Sign in

MInD

@inserm1329-mind.bsky.social
9 followers 9 following 0 posts

MInD - Motivation, Inattention & Distraction - is a cognitive neuroscience research group exploring the brain mechanisms of distractibility in healthy individuals and clinical populations. INSERM, Strasbourg, France 🇫🇷🇪🇺 PI: @matthieu-mx.bsky.social

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by MInD
Matthieu Chidharom @matthieu-mx.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
🚨📢 Paper alert! Our new paper is out in AP&P! We show that sustaining attention on both rewards and penalties is more effective than focusing on penalties alone—a first step toward a Goal-Competition Theory. @monicarosenb.bsky.social @edvogel.bsky.social link.springer.com/article/10.3...
link.springer.com
Not all benefits are equal: Incentives to seek reward and avoid penalty improve sustained attention in continuous performance tasks - Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Abstract Sustained attention is notoriously difficult to maintain over time, with attentional lapses emerging rapidly during prolonged tasks. Motivation has been identified as a key factor in reducing...
071
Reposted by MInD
Matthieu Chidharom @matthieu-mx.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
After five years in the US 🇺🇸, I'll soon be returning to my hometown of Strasbourg, where I'll join INSERM as a tenure-track Junior Group Leader and launch the MInD (Motivation, Inattention & Distraction) Research Group. 🇫🇷🇪🇺 Two graduate positions available: matthieuchidharom.wixsite.com/mind
13615
Reposted by MInD
Matthieu Chidharom @matthieu-mx.bsky.social · 28/09/2025
1/ Why are we so easily distracted? 🧠 In our new EEG preprint w/ Henry Jones, @monicarosenb.bsky.social and @edvogel.bsky.social we show that distractibility is associated w/ reduced neural connectivity — and can be predicted from EEG with ~80% accuracy using machine learning.
16226
Reposted by MInD
Matthieu Chidharom @matthieu-mx.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
1/ To reduce distraction and boost focus, nothing works better than linking performance to rewards 💰 But what about focusing to avoid penalties? Turns out — it works too… just not as much as combining both! Check out our new preprint 👇 w/ Ed Vogel and @monicarosenb.bsky.social
Representation of goal activation in working memory as a function of participant motivation. According to the goal competition hypothesis, goal activation in working memory is influenced not only by cognitive control but also by the level of associated benefits. A goal with little or no benefit (neutral) will be weakly activated in working memory compared to conditions involving incentives (penalty avoidance, reward seeking, or the combination of both). It can be assumed that the combination of reward and penalty leads to stronger goal activation than penalty alone, potentially explaining the higher number of no-go errors observed in the penalty-only condition.
1184