iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 22/11/2025

Lets face it. Mamdani is objectively impressive. Progressivism built on sound policy. Trump saw what was obvious to anyone not in some Fox echo chamber. Mamdani is so on point he has Trump calling himself a fascist.

020

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 16/11/2025

I dont doubt JD here. Evidently Bubba can attest as well.

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 16/11/2025

If I was raised by his father, I would too.

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 12/11/2025

Im sure there were, but unfortunately the rest of us dont get airline lobby money and have to actually buy health insurance

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 08/11/2025

Considering the loose definition of unemployment….not great

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 06/11/2025

So hell talk about it once and then trust me”deregulation” to do the rest. Got it

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 06/11/2025

Sorry had to step away. Lots of behind the scenes action to make last night possible. Our gains are not just in who youd think they are. Look at the actual rural vote counts. The banner of progress has been raised.

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Need a break from Bluesky. Good platform good people but im a luddite with no SM besides this so its a tad much on occasion. See you soon

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Eh I give up. best of luck with it then. Keep on trying to work within the existing framework.

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

The whole point is that if we get rid of section 230 i can sue the energy company for CO?

200

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Now section 230 covers the energy sector. Wonderful.

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

I mean was prison until death with no possibility of parole not bad enough in that case?

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Yep, thats about right. “But he doesnt mean that” i hear the RWs chanting in unison as the look into chicken farming

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

This is correct, i should have said FD and not ET, all apologies

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

And in that regard I disagree with you. Did you read the article this is all in response to?

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

You have completed missed the point. When you speak with someone IRL and you ask where they got some flagrantly wrong info. Where do they say they heard it? Do they often quote the specific poster or the platform? That wasnt an issue weve had with libraries

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

The point I was making is the library is creating a new book by smashing together contents of others. Like a newsfeed

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

The ability to audit the actual prop code and processes in tandem with a random sample of feeds and say “this is messed up” or “its ok”

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Good questions and i definitely have some ideas. May be better for a blog than short form. But Im not saying it would be perfect, but I think it starts with the creation of a department that does before and after oversight on social media and entertainment algos. I think someome needs

200

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

In my analogy they would be an author if they removed the covers and glued books together.

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

People dont fall into disinfo because they watch one guy, no matter how crazy. They fall to it because a feed picks up that they are susceptible to it and floods them with one sided stuff until they think thats reality.

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Thats the archaic thinking these things hide behind. I can craft an entire narrative using 3rd party content without actually editing a word. The total here is greater than the sum of its parts.

200

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Oh god i know who your talking about but im blanking on the name too!

110

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Sure. Lets call it a process that curates information for viewership based on the individual as opposed to a broad audience.

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Because we get back to the fear of a dominant point of view influencing election outcomes, which is the same reasoning underpinning its original enaction

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Right, and my entire point is that algorthmic curation of a given feed makes the owner of that algorithm an author at most and an editor at least.

200

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

100%. The problem is that words mean different things to different people, and the people with the most money and influence win the demarcation battle daily

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

There is a 100% percent Chance JD made this story up. This dude lies so easily im not sure he even knows what the truth is anymore

010

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

In fact, it sounds like the road you describe would eventually lead to the resurrection of something like the equal time clause and the return of the right of reply. So resounding yes

400

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Photographs? Well omg that cracks the case right there.

020

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Im not saying its common, im saying its terrible that one industry gets a carve out period

200

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

He skipped the part where he lied his ass off because his position is indefensible and then used his kid as a human sheild to hide his abject shame

020

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Publishers net comment sections. Sorry, what do you believe on the subject? Do you agree with the OP’s article or no?

310

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Sorry, do you mean positivism? Absolutely. My opinion does carry no more weight than anyone elses. Legal realism, legalism…these are the plagues of our time and allowed a BS artist to rise. What is UET except this taken to its logical conclusion.

000

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Well said, however The law is what people believe the law is. Law is not objective. Hence objective reasoning serves no purpose regarding it. Law is the expression of will in written form. Law as objectivity is legalism, a worse form of tyranny than that under which we currently live.

210

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

The point, which admittedly I could have done a better job communicating, is that the courts and sentiment at the time had it ass backwards.

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Because im trying to point out that prodigy did no more than a modern social media company. In fact far less.

200

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Exactly. And thats what needs to be obviated. Oh its definitely a should, of that I am well aware.

100

Emissary of the Deep State @emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Than how was prodigy found liable for something a user said against SO

200