lease renewal. Mansion flats replaced terraced houses. Stables became mews houses. But even more interestingly, the great estates have examples of comprehensive regeneration. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024This preserved market incentives to intensify as the price of land rose. When leases on a street came due, the landowner (and builders) could reassess the suitability of what was built (taking into account the total value of the area) without the issues of land assembly (leases were coordinated). 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024When the lease ended (terms varied but they were rarely longer than 99 years) the landlord would have ownership of the building itself and the underlying land. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024The initial construction benefited from the ability to capture spillover effects through the concentrated ownership of the land. Continuing ownership also created a long-term pecuniary and reputational interest. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024I show how the private planning enabled (builders often played crucial roles) and practiced by the estates allowed coordinated responses to changing markets. As tastes changed so did neighborhoods. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Because of the class of resident in the Grosvenor's Mayfair this also included things like restrictions on building works during the London social season (as seen in Bridgerton) 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Through legal covenants and discretionary control they were also able to restrict negative spillovers by coordinating use and prohibiting users like butchers and blacksmiths whose work might annoy neighbors. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024[Despite his being British, Pigou's foundational work on externalities discounts this exact calculation. "uncompensated services are rendered when resources are invested in private parks in cities; for these, even though the public is not admitted to them, improve the air of the neighbourhood"] 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024John Weale in 1851 wrote "of course the quantity of ground appropriated to these ventilators is merely calculated so that the increased rental of houses enjoying the sight of the tree, may compensate for the loss of ground from the immeadiate purposes of the speculator" 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024The estates were able to provide things such as green space (including London’s famous private garden squares) when they added net value because they owned the surrounding real estate which captured the value. 110
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024In contracting with builders, agents of the landlord would engage in rudimentary site planning for basic infrastructure. They would also set parameters of what exactly the developers would agree to build and how common infrastructure was to be funded. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024The legal and financial conditions of the time meant that this land was most often developed via leasehold. Builder/developers would pay to take out a termed lease on land owned by a landlord. Upon building a finished product they could sell the lease on but the lease would ultimately revert back. 110
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024The map above is one of many that show the historic landlords who owned much of inner London. Many of these landholders were often aristocratic families, religious institutions, or charities. The most valuable estates like those held by the Duke of Westminster are sometimes called great estates. 110
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Much of expanding middle-class London between the 17th and early 20th centuries was built on land held by a number of different parties. But unlike our common perception of anarchic free-for-all, many of these developments took place on land which was owned by relatively few owners. 110
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024There is an interesting historical feature of inner London that shows similar features of the later developments in the US with the added benefit of seeing dynamics play out over a longer period of time with retained control by a single party. I'll show a few of these features in this thread. 100
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024Urbanists often look to places like zoning-free Houston, the private places of St Louis, and privately-developed exurban communities like Irvine. There we see rules about land use emerge between residents and via developers. I wrote about another example. theceme.substack.com/p/private-pl... 🧵 2208
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024old data from here but note how low the rates are at the low end of the UK threshold for children in other countries www.oecd.org/en/publicati... 020
John Kroencke @johnkroencke.bsky.social · 20/11/2024the combination of high rate at a relatively low threshold and unlimited gifts is particularly crazy (and even high tax countries like France charge it as inheritance tax per beneficiary). A system designed to tax upper mc people who live in SE England and die unexpectedly in their main asset 130