Sign in

Eran Politzer

@eranpolitzer.bsky.social
24 followers 29 following 11 posts

Assistant Professor of Health Economics @HebrewU's School of Public Policy; Visiting Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School @HMSHCP

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Eran Politzer
Journal of Public Economics @jpube.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
Just published in @jpube.bsky.social: "The dynamic fiscal costs of outsourcing health insurance - evidence from Medicaid" By Timothy Layton & @eranpolitzer.bsky.social www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... #econsky #publiceconomics #publicfinance #healtheconomics
131
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
I’m grateful for being able to work on this paper with such a fantastic team: Tim Anderson, John Ayanian, Vilsa Curto, John Graves, Laura Hatfield, Jeff Souza, and Alan Zaslavsky Thanks also to the NIA for their support! 11/11
000
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
Our findings highlight how MA insurers may use selective contracting and narrow networks to reduce costs The results do suggest that through PCP selection, insurers may also select more profitable enrollees, though this seems to be a more minor part of the story 10/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
Summing up, the chart shows PCPs’ costliness (x-axis) and quality (y-axis), relative to the region average PCPs excluded from MA networks (grey circles) are more costly and have lower quality than the average, while PCPs included in MA (other colors) are less costly 9/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
Turning to the group of PCPs excluded from all MA networks – they are much more costly than the average in their region, adding 14% to baseline costs ($1,617) These PCPs also have lower quality 8/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
But, the differences are there! We find that the average PCP in MA networks is $433 less costly per patient compared with the regional average (saving 2.9% of baseline costs) without a difference in quality In general, less costly PCPs are included in more MA networks 7/11
110
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
Now that we ranked PCPs by costliness and quality, we examine if those in MA networks are better than the regional average If there is no selective contracting and insurers select PCPs randomly, we shouldn’t observe any differences 6/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
We also assess PCP quality using HEDIS quality measures, that assess adherence to clinical guidelines For example, one HEDIS measure calculates the share of the PCP’s diabetes patients who receive the recommended biennial eye-exam 5/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
How do we measure PCP costliness? PCPs are more costly if the costs of their patients in traditional Medicare are higher than what we predict based on their risk score Basically, a costly PCP would have generated lower profits or higher losses for insurers 4/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
Why focus on PCPs? They oversee patient care, influencing costs also through referrals to particular specialists and hospitals Insurers may also exclude PCPs from networks to avoid costly patients (e.g. in a poor neighborhood) 3/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
Selective contracting with providers is a classic tool for managed care insurers We show that insurers in Medicare Advantage (MA) leverage selective contracting with less costly primary care physicians (PCPs) to cut costs, mostly without hurting quality 2/11
100
Eran Politzer @eranpolitzer.bsky.social · 05/03/2024
🚨 Thrilled to share our latest Health Affairs paper with Bruce Landon and team! 🚨 We ask whether Medicare Advantage insurers select better primary care physicians for network inclusion, examining both costs and quality 🧵 Thread... 1/11
healthaffairs.org
Primary Care Physicians In Medicare Advantage Were Less Costly, Provided Similar Quality Versus Regional Average | Health Affairs Journal
The use of many services is lower in Medicare Advantage (MA) compared with traditional Medicare, generating cost savings for insurers, whereas the quality of ambulatory services is higher. This study examined the role of selective contracting with providers in achieving these outcomes, focusing on primary care physicians. Assessing primary care physician costliness based on the gap between observed and predicted costs for their traditional Medicare patients, we found that the average primary care physician in MA networks was $433 less costly per patient (2.9 percent of baseline) compared with the regional mean, with less costly primary care physicians included in more networks than more costly ones. Favorable selection of patients by MA primary care physicians contributed partially to this result. The quality measures of MA primary care physicians were similar to the regional mean. In contrast, primary care physicians excluded from all MA networks were $1,617 (13.8 percent) costlier than the regional mean, with lower quality. Primary care physicians in narrow networks were $212 (1.4 percent) less costly than those in wide networks, but their quality was slightly lower. These findings highlight the potential role of selective contracting in reducing costs in the MA program.
130