iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Alright I've entertained this long enough. Bye. You're a failure at life and nobody loves you. Now that's bad faith but it's still reality. I'm muting you so I won't see your childish responses. Have a terrible life.

120

I don't have to prove reality. It's exists. You're in it.

100

Motherfucker you made the claim.

000

That AI isn't conscious? I have mountains of proof. It's code. On a screen. It doesn't think, feel, suffer, create, love, want, or anything else consciousness *could* be defined as. Prove me wrong.

100

No no, you must understand, I know that my ceiling fan is god and I can prove it! Just don't ask me to in any way prove it, defend it, back it up, or even lay out the most basic logic or terms. It's true!

I'm not making any claims. AI is not conscious is just a fact. Indisputable. There is no variant on truth.

220

And I told you, the onus is on you as the one making the claim. I'm willing to discuss around your definition, not have you pretend you win when my definition is different.

000

Then say it. What is your fucking stance? Make a point already.

I can't know what you think when you don't say anything. You're just trying to piss people off and think it's success.

100

When did I stick my fingers in my ears? You've made zero points. Literally none. You haven't said one thing in favor of your position.

Doubtful. You can't even tell a program isn't alive, dipshit.

Sure thing. Go kiss up to your electric toothbrush because it has feelings, pal.

This is why nobody with 2 brain cells knocking together takes AI bros seriously. They can't even engage their own points. Can't define them even. And they still believe they're smart.

Less than a tenth of a percent.

200

Bad faith isn't calling you out. That's just... calling you out. Bad faith is having no intention of discussing the issue reasonably. You've given nothing to show you intend to do that. So who is really bad faith here?

140

You can't make a ludicrous claim then say "ah but it's on you to explain the definition of what I even mean" like some smug idiot. YOU tell me what you mean so I can tell you why you're still wrong. You are responsible for the baseline of your own insane point, not us.

390

I'm not the one making the claim. Do you regularly argue in favor of someone else's definition or do you have any beliefs of your own? If you want to play it like that then suffering is being able to clap two human hands together. Is AI able to suffer? See why this doesn't work yet?

100

So the answer is asking me to define it for you? Kinda proving my point there.

170

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 6h

I did. What do they suffer? That's a great starting point.

150

Which is why nobody claiming it's conscious or sentient ever answers the basic questions. Just like every flim flam man and wannabe messiah. Reality isn't vibes.

160

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 6h

Yes but have you considered the "I don't work with them constantly and they aren't in front of me" argument? People convinced these fancy electric toothbrushes are conscious are only concerned about being seen as smart. They want to know things we don't. Evidence and empathy take too long.

150

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 6h

What do they suffer? In what way are they self aware that isn't just programming? People get their hackles up because you sound like every street corner prophet, alien abductee, and literal cult AI techbro. And we're sick of that kind of discourse being entertained.

270

Reposted by @elvancho.bsky.social

Mark Harris @markharris.bsky.social · 19h

This is going to be very appealing to the all-important "After three days, I suddenly noticed that my child was missing" voting demographic.

491581232

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 14/10/2026

Always remember free speech isn't to protect the stuff you want to hear. It's specifically designed for things you don't like. We can all agree you can say "I hope you are happy" it's the rude things we have to protect at all costs.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 14/10/2026

Yep, it was coined after that disastrous nomination. I'm actually surprised I remember, I was pretty young for knowing anything like that.

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 14/10/2026

Why would state media report something negative about the Supreme Chancellor/Fuhrer/Yam Tittied Monster?

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 14/10/2026

Oh man. Borked was a word for a while there. That takes me back.

2111

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 13/10/2026

Translation: "They're only helping kill you peons, I don't believe they're after me or anyone else in the Epstein files."

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 13/10/2026

But enough about the CIA, let's talk about this AI company.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 13/10/2026

I'm going to need everyone to back off with this before anyone checks up on my "greatest lover/astronaut/Olympic winner" history.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 12/10/2026

I like how "treasonous pedophile" sounds but this works too.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 12/10/2026

The Arnold Palmer one is new to me and honestly... nobody fill me in. I don't want to know.

150

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 11/10/2026

Russia hasn't had anything resembling an actual election since the 90s but sure let's pressure the victim some more while we cut a check to the abuser.

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 11/10/2026

I think I'm supposed to have sympathy but the media here is largely responsible for the maniac in the WH. You wanted big numbers and you got it and all it cost you was everything. Now you're all mouthpieces for him and still get abused. Oh and nobody trusts you. So I see no loss here.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Nothing more dangerous than a cornered animal. He needs to be removed from office before it gets to a level nobody wants to see. Because it's coming.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

Not this shit again. You know who has deserved it more? Everyone that hasn't started a war. You, me, all of us. That's for starters. Maybe get out of office so we can try and fix the economy instead of picking fights with allies too. Unless there's a Nobel prize for being a stupid fuckface.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

Powell was a monster I will never defend. The rest is the Republican platform. Hate minorities while whining that they are one.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

A real senator wouldn't be an apologist for the pedophile that put in the unnecessary tariffs to begin with.

000

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

So glad this game looks like it's not for me even before all this backend bullshit. I had no interest, now I have a deficit of interest. I'm making sure other people lose interest just to make up the difference.

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

This is the eternal argument. And as simple as "one person, one vote" sounds, it's complicated enough that we split the legislative in 2 because nobody had a good solution. It can't be fair for just cities deciding everything, population be damned. And what we have is trash too. No easy answer.

elvancho.bsky.social @elvancho.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

He also forgets "intimidating" the court is just reminding them that the Constitution gives the people the power. They should always be concerned how we feel. All public officials should. That's the job.