Sign in

Eric Fish

@ericfish.bsky.social
1.6K followers 820 following 168 posts

Law Professor at UC Davis. Writing about criminal law, constitutional rights, and prosecutions at the border.

PostsRepliesMedia
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Congratulations!
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
why should she have to forfeit the win? doesn't that make it harder??
130
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Trying to rewire people’s priors through Orwellian language games always seemed dumb to me. And “legal system” is vulnerable to the same kind of objection as “justice system” in any event. The system is designed to be mostly lawless.
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Ah, gotcha. I would've assumed the editors use AI on the footnotes, but guess not.
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
It also would be interesting to see how much of the AI use is footnotes vs main text
101
Reposted by Eric Fish
Quinn Yeargain @yeargain.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Now out in the Northwestern University Law Review! I chart the textual development of search-and-seizure provisions from 1776 to the present. While textual variations often don't produce divergence from federal jurisprudence, I argue they should. scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol121/...
TEXTUAL (IN)DIFFERENCE IN STATE SEARCHAND-SEIZURE PROVISIONS
Quinn Yeargain

ABSTRACT—Over the past 250 years, state constitutional drafters have refined the scope of rights and liberties protected by their constitutions’ texts. Today, all state constitutions include a search-and-seizure provision—and though only a minority follow the layout, text, and context of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, most of them bear a striking resemblance to it. However, textual variations abound. Some of them may seem minor, like using the word “possessions” instead of “effects,” or mandating that warrants describe their intended targets “as nearly as may be” instead of requiring that they “particularly describ[e]” them. But others, like the addition of “electronic data and communications,” are far more significant. Yet regardless of the nature of the addition, most courts do not seem to view these linguistic changes as legally significant. While there are some exceptions, most state courts effectively gloss over the textual differences when interpreting the scope of their searchand-seizure provisions.

In this Essay, I argue that these textual differences could alter the applicability of several doctrines from federal criminal procedure jurisprudence—and that they should not be read out of state constitutions. Relying on an original database of state constitutions and proposed amendments, I chart out the textual changes to state constitutions’ search-and-seizure provisions from 1776 to present, survey case law interpreting these provisions, and conclude that while courts have largely not treated these differences as relevant, they should.
34212
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
cool!
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
yup. best part is you keep getting the emails.
020
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
Talking to other law professors, the August cycle seems more dead than usual. Did they all fill up in February?
120
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
Congratulations!!!
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
In this case isn’t the problem fixed by Alaska’s runoff system?
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
I’ve been trying to reach you about your car’s extended warrantee!
020
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 25/07/2026
huh, true
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 25/07/2026
at least you weren’t behind a cyclops
140
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
0 explosive diarrhea is definitely suboptimal. Means you’re missing out on street meat.
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
Are the halcyon days of ssrn over? I keep hearing frightening reports
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
A BRICK IS NOT A WALL!
120
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Congratulations!!!
110
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Congratulations!!!
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
I took Kavanaugh to be agreeing with Alito on the 14th Amendment’s meaning, but holding that Congress has expanded citizenship above the constitutional minimum.
210
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 28/06/2026
that would work great!
110
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
Congratulations!!!
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
the law review article of babel
020
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
"enshittification"
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
they are not
000
Reposted by Eric Fish
Orin Kerr @orinkerr.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
Holding 17 year old for seven hours alone, refusing his requests to see his mother, claiming they had video evidence, and threatening the death penalty made resulting confession of committing two murders involuntary and inadmissible, Tenn SCT rules. www.tncourts.gov/sites/defaul...
312226
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
Wow!
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
parenting hack: pretend the roomba is alive so they don’t demand real pets
020
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
May her memory be a blessing
040
Reposted by Eric Fish
Lawrence Solum @lsolum.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Fish on Deportation in the Deep State Eric S. Fish (University of California, Davis – School of Law) has posted Deportation in the Deep State (forthcoming, Stanford Law Review) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Since 1997, low-level immigration agents have conducted fast-paced deportation hearings.…
legaltheoryblog.com
Fish on Deportation in the Deep State
Eric S. Fish (University of California, Davis – School of Law) has posted Deportation in the Deep State (forthcoming, Stanford Law Review) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Since 1997, low-level immigration agents have conducted fast-paced deportation hearings. These hearings, called Expedited Removals, circumvent the formal immigration court process. They involve an immigration agent interviewing an immigrant and deciding whether to order them deported, with no opportunity for appeal.
054
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
🐺
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
🐺
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Go Wolves!
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
It makes intuitive sense to me that self-defense could be understood as going to mens rea, if the statute so defined it. Your goal was not to wantonly harm the person, but to protect yourself/others.
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 27/04/2026
Tom Bombadil, baby
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
These guys are waaaay too big to have won a competitive marathon
050
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
The denial of judicial review thus helps resolve a conflict between two conservative political projects: the unitary executive and mass deportation.
000
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
The low-level bureaucrats of the “deep state” can no longer adjudicate patent or securities law claims. But they can still deport immigrants unilaterally and without appeal.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
By cutting off review, the government has created a zone of lawlessness in which it can deport immigrants without conforming to the Constitution’s requirements. This strategy has effectively excluded immigrants from the Roberts Court’s formalist reshaping of the administrative state.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Congress foreclosed judicial review through a series of jurisdiction-stripping provisions. This means Expedited Removal effectively exists outside of the Constitution.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
By conducting removal proceedings and issuing unreviewable deportation orders, they exercise authority reserved to Principal and Inferior Officers. Yet there is no clear mechanism to bring an Appointments Clause challenge to the Expedited Removal system.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
That means they must either be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, or appointed by an agency head pursuant to a statute. Further, all final Executive Branch decisions must be subject to review by a Principal Officer. Low-level immigration agents do not satisfy these conditions.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
In recent decisions, most notably Lucia v SEC and U.S. v Arthrex, the Court has strengthened the requirements for wielding executive branch power. Any executive employee who exercises significant authority under the laws of the United States must be either a Principal Officer or an Inferior Officer.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
If the Trump Administration succeeds in its current aims, Expedited Removals will soon comprise nearly the entire deportation system. Expedited Removals are also unconstitutional, based on the Supreme Court’s reading of the Article II Appointments Clause.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
They involve an immigration agent interviewing an immigrant and deciding whether to order them deported, with no opportunity for appeal. Expedited Removals currently produce more than half of all deportation orders. And they are the centerpiece of President Trump’s ongoing mass deportation campaign.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Since 1997, low-level immigration agents have conducted fast-paced deportation hearings. These hearings, called Expedited Removals, circumvent the formal immigration court process.
100
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Just posted "Deportation in the Deep State" to SSRN, comments welcome! Abstract/summary below. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Deportation in the Deep State (forthcoming, Stanford Law Review)
<p><span>Since 1997, low-level immigration agents have conducted fast-paced deportation hearings. These hearings, called Expedited Removals, circumvent the form
272
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
so keep doing what I've been doing then
010
Eric Fish @ericfish.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
Seems like they're going to lose rather lopsidedly in the Supreme Court, might just declare victory and move on. I imagine whenever he applies to be a federal judge he'll attach a long compilation of every law professor social media post excoriating him.
040
Reposted by Eric Fish
Prison Policy Initiative @prisonpolicy.org · 09/04/2026
Each year, 2.7 million jail admissions are for misdemeanor charges. Yes, this includes charges for behaviors like jaywalking or even sitting on a sidewalk.
Graph showing that one-third of jail admissions are for misdemeanor charges.
1249