Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 22/10/2025They also have a very neat way of deriving the efficient influence function for their infinite-dimensional parameter of interest based on Luedtke's autodiff work 020
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 22/10/2025The "basic" notions of semiparametric theory, from today's arxiv.org/abs/2510.18843 from Morzywolek, Gilbert, & Luedtke 140
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 17/10/2025great great plenty of time to procrastinate on this 010
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 11/10/2025State of the stats job market: here's the cumulative number of stats tenure-track jobs posted on the UF Statistics Job Board so far, since August #statsky 120
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 25/09/2025some of the tricks we found useful -- the last bullet especially, I learned a lot from working closely with @alecmcclean.bsky.social on this 100
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 25/09/2025what's neat about our approach is that you can vary the propensity score threshold that defines the overlap and non-overlap population, and then choose the threshold that yields the smallest bounds -- with frequentist guarantees 100
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 25/09/2025The idea is very simple: we divide the population into a part in which overlap is satisfied, and a part in which overlap is violated. The non-overlap part is the one that poses problems, so we just apply worst-case bounds on the ATE in that subpopulation. 100
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 25/09/2025New preprint out on a way to handle structural and practical violations of the overlap (also known as positivity) assumption in causal inference -- as long as the outcome is bounded, we derive simple partial identification bounds on the ATE. With @alecmcclean.bsky.social and @idiaz.bsky.social 1132
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 03/09/2025The insight is that while you can't point identify a treatment effect when the outcome is left-censored, it's possible to derive bounds on the true average treatment effect. It turns out you can estimate these bounds using standard causal inference methods like TMLE 120
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 16/01/2025leading off my working group talk with the traveling quack to remind everyone the healthy level of skepticism they should be bringing to the table 130
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 13/01/2025Looking forward to digging into this, new on ArXiv today: arxiv.org/pdf/2501.06024 020
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 08/01/2025This is a really nice and thought provoking preprint, and I think this point is largely true, and related to how strict causal inference is designed to estimate the effect of causes, but not causes of effects (or "reverse causation" as it's sometimes called www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/rese...) 161
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 28/12/2024This is an interesting article, and reading it made me wonder what role causal inference has in an alternative epidemiology. Causal inference gives us some nice estimators of e.g. health effects of industrial hog plants on communities, but is that really what is needed, rather than political action? 131
Herb Susmann @herbps10.bsky.social · 28/12/2024Nice commentary summarizing some issues with non-parametric Bayes, a big one being that in practice you often end up having to place priors on very abstract objects rather than on the things you may actually have prior information about projecteuclid.org/journals/bay... 030