Sign in

James Wallace

@jameswallace.bsky.social
414 followers 195 following 97 posts

Sublunary microcosm Sometime actor, director & researcher, now full-time carer You can unfollow me on Twitter @jamesthewallace

PostsRepliesMedia
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
I do admit though, now that I’ve seen it, I can’t unsee it. In the end, whatever the actual meaning of that visible foot may have been, at the very least the painter has made us look at the detail and workmanship of the rest of the tapestry more closely - and maybe that’s all he wanted… 15/ END
130
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
And this concealed emblem would also fit with the possible theme of the portrait - open to marriage, but behind it all remaining watchful and cautious. I’m not claiming any certainty here, just offering up a possibility. You can expand this photo to see the whole of the tapestry. 14/
110
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
So, while not being in any way as clear cut as Arcimboldo’s paintings, all the elements - the standing foot, watchful eye, head, beak, neck, body, wing, the raised foot holding the stone - are there and placed where they ought to be. If you want to see it, you can. If you don’t, you won’t. 13/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Because I definitely can - in that reversed white flower, which would represent the stone, and in the green sepals of its calyx, representing the grasping foot. Maybe the right-angle formed by the stem(s) to the right even sketches the crook of the leg. 12/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
… is something that would refer to the other significant part of the heraldry - the stone grasped by the crane’s raised foot. Here’s the larger picture again, and another version of the heraldic crane - can you see anything that matches that in the tapestry, below the body and above the foot? 11/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Is that its body outlined in that bunch of dark red grapes? Maybe those two green leaves sticking up above that are its wings? Or perhaps that middle, dark green vine leaf is a single wing folded next to the body? But what an observer would really need to be sure of what they’re looking at… 10/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Tracing the rest of the body is harder, less obvious, more subjective. But with this sort of cryptic puzzle, surely that’s all part of the game? And the first clue - the foot - is clear, which invites you to look closely for the rest. Here’s the bottom half of the tapestry. Can you see it? 9/
110
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
In her catalogue essay (p22), Christina Faraday suggests this is a reference to a specific piece of animal heraldry: The Crane in its Vigilance You can download a PDF of the whole catalogue here: philipmould.com/usr/library/... 8/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
The head is placed quite high up. So it’s a tall bird, standing on one foot, with an open eye. That’s already enough to make a guess as to what it might be. And it’s also embroidered on her dress in another portrait of Elizabeth in the exhibition, from the 1590s. A crane. 7/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Not as exactly defined, but enough to create a figure if you wanted to look for one. In which case, around the eye should be a head, beak & neck. Can you see a bird’s head? I can. In fact, the way those leaves above and below the eye seem deliberately painted to create that possible outline. 6/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
So I wonder if the rest of the bird isn’t hiding within or behind the foliage, fruit and fauna, but is actually made up of it? A bit like those wonderful composite heads painted by Giussepe Arcimboldo (1527-93), made up of vegetables or sea creatures or books? 5/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
And that eye Mathew saw in the foliage? Several people think it’s a snail. I agree. But my suggestion is: what if it’s meant to be BOTH? In a reply on Substack, June Girvin thought so too: “That is most certainly an eye. How intriguing. But on closer inspection it is most certainly a snail.” 4/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Several people have suggested that foot might belong to a falcon, referencing the heraldry of Elizabeth’s mother, Anne Boleyn. Maybe. A slightly strange place to put it though. But for now, whatever the species, let’s accept it’s a single bird’s foot. 3/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Here’s the whole portrait, and Mathew explains the circumstances in which it was painted, when the need for an heir - and therefore a possible marriage - had renewed urgency. 2/
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
Mathew ends his great review of this exhibition with a puzzle contained within the Hampden Portrait of Elizabeth I. What’s with that foot poking out at the bottom of the wall tapestry behind her? Also, is that an eye looking out from the foliage? Maybe there’s a solution to the mystery… 1/15👇
132
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
Can I ask how this AI image was generated? Because if it’s *purely* an extrapolation from the Holbein sketch labelled as AB, it means the sitter does actually look enough like the woman in the later, cruder AB portrait for me to believe that they are indeed both representations of the same person.
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
An extraordinary actor, and I’ve loved all four of his films that @filmsradiance.bsky.social have released so far - fingers crossed for more…
000
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
In John Lyly’s Endymion (Act 2 Sc 2), one of the two court ladies, either Favilla or Scintilla, carries a pet squirrel in a chain, like Anne Lovell? in Holbein’s portrait. (There’s also the pet monkey that Beatrice leads onstage in Eastward Ho 2.2…)
210
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
👍🙏
010
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Lastly, why was Pallas called Pallas? My guess is that he was named after Prussian zoologist Peter Simon Pallas (1741-1811), whose book Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica (1811, St Petersburg) contains this illustration of a walrus.
010
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Here’s another postcard from the period, this time with Carl Hagenbeck himself (in his initialled cap) sat next to a walrus. Is it Pallas? I don’t know…
110
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Pallas the Walrus also features in this enormous painting (2.71m x 2m) from 1911 with the zoo’s owner Carl Hagenbeck, by German painter Lovis Corinth. It was acquired by the Hamburger Kunsthalle the same year.
Portrait of Carl Hagenbeck with the walrus Pallas

1911 - Painting - 2.71m x 2m

The Portrait of Carl Hagenbeck with the Walrus Pallas is a painting by the German painter Lovis Corinth. The picture shows the well-known director of the Hamburg Tierpark Hagenbeck, Carl Hagenbeck, together with the walrus Pallas, who was very well known at the time of the creation of the picture. The painting was created in 1911, a few months before Corinth's first stroke, and was acquired by Alfred Lichtwark in the same year for the Hamburger Kunsthalle.
110
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Back from the rabbit hole with their names: Barry the Keeper and Pallas the Walrus. Pallas was captured in Novaya Zemlya, Russia, and arrived in Tierpark Hagenbeck 15 Sept 1908 when he was 3 or 4 years old He died of starvation there during WWI, in 1915.
Black and white postcard with Pallas the Walrus and Barry the Keeper leaning lovingly on him cheek by cheek while both are sat next to Pallas’ pool in Carl Hagenbeck’s Tierpark in Hamburg.
220
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 12/12/2025
A few - this one is by François Gérard
110
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 12/12/2025
Hers
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
I’d recommend: Lighting the Shakespearean stage, 1567-1642 by R. B. Graves (1999)
010
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
Yes, I see - in which case, if it was filmed earlier, my first thought was to wonder if it might possibly be Richard Wordsworth, who I see was in the 1939 Stratford season. www.theatricalia.co.uk/01smt/smt293... Here’s a comparison with him in the 1955 film of The Quatermass Xperiment:
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 28/09/2025
Sir Henry’s body was whisked down to London by train, and the sculptor Sir George Frampton was employed to make a death mask. I’ve traced 9 copies of it - back in 2019 I bought one of them at auction that had belonged to the Irving family. It hangs on the wall and is looking over me now.
031
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
Here he is on the cover of The Sphinx magazine in 1944 (for sale on eBay)
000
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
Production photo from a modern revival? Obvious choice: Sejanus (William Houston; Will & Peter de Jersey. Dir. Greg Doran 2005 RSC)
110
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
You and @andykesson.bsky.social there nine years ago - 8 June 2016
220
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 26/06/2025
David Lynch’s personal theramin, recently sold at auction for $10,400
040
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 20/04/2025
Meme: “This isn’t a portrait of Christopher Marlowe” - “So you’re not going to use it, right” - first picture, but closer - “Right?”
1123
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
The Moorfields section of the 1550s Copperplate Map shows two windmills in that part of Finsbury Fields now called Bunhill [Bone Hill] Fields, just north of what became The Artillery Ground, now the home of London Cricket Club.
140
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 26/02/2025
I’m guessing it’s actually a satire of his crazed genocidal property developer fantasies that he’s been pranked into posting… I mean, he dreams of bearded-belly dancers?
100
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 16/01/2025
Love this! William Charles Macready (1793-1873) by William Etty (1787-1849), 93x70cm At auction 11 Feb Lot 101, est. £6-8,000 Dreweatts catalogue says ‘apparently in the role of Hamlet’, but given the toga, I’d guess Coriolanus, which he played in 1838 & invited Etty to see. Any better guesses?
010
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 15/01/2025
If you doubt the quotation on this is actually by Shakespeare, bear in mind he’s personally signed it
250
James Wallace @jameswallace.bsky.social · 03/11/2023
If you’ve been feeling a bit misty-eyed & nostalgic listening to the new Beatles song ‘Now and Then’, just IMAGINE how Shakespeare fans felt in 1634 when Thomas Cotes followed up his remaster of the folio two years earlier by printing the FIRST EVER release of his final play, The Two Noble Kinsman…
Title page of the 1634 first quarto of Shakespeare & Fletcher’s play The Two Noble Kinsmen
060