Sign in

Ellipsus

@ellipsus.com
5.4K followers 80 following 937 posts

Write like a human. Ellipsus is an easy-to-use collaborative writing tool made by writers, for writers. Us 👉 ellipsus.com Our stance on AI 👉 ellipsus.com/generative-ai Support 👉 help.ellipsus.com/support/home Status 👉 status.ellipsus.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 2h
Line go up big time. (Nearly 8M documents!) 😍 Btw, if you’re not already following us on Instagram and Tiktok, consider it! Memes, product vids, community takes—we’re sharing it all. Instagram: www.instagram.com/ellipsuswrites Tiktok: www.tiktok.com/@ellipsus_writes
26215
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 29/09/2026
Who's ready for cozy writing weather? ☺️🍂
Characters:

Your character has a favorite place—where/what is it? How does it make them feel?
17115
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 28/09/2026
Pangram once again being weaponized to damage careers without checks or balances 🤦 This is a very harmful trend for writers. AI verifiers should *not* be allowed to decide questions of human authorship (especially when their errors and biases are so well documented!) shorturl.at/lLBiy
An anonymous account called Balance ton Claude – a reference to Anthropic’s AI agent – said it had fed the novel into the AI detection software Pangram and found it to be “almost entirely” written by artificial intelligence.

Questions have been raised over Pangram’s accuracy, and French media outlets have found other AI detection programmes that identified It Was That or Die as very probably written by a human.

Orélien, 38, has denied the allegation, saying it was racially motivated. “I’ve always loved creating and writing,” he said. “I don’t see why I would use a machine.”

He told the newspaper Libération that he used traditional language and rhythms that were Haitian and Caribbean. “The imagery, repetition and rhythm are a living language, they are mine.”
410538
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 24/09/2026
The feeling when a verifier erroneously flags your writing as AI… Infuriating? Absurd? All of the above? This article perfectly captures *that* feeling. sohbae.substack.com/p/i-ran-some...
Who am I to point fingers simply because a wonky AI detector says some of my favorite reads were AI-generated? As you already know , curiosity killed the cat (me), so I ran my very own article through ZeroGPT, maybe to prove a point. A part of me already concluded that my results would be different because maybe these writers used AI to write; I could not be too sure. Guess what the results said? Drum roll please...68.3% human-written and 31.7 AI-written. I stared at those results, wondering where I had gone wrong in life.

AI written????

AI written????
06015
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 23/09/2026
The future for AI verifiers not looking too bright 😬 www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Pangram can be easily fooled by “humanizer” tools that introduce grammatical and stylistic quirks to evade detection. (Yes, this is dizzying: AI that makes your AI writing seem less AI, to escape other AI.) A non-native English speaker who writes their own essay but then runs it through Grammarly, the writing software with AI-powered editing features, might be more likely to get in trouble than a student who let ChatGPT do all the work and then ran the essay through a humanizer.
36821
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 23/09/2026
It’s the week that keeps on givinggg 💅 GIFs now work in the editor AND the Reader! Upload as you would any other image (5mb for Plus users; 512kb on the free plan) to give your fic a dose of the cinematique.
09026
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 22/09/2026
📄 Document defaults (for Ellipsus Plus). Set your favorite font, size, spacing, alignment, and pages/pageless layout once—every new doc will open looking just how you like it. (Want something different for an individual doc? You can still tweak everything in the Format panel.)
A screenshot of document defaults on Ellipsus.
58819
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 22/09/2026
Two new releases in Ellipsus today 👀 🔒 Spoiler text (free for all!). Hide text behind a click! Use spoilers in your docs and drafts, in comments, or in the Reader for your audience. Select any text → hit the Spoiler button (closed eye icon) on the bottom bar or under Styling in the Format panel.
316874
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 21/09/2026
The reviews:
"I really enjoyed this book! It's Knodung." - Editore Lucker

"(...)It is a good pleasure.Wow." - Claire of J. Gordon

"I don't mind you get the book without a few meaning. I read a lot. (...)" - Michelle C. Karcino.
0251
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 21/09/2026
AI hypers: “INCREDIBLE. I WROTE A NOVEL IN 5 MINUTES. i am AN aRTIST!!!” The novel:
They United States Constitution by We The People
2396
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 21/09/2026
Prompt incoming!! (artwork by Edvard Munch)


Characters:

Think about 3 people your characters only met in passing. How do they influence the story?
1374
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 18/09/2026
Cory Doctorow with the perfect summary of why AI generated content can never be art: Zero imagination. Zero creative novelty. (Extract from his newsletter “Textured”)
With LLMs, we have invented a machine that uncovers the statistical regularities in our seemingly irregular world, and we have learned that the roughness is rarer than our intuition led us to believe. This machine will also produce statistically regular, smooth output that has the seeming of understanding and consciousness. But - by definition - it can't contain any of our future surprises, because it's just trained on the things we already know, and if we knew about something, it wouldn't be a surprise anymore.
07527
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 18/09/2026
"The largest theft of labor in human history." We done knew it. (www.404media.co/doom-loop-op...)
Executives working on AI at Microsoft and OpenAI admitted what its critics have been saying all along: Large language models are predatory pieces of technology that have been built on what a Microsoft executive called “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” and the “largest theft of labor in human history.” An internal Microsoft document said generative AI products have created a “doom loop” that is killing “the entire web.”
8825344
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 17/09/2026
Here in Berlin, we can’t wait for our favorite season to arrive. Already we’re readying our sweaters, and gorging on all things pumpkin spice… and we wanna share the love! This is #ThemeThursday. Download and browse custom themes for free! All you need is a Plus subscription to join in the fun.
"8bit Fall" on Mobile"Lady Autumn" on the Reader"Backseat Racers" on Mobile"Scattered Leaves" on Mobile
27821
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 17/09/2026
Let’s face it, being a writer these days can feel a little scary. AI slopification, ominous algos… In this uncanny valley, how can human writers show that their work is their own? This spooky season, one writer stumbles upon a source of hope… Introducing Ellipsus Emboss, a short film.
36520
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 16/09/2026
Share your Writing Journey by URL wherever, whenever. Easy to use; turn off with a click.
A snapshot of a Writing Journey shared via URL.
0316
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 16/09/2026
AI companies are exploiting the anxiety engendered by the technology to force AI into human creative spaces. We’re not having it. We’ve made the Writing Journey free to share for all Ellipsus users, because everyone deserves the right to share the humanity behind their work.
19533
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 14/09/2026
Find yourself railing against AI verifiers over dinner? Us too (🙈) Our latest blog post lays out the the conceits and pitfalls of AI verifiers in exhaustive detail, so you can complain with confidence 💁‍♀️ Full post: ellipsus.com/blog/the-pro...
“The culture emerging in many writing spaces today is a culture of suspicion. We’ve all heard these stories, and it goes without saying that having one's work flagged as AI carries major consequences. There’s a sense of dread from many writers worrying about posting work online at all, in the assumption that someone, somewhere, will get suspicious of an em dash or well-placed adverb. And many are changing their styles, honed over many years and deeply entwined with their voice and their personhood, the closest thing a writer has to a fingerprint—to fit within the confines of a verifier’s assumption.”
15921
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 11/09/2026
Kind of obsessed with our fresh #ThemeThursday custom themes this week - MonoSus, an homage to dark mode coding - make like our illustrious Ellipsus engineers and mutter "works on my machine" at your plot holes...
36611
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 03/09/2026
And live your best 13th Century life and disconnect with a vow of silence… at least, during your writing sprints. Invite your collaborators to Scriptorium leave feedback in the margins like the monks of old.
2463
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 03/09/2026
It's #ThemeThursday y’all: this week's we’re nostalgic for some back to school energy. Check out Lecture Hall for a dark mode theme where your editor is a chalkboard!
48916
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 30/08/2026
... Not to be all uhhh “promoting our Google Docs alternative writing tool” on main, but... Google has (again) decided that Trump’s geography fanfic is canon. blog.google/products-and... If it must be said: Ellipsus Would Not Do This. 💀
"A screenshot of Google Maps labeling Lake Ontario as Lake America for users in the United States." - source: NYTimes
621673
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 27/08/2026
Y2Cringe (sparkles, dolphins, bedazzled flip phones… and a yaoi mention 🙈) - Aero Sparkle (crystal water, '00s chrome tech, optimism) - Cyberweeb (anime neon), and more - all on the Custom Themes Gallery. themes.ellipsus.com?v=3bbc9fabd5...
1325
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 27/08/2026
This week on #ThemeThursday - the Ellipsus team's collective hyperfixation on the old internet (we’ve brought back souvenirs!).
29515
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 17/08/2026
It's time for your weekly writing prompt 🤡🤡 (artwork by Kazuo Kasai)
Characters:

If your characters were given the task to prank someone, who would it be, what would they do, and would the prank work?
0399
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 14/08/2026
In our latest blog post, writer and poet Jonah Wardell (better known by his Youtube handle, Roughestdrafts) gives us a peek into his writing process on Ellipsus. Curious about writing insights? Fancy seeing Emboss in action? This is the article for you! ellipsus.com/blog/inside-...
Turns out, when it comes to human authorship, the drafts, outlines, and evidence—the writing journey that Emboss catalogues on your behalf—have the final say.

 Humans: 1, AI: 0

- Jonah Wardell
28821
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 12/08/2026
WIPs… we love seeing them on the feed. There’s so much talent out there to celebrate. It’s time to bring back #WIPWednesdays. What are you working on? Share a snippet below! 👇
But success shall crown my endeavors. Wherefore not? Thus far I have gone, tracing a secure way over the pathless seas, the very stars themselves being witnesses and testimonies of my triumph. Why not still proceed over the untamed yet obiedient element? What can stop the determined heart and resolved will of man?
45414
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 10/08/2026
Voila, our Monday writing prompt. (Love this one!)
Two characters both have something the other wants. They aren’t allowed to communicate this to each other, but they both know that the other has this thing. How does this show up throughout a conversation? How does the subtext show this occuring?
06120
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 05/08/2026
Adverbs are a real vibe-maker don’t you think? They have a way of revealing the true… essence of a story. (Heavenly, Manly… Deadly? Anything you wanna talk about Homer? 🤭) What are some of your commonly used/favorite adverbs? Let us know beloowww 👇 #howIwriteWednesday
A screenshot of The Illiad in Ellipsus. The top three adverbs are "Heavenly", "manly", and "deadly."
3548
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 04/08/2026
When it comes the question of creative authenticity, there’s no silver bullet, no one size-fits-all solution. Trust cannot be based on the assumption of air-tight proof (cause then it ain’t trust!).
Pangram is not infallible. I’ve used it to run some of my newsletters through it, and they came back as 80% AI when I wrote every word myself. This is one of many reasons why I disagree with Substack’s decision to partner with Pangram. Another reason is that once a tool like Pangram is available to the masses, false accusations start flying around, and careers can be ruined. Whether you admit it or not, there is A LOT of jealousy in the publishing world, so it wouldn’t surprise me if someone who disliked author X decided to use Pangram on their work and made the results public. This is not the publishing world I want to live in.
1181
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 04/08/2026
This week, a major book contract fell apart at lightening speed following accusations that the author used AI. kathleenschmidt.substack.com/p/ai-accusat...
Here is where things get complicated. According to Publishers Lunch, “rumors surfaced quickly from people who had read the manuscript that the book contained many of the hallmarks of AI, including negative parallelism, off-kilter metaphors, and a flat prose style.” PL also ran the manuscript through Pangram, which stated the book was 97% AI.

Jeff Sneider, who writes the entertainment newsletter The InSneider, was able to speak to the author (who shall remain nameless) on the record:

“The accusations are wrong, and I am completely innocent,” Michael told me by phone on Wednesday night.“I was on the verge of success, and then all of a sudden, there were rumors, but no one asked me anything. I don’t know why my agency did not have my back,” said Michael, who noted that the book’s publisher is still willing to listen to his side of the story.
1211
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 04/08/2026
First, a question: why should writers embrace verifiers if they’re just AI chatbots dressed up in new clothes? (Source: www.nytimes.com/2026/07/29/b...)
Pangram’s interface resembles a chatbot. The website prompts users to insert a piece of text, and Pangram spits out a verdict — A.I., human or A.I.-assisted. Behind that simple interface is a powerful model. Pangram trained it by feeding its A.I. system millions of examples of text to analyze, and asking which were written by humans and which by A.I. Over time, the model honed its accuracy.
1331
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 03/08/2026
We all have one... or do we? Let us know!👇 (Art by Guillermo Martí Ceballos)
Reflection

What is your favorite work that you have ever written, and why?
0327
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 30/07/2026
Ellipsus Plus users, we got a snazzy update for you… 🥁 *drumroll* 🥁 Introducing: Typewriter scrolling! 📜📜
513632
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 30/07/2026
We’re using the opportunity to update the titles of collaborator roles to better reflect all the things Ellipsus can do now! "Can merge" ➡️ Document editor "Can edit" ➡️ Draft editor "Can comment" ➡️ Commenter (on both main & drafts) "Can view" ➡️ Viewer
An invite collaborator window with the new collaborator titles.
2202
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 30/07/2026
… as well as merged back into the main document from drafts 😱
1160
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 30/07/2026
Comments can be carried over from the main doc to drafts (just select ‘keep comments’) 👇
A create new draft window with a "keep comments" button.
1160
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 30/07/2026
Today we’re shipping a HEAVILY requested feature— Comments. On. Main. Say goodbye to the days of draft-only comments. Now you and your collaborators can leave comments right smack in the main doc. 🥵
An Ellipsus document populated with comments.
626581
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 29/07/2026
Style is what makes your voice unique, original, and all your own (read: AI could never)! Share your quirks loud and proud. This is #howIwriteWednesday. Who else loves mega-long sentences? (Clock the triple digit text complexity, go off James 💁‍♀️) What are your funny, unusual, or revealing patters?
A screenshot of Joyce's Ulysses in Ellipsus, with a text complexity score of 856.9
06613
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 28/07/2026
Fed up with AI, and wanting to explore a pro-human solution, Jonah tried out Ellipsus Emboss on some of his own writing. Lucky for us, he shared receipts 👀
“Instead of analyzing how ‘AI-sounding’ your cadence and language choices sound, Emboss features show the progression of your pieces from start to finish as you write…The same processes that make Ellipsus a functional writing software now help demonstrate your humanity.”
1224
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 28/07/2026
In our latest blog post, Jonah (aka 'Roughest Drafts' on Youtube) discusses poetry, drafting, and the regrettable surge of AI-verifiers onto the publishing scene—from Substack, to literary awards:
“While AI accusations are unfortunately impossible to avoid at this point, AI-verifiers are not the solution that tech companies would have you think they are. Even if AI-detectors were 100% accurate, they would still require feeding original work into AI, which is exactly what we're trying to avoid! When LLMs are trained on swaths of stolen content already, why would we willingly give up anything more to them? At the end of the day, Substack’s Pangram partnership is another step in the wrong direction.”
14614
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 27/07/2026
We're back with a stellar writing prompt to kick off the week ✍️ (Artist: Helin Ozdemir)
Scenario: Three characters are being interviewed separately, none of them could compare their stories beforehand. What contradictions exist? What do they agree on?
05217
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 23/07/2026
Reading through the comments of the Substack release post, it’s very clear: writers don’t want this. They see the ‘partnership’ for what it is: another attempt to shove AI down our throats.
Alex Garcia writes: "No no no! Please don't use this, folks! I hate that you're doing this, Substack. Pangram is AI. So you're basically telling us to use AI to make sure we're not reading AI. This is terrible.

The other thing is that you're not taking into account what authors want. Me, for instance, I do NOT consent to having my writing put through Pangram. With this new tool you're introducing, anyone can just dump my stuff in there with a click, without even realizing that I don't want that to be done. WTF?

Also worth noting that while Pangram's false-positive rates is indeed low (though I'd argue that even one mistake in ten thousand is one too many--what if you're that one?), its false-negative rate is much higher, as you can see in this article:

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/05/pangram-ai-detection-accuracy/687381/

What that means is that you're much more likely to see AI generated text marked as human-written. Is that what you want?

But I guess this move makes sense considering how Substack seems to be embracing AI in general from the rest of the article. I'm very disappointed.

The Nazi crap was bad enough, but I'm sad to say that for me, this is the last straw. I'd rather pull out than have my writing put randomly through an AI detector."
38313
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 23/07/2026
We’ve said it once and we’ll say it again: judging style for “AI-tells” is not a reliable way of adducing human vs. AI-generated work, especially given the grave consequences of getting it wrong (e.g. loss of trust, deplatforming).
Amy Jo writes: 'I write all my stuff. And I've run some work through Pangram. It almost always flags something as AI. My "How I Work" statement will say "I wrote this with my own brainpower and if Pangram says otherwise it's full of s**t."'
27314
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 23/07/2026
Despite Pangram’s insistence to the contrary, there are dozens if not hundreds of studies that indicate AI verifiers turn out false positives and negatives all the time. (See: www.theguardian.com/books/2026/j...) Substackers are running their own work through Pangram to prove it.
Nikki Beem writes "I just tested two essays I wrote, one academic and one more personal, but both 100% me, and both were flagged as 100% AI. When I looked up typical “signs” of AI-generated writing, it listed some of the things I do, and looking deeper, it turns out I was trained to write for the same kind of publications and texts that train AI. So am I writing like AI or is AI writing like me? I now need to completely overhaul how I communicate so that my writing is not flagged as AI, and so I am not discredited as a writer with my own thoughts, opinions, and manner of storytelling? I do appreciate reading stories that feel genuinely human, and come from human minds, but I’m not sure this how we will guarantee that outcome."
29419
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 22/07/2026
Style is what makes your voice unique, original, and all your own (read: AI could never)! Every week, we’ll share some Writing Insights from the canon’s finest. This is #howIwriteWednesday. Every writer has their own quirks, flourishes, and... fixations. ahem D.H Lawrence 👀 (mommy issues much?)
A screenshot of Lawrence's Sons and Lovers in Ellipsus. The word "Mother" is used 570 times.
27420
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 21/07/2026
Have you written much lately? Why or why not? ✍️
Characters: How do your characters calm themselves down? How are their approaches different?
86015
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 17/07/2026
Grifters generating metric f*cktons of slop and bogus biographies about people without consent is absurd, wrong, and, unfortunately, predictable. (See our article all the way back from 2024! ellipsus.com/blog/the-dis...) 🧵👇 (🔗 www.nytimes.com/2026/07/16/t...)
Still from NYT article: 

"Two business school professors, curious about A.I. books and whether anyone actually likes them, gathered data about 10 million books published on Amazon over the last five years. They found that the number of e-books published per month had tripled since the release of ChatGPT, to more than 300,000 at the end of last year, from around 100,000 in 2022. (Amazon said that its internal metrics did not show that level of growth, but would not share its figures.)"
16221
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 15/07/2026
Reply with your thoughts 🤔 (Artwork by Liza Sivakova)
Reflection: If you're facing writer's block or burnout, how do you overcome it?
155212
Ellipsus @ellipsus.com · 15/07/2026
Custom Themes take personalization to the next level 😍 Themes carry over to the Reader, so you can create the perfect ambience for your audience. You can even use them as backgrounds for your snippets! Try Ellipsus Plus free for one week (no payment info required) ➡️ ellipsus.com/pricing
06623