jamanetwork.com
Universal Opt-Out Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Treatment on Entry in California State Prisons
Expanding testing and treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections is an essential component of national hepatitis C elimination plans.1,2 Compared with the general population in the US, state prison systems have substantially higher prevalence of current HCV infection (8.7% vs 1.6%), making them vital venues for testing and treatment.3,4 In July 2016, California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) began implementing multiple strategies toward achieving elimination of hepatitis C within the state prison system, including universal opt-out testing on entry, gradual treatment eligibility expansions, and linkage to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment.5 With a universal opt-out approach, all entrants receive HCV testing regardless of their reported risk behaviors, unless they explicitly decline. This study characterizes HCV testing and treatment outcomes among individuals entering incarceration into California state prisons overall, by year, and by key individual-level characteristics.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was determined by the Stanford University institutional review board to be non–human participants research because deidentified secondary information was used; therefore, written informed consent was not required. We followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines. We analyzed individual-level electronic health record data from all adults entering California prisons, termed entrants, between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2023. We quantified the percentages of entrants receiving an HCV antibody test within 4 weeks of entry, antibody positive (ever infected) among entrants tested, RNA positive (currently infected) among those with antibody positive results, and initiating direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment within 1 year among those with RNA positive results. To accommodate CCHCS care guidelines during the study period, which required a minimum sentence length of 5 to 8 months for DAA treatment, we restricted our analysis to entrants with at least 6 months of follow-up.
We reported on outcomes overall and by fiscal year (July 1 to June 30), and we stratified by sex, age group, documented race and ethnicity, prior incarceration in a California prison, anticipated length of incarceration, and SUD history. We identified predictors associated with testing, test positivity, and treatment using multivariable logistic regression. Additional methodologic details are provided in the eMethods in Supplement 1.
Results
From July 2016 to June 2023, 176 967 individuals meeting eligibility criteria entered California prisons. Of entrants, 133 639 (76%) were tested for HCV antibody, 25 455 (19% of those tested; 14% of entrants) were ever infected with HCV, and 16 738 (66% of those ever infected; 9% of entrants) were currently infected (Table). A total of 7479 entrants (45% of those currently infected; 4% of entrants) initiated DAA treatment within 1 year. Among individuals initiating treatment within 1 year, 3837 (51%) started within 6 months of their positive test at entry. Among individuals who did not initiate DAA treatment, 4289 (46%) were released between 6 months and 1 year of entry. In a sensitivity analysis removing the 6-month follow-up restriction, the percentage initiating DAA treatment decreased from 7479 (45%) to 7613 (36%). From fiscal year 2017-2018 to 2022-2023, testing and treatment percentages increased (26 024 [80%] to 21 368 [92%] for testing and 675 [20%] to 1770 [76%] for treatment), antibody positivity remained largely stable (4628 [18%] to 4210 [20%]), and RNA positivity decreased (3327 [72%] to 2326 [55%]) (Figure).
Table. Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Treatment on Entry to California State Prisons by Demographic and Carceral Characteristics, Fiscal Years 2016-2017 to 2022-2023View LargeDownload (opens in new tab)Go to Figure in ArticleCharacteristicEntrant, No.No. (%)Antibody testPositive antibody testPositive RNA testDAA initiationOverall176 967133 639 (75.5)25 455 (19.0)16 738 (65.8)7479 (44.7)Sex Female10 63110 041 (94.5)1413 (14.1)786 (55.6)267 (34.0) Male166 336123 598 (74.3)24 042 (19.5)15 952 (66.4)7212 (45.2)Age group, ya 18-2964 04748 049 (75.0)6096 (12.7)4487 (73.6)1951 (43.5) 30-4991 85269 858 (76.1)14 270 (20.4)9504 (66.6)4359 (45.9) ≥5021 06815 732 (74.7)5089 (32.3)2747 (54.0)1169 (42.6)Race and ethnicityb American Indian or Alaska Native19061531 (80.3)472 (30.8)263 (55.7)110 (41.8) Asian or Pacific Islander26202027 (77.4)97 (4.8)52 (53.6)23 (44.2) Black40 99630 503 (74.4)1760 (5.8)1038 (59.0)447 (43.1) Hispanic82 35961 615 (74.8)12 145 (19.7)8487 (69.9)3915 (46.1) White42 51133 137 (77.9)10 291 (31.1)6422 (62.4)2764 (43.0) Otherc65754826 (73.4)690 (14.3)476 (69.0)220 (46.2)Previously incarcerated in a California state prison Yes102 92973 287 (71.2)20 790 (28.4)13 611 (65.5)6207 (45.6) No74 03860 352 (81.5)4665 (7.7)3127 (67.0)1272 (40.7)Time expected to serve, yd <160 80948 288 (79.4)9085 (18.8)5876 (64.7)1677 (28.5) 1-271 21852 971 (74.4)11 002 (20.8)7222 (65.6)3895 (53.9) 3-931 74522 314 (70.3)3894 (17.5)2647 (68.0)1421 (53.7) ≥1013 19510 066 (76.3)1474 (14.6)993 (67.4)486 (48.9)SUD statuse Assessed, SUD identified45 79740 072 (87.5)12 830 (32.0)8365 (65.2)4843 (57.9) Screened negative or assessed, no SUD identified60 73950 259 (82.7)5016 (10.0)3108 (62.0)1367 (44.0) Not screened or assessed, no SUD program70 43143 308 (61.5)7609 (17.6)5265 (69.2)1269 (24.1)Fiscal yearf 2016-201731 3284995 (15.9)829 (16.6)476 (57.4)26 (5.5) 2017-201832 53126 024 (80.0)4628 (17.8)3327 (71.9)675 (20.3) 2018-201932 67428 541 (87.4)5483 (19.2)3963 (72.3)1716 (43.3) 2019-202020 84518 568 (89.1)3463 (18.7)2426 (70.1)752 (31.0) 2020-202113 46712 165 (90.3)2348 (19.3)1460 (62.2)845 (57.9) 2021-202222 78821 978 (96.4)4494 (20.4)2760 (61.4)1695 (61.4) 2022-202323 33421 368 (91.6)4210 (19.7)2326 (55.2)1770 (76.1)
Figure. Bar and Line Graphs Showing Changes in Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Treatment on Entry to California State Prisons, Fiscal Years 2016-2017 to 2022-2023 View LargeDownload (opens in new tab)Go to Figure in ArticleConditional percentages were calculated as follows: antibody testing is calculated among all entrants; antibody positivity is calculated among entrants with an antibody test; RNA positivity is calculated among all entrants with a positive antibody test; and DAA treatment is calculated among all entrants with a positive RNA test. The decline in antibody testing and DAA treatment observed in 2020 and 2021 coincide with the COVID-19 pandemic, which considerably impacted the prison health system. Lines connect values calculated over 6-month periods, and bars reflect counts over 6-month periods beginning with the period from July 1 to December 31, 2016. DAA indicates direct-acting antiviral.
Although antibody and RNA positivity percentages differed across age and racial and ethnic groups, treatment initiation was similar (Table). Current HCV infection prevalence among tested entrants was highest among male, older, and Hispanic entrants, as well as entrants who had previously been incarcerated in a California prison. Individuals with identified SUD had substantially higher antibody positivity (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; 95% CI, 3.9-4.2) and DAA initiation (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), compared with individuals without an identified SUD.
Discussion
CCHCS implemented universal opt-out HCV testing and treatment on entry as part of a wide-scale effort to eliminate hepatitis C; this implementation was associated with effective and equitable increases in access to hepatitis C treatment, particularly for those with SUD. Although we document subgroup heterogeneity in RNA positivity, the high overall current infection rate among entrants supports opt-out universal screening strategies.3,6 Furthermore, higher DAA initiation among individuals with current HCV infection and SUD underscores the value of integrated SUD and hepatitis C treatment programs. Our primary limitation is that results from California may not generalize to other states due to differences in prison systems, demographics, and epidemiology.
Efforts to expand testing and treatment were supported by changes to CCHCS’s HCV care-delivery model, including providing training and decision-support tools that enabled task shifting of clinical workups, treatment monitoring, and risk-reduction counseling to primary care teams and nurses.5 Additionally, treatment expansion required a commitment of up-front funding from the state of $105.8 million per year for 3 years.7 Although other studies have found that investments in treatment can yield downstream health care savings by preventing liver-related complications, future work should evaluate the long-term health and economic effects of CCHCS’s HCV testing and treatment strategies.8-10
Back to top
Article Information
Accepted for Publication: June 30, 2026.Published Online: September 14, 2026. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.4041Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2026 Ye Z et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.Corresponding Author: Marissa B. Reitsma, PhD, Department of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 615 Crothers Way, Encina Commons, Stanford, CA 94305 (mreitsma@stanford.edu).Author Contributions: Dr Reitsma had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Concept and design: Ye, Lucas, Furukawa, Honeycutt, Krawiec, Salomon, Reitsma.Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ye, Lucas, Furukawa, Kalauokalani, Puente, Salomon, Reitsma.Drafting of the manuscript: Ye, Krawiec, Salomon, Reitsma.Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.Statistical analysis: Ye, Salomon, Reitsma.Obtained funding: Furukawa, Puente, Salomon.Administrative, technical, or material support: Ye, Lucas, Furukawa, Honeycutt, Kalauokalani, Krawiec, Puente, Salomon.Supervision: Furukawa, Kalauokalani, Krawiec, Salomon, Reitsma.Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.Funding/Support: This work was supported by award NU38PS004651 from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Epidemiologic and Economic Modeling Agreement.Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Employees of the funder participated as coauthors on the study and contributed to the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication as described in the Author Contributions section. The funder had no other role in these processes.Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the other authors’ affiliated institutions.Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
References
1.US Department of Health and Human Services. Viral hepatitis national strategic plan: a roadmap to elimination for the US (2021-2025). Accessed July 28, 2026. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/Viral-Hepatitis-National-Strategic-Plan-2021-2025.pdf2.Akiyama
MJ, Bialek
T, Simonson
R. The carceral-community cascade and HCV elimination. JAMA. 2025;333(5):369-370. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.20602ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref3.Hall
EW, Bradley
H, Barker
LK,
et al. Estimating hepatitis C prevalence in the US, 2017-2020. Hepatology. 2025;81(2):625-636. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000927PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref4.Spaulding
AC, Kennedy
SS, Osei
J,
et al. Estimates of hepatitis C seroprevalence and viremia in state prison populations in the US. J Infect Dis. 2023;228(suppl 3):s160-s167. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiad227PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref5.Lucas
KD, Krawiec
A, Wada
J, Kanan
RJ. The hepatitis C care cascade in California state prisons: screening and treatment scale-up and progress toward elimination, 2016-2023. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024;23(1):e0117. doi:10.1097/CLD.0000000000000117PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref6.McNamara
M, Furukawa
N, Cartwright
EJ. Advancing hepatitis C elimination through opt-out universal screening and treatment in carceral settings, US. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(13)(suppl 1):S80-S87. doi:10.3201/eid3013.230859PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref7.State of California. 2018-2019 State budget 5225 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Accessed July 28, 2026. https://ebudget.ca.gov/publication/e/2018-19/Department/52258.Chhatwal
J, Aaron
A, Zhong
H,
et al. Projected health benefits and health care savings from the US national hepatitis C elimination initiative. National Bureau of Economic Research. Published April 2023. Accessed July 28, 2026. https://www.nber.org/papers/w311399.Congressional Budget Office. Budgetary effects of policies that would increase hepatitis C treatment. Accessed July 28, 2026. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/6040710.Abimbola
TO, Symum
H, Van Handel
M, Teshale
E, Thompson
W. Lifetime medical costs of chronic hepatitis C in the US. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026;26(1):609. doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14360-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref