Sign in

🌬️🍃

@jem.ispost.ing
222 followers 386 following 487 posts

expert mesearcher | arch(l)iving ✍🏽 www.joeledmartinez.com 💭 scatteredseeds.leaflet.pub

PostsRepliesMedia
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 16/09/2026
music nostalgia era 🌼 song: Fiori - If I from first CD I ever bought, best of trance vol 1 🥹
120
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 11/09/2026
🕶️
020
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 11/09/2026
🪭
130
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 11/09/2026
chicago was everything.
140
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 04/09/2026
that’s a roly poly
Spatial Map of my dialectic quiz results showing I speak most like Miami, Houston, Atlanta than the Mid and North West.
020
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 29/08/2026
🥹🏋🏽‍♂️
160
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 23/08/2026
"It may be that race is the way anti-blackness appears to political economy, such that labor, exploitation, capital, & commodity are some of the best avenues to understand racial hierarchies. But this does not mean race need be reduced to its appearance; may be the distorted form of something else"
Excerpt from linked interview with Sara-Maria Sorentino

Text:
You recently wrote an article called, “The Abstract Slave: Anti-Blackness and Marx’s Method,” for the journal of International Labor and Working-Class History. What are the analytical gaps of Marx’s method for confronting structures of anti-Blackness?

Marx’s method is paradoxically well-suited to the theoretical critique of anti-blackness. One part of me is inclined to say Marx developed the right method—immanent critique, real abstraction, an analysis of social forms—but began with the wrong object. While Marx approached slavery metaphorically (“wage slavery”) and historically (a subsumed mode of production), I’m interested in what would happen if slavery was considered not merely a historical preface that withers away, or pedestal that is superseded, but a theoretical problem for totality on the order of (or exceeding) capitalism. Could there be a critique of the critique of political economy (now standing Marx on his head) adequate to the problem of anti-blackness? An immanent critique of this sort seems necessary, though precariously so, to expose the ways latent Marxist readings of labor tend to answer questions about anti-blackness, and slavery’s relationship to capitalism, before they have been adequately posed.

If Marx’s “abstract labor” is the way human capacity has become developed one-sidedly, visions of emancipation tend to want to liberate capacity for its full flourishing by also sidelining what bargain might have been struck for reduced capacity to feel like freedom. As the incapacity that is both the prelude to and remnant of this bargain, “abstract slavery” might extend the classic libidinal economizing involved in “wages of whiteness” (“I may be poor, broken, downtrodden, expropriated, incarcerated, but at least I’m not black”) towards a critical apparatus that encircles a negation always in motion. It may be that race is the way anti-blackness appears to political economy...
100
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 16/08/2026
#littlejoys journey to the rmu 🏋🏽‍♂️
050
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 14/08/2026
João Costa Vargas "Blue Pill, Red Pill: The Incommensurable Worlds of Racism and Antiblackness" tupjournals.temple.edu/index.php/ka...
A table that compares blue pill (racism) to red pill (anti blackness)

Text:

TABLE 1. THE BLUE PILL OF RACISM VS. THE RED PILL OF ANTIBLACKNESS
Blue pill
Racism
Basic hierarchy is White/nonwhite
Multiracial alliances a requirement
Specific but related forms of oppression between all racialized and oppressed groups Empire-state and multiracial democracy are ultimately redeemable
The solution is reform and/or radical transformation

Red pill
Antiblackness
Basic hierarchy is nonblack/Black
Black autonomy: multiracial alliances a possibility
Incommensurability of Black positionality
The Social and the Human are irremediably antiblack, and so is the world order
The solution is abolition
111
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 14/08/2026
"While antiracism seeks a recalibrated world, which suggests that we currently inhabit an embattled but perfectible social formation, anti-antiblackness requires an unqualified rupture. That is to say, the world we currently inhabit is intrinsically averse to Black people and thus unsalvageable"
Excerpt from João Costa Vargas's article "Blue Pill, Red Pill: The Incommensurable Worlds of Racism and Antiblackness"

Text:
"I take up the blue-pill/red-pill allegory to emphasize the irreconcilable difference between the worlds of racism and antiblackness. While the world of racism is defined by and experienced through the multiple and combined oppressions deriving from the effects of imperialist, cisheteropatriarchal White supremacist capitalism (hooks 2004), the world of antiblackness—the Matrix, as it were—is defined by and in radical opposition to the central, foundational, and unique structural positionality of Black people. The world of racism is configured in contrast to and in the perpetuation of White cisheteropartriachal propertied men, the fundamental positionality according to which nonwhites attain relative disadvantages and privileges. This is a world defined by a White/ nonwhite continuum in which Black people, like other nonwhites, are subjected to specific yet related vulnerabilities to early death by preventable causes. The world of racism stresses both specific and related forms of combined oppres-sions. In it, while excluded and deemed less than human, Black people and other nonwhites make articulable claims of inclusion into the human family (Spill-ers 2003, 226) and its corresponding sociability. As long as the combined oppressions of race, social class, gender, sexuality, and ability, among others, are located and pushed back, the world of racism—in theory, at least, and through political struggle (which is often, but not always, within the confines of the rule of law) —is malleable, allowing movement along the continuum. Put in another way: antiracism strategically utilizes and seeks to expand, rather than disavows, the blue-pill world foundational"Excerpt from João Costa Vargas's article "Blue Pill, Red Pill: The Incommensurable Worlds of Racism and Antiblackness"

Text:
The world of antiblackness is structured by an algorithm according to which nonblack peoples, including Whites, attain their relative privilege and disadvantages vis-à-vis the distance they are able to establish and maintain from Black people. Here, Black people's sui generis positionality is such that, while defining by radical contrast who is Human and who belongs to the Social-namely nonblacks, in varying degrees—it necessarily excludes Black people from the assumed universal realms of the human family and human social interaction.
While antiracism seeks a recalibrated world, which suggests, from a blue-pill perspective, that we currently inhabit an embattled but perfectible social for-mation, anti-antiblackness requires an unqualified rupture.'
1 That is to say, the
world we currently inhabit, from a red-pill perspective, is intrinsically averse to Black people and thus unsalvageable. In the world of antiblackness, the fundamental antagonism is between Black people and the planetary shared symbolic order that permanently locks Blackness into abjection. That is to say: even with the elimination of the combined oppressions of race, gender, social class, ability, and others, the Black person would still be Black and therefore fundamentally considered nonhuman and unequivocally excluded. As shown more pointedly below through a reflection on fungibility that Saidiya Hartman (1997) advances, antiblackness exceeds such combined oppressions that include exploitation and alienation, and thus necessitates conceptual invention to capture it. The world of antiblackness engenders a Black/nonblack continuum of belonging that requires
(a) Black people's imposed and unique positionality of exclusion, and (b) Black people's expulsion from the continuum itself."
121
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 13/08/2026
“This show is dedicated to all the Latinos who today live far from their country. To those who left their homeland searching for a better future. To those who, because of the circumstances of these times, face uncertainty, fear, and distance…
133
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 09/08/2026
space flow 💫
140
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 31/07/2026
holding everything is impossible🏋🏽‍♂️
120
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 21/07/2026
always my biggest jumpscare
Screenshot of email preview from us citizenship and immigration services. 

The subject line: “We have taken an action on your case”
 The body preview: “We have taken an action on your case Sign in to vour account to view vour case status”
130
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 30/06/2026
‘Patriarchy’: “missed the ways that women are treated differently than each other as women, the way that gender actually harms a lot of men, even if those men are also harming other men and women, it also missed entirely the place of children & animals in the picture & often assumed a sex binary”
121
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 25/06/2026
improving 🤸🏽‍♂️
150
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 25/06/2026
"“Slave labor” is the flesh and blood of capital Until our descriptions of existence take this as the point of departure, critical descriptions of the global political architecture will presume that everything that matters originated in and reflects post-Enlightenment white Europe”
Excerpt from Ramey, J. (2025). Elemental: Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Raw Materialist Justice. Religions


Text:
It is not nonsense. Having everything taken away and yet remaining in everything that has been taken is a long way of saying that it is an unpayable debt. “Slave labor” is the flesh and blood of capital because labor is nothing more than the transference of that which composes flesh and blood, the elemental components of everything, any and each possible and actual existent. Until our descriptions of existence take this as the point of departure, critical descriptions of the global political architecture will presume that everything that matters originated in and reflects post-Enlightenment white Europe. Since anything can be traced back there, these descriptions will be unable to account for how much that which matters only does so because it is the materialization of what has been extracted from everywhere else. (Ferreira da Silva 2022d, pp. 168–69)
100
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 25/06/2026
“The return of the total value produced by those subjected to expropriation (colonization, enslavement) would involve something infinite, immeasurable, unthinkable from the point of view of capital’s notion of value or its Marxian critique. What must be addressed is the elemental continuum"
Excerpt from Ramey, J. (2025). Elemental: Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Raw Materialist Justice. Religions

Text:
"t is non-imperialist, non-colonizing, non-racializing, non-extractive, and so on.  To summarize Ferreira da Silva’s intervention, an apparently formal abstract, formal problem with modern discursivity turns out to be painfully concrete. The economic (let alone the ethico-political) claim of the formerly enslaved, colonized, and those subject to neo-colonial practices is impossible to fully address in terms of any discourse that presumes separability and sequentiality as conditions for sense-making or meaning-making. Such strictures, while being part of the formal, ideal, abstract (conceptual) identification of subjects considered to have legal status or moral worth, obscures both what has been taken and given as labor, labor’s elemental persistence, as well as the persistence of the elements themselves (in the shape of raw materials, means of production, and so on). The return of the “total value” produced by those subjected to expropriation (colonization, enslavement) would involve something infinite, immeasurable, unthinkable from the point of view of capital’s notion of value or of its Marxian critique. What must be addressed is the elemental continuum, something Ferreira da Silva suggests we think of cosmically, as a corpus infinitum that will have been both the past and the future, not only that the colonized and enslaved were but that we all, now and in the future, also are, in the most strictly material sense (Ferreira da Silva 2022d). The difficulty is that what must be carried forward is, paradoxically, that which was not, never allowed to be, could have been but has not yet been, life otherwise than as subject to total violence."
100
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 25/06/2026
"bc value can only be measured in terms of time, & exchange value only includes the time of those considered to have time as separable subjects, we cannot even see the economic/ethical value of the lifeways & persons subjected to total violence (including lifeways of non-humans or inorganic matter)"
Except from Ramey, J. (2025). Elemental: Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Raw Materialist Justice. Religions


Text:
[enslaved] labor might as well be that which [the enslaved person] is laboring on, that which her body becomes when it is applied in the effort to un/make, re/de/compose, enters into the constitution of that other thing, the cotton boils, the stewed collard greens, the clean undergarments, the shack where she lives, or the houses her descendants may or may not be able to afford to own. That labor, her body in the cotton boils, Marx tells us, does not count. It does not explain or create capital. It does transform, transfer, convert itself to what she is handling, touching, moving around. But because it is not graspable as a manifestation of her “will” or an effect of her “desire” or “drive”, whatever she makes, whatever contains a piece of her is not to be counted as wealth. And yet she is right there. In that cotton boil, in that factory in London’s East End, a child or a young woman uses up her body, moving the spindle, separating the threads, and both of them together—the captive body in the scene of subjugation and living labor—come together in the yarn. It is not only that her labor—the expenditure of her bodycreates something that is then separated from her as an object of use and brought to the market to become a commodity. No, she is always there, within it, and never alone. That piece of fabric is also a singular composite that gathers the labor and the calor of everything found in the expropriated Native lands where the iron ore or gold was extracted or the cotton grown. From this tangible transduction alone, and not through the abstract translations operated by labor as a conceptum, in particular its translation as time that renders it measurable—it is possible to consider her person to matter both ethically and economically. (Ferreira da Silva 2022d, p. 259)
100
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 25/06/2026
The Kantian "presumption of separability & sequentiality for sense-making distorts the fact that the same elements involved in past harms are still present This is why labor subjected to total violence in past remains an unpayable debt we owe to enslaved or colonized" www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16...
Excerpt from Ramey, J. (2025). Elemental: Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Raw Materialist Justice. Religions

Text:
Although formal, Ferreira da Silva’s point is not abstract. She is addressing a concrete problem faced by organizers and activists everywhere: those subjected to total violence, to past and present coloniality and/or enslavement, were and are experiencing an ongoing harm that cannot be coherently articulated as the harm it actually was and remains. The presumption of separability and sequentiality for sense-making distorts the fact that, at a physical, material level, the same elements involved in past harms are still present, transformed (through changes of state such as heat or pressure) into other states of matter. In a strictly material sense, the present moment is part of a continuously extended material reality, with each singular node of existence implicated with and effected by all others. This is why Ferreira da Silva insists the labor subjected to total violence in the past remains part of an unpayable debt we owe to those enslaved or colonized. The debt is unpayable, or cannot be discharged, because the harm is not over but lives on, in and as the very materiality of the present.
110
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 12/06/2026
changing my machinery
Smiling & shirtless desk selfie, green art tapestry behind OP and bookshelf with a plant and about 20 books above.
280
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 16/05/2026
progress 🌱
130
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 16/05/2026
idc how cheesy, instant fave.
Image still from the animated movie Swapped, showing a colorful bird next to a small rodent looking down into the lake with the water acting as a mirror and reflecting them back, but with swapped reflections
060
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 12/05/2026
these early workouts and park walks are really speaking to me 🥹🌞
Smiling headshot selfie on a bridge in a park, pond and willow tree in the background. OP is wearing a black leather cap, tinted glasses, dark blue t shirt, and backpack
160
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 11/05/2026
“blackness is non-identical with race; both before race and only glimpsed internal to race’s sociogenic schema” sci-hub.ru/10.1080/1462...
Excerpt from Tapji Paul Garba and Sara-Maria Sorentino. “Blackness Before Race and Race as Reoccupation: Reading Sylvia Wynter with Hans Blumenberg.”

Text:
The fungibility of blackness works to obscure these operations: congealing blackness into a biological "as if," an example of "otherness," even if extreme, this order extends (by obfuscating) its underlying sociogenic principle. Society, that is, works to autopoetically instantiate itself through blackness both by writing blackness as an empirical Thing (race) and writing blackness out of the frame altogether (anti-blackness). In this way, blackness names the concentration of drives and desires that leads race to be resolved into what Denise Ferreira da Silva calls "affectability "114 As such, blackness is non-identical with race; both before race and only glimpsed internal to race's sociogenic schema, its priority becomes a speculative weapon. Blackness-before-race elaborates race's emergence and intractability, the way race-as-reoccupation exceeds empirical decipherability, for blackness becomes the substrate through which the world is rendered intelligible. Not one object among others, but the most extensive condition by which we access anything at all, the available language that opens the social reproduction of both violence and possi-bility, space and time. While nothing provides an interpretative framework without
131
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 09/05/2026
… but putting in the werk ✨
130
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 09/05/2026
feeling like a 👶🏽 learning to walk
130
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 03/05/2026
💜🪭
Group of 5 friends posing side by side, smiling in swimwear at a pool party.
030
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 27/04/2026
“the Way guiding us at any given moment need not be a path with a defined terminus or summit. It can be uncertain & tender: a not-quite-knowing where one has come from, a not-quite-knowing where one is going, held with enough attention & intention to count as orientation nonetheless”
Excerpt from a newsletter by Muindi, AGAPE, postmodernliving

Text:
One lesson that might be drawn from this is that the Way guiding us at any given moment need not be a path with a defined terminus or summit. It can be uncertain and tender: a not-quite-knowing where one has come from, a not-quite-knowing where one is going, held with enough attention and intention to count as orientation nonetheless. This is a different thing than being lost. Being lost is the failure to locate oneself. Being on the Way, in the sense I encountered in your company, was being on the move and feeling that there is somewhere behind us worth departing from and somewhere ahead of us worth arriving at or returning to -- often without being able to say, in any final or exact sense, what either of those somewheres is
010
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 25/04/2026
one, two, back to the groove.
010
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 21/04/2026
“Real possibility doesn't sell. Real possibility can't be marketed. Real possibility can't be sold as a potential career or as a potential escape/ Let’s not miss that moment.
Excerpt from podcast Disintegrator, episode: the pre-individual with Ramon Amaro

Text:
“Real possibility doesn't sell. Real possibility can't be marketed. Real possibility can't be sold as a potential career or as a potential escape.
Because anyone that has ever entered into a space of pure creativity process, and we all have, regardless of if you're making a sculpture or washing the dishes, we have all reached a moment of pure possibility.
And in that moment of pure possibility is where humility happens. Because it's in that moment where we touch into that which is greater than us, whatever that source is.
And it's in that moment where we begin, even for a microsecond, to think that we can be something that we have yet to articulate. And let's not miss that moment.
So in a way, the book is quite
simple in-lts complexity.”
000
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 14/04/2026
this fucking weather 🌱✨
Selfie by the ocean, smiling, wearing a black sleeveless shirt and strap bag. City skyline and ocean in the background, blue skies, and sunshine everywhere!
150
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 12/04/2026
finally: spring ☀️
Selfie in a blue hammock, OP is smiling, throwing a peace sign above their head and wearing a grey tank top
180
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 02/04/2026
there’s a rhythm to reclaim
A shirtless bathroom mirror selfie, holding a pink glittery phone case, orange towel and tan shower curtain with patterns in the background
160
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 31/03/2026
switched it up, 1st morning class 🏋🏽‍♂️
110
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 28/03/2026
magic, a reminder to whimsy ✨
Poster of Project Hail Mary movie, a bright sun on lower portion, ryan gosling at the top, and in the center a silhouette of ryan gosling and the alien
120
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 27/03/2026
US = "network of wealthy nodes" - SF/Seattle controls tech, IP - NYC prices financial assets - DC commands military apparatus - Chicago is continental hinge - Houston manages energy - LA manufactures desire "For white settler, high inequality is a landscape of possibility, steep but navigable”
Excerpt from linked title at top of thread.

Text:

Thirty-one American cities rank between positions 2 and 57, with dispensations between $32,984 and $130,815. This is not a country with one dominant capital. It is a distributed network of wealthy nodes. Silicon Valley ($130,815), the San Francisco Bay Area ($111,078), and Seattle ($82,301) control technology, design, and intellectual property. New York ($70,544) prices financial assets and clears the dollar. Washington ($66,844) commands the military and regulatory apparatus. Chicago ($58,608) is the continental hinge, connecting commodity, freight, and futures markets across the interior to global pricing. Houston ($57,164) manages energy. Los Angeles ($60,321) manufactures desire. Below these: Indianapolis, Atlanta, Baltimore, Charlotte, Dallas, Philadelphia, Cincinnati, Portland — all between $50,000 and $56,000. Mid-sized cities each sharing more broadly distributed privilege than London, Paris, Tokyo, or any city in China. 

America's inequality — 0.398, the highest in the developed world — discounts every node by 40%. Rural America, the prison system, the deindustrialized interior absorb the cost. But per-person output is so high that even after the discount, the network averages around $57,000.
200
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 27/03/2026
"Africa has zero entries & 1/3 of the world's minerals. Those minerals flow into cities at the top of this list. The minerals arrive. The wealth does not return. The map shows where returns land. The absent regions are where the inputs come from. Their absence is the data's most important finding."
A map titled The dispensation index, subtitle is "100 largest metropolitan economies ranked by what the system dispenses per person. Circle size = dispensation."

The meaning of the index: Take each city's total annual economic value — what economists call GDP, the total value of all goods produced and services rendered within its borders in a year, which is to say the sum of everything claimed and counted there — divide by population to get the value per person, then discount by the national inequality index. That index, the Gini coefficient, runs from 0 (everyone shares equally) to 1 (one person takes everything). Multiply per-person economic value by one minus the Gini and you get what we'll call the dispensation — a proxy for what the system dispenses to the average person at each node. What is allotted, after the structure has sorted who gets what.

In the map, only cities in The US, Europe, and scattered parts of Latin America, Asia, and Australia are colored (which higher indices in US and Europe). The rest of the map is bare.
110
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 26/03/2026
and when ppl say race is a “technology”… “the idea of race as a technology conflates ‘race’ with racialization and racism. 𝑅𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 are technologies, or tools. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑦 do things in the world” philpapers.org/archive/HOCF...
Excerpt from Adam Hochman “Further Defense of the Racialization Concept: A Reply to Uyan.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Text
This is just one example of what I am calling the inflation problem with the social kind approach to race. Perhaps it can be fixed, but I doubt it. However, this isn’t the kind of racial realism that Uyan endorses. Uyan claims that race “must be analyzed as a technology of social control and a category that developed out of the constraints and imperatives of specific social relations” (Uyan 2021, p. 16). (She also says that race is a “condition,” but I won’t respond to this, because I don’t know what it means). The idea of race as a technology is popular among race theorists (Coleman 2009; Chun 2012; Jones and Jones, 2017; Lentin 2020). However, “race” does not have to be understood as a technology, as Uyan claims. In fact, I believe that the idea of race as a technology conflates “race” with racialization and racism. Racialization and racism are technologies, or tools. They do things in the world. They serve a range of different purposes in different contexts. I do not believe anything is added to the claims that racialization and racism are technologies by claiming that “race” itself is also a technology—except, perhaps, confusion. If we say that race “must be analyzed as a technology of social control and a category” we make clear communication about this important topic exceptionally difficult (Uyan 2021, p. 16). If we think of race as a technology and as a biological category, then race is real in one sense, but an illusion in another. This is a recipe for confusion. Given the long history of race being used as a biological category, non-specialists are likely to interpret ‘race’ biologically when they hear the term.
000
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 26/03/2026
when social constructionists say race is real, the same way money is… (i heard this analogy used a lot in social psychology) sci-hub.st/10.1002/ajpa...
Excerpt from Adam Hochman “Janus‐faced Race: Is Race Biological, Social, or Mythical?” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 

Text:
Race” is sometimes thought to be real in a similar way to money (Taylor, 2000). Money is only valuable because enough of us believe it to be valuable. Similarly, “race” is believed to be real precisely because we give “it” social meaning. However, there is an important difference between the two categories. When we collectively agree that money is valuable it becomes valuable, but when groups were racialized they did not take on the key properties they were believed to possess. For this reason, we may not want to think of racialization as a race-making process.
110
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 26/03/2026
“our origins must be placed in Representation rather than in Evolution, which would redefine the human outside the terms of our present hegemonic Western-bourgeois conception as a purely bioeconomic being which pre-exists the event of culture—this would call for a new poetics/ that of homo culturans
Excerpt from Karen Gagne “On the Obsolescence of the Disciplines”


Text:
Wynter’s hypothesis is that our origins must be placed in Representation rather than in Evolution, which would redefine the human outside the terms of our present hegemonic Western-bourgeois conception as a purely bioeconomic being which pre-exists the event of culture—this would, of course, call for a new poetics. This poetics is to be that of homo culturans/culturata, that is, as the autoinstituting because self-inscripting mode of being, which is, in turn, reciprocally enculturated by the conception of itself which it has created; the poetics, in effect, of a hybrid nature-culture, bios/logos form of life bio-evolutionarily preprogrammed to institute, inscript itself, (by means of its invented origin narratives up to and including our contemporary half-scientific, half-mythic origin narrative of Evolution), as this or that culture-centric (and, as also, in our case, classcentric) genre of being human.
010
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 20/03/2026
hang snatch practice, 120lbs 🏋🏽‍♂️
020
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 15/03/2026
🌱3️⃣5️⃣🌿
OP shirtless standing and smiling in front of macrame art that looks like big waves. The photo is covered by blacklighting with glowing orbs of colors behind the macrame.
150
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 12/03/2026
We've been unable to "shift out of our present conception of Man, out of our present World System" in part bc of “our reluctance to see a relationship so global in reach—between the epistemology of knowledge and the liberation of the people—a relationship that we are not properly able to theorize”
Excerpt from Karen Gagne's article "On the Obsolescence of the Disciplines"

Text:
That we have been unable to reach “another landscape”—as proposed by Amiri Baraka (Leroi Jones) in the 1960s—in order to “exoticize” Western thought to make visible its laws whereby we would be able to unfix the sign of blackness from the sign of evil, ugliness, and the negation of whiteness, has been for two reasons. These are, according to Wlad Godzich (1986) as quoted by Wynter, first, “the imperviousness of our present disciplines to phenomena that fall outside their pre-defined scope” and, second, “our reluctance to see a relationship so global in reach—between the epistemology of knowledge and the liberation of the people—a relationship that we are not properly able to theorize” (Wynter 2006a: 113).
220
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 08/03/2026
“Thirty years later, now, it may have become evident to many that Deleuze’s image was partial, that it missed something… At the same level of abstraction, raciality recalls how human beings do not exist (live and die) in this world in the same way” socialtextjournal.org/periscope_ar...
Excerpt from Denise Ferreira da Silva’s essay “The future of two presents”

Text:
Both humanity and raciality prevail in this dystopian digital future. Each seem to continue to work as planned and, as expected, their workings become explicit when they happen to cross paths. Humanity and raciality meet in the abstractions (lines, curves, scenarios, maps) that capture the population as a statistical composite, but only because Sars-CoV-2 mirrors the human as a species (to use Spivak’s term—Marx’s “Species Life”). That figuring replaces the qualitative (historically achieved transcendentality) singularity of the human with a quantitative (scientifically determined) generality. As such, this generality lacks precisely the attributes that testify to humans’ singularity: namely, dignity. Each person only counts as a potential casualty (infected, recovered, or dead), a digit to be added to the graph of confirmed cases, one which has the possibility of either joining the dead or the non-dead column. Is this a signal that Deleuze’s control society has displaced disciplinary power and its dichotomies? After all, these abstractions are the product of other abstractions and, as experts repeat on TV, are just predictive models, probabilities. Thirty years later, now, it may have become evident to many that Deleuze’s image was partial, that it missed something. Something that many still miss even as raciality cuts through COVID19 numbers, adding other abstractions that qualify its deaths. For it brings in bodily (underlying conditions) and economic (essential services) configurations that indicate which persons are more likely to be contaminated and which persons, once infected, are more likely to die from this new disease.
000
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 04/03/2026
"When decolonial philosophy and praxis are taken seriously, merely studying or raising questions about gender and sexuality is not inherently revolutionary or radical If feminism is merely the recuperation of a positively defined “womanhood” or “manhood,” it becomes a colonial feminism"
Excerpt from Alex Adamson's article "Beyond the Coloniality of Gender: María Lugones, Sylvia Wynter, Decolonial Feminism, and Trans and Intersex Liberation"

Text:
The decolonial perspective offers an analysis of Eurocentrism as a geopolitical organization of knowledge and power that ushers in a particular conception of what it means to be human. The Eurocentric conception of the human works to justify our present geopolitical organization of power and wealth. When decolonial philosophy and praxis are taken seriously, merely studying or raising questions about gender and sexuality is not inherently revolutionary or radical, as some feminists have purported. The focus in feminist philosophy on the constructedness of identities and socio-political categories is not the same as recognizing their constructedness within the context of colonialism nor the culturally specific Western bourgeois norms to which they adhere. Similarly, if queer theory and analysis are to be the epitome of a denaturalizing analysis of sex/gender/sexuality, one cannot properly understand these concepts without also interrogating the mode of being human from which these categories emerge. A “history of sexuality” that does not make this point salient hides the prior violence, dispossession, and exploitation that enact our present mode of being human, meaning that such history does not, and cannot, point to anything beyond this paradigm.
140
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 04/03/2026
shoulder press practice, 105 lbs 🏋🏽‍♂️
000
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 27/02/2026
i feel much more than what i planned
Front upper body headshot of OP who is half smiling, wearing a golden yellow t shirt and standing in front a scuffed up blue wall.
130
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 26/02/2026
“ungendering = primary narrative of violence/ consequent elaborations of gender as forms of violence that gift gender as additional violence/ “doubled” nature of gendered violence is in the giving of gender itself gift of gender as the gift of death redoubled as a violent entryway into being Human”
Excerpt from John Gillespie article “Anarcha’s Science of the Flesh: Towards an Afropessimist Theory of Science” in the journal Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 2022

Text:
By taking Blackness as a point of departure into thinking the question of gender,
 science, and beyond, towards the question of the genre of the Human itself,
 rather than seeing in Anarcha, Lucy, and Betsy's suffering, an instance of
 possession, the sole instance of reproductive violence inaugurating a perverse
 symbolic integrity to a claim of possessing gender, Spillers's analysis centers
 ungendering as a primary narrative of violence to locate consequent elaborations
 of gender as forms of violence that consequently gift gender as additional
 violence. Thus, the "doubled" nature of gendered violence is in the giving of
 gender itself. The gift of gender as the gift of death redoubled as a violent
100
🌬️🍃 @jem.ispost.ing · 20/02/2026
you can be remade, you can live again and you know what is great? nothing stays the same
Bathroom mirror phone selfie, phone is covered in pink sparkly case, OP is wearing green shirt, smiling into the camera
030