emily, professional edge case
@emily.fedi.uni.horse.ap.brid.gy
8 followers 0 following 329 posts
I make electronics go beep boop and tools go spinny. Also, I pet cats sometimes. I am eternally grumpy that the state of the internet, and of fedi in particular, is […] 🌉 bridged from ⁂ fedi.uni.horse/@emily, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
![nethack shopkeeper offering "6 gold pieces for [my] corpse"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:owdoq34ak5h3ekeew5wrzrok/bafkreidca4qlcazgyeidafj52e5vqxdat6zyhgxe4pokxa2l2f3wxn6ujy)
![LLM:
The pre-submission review found several issues. Here's what needs to be fixed:
Blocking issues (must fix before submission):
Title - Still shows the default placeholder "Report Intent #[redacted]"
Severity - Not set (review suggests CRITICAL with CVSS 3.0 score of 9.8)
Non-blocking issues (recommended to fix):
Asset - Review suggests [redacted].com instead of [redacted]
Weakness - Review recommends "ASI02: Tool Misuse and Exploitation" instead of CRLF Injection
Additional feedback:
Your IP address notation mentions 172.32.0.0/11 which is actually public IP space, not RFC1918 private addresses. You may want to clarify this.
Move your Business Impact Analysis content to the impact field (currently says "Describe impact here.")
Would you like me to fix all of these issues for you? I can update the title, set the severity, correct the weakness classification, update the asset, and fill in the impact field.
me:
title: fixed
severity: critical is overstating it imo, filled out the cvss thing and got medium. but also that's not a required field
asset: [redacted] is its own asset in the list, and that is the thing this directly affects
weakness + impact: it is set to those, think you're looking at a cached version
ip address: yes? why would they want my private ip address](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:owdoq34ak5h3ekeew5wrzrok/bafkreigo3bij7pk7gvk3trto3x22n6jkgltzlemjnivhhgieas5p5cza44)
