Sign in

Blundered, too dirty

@gurneyslade.bsky.social
184 followers 333 following 26 posts

Shan’t

PostsRepliesMedia
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
I do understand that. And I know that you are writing in good faith. But I’m sure you understand that when we are talking about a senior figure in a party that has sought to dehumanise millions, whose rhetoric has validated violence against our most vulnerable it’s hard not to feel a little gaslit.
110
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
In asking us not to dehumanise politicians you seem to be holding the people to higher standards than their representatives. They (particularly the party to which she belonged) are happy to dehumanise many of us.
130
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
Oh so you’d be happy with ICE stealing seats, would you?
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 11/03/2026
Haven’t you got some sub-postmasters to persecute?
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
Hi. I’ve heard of a new condition called JE Withdrawal. I wonder if any of your recently hired contributors may be able to shed light and offer a cure for poor, unfortunate sufferers (or rich, unfortunate sufferers).
020
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
They both take pleasure in protecting snakes.
010
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
www.google.com/url?q=https:... Makes you think, huh?
google.com
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 12/01/2026
Known Epstein associate
010
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 11/01/2026
No, it’s saying you should at least consider solutions other than a party whose leadership thought last year’s campaign just needed a few more Cheneys to get over the line.
110
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 11/01/2026
Yes, that’s what they’ll give you.
100
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 09/01/2026
To be fair, the statement was a lot stronger before Stephen Miller rewrote it for them.
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 09/01/2026
If only a news network were around to investigate the truth of these claims.
020
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 09/01/2026
Explains the demands for Pete Rose’s reinstatement.
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 22/12/2025
“My column’s gonna make you chunder”
020
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
You could fuck off, fuck off again, and then spend your life in a spiritual journey devoted to fucking off, and you still wouldn’t have fucked off enough to make up for this post.
020
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Even aside from their awful views, contempt for solidarity and willingness to abandon any position they may take out of expediency, their use of push polling is a nasty, unethical blight on politics.
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Hey. Great question today. Not loaded at all. Now ask this one: “Do you want a leader who you can trust not to throw your freedoms under the bus or would you prefer if Wes Streeting repeated whatever gripe was on GBNews yesterday in a desperate attempt at short-term popularity?”
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
Valerie?
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
We learnt about the problems, eventually, years after the damage was done. And no one was held to account in court. And I’d like to be convinced by any success that has happened in this country. We’ve seen over the last decade that we in the UK can screw up any scheme under any government.
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
If it was legal doesn’t it show what a hideously bad contract it was? You accused me of demanding the govt clear up all their predecessors’ messes. I’m just not convinced they won’t make the same mistakes as the Tories AND the last Labour govt.
000
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
So, procurement is a mess whoever is in charge. And companies will profiteer and take liberties with data whoever is in charge. What on earth convinces you that this government should be trusted than any other over the last 40 years?
100
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
I imagine if you robbed a bank and your punishment was to return the money you’d be feeling very relieved. Oh, and the Fujitsu PO contract was signed in 1999. Remind me who the Tory Prime Minister was then.
210
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
It’s the one that means no one from Fujitsu has been prosecuted. It’s the one that means Michelle Mone hasn’t been charged. We’re LIVING in that contract.
110
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
Isn’t this just a tactic used by domestic abusers?
100
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
They didn’t negotiate a hopelessly unfavourable contract with the kind of corrupt, venal tech firm that caused persecution of thousands of postmasters and profiteered off a pandemic. You believe this govt won’t spaff billions on something that fails, leaks data or actively harms the vulnerable?
110
Blundered, too dirty @gurneyslade.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
So just carry on with Clintonian triangulation and NYT centrism that’s proven EVER so effective in exciting and mobilising the electorate over the past 25 years, yeah?
030