Reposted by Patrick GildersleveBen Phillips @benphillips1989.bsky.social · 23/06/2026A statement from Exeter UCU branch @ucu.org.uk - please share far and wide. 16231273
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 22/01/2026We had a blast hosting Sarah @craicexeter.bsky.social . We should be having more of these much needed discussions as scholars - Sarah’s talk featured a great mix of critical edge and openness to dialogue 031
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 15/01/2026Happy 25th birthday to Wikipedia! 🥳 A fitting moment to share 1. Their great site to mark the occasion: wikipedia25.org 2. A paper in Big Data & Society, published over the winter break, where we develop Wikipedia as a “Refractive Dataset”, led by @beeeeeers.bsky.social: doi.org/10.1177/2053... 072
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 09/12/2025I’m chuffed to share that I’ve been awarded this grant with @ftripodi.bsky.social and Brett Zehner 🥳 We’ll be studying how AI systems may reproduce or reinforce biases in Wikipedia, whether by extracting knowledge from the platform or by contributing content back to it. Excited to get started! 2122
Reposted by Patrick Gildersleve LSE Impact @lseimpactblog.bsky.social · 24/11/2025👀ICYMI: "It matters less that Grokipedia succeeds than whether it helps to delegitimise Wikipedia." @gildersleve.uk #Grok #Wikipedia #Knowledgeblogs.lse.ac.ukGrokipedia falls flat, but AI is already rewriting Wikipedia’s future - Impact of Social SciencesLaunched as a competitor to Wikipedia, Grokipedia is one of the first LLM based encyclopaedias, but how does it compare to the last best place on the internet? 066
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveLSE Blogs @lseblogs.bsky.social · 18/11/2025Launched as a competitor to Wikipedia, Elon Musk's #Grokipedia is one of the first LLM-based attempts to create an encyclopaedia. @gildersleve.uk finds it compares poorly to Wikipedia, but the latter faces challenges as AI tools cannibalise its content and audiences. @lseimpactblog.bsky.socialblogs.lse.ac.ukGrokipedia falls flat, but AI is already rewriting Wikipedia’s future - Impact of Social SciencesLaunched as a competitor to Wikipedia, Grokipedia is one of the first LLM based encyclopaedias, but how does it compare to the last best place on the internet? 043
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 17/11/2025I enjoyed writing this piece for the LSE Impact Blog on Musk's latest swing at Wikipedia, and its future in a hostile AI-skewed political landscape 👇 095
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/10/2025It was a great experience organising this workshop with colleagues - looking forward to more good CrAIC! 030
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 25/09/2025Super excited for the launch workshop for our research centre. Sign up below for the public roundtable! 020
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 04/09/2025A really great read overall on how Wikipedia has survived the Internet, and the challenges it still faces. Going straight on my students' reading lists! 05310
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 03/09/2025I’m hardly a fan of much of the UK’s speech laws (especially regarding protest, Palestine recently), and cannot imagine what Esther Ghey has gone through. But what on earth are we doing here??? 040
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 03/09/2025A depressing juxtaposition of news stories, there is such a disconnect in the national conversation. A public figure directly calling for violence against trans people is met with police sympathy and instead we get phone ban campaigns to tackle online harms 🙃. 170
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 11/08/2025A glimmer of hope - the judge issued a warning shot towards Ofcom and the govt on protecting Wikipedia's operation in the UK. Wikimedia have focused on this in their response. We expect to find out more on Wikipedia's categorisation and obligations later this summer. This will rumble on...wikimediafoundation.orgWikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations – Wikimedia FoundationUPDATE: On Monday, 11 August, the High Court of Justice dismissed the Wikimedia Foundation’s challenge to the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) Categorisation Regulations. While the decision does not provi... 041
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 11/08/2025Troubling news as Wikimedia's claim against the OSA is dismissed. This opens the door for onerous new requirements such as ID verification and stricter content moderation. These measures run antithetical to Wikipedia's practical operation and core principles as the encyclopaedia anyone can edit.reuters.comWikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulationsThe operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of Britain's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms and has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech. 161
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 22/07/2025For even more WikiResearch at #IC2S2, I'm presenting our work on WikiReddit on Wednesday 14:30 in 'Social Media II' 🧑💻 I'll explain how these complementary platforms are powered by the magic of ✨𝐩𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐲✨, and how our dataset can be used to study cross-platform flows of information and attention 🔀 060
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 22/07/2025Great session on Wikipedia at #IC2S2 with some very cool research. Strong themes of multilingual analysis and coordination dynamics @smfsamir.bsky.social @feloe.bsky.social 1100
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveSteve Jankowski @textaural.bsky.social · 08/07/2025I am pleased to announce the launch of the Manifesto for Wikimedia Research manifesto.wiki. As my co-authored Big Data & Society commentary explains, the manifesto is dedicated to a humanist and critical tradition of taking Wikipedia's importance seriously. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...manifesto.wikiA manifesto for Wikimedia research: Critically studying Wikimedia as infrastructure 1105
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 26/06/2025Had a great time meeting everyone and seeing all the interesting work @icwsm.bsky.social. I presented our study on the Wikireddit dataset - exploring Wikipedia’s role in fact-checking, discussion, and cross-platform attention on the web. Thank you to the organisers! 📄: ojs.aaai.org/index.php/IC... 083
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 24/06/2025Important starter pack research in action! I received lots of follow notifications during this talk - hopefully this work prompts more ICWSM activity here! 050
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 24/06/2025Very cool work at #ICWSM tracking information manipulation in response to national regulation on the Russian Wikipedia fork From Mykola Trokhymovych, @elaragon.bsky.social, @e-migrante.bsky.social & others 031
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveLeo Balduf @leobalduf.bsky.social · 21/06/2025I'll be at #ICWSM 2025 next week to present our paper about Bluesky Starter Packs. For the occasion, I've created a Starter Pack with all the organizers, speakers, and authors of this year I could find on Bluesky! Link: go.bsky.app/GDkQ3y7 Let me know if I missed anyone! 63013
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveLSE Methodology @lsemethodology.bsky.social · 23/05/2025You can still sign up for our My580 Methods Short Course 👉 Modern Text Analysis and NLP with Python, by @gildersleve.uk 📆 Tuesday 27 May, from 10am - 3pm 🖱️ www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/modern-tex...eventbrite.co.ukModern Text Analysis and NLP with PythonTraining for PhD and MSc students in the design of social research, quantitative and qualitative analysis. 063
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveLSE Methodology @lsemethodology.bsky.social · 13/05/2025Next up on our My580 Methods Short Courses 👉 Modern Text Analysis and NLP with Python, by @gildersleve.uk 📆 Tuesday 27 May, from 10am - 3pm 🖱️ www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/modern-tex...eventbrite.co.ukModern Text Analysis and NLP with PythonTraining for PhD and MSc students in the design of social research, quantitative and qualitative analysis. 021
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveWikimedia Foundation @wikimediafoundation.org · 08/05/2025We are challenging the lawfulness of the UK’s Online Safety Act Categorisation Regulations, which determine our obligations under UK laws. These rules create unacceptable risks for Wikipedia’s volunteer users, such as disempowering those who wish to keep their identity private. Read ➡️ w.wiki/E3XD 16633
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveMilena Tsvetkova @mtsvetkova.bsky.social · 02/04/2025I have two postdoc positions for a computer scientist and a social scientist to work on my ERC-funded project HUMANET Human-Machine Social Systems at LSE. Please read more and apply at jobs.lse.ac.uk/Vacancies/W/.... More information about the project is available at humanet.science.jobs.lse.ac.ukResearch Officer in Computational Social Science (2 Posts)Research Officer in Computational Social Science (2 Posts), , <p style="text-align: center;"><em><span>LSE is committed to building a diverse, equitable and truly inclusive university</span></em></p> ... 0147
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveLSE Methodology @lsemethodology.bsky.social · 19/03/2025📣Call for papers! 1️⃣ week left to send your 250-word abstract for @audreyalejandro.bsky.social and @dandekadt.bsky.social's two-day workshop on "Computational Social Science meets Qualitative Research" Learn more➡️ www.lse.ac.uk/Methodology/... @lsedatascience.bsky.social 065
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025🙏 Thank you to @wikiresearch.bsky.social and the reddit4researchers programme for the data access. I spoke more about this and other projects as part of the January Wikimedia research showcase, which you can watch here: www.youtube.com/live/gvF8p4r...youtube.comWikimedia Research Showcase - January 2025YouTube video by Wikimedia Foundation 040
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025On exploratory analysis, we find: 📉 Declining activity in posts, but stable performance of Wikipedia content on Reddit 🔗 Strong correlations between Wikipedia and Reddit activity 🌍 Intriguing asymmetric patterns of cross-lingual linking, dominated by English 130
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025👷 Care has been taken to omit and anonymise any potentially personally identifiable information. Future researchers with access to the Reddit and Wikipedia APIs can enrich their analyses by pulling extra data (e.g. post content) and linking to the processed cross-platform information provided here. 130
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025📂 The SQL database contains: - All Reddit posts and comments mentioning Wikipedia 2020-23, including hyperlinks, hashed IDs, and metadata. - Edit history and page view activity for Wikipedia articles at the time of posting, page IDs, and redirects. 110
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025Our dataset enables further research on: 📰 How Reddit drives attention to Wikipedia 🎭 Wikipedia’s (mis)use as a trusted source in online discourse ⚖️ How different communities engage with Wikipedia, revealing knowledge gaps 🔄 The interplay of demographic and platform biases on Reddit and Wikipedia 120
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025📊 We introduce a new dataset of 12.2M Wikipedia links shared on Reddit over four years, offering a new lens on how two of the web’s most influential platforms interact. 📄 Preprint: doi.org/10.48550/arX... 💽 Dataset: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...doi.orgWikiReddit: Tracing Information and Attention Flows Between Online PlatformsThe World Wide Web is a complex interconnected digital ecosystem, where information and attention flow between platforms and communities throughout the globe. These interactions co-construct how we un... 120
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 10/02/2025📄 Excited to share a new dataset preprint! WikiReddit: Tracing Information and Attention Flows Between Online Platforms A collaboration with @beeeeeers.bsky.social, Viviane Ito, Agustin Orozco, and @ftripodi.bsky.social at @citap.bsky.social . 1176
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveLSE Methodology @lsemethodology.bsky.social · 07/02/2025📣Call for papers! Dr Daniel de Kadt and @audreyalejandro.bsky.social are hosting a two-day workshop on "Computational Social Science meets Qualitative Research" Learn more➡️ www.lse.ac.uk/Methodology/... @lsedatascience.bsky.social 11712
Reposted by Patrick GildersleveStephen Harrison @stephenharrison.com · 05/02/2025I wrote for Slate about how a conservative think tank plans to "identify and target" Wikipedia editors who it claims are abusing their position—a dangerous escalation that shifts the fight from debating edits to going after the editors themselves. slate.com/technology/2...slate.comA Powerful Conservative Think Tank Is Targeting One of the Last Good Things on the InternetThe Heritage Foundation plans to “identify and target” Wikipedia editors it accuses of antisemitism. 341769830
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024📖To find out more, check out the following: 🔗Preprint link: arxiv.org/abs/2408.07052 🐍Try FORUM in Python: github.com/pgilders/pyf... 🌟Finally, big thanks to Flora this project came out of her prizewinning work at LSE Methodology!arxiv.orgThe News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online ForumsThe disparity between news stories valued by journalists and those preferred by readers, known as the "News Gap", is well-documented. However, the difference in expectations regarding news related... 040
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024🗣️Understanding these preferences and algorithmic consequences is vital in fostering healthy discussion online and of clear interest to journalists presenting their stories This is especially important given the increasing scrutiny of online speech and how it is hosted/moderated 150
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024💪We thus argue editors can exercise agenda setting power in comment sections through curational and algorithmic means The effects on how audience reception to an article is represented by ranking algorithms are larger than those from more traditional measures (e.g. Editor Picks) 140
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024🔍With FORUM, we find dramatic differences in how different, even simple, algorithms prioritise different kinds of comments, as measured by their sentiment, readability, lexical diversity, and similarity to the article 100
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024🛠️FORUM is a versatile, interpretable tool that can be applied to any task of scoring how well a set of items are sorted, far more than just news comments! 100
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024📈We develop the Feature-Oriented Ranking Utility Metric (FORUM 🥁) to evaluate how well a ranking algorithm (most upvoted, chronological, etc) returns comments by a certain feature (sentiment, readability, etc) compared to best/worst-possible and random baseline 100
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024🕵️With data from @derStandardat, we find, compared to readers, journalists prefer more positive, timely, complex, direct responses, while readers favour comments similar to article content from elite authors 100
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024👨🏫I presented this work @ic2s2 2024 🔗Read the preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2408.07052 🐍Try our FORUM score for evaluating ranking algorithms in Python: github.com/pgilders/pyf...arxiv.orgThe News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online ForumsThe disparity between news stories valued by journalists and those preferred by readers, known as the "News Gap", is well-documented. However, the difference in expectations regarding news related... 100
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 14/08/2024🚨New preprint! 📰The News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online Forums w/ Flora Böwing We study: 1) The differences in comment preferences between journalists and readers 2) How comment ranking algorithms prioritise different kinds of comments to display to users 🧵 262
Patrick Gildersleve @gildersleve.uk · 18/07/2024Also, I’m not a big poster, but would love to help build more of a CSS community here on BlueSky - make yourself known if you’re here! 000