iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

epsanet.bsky.social @epsanet.bsky.social · 25/06/2025

w/ @griffinjd.bsky.social‬ @allisonwkoh.bsky.social @stefwalter.bsky.social‬ + many more — join us at #EPSA2025 in Madrid (June 26–28)! 🧠 Diversity & Mental Health 🌍 Geopolitics & Europe ⚖️ War in Gaza 🎓 Postdoc Job Market 📚 Journal Editors Roundtable 🔗 epsanet.org #PoliticalScience #SocialScience

072

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 25/06/2025

📢 EPSA starts this week in Madrid (Spain) 🌞 ➡️PSRM is the flagship journal of the European Political Science Association @europsa.bsky.social 💻Subscribe to the PSRM content on our website www.cambridge.org/core/journal... EPSA programme 👉 epsanet.org

cambridge.org

Political Science Research and Methods | Cambridge Core

Political Science Research and Methods - John D. Griffin

021

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 18/06/2025

🧠What drives support for antitrust policies? ➡️ @ryanbrutger.bsky.social & A Pond find that fairness and the importance of maintaining democratic institutions matter more than lower prices www.cambridge.org/core/journal... #FirstView

073

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 20/06/2025

📺Do TV ads sway voters in presidential primaries? ➡R Bird & M Peress develop a new method to estimate ad effects and find that both positive and negative ads boost support—but negative ads work best www.cambridge.org/core/journal... #FirstView

062

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 21/06/2025

🧠Can affective polarization erode democratic support without strong party ties? ➡️Using a survey experiment in Chile’s 2022 plebiscite, L. Cox, P. Cubillos & @carmenlef.bsky.social show that subtle polarization cues reduce democratic commitment www.cambridge.org/core/journal... #FirstView

073

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

💡Can citizens in autocracies evaluate leaders without knowing their ideologies? ➡️Using Wason selection tasks in China, Y. Yang, M. Liang & B. Wang show that people rely on cheater detection, judging leaders by fairness rather than ideology www.cambridge.org/core/journal... #FirstView

072

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Toni Rodon @tonirodon.bsky.social · 09/05/2025

🎙️I had a great time on the Not Another Politics Podcast discussing my article with @pauvallprat.bsky.social on the 1930s Turnout Gender Gap—and how serving as a polling officer helped close it. History has lessons for today! 🗳️ @ethanbdm.bsky.social @upf.edu effectivegov.uchicago.edu/podcast/is-t...

effectivegov.uchicago.edu

Is This the Most Unexpected Voter Turnout Strategy Ever?

What if one of the most powerful tools to boost voter turnout isn’t a flashy campaign or a new voting law—but being randomly forced to work the polls?In this episode, we explore a surprising study of ...

172

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 15/05/2025

🏦When do people report their true views on the economy? ➡️ @janzilinsky.bsky.social & J.Bisbee find that less-politicized survey questions better capture actual public welfare—beyond partisan bias www.cambridge.org/core/journal... #FirstView

093

Reposted by @griffinjd.bsky.social

Political Science Research and Methods @psrm.bsky.social · 27/03/2025

🗣️When mainstream parties engage in populist rhetoric and adopt radical right issue positions... ➡️ @markuskollberg.bsky.social shows that voters penalize or reward them for their programmatic responses but do not react to rhetorical accommodation www.cambridge.org/core/journal... #FirstView

041