Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 30/09/2026It's impossible to capture all of the recent changes, so I tried to focus on two points: how the the interpretation of regulations is changing; and how regulated entities could start to think about coping with these changes.// 000
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 30/09/2026I spoke at the NBCOT State Regulatory Leadership Forum about the changing state of administrative law. A link to the talk is below./ echo360.org/media/752971...echo360.orgOutput.mp4 101
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 29/09/2026Sure, it's controversial, but someone has to hand it to water. 020
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 28/09/2026This year's Great Lakes Water Conference topic is Water, Technology, and Law. Speakers will address how new technology can both imperil and protect water safety and security. Registration below: www.utoledo.edu/law/academic...utoledo.eduGreat Lakes Water ConferenceGreat Lakes Water Conference : College of Law : The University of Toledo 030
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/08/2026This is not a good idea, but it follows from years of musings about how statutes should be interpreted according to their ordinary conversational meaning. 000
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 22/08/2026If you call it a "retreat" it sounds more relaxing. 210
Reposted by Evan ZoldanMatt Steilen @mattsteilen.bsky.social · 29/07/2026Routledge has just listed my book as forthcoming: www.routledge.com/Parliament-a...routledge.comParliament and the Invention of Legislative Power: England, 1100-1330How did the English parliament become a legislature—an assembly that deliberates, makes law, and represents a nation? In this wide-ranging and carefully argued reinterpretation, Matthew Steilen retrac... 76621
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 13/07/2026Thanks! I will be happy to hear what you think if you have a chance to read it. 000
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 13/07/2026From Yale JReg Notice and Comment. I introduce a new method for measuring judicial ideology based on the way that judges use tools of statutory interpretation. The full piece is forthcoming in the Indiana L J. www.yalejreg.com/nc/introduci...yalejreg.comIntroducing a New Methodology for Measuring Judicial Ideology - Yale Journal on RegulationScholars, lawmakers, and the public alike express an intense interest in knowing what motivates judicial decision-making. Are judges like umpires, merely calling balls and strikes, as then-Judge John ... 152
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 06/07/2026And here is mine, scholarship.shu.edu/shlr/vol50/i...scholarship.shu.eduCorpus Linguistics and the Dream of ObjectivityBy Evan C. Zoldan, Published on 10/13/19 230
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 06/07/2026This is Carissa Hessick's, one of the first critiques: digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vo...digitalcommons.law.byu.eduCorpus Linguistics and the Criminal LawThis brief response to Ordinary Meaning and Corpus Linguistics, an article by Stefan Gries and Brian Slocum, explains why corpus linguistics represents a radical break from current statutory interpret... 230
Reposted by Evan ZoldanAnthony Michael Kreis @anthonymkreis.bsky.social · 10/06/2026So, yesterday I talked about the first known Black voter in a parliamentary election in Great Britain and, before that, the experience of the Welsh. Today, let's talk about English Jews and what we might learn from their history and birthright citizenship in my paper. Let's go back to the 1290s... 15312
Reposted by Evan ZoldanMichael Smith @msmith750.bsky.social · 10/06/2026My essay on the many ways that state courts interpret state constitutions in lockstep with federal doctrine is now live on the @statecourtreport.org! statecourtreport.org/our-work/ana...statecourtreport.orgThe Many Versions of State Constitutional LocksteppingThe practice of interpreting state constitutions identically to their federal counterpart is often criticized in blanket terms. But the ways state courts lockstep vary widely. 21511
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 05/06/2026I'm looking forward to reading this. Discussions about the value of process are particularly valuable now. 050
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/05/2026In fairness, if a word can have silent letters, why not invisible ones? 160
Reposted by Evan ZoldanAlicia Bannon @aliciabannon.bsky.social · 18/05/2026Thinking about applying for clerkships? Don't miss @statecourtreport.org's resources on state supreme court clerkships, including hiring info for 80+ justices. statecourtreport.org/state-judici...statecourtreport.orgState Judicial Clerkship Resource 065
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 14/05/2026The delay, but only if you pretend you just pulled the email from a bottle on your own desert island. 020
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 01/05/2026www.linkedin.com/posts/evanzo...linkedin.comIt was an honor to be selected as one of UT's Outstanding Teachers this year along with five other faculty members from around the University. Being in the classroom with our students never stops...It was an honor to be selected as one of UT's Outstanding Teachers this year along with five other faculty members from around the University. Being in the classroom with our students never stops bei... 000
Reposted by Evan ZoldanMaya Sen @mayasen.bsky.social · 17/04/2026We had a last minute cancellation: does anyone with policy experience working in federal administrative agencies want to come talk to my HKS admin law seminar tomorrow (Friday 4/17) at 1pm ET about the role of policy experts in federal agencies? Happy to do remote - DM me if interested! 21915
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 14/04/2026Congratulations. I'll look forward to hearing how cite checking goes. 130
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/03/2026I usually keep it to myself. But the implication that we are all out here writing bloated op-eds is undeserved. 140
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/03/2026! Lukewarm is as warm as my public takes tend to be. 040
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 20/03/2026For 1Ls especially, make sure to answer the question asked. 040
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 18/03/2026Similar experience this semester in legislation. For what it's worth, I am finding it helpful to connect legislative process points to points about statutory interpretation. 031
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026It has been a great day here in Memphis and thanks to the wonderful law review students. // 000
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026I conclude that we should use these justifications as something of a checklist to assess whether the procedures used by the government are appropriate in a given case. / 100
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026I present five basic justifications and apply them to high profile deprivations of rights without a hearing that the government has effected in this past year, focusing on deportations and the law firm executive orders. / 110
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026But, the reason for this distinction is a bit murkier. There are a few competing, overlapping justifications for this distinction. / 100
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026The law is fairly settled: a hearing is required when the government purports to take adjudication-like action against a small number of identifiable individuals; a hearing is not required when the government's action is rule-like and affects a large number of unidentified individuals. / 100
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026Whether hearing rights are required before the government takes action depends on the distinction between two progressive-era cases, Londoner and Bi-Metallic. / 100
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 27/02/2026Thanks to the Memphis Law Review for including me in their symposium on Due Process today. The day is split between substantive due process and procedural due process and I am speaking about the procedural due process right to notice and an opportunity for a hearing. / 110
Reposted by Evan ZoldanLawrence Solum @lsolum.bsky.social · 31/12/2025Thank you, Paul Caron: Shout Out to Larry Solum and the Legal Theory Blog • TaxProf Blog taxprofblog.aals.org/2025/12/30/s...taxprofblog.aals.orgShout Out to Larry Solum and the Legal Theory Blog • TaxProf BlogOn the cusp of the new year and its new beginnings, I pause to celebrate the astonishing continuity of the Legal Theory Blog, published since 2002 (at least) by Lawrence (Larry) Solum, now at the… 061
Reposted by Evan ZoldanPhil Rocco @philiprocco.bsky.social · 26/12/2025It has been a bracing moment for American federalism, with both unprecedented efforts to extend executive control over state and local govts, novel forms of subnational resistance. Where is federalism going? Paul Nolette and I have edited a new issue of Publius on that question. Short thread: 39038
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/2025Because it has different strengths than the standard methods of measuring judicial ideology, it can be used alongside them to provide a more robust picture of judicial ideology, with a focus on state courts. // 020
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/2025And here is a figure showing how my results correlate with campaign finance scores: 120
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/2025Here is one of the figures from the paper showing State Supreme Court ideology as measured by references to the major questions doctrine and legal corpus linguistics 110
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/2025As proof of concept of the theory, I observe state supreme court citations to two tools of interpretation associated with the conservative legal movement: legal corpus linguistics and the major questions doctrine. / 110
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/20253. because it does not depend on substantive state law, it can be used to measure ideology across state lines. Because it measures ideology based on the observation of Canons and other Interpretive Tools as they Emerge, I call it the CITE Method. / 100
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/20251. it measures ideology based on observations of judicial behavior directly rather than looking at attenuated proxies; 2. it measures ideology based on behavior that is voluntary (i.e. citing particular interpretive tools) rather than looking at case outcomes; and / 110
Evan Zoldan @eczoldan.bsky.social · 23/12/2025In this article, I propose a new method of measuring judicial ideology: observing how courts treat tools of statutory interpretation that are closely associated with partisan political ideologies. Compared with the standard measures of judicial ideology, this method has some advantages: / 100