iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 18h

Kew Approved Premises in Richmond has been rated ‘Requires improvement’. Inspectors found strong leadership and effective public protection, but staffing shortages continued to impact services including rehabilitative activities and pre-arrival planning buff.ly/3Z5CTEG

A picture of the Chief Inspector of Probation with a quote that says
"At Kew AP we found a service that had made progress following a prolonged period of instability, supported by improved leadership and governance and effective work with partner agencies to manage risk and protect the public. However, further work is now needed to ensure residents receive consistent opportunities to address their needs, reduce their risk of reoffending and prepare for successful resettlement.”

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 13/10/2026

Tameside YJS has been rated 'Requires improvement' following an inspection of their work. Inspectors found committed staff helping children build positive futures, but said improvements are needed to better protect victims and manage risks to public safety. buff.ly/OUlcxbc

A picture of the Chief Inspector of Probation with a quote that says Tameside YJS and the broader partnership had faced a range of challenges which had impacted on the delivery of services to children and victims. Senior leaders knew their service well, and a strengthening in stability and strategic grip meant there were foundations on which to build consistent effective practice. However, improvement in the commitment of the partnership and a maintained focus on driving improvement at pace were also required.”

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

Calderdale YJS has been rated 'Requires improvement' following an inspection of their work with children and victims. Inspectors noted positive work with victims but identified inconsistencies in assessment, planning and risk management. buff.ly/Aq4Q9Zi

A picture of the Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones with a quote that says practitioners at Calderdale YJS worked hard to understand the children in their care and to support them to achieve positive change. However, we found inconsistencies in some aspects of planning and assessing activity, which resulted in an overall rating of requires improvement.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

What works in public protection? Our new Effective Practice Spotlight showcases examples from across the Probation Service, highlighting approaches that support high-quality practice and safer communities. 🎥⬇️ buff.ly/hoOZurY

Greater Manchester Multi-Agency Public Protection Team slide featuring a quote about shifting from reviewing past incidents to focusing on next steps to manage risk and protect potential victims; footer labels it an Effective Practice Spotlight from national inspection findings.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

Slide titled "Complex Case Support: building confidence and support networks for practitioners managing complex risk," showing a quote urging practitioners to "zoom out, take a breath and review the case and its complexities," with a footer noting an Effective Practice Spotlight.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

Merseyside's automated domestic abuse information sharing system. "from the get-go we have that information to help us inform our assessments. Practitioners are getting real time information about alerts, and they can be confident about decisions they take."

020

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

The characteristics of effective practice. "Practitioners cannot manage risk on their own, we need partners and colleagues to help us, and the more we can engage with other agencies the better we are at getting a real sense of what's important."

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

NEW: Today we published our national findings following a review of public protection measures delivered by all 12 regions of the Probation Service in England and Wales. buff.ly/vUK9FWW

A picture of the Chief Inspector of Probation with a quote that says frontline probation staff are working hard to keep communities safe, often in very difficult circumstances. However, public protection work was not being delivered consistently well enough to provide the assurance that victims, communities and partner agencies were entitled to expect. Our findings show that regions cannot resolve these issues alone. National action is needed to stabilise the workforce, strengthen information-sharing with the police and children's services, and support practitioners to make full and confident use of the information available to them.

This report focused specifically on public protection work being delivered by all 12 regions of the Probation Service across England and Wales.

We inspected public protection work across 858 cases and conducted 711 case inspection interviews with practitioners, examining assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work.

Vetting delays remain a significant barrier to recruitment, hindering the timely filling of vacancies and, in some cases, causing successful candidates to withdraw before appointment.

Increased workforce instability, and decreased resilience across probation staffing, is directly impacting the quality and consistency of risk management practice; these are longstanding problems, and recruitment shortfalls and staff shortages do not simply mean a busier workforce, they contribute to a heightened risk to public protection.

Information-sharing with the police has improved, but in almost one in five cases (18 per cent) information received about domestic abuse was of insufficient quality to be meaningful in assessing risk; information-sharing with children’s services remains a more significant and persistent weakness, with information of insufficient quality to inform risk assessment in nearly a third of relevant cases (31 per cent).

Even where information was available, practitioners did not always make effective use of it: in more than half of cases inspected (54 per cent), critical information was not sufficiently interrogated, analysed or translated into robust risk assessment and management activity.

There is currently no agreed national strategy setting out overarching principles for how probation should work with the police and children’s services, meaning individual Probation Delivery Units are left attempting to solve the same shared problems in isolation.

Public protection outcomes were consistently strongest where regions and Probation Delivery Units had the flexibility to use their initiative and apply locally innovative solutions, within a clear national framework.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 15/09/2026

Sandwell YJS has been rated ‘Good’ following an inspection of their work with children and victims. Inspectors praised effective partnership working, strong leadership and coordinated responses to exploitation, youth violence and extra-familial harm. buff.ly/kyM9Vwr

A picture of the Chief Inspector of Probation, Martin Jones with a quote that says “Work with victims was a notable strength. Practitioners and managers demonstrated genuine care and commitment to supporting victims, and the YJS, partnership board and commissioned service had worked collaboratively and at pace to develop a high-quality service.”

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 04/09/2026

Together with @ofstednews.bsky.social, Care Quality Commission and HMICFRS, we have today published guidance for a new round of thematic inspections focusing on younger children living with neglect, as part of our programme of joint targeted area inspections: www.gov.uk/government/n...

Younger children living with neglect to be focus of new joint targeted area inspections

Ofsted, CQC, HMICFRS and HM Inspectorate of Probation will begin a new joint inspection programme in autumn 2026, focusing on how local agencies work together to identify, respond to and prevent neglect affecting unborn children and children aged 0 to 11.

Quote from Martin Jones, Chief Inspector of Probation "Probation services play an important role in assessing and managing risks posed by adults whose behaviour may affect children’s lives, sharing information with partners and contributing to safeguarding arrangements.

These inspections will provide valuable insight into how effectively local agencies are working together to recognise and respond to neglect, helping to ensure that younger children receive the protection and support they need at the earliest opportunity.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 01/09/2026

Buckinghamshire YJST has been rated 'Good' following an inspection of work with children and victims. Inspectors praised the range of activities available to meet children's needs. Recommendations were made to improve the consistency of work with victims buff.ly/idqgwqe

Buckinghamshire Youth Justice Support Team (YJST)

Overall rating: Good. A quote from HM Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones CBE, “Buckinghamshire YJST was a well-led partnership that placed children at the centre of its work. We saw an environment where children felt listened to, respected and valued by skilled and dedicated practitioners”.

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 26/08/2026

Merseybank AP has been rated 'Good' following an inspection. Inspectors found positive relationships between staff and residents which supported both rehabilitation and effective management of risk. However, the quality of rehabilitative work was variable buff.ly/1m60JSP

Merseybank Approved Premises (AP). Overall rating Good. A quote from Chief Inspector of Probation, Martin Jones “This was a well-led service with a clear commitment to learning and improvement. Leaders had used learning from findings identified during previous inspections elsewhere in the region to strengthen practice through audit and quality assurance activity in several areas. They provided visible and supportive leadership, helping to create a positive culture where staff felt valued and residents were treated with respect.”

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

Probation Service practitioners: Help shape our SFO Annual Report 2026. We're seeking views from practitioners on how learning from SFO reviews is shared, acted on and embedded across the Service. Find out more: hmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/news/have-yo...

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 21/08/2026

NEW: Today we published our 75th Academic Insight which highlights the relevance of compassion fatigue as one of the vicarious harms faced by probation practitioners. Read the full report here buff.ly/mwsT63A

A quote which says compassion fatigue can affect practitioners both professionally and personally contributing to reduced wellbeing diminished work performance and commitment and a range of physical and emotional consequences. It is therefore vital that the service takes the concept seriously prioritising staff wellbeing and creating conditions for high-quality delivery including reduced sickness absence and improved staff retention. The focus should be on developing a system that promotes psychological safety and resilience and the paper sets out a range of recommendations including raising awareness of compassion fatigue drawing on learning from other sectors strengthening protective factors adopting strength - based approaches and maximising reflexivity.

020

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 20/08/2026

A Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the North East region was published today. While inspectors identified areas where further progress is needed, they praised the region's improvements and highlighted stronger operational practice in relation to public protection. buff.ly/hk9OnuN

A picture of the Chief Inspector of Probation with a quote that says "Leaders and staff in the North East should be proud of the progress they are making. This has been the only region where at least half of the cases examined were evaluated to have sufficiently met all four of our key questions relating to the management of risk. As we mentioned in our last inspection many of the right systems were in place in the North East region and with continued focus improvements were likely. This is likely the fruition of that work."

Context: The North East region of the Probation Service covers seven probation delivery units (PDUs). These are: Newcastle upon Tyne, County Durham & Darlington, Redcar, Cleveland, & Middlesborough, Stockton & Hartlepool, North Tyneside & Northumberland, Sunderland, and Gateshead & South Tyneside. Sixty-one cases were inspected where the Inspectorate examined assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work. At the time of the inspection, the region supervised 11,342 people in the community or in custody.

HM Inspectorate of Probation Findings: Inspectors generally found notable improvements compared with our last inspection in the North East region across all areas of assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, with over 60 per cent of cases evaluated to be meeting our standards for assessment and planning. Structural changes had been made by leaders since our last inspection to reinforce the importance of public protection work. Further work was required to improve the quality of case assessments, to ensure they drew sufficiently from all available sources of information. Shortfalls were found in assessment and planning, with some staff still lacking the confidence and experience to seek clarification about information they received from partner agencies.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 20/08/2026

A Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the London region was published today. Despite leadership being a strength, inspectors identified a significant gap between strategic ambition and frontline delivery. Read the full report: buff.ly/VCZE92A

Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the London region.

Quote from Martin Jones CBE Chief Inspector of Probation, "Leaders demonstrated a strong commitment to improving the quality of practice which was supported by well-developed systems for performance management and learning. Despite these positive steps, the quality of practice observed during this inspection remained inconsistent, and inspectors did not find enough evidence that these strategic improvements had translated into consistent outcomes in frontline delivery.”

Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection
in the London region

Context:

London is the largest probation region in England and Wales. One hundred and two cases were inspected where the Inspectorate examined assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work. At the time of the inspection announcement, the region supervised 37,195 people in the community or in custody.

Staffing numbers were improving in the region, however a significant gap remained with a 33 per cent vacancy rate at probation officer grade

Findings:

The inspection identified a significant gap between strategic ambition and frontline delivery. Innovative operating models, specialist multi-agency forums and enhanced quality assurance processes demonstrated a region that was actively seeking solutions to persistent challenges. However, weaknesses in assessment, planning, implementation, and reviewing remained evident across casework.

Inspectors described leadership to be a particular strength of the London region, with regional leaders displaying a strong understanding of public protection.

Workforce capability was found to be a significant issue affecting the region’s ability to adequately protect the public.

Information sharing with the Metropolitan Police remains a longstanding concern.

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 13/08/2026

A Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in Wales was published today. Inspectors commented on positive improvements since our last inspection in 2025, with planning a clear strength. However, public protection still needs focus. Read the full report: buff.ly/gkdrDFs

Dynamic inspection of public protection in Wales. A quote from HM Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones CBE, “Overall, while the region was moving in the right direction, the quality of public protection work was not yet consistently good enough. Sufficient time and emphasis were now needed to embed changes, strengthen analytical practice, and improve information sharing. A sustained focus on these areas would be essential if the region was to realise its ambition of delivering consistently high-quality work to keep people safe.”

Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection
in Wales.

Context:

The Wales region of the Probation Service covers six Probation Delivery Units (PDUs), Cwm Taf Morgannwg, Dyfed Powys, Swansea Neath Port Talbot, Cardiff and the Vale, Gwent, and North Wales.

Fifty-five cases were inspected where the Inspectorate examined assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work. At the time of the inspection announcement, the region supervised 10,686 people in

the community or in custody.

Findings:

Planning was a clear strength in practice, reflecting the sustained and targeted activity which had started before the previous inspection in 2025. Revised offender assessment system briefings had supported practitioners to produce more focused and strategic risk management plans.

While most cases demonstrated an appropriate overall risk classification, there were persistent weaknesses in analytical depth. Domestic abuse histories were not always explored fully, and practitioners did not consistently link behaviour to the impact on children or recognise patterns across cases.

Staffing levels across the region were stable overall, however workloads continued to be adversely affected by vacancies.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 12/08/2026

Trent House AP has been rated 'Requires improvement following an inspection. Inspectors noted some strengths but found prolonged staffing shortages and management instability had impacted their quality of service delivery. Read the full report here. buff.ly/3ROpfxD

A quote from Martin Jones Chief Inspector of Probation which says overall rating: 'Requires improvement'. We recognise that Trent House was operating in challenging circumstances at the time of this inspection, having been without a substantive manager for an extended period. Despite this, we found a committed and resilient staff group who were working hard to maintain service delivery.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 04/08/2026

Medway YJS has been rated 'Requires improvement' following an inspection of work with children and victims. Although planning to achieve positive change for children was impressive, inspectors found the quality of assessing needed strengthening buff.ly/RvyMomJ

Medway Youth Justice Service (YJS). Overall rating: Requires improvement. A quote from HM Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones CBE, “The practitioners at Medway YJS were skilled at building meaningful and trusting relationships and tailoring interventions to the needs of children. While we found evidence of promising practice, there remained important aspects of service delivery that needed to improve to ensure consistent outcomes for children, victims and the community were met.”

001

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 04/08/2026

Rotherham YJS has been rated 'Requires improvement' following an inspection of work with children and victims. Inspectors found that practitioners were skilled and committed to identifying the strengths of the children, but noted inconsistences in practice buff.ly/AeRNJXG

Rotherham Youth Justice Service (YJS). Overall rating: Requires improvement. A quote from HM Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones CBE, "We recognise that this inspection took place during a period of significant change for the service. Despite this, there was a sense of optimism that the proposed changes would create opportunities to strengthen services for children and victims. I wish the team every success for the future.”

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 31/07/2026

To wrap up our week focusing on working with domestic abuse, we’re highlighting the Changing Futures programme in Lancashire, a joint initiative by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the National Lottery Community Fund. Read the full guide here: buff.ly/AYpqnDJ

Example of effectiveness: Changing Futures, Lancashire
Changing Futures supports adults experiencing multiple and complex needs, including domestic abuse, homelessness, mental health issues, substance misuse, and involvement with the criminal justice system.

The programme was co-produced with people with lived experience and provides tailored support to help individuals address practical needs such as housing, health, and finances, creating greater stability in their lives.

By addressing underlying needs, the programme helps individuals engage more effectively with probation and increases opportunities to participate in domestic abuse interventions.

Probation practitioners reported that coordinated support from multiple agencies helped individuals access services, maintain engagement, and make positive changes that can reduce the risk of further domestic abuse.

020

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 30/07/2026

As we continue to highlight effective examples of working with domestic abuse, today we are focusing on the Wales Integrated Serious and Dangerous Offender Management (WISDOM) programme. Read the full Effective Practice guide here: hmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/effective-pr...

Wales Integrated Serious and Dangerous Offender Management (WISDOM). WISDOM is a multi-agency programme in Wales which brings together probation, police, forensic psychological services and other local partners to improve public protection and manage individuals who present a high risk of causing serious harm, including domestic abuse.

The WISDOM team draws heavily on advice and support from HMPPS psychological services to understand and work with complex cases. Case formulations are shared with partners to allow all agencies to take a consistent approach with each individual.

Case illustration: Ed had a history of abusing multiple victims and was managed by the WISDOM team due to the seriousness and complexity of his domestic abuse offending. Working closely with police, children’s social care, and other agencies, the probation practitioner completed a detailed assessment, coordinated information sharing, and put safeguards in place to protect victims through measures such as MARAC referrals and Clare’s Law disclosures.

Following Ed’s release, agencies continued to work together, responding quickly to emerging concerns and ensuring risks were identified and managed to protect existing and potential victims. Ed’s case is an effective example of the work of the WISDOM team and demonstrates the benefits of this multi-agency approach to working with complex individuals.

110

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 29/07/2026

This week we’re highlighting examples of effective practice when working with domestic abuse. This example of effectiveness demonstrates the impact of an effective relationship with children’s social care, where information shared in a timely way had helped to keep a child safe.

Working with domestic abuse Children’s Social Care. Example of effectiveness:

Harry was a 28-year-old male sentenced to a 24-month community order with rehabilitation activity requirement days and a requirement to complete the Building Better Relationships programme for an offence of criminal damage linked to domestic abuse.

The probation practitioner was open and transparent about their role and how information would be shared with partner agencies, helping to establish trust and openness throughout supervision.

This approach helped build a positive working relationship, enabling Harry to engage openly in supervision, take ownership of his actions, and play an active role in planning his sentence.

When Harry disclosed changes in his relationship and later his partner's pregnancy, the probation practitioner promptly shared relevant information and concerns with children's social care.

Probation and children's social care worked closely together, regularly sharing information, reviewing risks, and coordinating their activity. The allocated social worker also worked with the nominated midwife to plan for the child's safe arrival.

Consistent communication and joint working enabled services to identify risks early, put safeguards in place, and help protect Harry's unborn child throughout the pregnancy and beyond.

100

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

This week we’re highlighting effective examples of working with domestic abuse in probation. As part of its commitment to ensuring that perpetrators of domestic abuse are managed robustly, the Probation Service in Wales established a Domestic Abuse Board.

Strategic approach to domestic abuse, Wales Probation Service.
Example of effectiveness:
The Probation Service in Wales established its Domestic Abuse Board in 2022 to strengthen the management of domestic abuse perpetrators, reduce reoffending, and improve protection for victims.

The board brings together teams from across probation to coordinate activity, oversee delivery of the Wales Domestic Abuse Action Plan, and support a consistent approach to tackling domestic abuse across Wales.

This approach creates a single forum where all aspects of domestic abuse are considered, bringing together representatives from operational teams, learning and development, and quality and performance.

By working collaboratively, these teams ensure a joined-up approach across probation, enabling the consistent sharing of information, learning, and good practice with frontline staff to strengthen the response to domestic abuse.

100

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 22/07/2026

Congratulations to Elizabeth Fry AP on their rating of 'Outstanding'. The service received a score of 15/15 through our inspection standards and inspectors praised staff for their strong understanding of working with women in the criminal justice system. buff.ly/A5bOri9

030

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 21/07/2026

ICYMI: We have published our 2025-2026 Annual Report which, for the first time, covers all Inspectorate programmes including probation, youth justice, and national, and local area inspections. hmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/news/our-new...

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 21/07/2026

Stoke YJSS has been rated 'Inadequate' following an inspection of work with children and victims. Although practitioners formed strong relationships with children and families, inspectors found significant shortfalls across assessing, planning and delivery buff.ly/qdb58Qu

Stoke-on-Trent Youth Justice Support Service. Overall rating: ‘Inadequate’. A quote from His Majesty Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones CBE, “While Stoke-on-Trent Youth Justice Support Service had the elements that should have enabled a high-quality service, including a well-resourced, multidisciplinary team that were committed and motivated to work with children and their families, concerningly, this was not currently translating into sufficient youth justice practice, and overall, the service was rated ‘Inadequate’.”

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 20/07/2026

In our first combined Annual Report, the Chief Inspector of Probation has called for “urgent, focused action” to protect the public and support victims. For the first time, this report covers all Inspectorate programmes. Read more here: hmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/news/our-new...

Text reads Annual Report, 2025-2026 with a quote ascribed to Chief Inspector of Probation, Martin Jones CBE which reads: “Our programmes continue to recognise committed, motivated practitioners working hard to achieve better outcomes for the people they manage, however, there is still much more to do to. I am pleased to have this opportunity to share the evidence that continues to underpin our call for urgent, focused action to protect the public, support victims, and give the Probation Service the foundations it needs to succeed.”

011

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

NEW: Today we published our latest Research and Analysis Bulletin which aims to understand the issues of blame, learning and growth following Serious Further Offences in probation. buff.ly/fLr31qF

030

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 14/07/2026

Peterborough YJS has been rated 'Good' following an inspection of their work with children and victims. Inspectors were impressed with assessing activity at the service and noted its revised victim policy had improved quality engagement with victims. buff.ly/t1h1qFu

A picture of Martin Jones (Chief Inspector of Probation) with a quote that reads Children at Peterborough YJS were supported by skilled practitioners who had high aspirations for them. There was a clear focus on helping children to recognise their potential, and staff actively worked with them to effectively support positive change.

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 10/07/2026

NEW: Today we published our latest Academic Insight exploring the current and potential uses of Artificial Intelligence within probation, highlighting the opportunities presented and the challenges raised for practice, decision-making, and service delivery buff.ly/ABXE8hn

Quote from Dr Robin Moore, Head of Data Analysis and Research about Artificial Intelligence in Probation, "AI tools provide opportunities to automate tasks and reduce workload, freeing up practitioners to focus upon the uniquely human aspects of their role, notably developing good relationships with people on probation. At the same time, as is set out in this paper, the introduction of AI into probation raises ethical, legal, and professional challenges. Attention needs to be given to risks and challenges in relation to (i) bias, discrimination and privacy, (ii) transparency and overreliance, and (iii) due process and accountability."

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 08/07/2026

Stonnall Road AP in Walsall has been rated 'Good'. Inspectors praised the leadership culture and staff building constructive relationships with residents, while highlighting that not all staff had completed essential training. buff.ly/Y9Ymiw0

An inspection of Stonnall Road Approved Premises. Overall rating: 'Good'. A quote from HM Chief Inspector of Probation Martin Jones CBE, "Stonnall Road is delivering a good standard of service. There is a clear focus on rehabilitation, and the staff and managers have cultivated a respectful, inclusive environment where residents are supported to resettle into the community.”

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 01/07/2026

Crowley House AP has been rated as ‘Good’ following an inspection. Inspectors praised staff, management, and partnership agencies for delivering a service that was making a positive difference to women. buff.ly/bxCfKVW

A picture of Martin Jones, Chief Inspector of Probation with a quote about Crowley House Approved Premises. Overall rating: 'Good' "We found many strengths at Crowley House. Staff engaged well with residents and delivered high-quality rehabilitation work, and a range of well-developed interventions supported residents towards more independent living. By addressing some of the areas identified in this report, this service is well placed to build on its strengths and further improve outcomes for the women it supports." Martin Jones Martin Jones CBE HM Chief Inspector of Probation

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 26/06/2026

In this example from our safeguarding adults on probation effective practice guide, we saw how professional curiosity and trauma-informed interviewing led a practitioner to uncover an individual’s history of coercion and exploitation. buff.ly/r1gZBvm

Example of effectiveness: Supporting a victim of modern slavery and cuckooing. Graham, a 43-year-old male, was sentenced to a community order for theft. Initial contact revealed a number of safeguarding concerns, including modern slavery, mental health challenges, and housing vulnerability due to cuckooing, where his home was being exploited by criminal networks.

Identification of exploitation: Professional curiosity and trauma-informed interviewing led the practitioner to uncover Graham’s history of coercion and exploitation linked to forced criminal activity. Graham was formally recognised as a victim of modern slavery and referred to Causeway10m a leading crime reduction charity, which ensured he had access to trauma-informed psychological support, legal advocacy and recovery planning.

A case plan was developed, integrating multiple strands of support, including: - referral to an emotional wellbeing provider for trauma and anxiety management - engagement with a debt advice service to address financial exploitation and rebuild independence - ongoing contact with Causeway for long-term recovery from modern slavery, including reintegration support and safety planning.

Safeguarding outcomes were achieved through timely identification, multi-agency coordination, and evidence-informed planning. Graham reported feeling safe, heard, and supported, marking a significant shift from crisis to recovery. The case exemplifies how inspection standards around risk management, engagement, and desistance can be met through curious, compassionate, and coordinated practice.

020

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

In another example from our safeguarding adults on probation - effective practice guide, we saw how a practitioner’s proactive approach supported one individual throughout their sentence. buff.ly/r1gZBvm

An example from our safeguarding adults on probation, effective practice guide. Barry presented with multiple safeguarding concerns, including mental health difficulties and a history of sexual exploitation, domestic abuse, and trauma. Barry also experienced gender dysphoria, which was an important consideration in understanding their needs and potential vulnerability.

Assessment and planning: The court report was thorough and clearly articulated Barry’s vulnerabilities, identifying a risk of harm to Barry through sexual exploitation and mental health instability.

Delivery and intervention: The probation practitioner (PP) adopted a trauma-informed, strengths-based, and person-centred approach, which enabled Barry to engage meaningfully with supervision. When Barry was threatened with eviction from a hostel, the PP acted swiftly by conducting a home visit, coordinated with the mental health team for additional support. They ensured the rent arrears were paid to prevent Barry from becoming homeless.

Outcome: Barry made significant progress in stabilising their mental health, maintaining accommodation, and reducing risk. The PP’s proactive safeguarding actions and collaborative working ensured Barry remained protected and supported throughout the order.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

This week we are sharing examples from our safeguarding adults on probation effective practice guide. In this example, we saw how practitioners worked to protect an adult at risk of gang exploitation. buff.ly/r1gZBvm

Example of effectiveness: Craig, a 23-year-old male, was sentenced to a custodial sentence for supplying cannabis. His case presented significant safeguarding concerns, including vulnerability to coercion and exploitation through involvement with urban street gangs, financial exploitation, and contextual harm to others.

A thorough assessment articulated the risks posed by Craig’s gang affiliation, including potential violent harm to others, financial exploitation, and collateral damage to family and the wider public. It also recognised Craig’s immaturity and limited understanding of the gravity of his involvement.

On release Craig was relocated out of the area to reduce his exposure to gang-related harm and to support disassociation from pro-criminal peers.
This move was central to reducing risk and promoting rehabilitation. Weekly appointments with the probation practitioner, regular drug testing, and referrals to housing and emotional wellbeing services ensured sustained engagement.

Craig was demonstrating increased confidence and appeared to be distancing himself from harmful associations, indicating progress toward stability and reduced risk.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 23/06/2026

This week we will be sharing examples from our Effective Practice guide, which focused on positive action taken to safeguard adults on probation. buff.ly/r1gZBvm

A quote that says effective practice focus week, safeguarding adults on probation. Adult safeguarding refers to the process of protecting an adults right to live safely, free from abuse and neglect. This is a statutory responsibility under the care act 2014.

In Coventry, the Engaging People on Probation (also known as EPOP) initiative was helping to reshape how probation services safeguarded vulnerable adults. Safeguarding was embedded in everyday practice. Sentence planning was co-produced, focusing on what the person needed to feel safe and supported, rather than being dictated by process. Peer mentors were trained and recruited mid-way through their orders and played a vital role in this.

Coventry’s safeguarding approach was relational and inclusive, recognising that vulnerability feeds directly into public protection, and that when people feel disconnected, risks escalate.

Peer mentors attended team meetings to share what works, helping staff adapt their approach and strengthen protective factors. This culture shift was helping ensure that people on probation felt safe, supported, and central to their own rehabilitation.

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 19/06/2026

NEW: Today we published our latest Academic Insight which highlights why leadership quality matters both instrumentally and ethically for probation and youth justice services. Read the full report here buff.ly/F0jTYzz

A quote from Dr Robin Moore that says Having summarised the key developments in the academic research, it is shown how the evidence base for investing in leadership has never been stronger supporting staff engagement satisfaction performance and retention and how it promotes a focus upon the transformational leadership behaviours of building trust and acting with integrity, encouraging others, encouraging innovative thinking and coaching and developing people.

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 18/06/2026

A Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the North West region was published today. Inspectors commented on some improvements since our last inspection in 2023, but noted shortfalls remained. Read the full report here: buff.ly/ADzIpcL

A picture of chief inspector of probation with a quote that says “Overall, we saw some examples of well managed cases, but some shortfalls remained, particularly in relation to case assessment. In too many cases, insufficient analysis of information, a lack of professional curiosity and limited liaison with other agencies to obtain a full picture of the person on probation undermined effective practice.”

Ninety-four cases were inspected where the Inspectorate examined assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work. Inspectors interviewed 85 practitioners and held focused discussion groups with representative managers from probation and partner agencies working alongside them. At the time of the inspection announcement, the region supervised approximately 27,680 people in the community or in custody and around 2059 staff were in post.

A quote that says There was a strong strategic focus by regional leaders on public protection centred largely around its two-year public protection delivery plan. Despite this, too often, practitioners did not sufficiently analyse information available to them about the person on probation or focused exclusively on the present conviction without considering how previous patterns of behaviour may impact future risk and activity.The inspection found shortfalls in casework in all four key questions relating to the management of risk in the North West probation region. The shortfalls were particularly notable in relation to assessment, where fewer than 40 per cent of cases were deemed to be sufficient. These shortfalls in casework were often similar to those we have seen in other probation regions.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 05/06/2026

To wrap up our week focusing on MAPPA, we’re highlighting an example of effective practice in managing transfers. It shows how careful planning and coordinated multi-agency working can support safe transitions and maintain effective risk management buff.ly/vn40RJR

Example of effectiveness: Transfer of MAPPA cases
Sylvia received 84 months in custody for offences linked to modern slavery and was assessed as posing a high risk of serious harm. The case was initially managed at MAPPA Level 3, due to the seriousness, the complexity, the number of people involved and media interest. Sylvia was also a victim of domestic abuse and trauma-informed approaches were used.

Through coordinated MAPPA management, agencies shared information effectively and supported risk management. After four months on license, following positive progress, Sylvia was reduced to MAPPA Level 2, and a structured plan was developed to support her transfer to another area.

The transfer was carefully planned, with joint working between areas and regular three‑way meetings to support continuity. Reducing her MAPPA level further was considered, however it was recommended that Level 2 should continue to ensure integration and stability in the new location.

Sylvia settled well in the new area, and once stable, the MAPPA level was reduced further. Management oversight was recorded throughout, including discussions about potential recalls due to Sylvia’s behaviour. The practitioner and their manager regularly reviewed Sylvia’s case in supervision to ensure there was sufficient risk management. Given the case’s complexity, MAPPA played a vital role in drawing together a large volume of intelligence from partner agencies.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 04/06/2026

Reducing MAPPA levels requires a careful, evidence‑based approach. In this example, sustained progress, strong multi‑agency engagement, and effective risk management planning provided the confidence to step the case down safely. Read the full Effective Practice guide here: buff.ly/vn40RJR

MAPPA cases should be managed at the lowest level necessary to deliver an effective risk management plan..

While serious offences can make reduction challenging, keeping cases at too high a level unnecessarily can limit capacity. Equally, reducing too early can undermine risk management.
Decisions must be based on clear evidence of progress and stability.

Case example:
Malik was sentenced to a long prison term for sexual activity with a child under the age of 13. There were a large number of co-defendants and the case attracted media coverage. Malik was initially managed at MAPPA Level 2 and released to approved premises with strict licence conditions.

Malik was carefully monitored during his time at the approved premise. He complied with licence conditions and made sustained progress. He completed an offence‑focused programme, developed protective factors, and engaged well with probation and partner agencies. Regular multi‑agency liaison confirmed consistent positive progress.

After four Level 2 meetings, Malik’s case was reduced to MAPPA Level 1. The rationale was that the risk management plan was in place and being delivered effectively. The risk and complexity of the case were no longer at a level that required formal multi-agency meetings. The positive working relationships that had developed through MAPPA continued at Level 1 and active collaboration continued.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 03/06/2026

This week we’re highlighting effective examples of MAPPA in practice. This case demonstrates how Level 2 MAPPA adds value when risks cannot be managed at a lower level. It demonstrates highly effective joint working, appropriately overseen by MAPPA, to prevent further offending.

Effective multi-agency working at Level 2. Example of effectiveness: Effective use of multi-agency working at Level 2
Case example: Arnold, 33, received a six‑month custodial sentence for breaching a Sexual Harm Prevention Order. He had a history of non‑compliance, repeated breaches, and ongoing concerns about harmful sexual behaviour. Due to escalating risks and previous risk management plans proving ineffective, the case was managed at MAPPA Level 2.

MAPPA Level 2 meetings were held before release to ensure robust multi‑agency plans were in place. This provided structured oversight and coordination, ensuring agencies were prepared to manage Arnold’s risks effectively on release.

On release, Arnold was assessed as posing a very high risk of serious harm and was closely monitored, initially in approved premises.

: Joint work between probation and police uncovered multiple concerning behaviours, including access to internet‑enabled devices, non‑compliance with restrictions, and failure to take prescribed medication. These actions led to a breach of his sexual harm prevention order and he was eventually given a further custodial sentence.

Mental health professionals and other agencies worked together both within and outside formal MAPPA meetings to coordinate support and risk management. While Arnold has continued to reoffend by breaching the controls, the emerging risks have been identified and acted on, potentially preventing more serious offending.

110

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 03/06/2026

This case demonstrates how effective information‑sharing and joint working at Level 1 can address risks early and reduce the need for escalation to higher MAPPA levels. Read the full Effective Practice guide here: buff.ly/vn40RJR

Example of effectiveness: Effective use of multi-agency working at Level 1
The majority of MAPPA cases are managed at Level 1, where the lead agency delivers the risk management plan with multi‑agency support and information‑sharing.

Although formal meetings are not required, effective collaboration between agencies such as police, probation, social care, housing, and health services remains essential.

Case Example
Daniel was sentenced to an eight‑year custodial sentence for a sexual offence and later recalled for failing to disclose a relationship. On re‑release, he was managed at MAPPA Level 1, supported by strong multi‑agency working.

There was effective communication between probation, police, and partner agencies before release. Safeguarding checks, home and employment enquiries, and key information sharing supported planning, including disclosures and monitoring arrangements.

A comprehensive management plan balanced restrictive measures with support for resettlement. This included approved premises, licence conditions, and a clear contingency plan. Regular reviews ensured the MAPPA level remained appropriate without escalating to Level 2. Ongoing collaboration enabled swift responses to emerging risks and consistent monitoring of compliance. Daniel engaged with support and showed progress while risks were actively managed.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 02/06/2026

1/3 This week we’re highlighting effective examples of MAPPA in practice. To begin, we’re focusing on the importance of early identification and coordinated multi-agency working to manage risk effectively. Read the full Effective Practice guide here: buff.ly/vn40RJR

Lee was sentenced to a 24‑month community order with a mental health treatment requirement after threatening to kill and assaulting an emergency worker. He had a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Before sentencing, court-based probation staff identified the complexity of the case and referred it to MAPPA Level 2 under Category 3.

A multi‑agency meeting informed the pre‑sentence report, and a formal MAPPA meeting followed promptly after sentencing. Appropriate enquiries were made across agencies, including firearms checks and Prevent consideration, ensuring all partners were fully informed and coordinated in managing risk.

Effective MAPPA practice was demonstrated through the early identification of eligible cases. Court‑based probation staff consistently flagged MAPPA cases at the point of sentence, following clear national processes and timescales. This ensured that risks were recognised early and recorded appropriately.

Early MAPPA involvement enabled practitioners to engage meaningfully with people on probation, explain MAPPA arrangements and their implications, and incorporate them into risk management planning. It also supported timely referrals and effective release or sentence planning, particularly for cases involving mental health needs.

100

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

NEW video. Professor Matthew Millings reflects on two decades of research into how probation works in partnership to support rehabilitation and desistance for vulnerable people. Watch here: buff.ly/QvjaEhz

Reflections from research.
1. Keep sight of core probation values and purpose
2. Maintain the appetite to learn and develop
3. Recognise the value of probation
Professor Matthew Millings, Liverpool John Moores University

011

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 19/05/2026

Bedfordshire YJS rated 'Requires improvement' in an inspection of work with children and victims. Direct work with victims was found to be a clear strength at the YJS, however strategic oversight of this area needed further strengthening. Read here: buff.ly/lJ56U7W

Bedfordshire Youth Justice Service (YJS). Overall rating: Requires improvement. A picture of the chief inspector of probation Martin Jones with a quote that says “Staff at Bedfordshire YJS consistently demonstrated a strong determination to support victims and help children achieve their full potential, however inconsistencies in practice have resulted in an overall rating of ‘Requires improvement’.”

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 19/05/2026

Luton Youth Justice Partnership has received an overall rating of 'Good' following an inspection. Inspectors found skilful work to achieve positive change for children, and praised 'passionate' practitioners committed to improving their offer for victims. Read the full report here: buff.ly/3KRwweW

A picture of Martin Jones who is the Chief Inspector of Probation followed by a quote from him that says the staff and management at Luton YJP were committed and motivated in supporting positive change for children and families. It was encouraging to see how the building of trusting relationships was prioritised." LA Martin Jones Martin Jones CBE HM Chief Inspector of Probation

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 15/05/2026

NEW: Today we published our latest Academic Insight which highlights the benefits of Human Learning Systems (HLS) as an alternative paradigm for public management and its applicability to the delivery of probation services. buff.ly/K3hgEwI

A quote by Dr Robin Moore, Head of Research which says desistance theory supports approaches which are personalised and relational, aligning with the HLS emphasis on bespoke public service provision, built on human relationships that are flexible, responsive, and grounded in care. Attention needs to be given to facilitating supportive and bespoke co-produced approaches, creating continual learning environments, and maximising collaboration between local and national stakeholders.

010

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 14/05/2026

A Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the Yorkshire and the Humber region was published today. Inspectors found that strategic action had been taken following our previous inspection, however further progress was still required. buff.ly/cCNY9DM

A picture of Martin Jones, Chief Inspector of Probation with a quote that says “We were encouraged to find signs of increasing stability across the Yorkshire and the Humber region. However, longstanding issues with vacancies, sickness and attrition, combined with high levels of practitioner and middle manager inexperience, continued to undermine capacity and confidence.”

Context
The Yorkshire and the Humber region of the Probation Service is the second largest, after London. It delivers services 11 Probation Delivery Units (PDUs) spans four police force areas and 21 local authorities.
90 cases were inspected where the Inspectorate examined assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work.

Workforce pressures remained a significant challenge in some probation delivery units (PDUs) although, encouragingly, there were signs of increasing stability. Despite this, longstanding issues with vacancies, sickness and attrition, combined with high levels of practitioner and middle manager inexperience, continued to undermine capacity and confidence.
Staff retention was being affected by long vetting delays, concerns about pay, and excessive workloads, and leaders felt national recruitment campaigns had not properly reflected the public protection responsibilities of the role, leaving new staff unprepared.
Inspectors noted constant organisational change, driven by national policies, and crisis-driven working, which meant that staff were encouraged to focus on transactional tasks rather than reflective, analytical decision-making.

000

HM Inspectorate of Probation @hmiprobation.bsky.social · 14/05/2026

A Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the East Midlands region was published today. The report noted some progress since our last inspection, but the region still has further to go before public protection is delivered to a consistently good standard. buff.ly/OqoGpiW

A picture of the chief inspector of probation, Martin Jones with a quite that says Dynamic Inspection of Public Protection in the East Midlands region. The region had a clear and sustained focus on improving resettlement which was encouraging. However, despite leaders and staff displaying a clear commitment to obtaining timely information from partner agencies, a significant barrier remained across the region which continued to undermine effective risk management." Martin Jones Martin Jones CBE HM Chief Inspector of Probation

Context: The East Midlands region of the Probation Service spans five counties and six Probation Delivery Units (PDUs). Fifty-four cases were inspected where the Inspectorate examined assessment, planning, implementation and delivery, and reviewing, all through the lens of public protection work.

Since our last inspection of the East Midlands region in 2025, leaders had acted quickly to address previously identified areas for development. Inspectors identified early signs of progress across sentence management; however, many changes were still bedding in and several long-standing issues remained. Planning was found to be a strength, while assessment remained weak. Implementation and delivery were inconsistent, and inspectors found missed opportunities to act on new information or coordinate work with other agencies.

000