David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 31/10/2025Great post. Enough people with minimal background try to over-interpret this that I thought it might help make good faith (but not inside baseball) interpretation easier to quickly annotate your graph with more general explanatory language. 1111
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 17/10/2025I hope this will be fixed. Doesn't seem to agree with their "about" page: they "actively promote development of novel research tools for analysis of genomic data and helping developers facilitate the integration, or connection of their tools to analyze gisaid data." 010
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 10/10/2025So you're saying that this was not the obvious solution? 230
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 08/05/2025Is It Moral For Catholics To Bet On Who The Next Pope Will Be? Where did you put your money? 100
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 02/05/2025Extracted blurb our department received from biotech company, surcharge to "maintain our operational integrity" and "retain flexibility". If you are lucky enough to still have a grant, be prepared to cut anyway. 000
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 28/01/2025How does this end? Not well. "Confident that biology would conform to ideology in the end...Lysenko's ideas and practices contributed to the famines that killed millions of Soviet people." "The adoption of his method in China had similarly calamitous results." Wikipedia 110
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 11/12/2024There is a snark font and even a snark mark.~ Why did I waste my time on this? Do I need to know more than that Ne allows me to run simulations on a fixed population size and pretend it applies to everything?~ 230
David Pollock @genomesevolve.bsky.social · 09/12/2024And I got a link to a pretty page out of it... 👍 000