Sign in

Franziska Lesigang

@franzilesi.bsky.social
35 followers 32 following 5 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Franziska Lesigang @franzilesi.bsky.social · 07/04/2025
Thank you!!
000
Franziska Lesigang @franzilesi.bsky.social · 06/04/2025
This result is remarkable for two reasons. First, it offers a sufficient condition for when individuals can afford to remember less than their opponent. Second, it helps identify equilibria among reactive-n strategies more efficiently, as it reduces the number of deviations that need to be checked.
061
Franziska Lesigang @franzilesi.bsky.social · 06/04/2025
We prove that in this setting there always exists a best response that only depends on the last n-1 events, thus allowing a player to remember less than their opponent without any harm to their payoff.
051
Franziska Lesigang @franzilesi.bsky.social · 06/04/2025
We consider additive games, where each player’s payoff is the sum of two components, and each component only depends on the action of a single player. Further we suppose that the opponent plays a reactive-n strategy, i.e. their moves depend on the opposing player's last n moves.
051
Franziska Lesigang @franzilesi.bsky.social · 06/04/2025
How valuable is memory? In my very first paper, now published in Economics Letters, together with @chilbe.bsky.social and @nikoletaglyn.bsky.social, we give sufficient conditions under which a player can afford to remember less than their opponent. 🧵 📜 doi.org/10.1016/j.ec...
4385