Sign in

Jens-Bastian Eppler

@j-b-eppler.bsky.social
657 followers 1.3K following 116 posts

Postdoc in Computational Neuroscience | CRM Barcelona Mostly interested in the mechanisms underlying learning, forgetting, memory formation, and most recently also creativity. And "representational drift". jb-eppler.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The second (is already out as a preprint and more theoretical): "Random network structure stabilizes neural manifolds" (Wed, Session III, Poster 28) How can representational similarity be preserved in the face of representational drift? 3/3
050
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The first (is new and completely experimental): "The emergence of spatial fields in mouse CA1 underlies learning of self-motion integration for estimating distance" (Tue, Session I, Poster 85) In a VR self-motion integration task do mice rely more on time or space representations? 2/3
140
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
At Bernstein Conference (@bernsteinneuro.bsky.social) next week we will present two posters. Would be amazing to see you there. If you like hippocampus, memory and representational drift those might be interesting for you! 1/3
1101
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Looking forward to Bernstein Conference (@bernsteinneuro.bsky.social) next week in Frankfurt. Hope to see many of you there!
090
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Was passiert, wenn sich Repräsentationen in unserem Gehirn verändern? 🧠 Ab Montag nehme ich euch bei @realscientists.de mit in die Neuroforschung zu Representational Drift: Was ist eine Repräsentation? Warum „driften“ sie? Und was haben Langeweile und Kreativität damit zu tun? 🧪 Ich freue mich!
081
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Excited! Ab Montag übernehme ich für eine Woche bei @realscientists.de! Dann können wir ein wenig (auf Deutsch) über meine Forschung sprechen. 😀 I’ll be taking over @realscientists.de for a week starting Monday! Looking forward to chatting about my research with you! In German, though... 😅 🧠🧪
160
Reposted by Jens-Bastian Eppler
Omas gegen Rechts Frankfurt Uffbasse @ogrffmuffbasse.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
Kommt alle zur Kundgebung am Wahlabend in Sachsen-Anhalt! Bringt euch ein, sichtbar, friedlich, solidarisch gegen Hass und Menschenverachtung: Das Bündnis gegen Rechtsextremismus Frankfurt am Main ruft zur Kundgebung am Wahlabend in Sachsen-Anhalt auf. Wenn am 6. September 2026 die ersten Prognosen/
Bündnis gegen Rechtsextremismus 
Frankfurt am Main
1156
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
Finally, a recurrent network model reproduces this population code. Combining afferent depression with recurrent facilitation gives rise to a matching entropy representation. A beautiful example of behaviour, systems neuroscience and modelling coming together. Congrats, Johannes! 🎉 5/5 🧠🧪
030
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
My contribution was modelling the neuronal activity. Surprisingly, entropy isn't just reflected in stronger responses. Instead, neural activity shifts along a stimulus-independent entropy axis. And as entropy increases, responses to different stimuli become progressively more similar. 4/5 🧠🧪
140
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
And the parallels don't stop there. In humans, EEG responses increase with stimulus entropy. In mice, widefield calcium imaging shows the same trend. Across species and recording modalities, cortical activity tracks the information content of the sensory world. 3/5 🧠🧪
110
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
The first cool part is the cross-species approach. Humans and mice perform strikingly similar in a task where they choose between monotonous and information-rich input. Both avoid monotony, and the behaviour is beautifully captured by a simple measure from information theory: entropy. 2/5 🧠🧪
120
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
This is not what I usually work on, but sometimes you get bored... 😜 But what actually IS boredom? My collaborator Johannes just put out this beautiful new preprint tackling exactly that question, from behaviour all the way to neural population codes. doi.org/10.64898/202... 1/5 🧠🧪
doi.org
Boredom and the representation of information content in the neocortex
Boredom – a pervasive mental state – promotes the pursuit of novel information by assigning negative value to monotonous conditions. Yet, how the brain extracts and represents the information content of ongoing sensory experience remains poorly understood. Here, we combine behavioral assays, neurophysiological recordings and computational modeling across humans and mice to investigate how sensory information shapes boredom-related behavior. In a cross-species choice task, both humans and mice robustly avoid monotonous sources of sensory stimulation. We formalize perceived monotony using empirical entropy as a measure of information content and show that monotony avoidance scales directly with low entropy and in humans correlates with boredom experience. Human electroencephalography and mesoscopic calcium imaging in mice reveal that the recruitment of neocortical activity tracks stimulus entropy. Two-photon calcium imaging in the auditory cortex of mice further uncovers a stimulus-invariant population code for entropy, supported by neurons tuned to information content. A recurrent network model reproduced this code through an interplay of afferent depression and recurrent facilitation. Together, we demonstrate how the information content of sensory experience is represented in cortical population activity, providing a basis for boredom-related avoidance behavior. Thus, our findings link synaptic and neuronal dynamics to boredom, acting as a safeguard mechanism to ensure high information input to the brain. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. This work was supported by research grant Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC1080-C05 (S.R.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 2041 Project #347573108 (S.R.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/Agence nationale de la recherche Project #431393205 (S.R.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DIP M-BM-^SNeurobiology of ForgettingM-BM-^T (S.R.), Rhine-Main University Alliance RMU (S.R.), JST Moonshot R & D #JPMJMS2292-A1-02 (O.T.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft #512007073 SFB/TRR379 TP B02 (O.T.), BMFTR German Center for Mental Health (DZPG, grant 01EE2505C & VISIONS TRESPE 01EE2507Q) (O.T), and a fellowship of the Focus Translational Neuroscience Mainz (J.S., L.W.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
1273
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
I think, your comment aligns pretty well with our main point. However, here, we go one step further: there is no need for a network to couple or adapt to the stimuli. Any random network will just reproduce input similarities, regardless. This even holds for highly non-random networks (Fig 6, DNN).
010
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Happy to discuss, and as always, feedback is very welcome! Big thanks to my co-authors: Gabe for some random matrix magic. Santi for the deep learning. And Alex for being a great supervisor, letting me do what I want, and always having time to discuss. It has been a pleasure! 8/8 🧠🧪
050
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Figure 6: does this matter for real networks? In deep neural networks, continued training produces representational drift with the same underlying geometry-preservation. So, a simple theoretical idea connects experiments, random networks, recurrent circuits and modern deep learning. 7/8 🧠🧪
Fig 6. A scientific figure. We show that also deep neural networks (DNN) preserve input topology. Toroidal inputs result in toroidal outputs. And we also quantify this  through layers of the DNN.
150
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Figures 4 & 5: how general is this? The phenomenon isn't specific to random rewiring in feedforward networks. We find the same behaviour with Hebbian plasticity, and it extends to recurrent networks. Preserving manifolds during drift is a surprisingly generic property of network dynamics. 6/8 🧠🧪
Fig 4. A scientific figure. If we use Hebbian plasticity instead of random changes, still response vectors change, but response angles don't.Fig 5. A scientific figure. If we use a recurrent network instead of a feedforward one, still response vectors change, but response angles don't.
141
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
...but it isn't. If neurons are sorted according to their new preferred stimulus, the structure reappears. This can be quantified: response vectors drift a lot, whereas the angles between responses - the neural manifold - change very little. That's already the central result of the paper. 5/8 🧠🧪
130
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Figure 3: now let the network drift. We randomly rewire a fraction of synapses between sessions. The result looks strikingly like experimental representational drift: individual neurons change their tuning over time. At first glance, it looks as if the representation is falling apart... 4/8 🧠🧪
Fig 3. A scientific figure. We reproduce experimental data from Fig 1. And show that responses change substantially, whereas response similarities don't.
141
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Figure 2: random networks preserve geometry. Before thinking about drift, we asked a simpler question: If similar stimuli enter a random network, are their outputs still similar? Well, yes. In fact, we show that output similarity is a simple monotonic function of input similarity. 3/8 🧠🧪
Fig 2. A scientific figure. Random networks preserve input similarities in their outputs. This is exemplified for linearly dependent inputs and inputs on a torus. And one plot showing the monotonic input-output relationship.
141
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Figure 1: the puzzle. During representational drift, individual neurons change their tuning over days, yet the representational geometry is maintained. The figure illustrates exactly that. So... how can both be true? 2/8 🧠🧪
Fig 1. A scientific figure showing drift in experimental data. Activities change, but similarities are maintained. This is exemplified by a rotating manifold (torus).
142
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
As promised (and only slightly late 😅): here's a figure-by-figure walk-through of our preprint "Random network structure stabilizes neural manifolds". This one is a bit more for the nerds. For an overview version 👉 bsky.app/profile/j-b-... Preprint: doi.org/10.64898/202... 1/8 🧠🧪
doi.org
Random network structure stabilizes neural manifolds
Neuronal activity patterns change continuously over days and weeks, a phenomenon known as representational drift. Despite this, the geometric structure of population representations, namely the pairwise similarities between stimulus-evoked activity patterns, remains remarkably stable. How can ongoing changes in activity be consistent with stable representational similarity? We show that this is a generic consequence of random connectivity: in networks with random connectivity, output similarity is a monotonically increasing function of input similarity, independent of the specific connectivity pattern. Drift, whether driven by random synaptic turnover or Hebbian plasticity, merely transitions the network between random instantiations, leaving similarity intact. This extends to recurrent architectures and to deep neural networks, where continued training beyond performance saturation produces activity drift while preserving representational similarity. Although connectivity in the brain is not random, networks trained on high-dimensional inputs acquire connectivity that behaves statistically like a random projection, making these results broadly applicable to biological neural circuits. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, PCI2023-145967-2, PID2021-124702OB-I00 Spanish State Research Agency (AEI) – Severo Ochoa and María de Maeztu Program for Centers and Units of Excellence in R&D, CEX2020-001084-M German Research Foundation (DFG), FOR 5368 ARENA
2329
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Congrats to my office mate @d-ferro.bsky.social on his fantastic new paper, now out in @natcomms.nature.com! The gist: as the jackpot gets "closer", macaques' decisions become more accurate, but also riskier. Even cooler, all this is mirrored in neural activity. Elegant study and super clear. 🧠🧪
090
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
Nordderby.
000
Reposted by Jens-Bastian Eppler
Bernstein Network Computational Neuroscience @bernsteinneuro.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
⏰ Last-minute reminder! Only 48 hours left to submit your Poster abstracts and Travel Grant applications for the #BernsteinConference 2026! 🗓️ Deadline: July 1 All information 👉 bit.ly/4rQowo6... #CompNeuro #Neuroskyence #BernsteinNetwork
01311
Reposted by Jens-Bastian Eppler
Bernstein Network Computational Neuroscience @bernsteinneuro.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
⏳️ One week left to submit your Poster abstracts and Travel Grant applications for the #BernsteinConference 2026! 🗓️ Deadline: July 1 All information 👉 bit.ly/3vQYaIw #BernsteinNetwork #CompNeuro #Neuroskyence
052
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Cool study! Maybe our recent preprint might be of interest: doi.org/10.64898/202... We show that this preservation of geometry is a feature of (random) networks...
doi.org
Random network structure stabilizes neural manifolds
Neuronal activity patterns change continuously over days and weeks, a phenomenon known as representational drift. Despite this, the geometric structure of population representations, namely the pairwi...
140
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
Stable input tuning, you can get for free by just considering that there is an underlying network. We show this in our recent preprint: doi.org/10.64898/202... Not solving the decoding problem though.
doi.org
Random network structure stabilizes neural manifolds
Neuronal activity patterns change continuously over days and weeks, a phenomenon known as representational drift. Despite this, the geometric structure of population representations, namely the pairwi...
010
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
The idea is, the path between them is still built from small changes: 🔴 red → 🟠 orange → 🟡 yellow → 🟢 green → 🔵 blue Preserve local relationships all along the path, and the global manifold is preserved too. So, colour perception will always be represented by a ring-like structure. 5/5 🧪🧠
080
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
A second intuition: Networks tend to preserve small differences. If two stimuli are similar, their outputs stay similar. Example: 🔴 red → 🟠 orange Thus, even if activity drifts, nearby points remain nearby. But what about very different stimuli, like 🔴 red vs 🔵 blue? 4/5 🧪🧠
130
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
We find: A broad class of networks naturally does exactly this. Mathematical intuition: The same structure can be represented in different coordinate systems. A projection into a new basis will make activity look very different… …while preserving the geometry of the population code. 3/5 🧪🧠
120
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
Experiments often find: - activity of individual neurons changes over days/weeks → population activity “drifts” - but the geometry of the neural manifold stays remarkably stable So, how can activity change while structure is preserved? That’s the question we wanted to understand. 2/5 🧪🧠
130
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
New preprint: Random network structure stabilizes neural manifolds We’re excited to share our new work on representational drift. doi.org/10.64898/202... Representational drift poses a puzzle. 👇 A short thread below. In the next days a figure by figure walk through will follow. 1/5 🧪🧠
doi.org
25011
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
Two of the authors are here on Bluesky: @pamelaosuna.bsky.social @martinagvilas.bsky.social Congrats (of course also to the ones not on here)! 🧪🧠
120
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
Very cool work from former colleagues: doi.org/10.48550/arX... They render 3D objects into 2D images, systematically varying parameters like hue, lighting, camera angle, etc. Having tightly controlled stimulus sets like this will help compare representations across AI and biological networks. 🧪🧠
doi.org
MAPS: A Synthetic Dataset for Probing Vision Models in a Controlled 3D Scene Space
Modern vision models achieve strong performance on standard benchmarks, yet their aggregate accuracy reveals little about which scene properties drive their predictions. Existing robustness benchmarks...
141
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 17/05/2026
It's happening already. Just look at grok.
100
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 08/05/2026
This will be fun. Including my talk on how neuronal activity manifolds are preserved in random networks on Tuesday. Hope to see some of you there!
051
Reposted by Jens-Bastian Eppler
Hospital del Mar Research Institute @researchmar.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
🧠11-12/5: #GreenHippocampus will bring together international experts in hippocampal physiology. 🔬Organised by Manuel Valero @researchmar.bsky.social + @lmprida.bsky.social Daniel Bendor & Lisa Roux. 👥150 places available: www.researchmar.net/agenda/1078/ @cnrs.fr @csic.es @ucl.ac.uk @prbb.org
093
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
Or at least give your definition in the introduction. I always try to...
010
Reposted by Jens-Bastian Eppler
Joao Barbosa @jbarbosa.org · 03/04/2026
Wanna do neuroscience in Paris but can't find interesting lab? Want to come do a sabbatical but don't know who to collaborate? Check this webpage aggregating ~all the neuroscience labs (+200) in Paris. ⚠️only the information of 'verified' profiles is reliable⚠️ Please retweet 🙏 parisneuro.fr
212771
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
I agree. Useful tools. But doesn't it feel different for you reading about something that is new for you, e.g. in an encyclopedia, or figuring it out for yourself? (and compared to LLMs, encyclopedias were mostly right...)
100
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
Ok. But is discovery the same without the process? Won't it become boring, when a machine does it for you? And maybe even predictable (and full of mistakes)?
110
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
I disagree. To me science is more about the process. A bit like art. Like creativity is not defined by the outcome, but by going through the process. What is science without the struggle? Without the human interaction? To me the knowledge, without the way would be meaningless.
130
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Shoutout to my co-authors Johannes, Ohad, Jonas, Matthias, and Simon (all not on Bluesky, to my knowledge). It was great fun working with you!
020
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
You might ask: But where does representational drift come in? If cognitive maps themselves change over time, they may continuously reshape the space of possible ideas. Thus opening new paths for exploration and enabling novelty. 🧪🧠 4/4
131
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
But navigation alone is not enough. Creative thought also relies on variation and selection: generating candidate ideas and selecting those that are useful or valuable. This connects creativity to core biological principles. 🧪🧠 3/4
121
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
A key ingredient: cognitive maps. Ideas are structured in internal representations, and creativity involves navigating these maps, exploring remote associations and linking distant concepts. 🧪🧠 2/4
121
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
And now for something completely different... New paper out: Towards circuit mechanisms of the creative process doi.org/10.1080/1040... How does the brain generate creative ideas? We argue that creativity can be understood at the level of neural circuits - not just behavior or cognition. 🧪🧠 1/4
doi.org
Towards Circuit Mechanisms of the Creative Process
Creativity stands as one of the most intriguing aspects of cognition, attracting cross-disciplinary investigation due to its multifaceted nature and profound implications. While significant progres...
1112
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
Recent studies have shown (e.g. Noda et al., 2025) that representational similarity seems to be preserved during representational drift. Does this qualify? Maybe representations as in "representation of similarities" (Edelmann, 1998).
030
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 21/02/2026
I can only recommend @bernsteinneuro.bsky.social conference. Topics similar to cosyne, but feels so much nicer.
181
Jens-Bastian Eppler @j-b-eppler.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Most recent models explain "representational drift" as continuous learning in some way (e.g. doi.org/10.1038/s415..., doi.org/10.7554/eLif... or our recent doi.org/10.1073/pnas...). I don't like the name "representational drift" either, but I'm afraid, it's here for good...
120