iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

"Polarization Is Not the Problem." The paragraph below says more about "both sides" journalism than just about anything I have read. By @lilymasonphd.bsky.social It's starting to get attaction. So read the rest, and let me know what you think. muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/articl...

22358124

Not good. I had coffee with him once. He's smarter than that.

540

Yes. Here's how I put a piece of it in 2024 . bsky.app/profile/jayr...

091

Yesterday I slipped and published the wrong draft of my post about, "Polarization Is Not the Problem." But I got lucky with the error, which made enough sense that no one noticed. Today I am publishing a better version of what I was think is an important piece by @lilymasonphd.bsky.social

1373

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

22358124

It's the same problem that I tried to get at here.

519736

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

"Polarization Is Not the Problem" This paragraph says more about "both sides" journalism than just about anything I have read. Read the rest here: muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/articl... By @lilymasonphd.bsky.social via @brizzyc.bsky.social

muse.jhu.edu

Project MUSE -- Verification required!

1215236

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

The Daily Beast knows that it is "character driven" in its election coverage. That's an improvement over the view from nowhere. www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/the-... That the biggest character will always be Trump is their "view from somewhere," which is valid but costly too. Make sense?

4374

PressThink: Off the Charts: Sinclair Broadcast Group's Political Vision

Not what you're asking for but see if you follow ... archive.pressthink.org/2004/11/16/s...

archive.pressthink.org

110

PressThink: Retreat from Empiricism: On Ron Suskind's Scoop

Here's something that moves in the same direction, ten years before Trump. archive.pressthink.org/2006/12/18/s...

archive.pressthink.org

200

It's a tremendus achivement.

040

Yes. A necessary observation.

020

I started fact-checking Trump 10 years ago. Here are 15 things I’ve learned | CNN Politics

Can't think of any reporter who speaks for me more than this guy— a Canadian. "Hundreds of hours immersed in Trump’s rhetoric has given me some insights and personal opinions about the nature of his lying, how it is received by the public and how it is covered..." www.cnn.com/2026/09/27/p...

cnn.com

Ten years ago this month, in my old job as Washington correspondent for the Toronto Star, I started what I believed would be a quick little side project: fact-checking underdog presidential candidate ...

15320104

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

Amid all the coverage of it, this Washinging Post column does the best — for me — in explaining why the Pool fights matter. Via @brianstelter.bsky.social See the original: www.washingtonpost.com/style/2026/0...

5313110

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

See my post called, "Send the Interns," from January of 2017. pressthink.org/2017/01/send...

15115

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

Did someone say they weren't?

010

Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

People, I can't accept that I misspelled his name first time around. It should read: "No one on Bluesky thinks they're interacting with a cross section of the population. But a lot of people on X do think that." —Josh Marshall" sorry @joshtpm.bsky.social

1718122

Sorry, I don't follow that. You will have to elaborate.

100

We Didn’t Know Until This Day … Twitter Was the Echo Chamber All Along

"No one on Bluesky thinks they're interacting with a cross section of the population. But a lot of people on X do think that." —Josh Harshall talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/we-di...

talkingpointsmemo.com

Daniel Drezner says we are now in the Wile E. Coyote phase...

1016327

No. Alex. E cannot be grouped with Y. You know how I know? I put on my unbiased hat. See how that works

010