How does Habermasian communicative rationality compare with Confucian moral philosophy and relational ethics?
In a new Journal of Sortition paper, Baogang He explores this question and reflects on his pivotal encounter with Habermas.
Read the paper: www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/...
![„The really hard problem of consciousness is the problem of experience. When we think and perceive, there is a whir of information-processing, but there is also a subjective aspect. As Nagel (1974) has put it, there is something it is like to be a conscious organism. This subjective aspect is experience. […] It is undeniable that some organisms are subjects of experience. But the question of how it is that these systems are subjects of experience is perplexing. […] It is widely agreed that experience arises from a physical basis, but we have no good explanation of why and how it so arises. Why should physical processing give rise to a rich inner life at all? It seems objectively unreasonable that it should, and yet it does.“
CHALMERS, DAVID (1995): Facing up to the problem of consciousness In: Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3), 200-219, hier: S. 201.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:zzlautktfliumzusgleekgco/bafkreieqoc33hoijw56c6u3oqiqnblzgfbxiotfmba3pzvhve47s2yso7a)
