Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 29/08/2026This piece brought to mind something from the end of my long-ago dissertation — perhaps a bit too fluffy now, but still a friend. 020
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 15/07/2026Tinbergen, N. 1963. “On aims and methods of ethology.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20:410-433. 000
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 01/07/2026The book Essentials of Conversation Analysis by Alexa Hepburn and Jonathan Potter (2021) appears in the APA’s Essentials of Qualitative Methods series - aimed at psychologists. 020
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 08/04/2026This reminds me, I once ask a member of UNH’s Family Research Laboratory (nationally known for studying family violence), if they actually had any. The answer was ‘no’. 130
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 04/04/2026From Pomerantz, A. (1990). On the validity and generalizability of conversation analytic methods: Conversation Analytic Claims. Communication Monographs, 57:3, 231-235. 070
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Can I just leave you with this: “My point is that characterizations of the actions are less central to analyses than is sometimes believed. The thrust of an analysis is to explicate how methods of accomplishing actions work rather than with finding the right names with which to label actions” 1134
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 03/04/2026And I think Jefferson (1980) deals with something like this. 110
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 03/04/2026I’m sure Manny Schegloff has worked this out somewhere or there must be stuff in Sacks’ lectures. One thing it can do is short circuit the ‘reason for the call’ - if you don’t get ‘fine’. 140
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 03/04/2026For HAYs in this place, you can then ask what does it do there. What is the sequence doing there and then what can the various responses accomplish. 120
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 03/04/2026First ask, ‘where does this small sequence occur?’ There are, perhaps, several places, but there is (or was, ’in the olde days’) one structurally locate-able place: in opening sections. 140
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 03/04/2026I’m not sure that’s the question to starting with, and perhaps not the place to begin the analysis. 171
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 04/02/2026"Those were choices they made." "That's a thing you can wear." "That was an action he took." These appear to be responses. It could be helpful if you’d post an actual instance including the thing that your target response is addressing. 100
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 27/01/2026FYI: The Personal Names article is now available on the Pragmatics website. 000
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 15/01/2026I wonder if work on ‘online commentary’ in medical interactions might be useful. Heritage (2016). Online Commentary in Primary Care and Emergency Room Settings. Acute Medicine & Surgery. Heritage & Stivers (1999 ). Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits. Soc. Sci. Med. 150
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 03/01/2026Kevin Whitehead & I have something coming out in Pragmatics on this topic: Whitehead, K. A. & Lerner, G. H. (2026). When Personal Names Are Mentioned in Conversations: Presumed Known, Perhaps Known and Presumed Unknown. No idea what issue it will appear in. 210
Reposted by Gene LernerNPR @npr.org · 02/11/2025The report's claim comes with caveats. Its critics say it does more to reveal issues around collecting and analyzing domestic terrorism data than it does to clarify the current state of the problem.n.prA report claims left-wing terrorism is rising. The data paints a complicated pictureThe report's claim comes with caveats. Its critics say it does more to reveal issues around collecting and analyzing domestic terrorism data than it does to clarify the current state of the problem. 6220048
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 04/09/2025This olde exchange concerning the place of ‘social-structural’ considerations in descriptions of the organizations of talk-in-interaction was recently brought to mind. (Perhaps the ‘obscurity’ involved was there to shield the suggestion from promiscuous application!) #EMCA 162
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 06/08/2025Yes, it’s important to have CA work available in ASR. AJS is another important leading outlet with a recent CA paper: Whitehead, Raymond & Bowman, (2025), "Cross-Cutting Preferences in Interactional Trajectories Toward Violence", American Journal of Sociology. 030
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 27/07/2025How about running this again, but increasing the data set by a power of 10 - and not including any data collected before 1984? Also, would it be feasible to introduce the original Pomerantz report, rather than just a summary (and perhaps Sacks’ piece on Agreement & Contiguity)? 000
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 21/07/2025I would be curious to see the results of another kind of instruction to AI: Reproduce the investigation that resulted in a published CA report and compare/contrast the new results with that of the original/target published report. 010
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 21/07/2025…asked them to "find a something". The results are less impressive than the conceptual acrobatics in their PhD proposals. —— Perhaps your instruction to AI came in the wrong place (as a starting place). Sacks’ instruction would have come after seeing what he could do/notice in data sessions. 110
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 19/07/2025“I asked five AIs to draft PhD proposals in conversation analysis.” I wonder what would happen if you directed them to (as Sacks did to Pomerantz) “Find a something,” instead of starting by requiring a proposal.” 160
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 20/05/2025Here’s my brief contribution to Manny’s memorial.dropbox.com 020
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 26/02/2025I should make it clear, that when I recommend these readings, it’s NOT to expose the intellectual history of our field, but because I strongly believe they furnish students with a necessary deep backdrop for doing good CA work. 130
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 26/02/2025When I offered my ‘Sacks reading list’ from memory I would have included IA Richards and Parry’s student Alfred Lord. 010
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 26/02/2025And I believe he was connected to a research proposal of Garfunkel’s on ‘Kids’ Culture’ but he told me that his relationship to that stuff was “historical.” 120
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 26/02/2025Sacks was drawn to stuff about children, not because they were children, but because of how people wrote about them. See One Boy's Day: A Specimen Record of Behavior by Roger Barker (& Sacks had Baker’s unpublished records too) or Children's Games in Street and Playground by the Opies. 220
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 26/02/2025Sacks was engaged in self-consciously groundbreaking methodological empirical studies. I believe he was scanning the world of scholarship for investigations that resonated in some way. Each of the readings on the list do that in very different ways. 110
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 25/02/2025Over the years, I’ve sometimes given grad students the list of reading - as I then recalled it - that Sacks gave me when we first met. Yesterday, I came across my original list, while rummaging through a file folder of my earliest lecture notes from grad school. Here is the actual list. Enjoy!dropbox.com 4277
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 19/02/2025I just came across another (apparent) handout: “Some Ways Conversation Analysts Interrogate Talk-in-Interaction” but cannot remember the venue at which it was circulated. Nonetheless, some might find it or bits of it useful… www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/poylj...dropbox.com 0114
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 10/02/2025Because CA findings are necessarily tied to and grounded in and configured by reference to participants’ situated participation, I was wondering just how broad or general purpose CA findings could be (without becoming untethered). www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/k4f6n...dropbox.com 0123
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 08/02/2025And when I wrote, “There were reasons for this shift” I was also thinking of something Manny once mentioned about this: That Harvey thought it would just be too easy for people to misuse (i.e. stipulate) membership categories, rather than develop them from data. 021
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 08/02/2025Perhaps I should have made it clear that when I wrote “We didn’t know that these small sequences just kept ‘bipping along’” I was echoing what Harvey said to me, not giving my own opinion. 111
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 01/02/2025I’ve come across a clipping of Note 1 from “Everyone has to lie” which I haven’t thought about for a long time. So, I thought I’d pass it along. www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kl82h... There were reasons for this shift. Here’s one: We didn’t know that these small sequences just kept ‘bipping along’. 184
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 29/01/2025Here’s an old note from a beginning grad student (requesting some help with a first assignment) and then my reply.dropbox.com 1104
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 27/01/2025Here is an old course assignment I created, but I find it can be a useful way to proceed with the work. www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/v78l1...dropbox.com 092
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 25/01/2025I just stumbled across an old course handout. I thought I might share it here.dropbox.com 1229
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 20/12/2024I’ve always wished I could refer to ‘lean’ as ‘tilt’ for the alliterative torque & tilt’ ( I think some physical therapists use ‘hinge’ which may have some technical advantage in the same way ‘torque’ has some advantage over ‘twist’ - but loses its vernacular flavor. 010
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 20/12/2024This reminds me of a lovely paper written for Sandy Thompson’s and my Language and the Body seminar on “Laugh Leans” (unfortunately, never prepared for publication). 220
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 18/12/2024“…if on the other hand one figures, or guesses, or decides that …whatever humans can do can be examined to discover some way they do it, and that way would be stably describable. That is, one may alternatively take it that there is order at all points.” 230
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 18/12/2024I don’t believe, “There is order at all points” is quite right. 110
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024I might like to say, ‘CA grew alongside Ethnomethodology’. Sacks once characterized his relationship ‘to that stuff’ as ‘historical’. 041
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 16/11/2024That reminds me of another thought provoking response from Sacks. When ask to describe his methods, Sacks responded with something like, ‘I don’t study that…but you* could.’ (You as in ’one could’.) {See e.g. p.621 of Lectures} 000
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 15/11/2024But I think it is important to remember, that when asked (after giving a talk which I believe Garfunkel had filmed, but I haven’t seen) something like, ‘who are your intellectual fore-bearers’, Sacks, after a prolonged silence tapping an unlit cigarette, responded, ‘I don’t have to answer that’. 150
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 15/11/2024Somewhere (I believe in an elevator at UCI) Henry Beck asked Sacks how he thought of his work. And Sacks apparently (‘apparently’, because I can’t track down how I know this) responded, ‘I’m working out Wittgenstein’s language games’. 190
Gene Lerner @glerner.bsky.social · 15/11/2024I look forward to seeing this. Although there is a crowded field of W interpreters, I’ve always thought that one can best grasp what W was aiming for through the empirical lens of Sacks’ work. 160