Reposted by dee (still a mouse)bentley ΘΔ @bentley.trashcan.lol · 09/03/2025love that this old telegraph pole has gradually been consumed by foliage 0145
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)CatFries @catfries.bsky.social · 09/03/2025"Who am I speaking to? What year is it!?" 0101
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)Out of Context Nickelodeon Game Shows @oocnickgas.curt.dog · 12/10/2024(Part 2) 1297
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)Adler the Eagle @adlertheeagle.bsky.social · 02/03/2025Okay, so despite being an Ad for some match 3 style mobile game or something, the animation and pacing of this little short is really good? It's probably just because the characters are cute little animals but still, pretty decent for a mobile game ad lol! youtu.be/SR3pk0qD3cc?...youtu.beToon Blast Animated Short | TumbleweedYouTube video by Toon Blast 37511
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025and need a distraction. but... that time would prolly be better spent reading poetry or discworld or smth idk. im not denying that public social media has brought me wonderful priceless treasures, but i think im no longer getting the value out of it that i used to. 1110
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025anyway im not really sure i still have a use for my tumblr or bluesky accounts. i have a lottt of fun just texting my close friends random thoughts/photos/art and having phone calls and playing games and watching movies together. i feel like im only ever scrolling bsky when im doing poorly mentally 2160
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025or maybe the spambots are considered engagement and therefore make bluesky more valuable to investors idk. im talking outta my ass at this point, i know nothing about finance or commerce or whatever 030
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025The thing is, even if each person invited just 2 people on average per week, it'd take less than 5 months to get a million accounts. I guess the actual frequency of invites is much less, since people are really hesitant to create new accounts. 130
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025I guess my only plausible reason this might actually work is that... maybe this hasn't been implemented because of profit incentives? Because I can see how an invite-only social media would have difficulty growing.... maybe? 130
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025Like, I'd hate to be that annoying non-expert on social media saying "why don't you just..." Usually, the simple solution hasn't been implemented because it simply doesn't work (and it not working is something the experts have had to patiently explain 10000 times) 130
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025I'm not an experienced computer scientist or anything and I'm sure the problem is a lot more complicated than this, but I genuinely am struggling to see what issues this account moderation system has. 130
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025oh also if people use this to block groups of people, that's fine, right? Sometimes you *do* just want to block entire friend groups or circles of jerks. The trans ppl won't get blocked by anybody except transphobes, AND trans ppl have the power to block terf networks 120
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025so this levels the playing field for humans vs spammers. They no longer have the power to create bots faster than we can block, because now our blocks are exponentially more effective. 120
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025so spammers are "encouraged" to create branching structures of bot invites... but this also makes it wayyyy more efficient for us to prune them out, because each time you go 1 level up the invite chain, the amount of spambots you can block increases exponentially 110
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025if the cooldown was 1 week per invite, and each new account was allowed 10 invites, that would mean a branch structure could create 100 accounts in 2 weeks, and a chain of 100 bots would take ~ 2 years to make 120
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025you could even add a "cooldown" period to discourage these linear bot chains. If each invite takes 24 hours to be approved, creating a linear chain of 42 bot accounts would take 42 days, whereas creating 42 bot accounts using a branch structure takes just 2 days 120
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025and even if spammers try to get around this by creating linear chains of bots inviting more bots rather than trees with many branches, you could just follow the invite chain up 'til you're satisfied that you're dealing with a human, then sever the branch there... 120
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025the more spam accounts you create, the more likely you are to get discovered as a spammer, because you're creating more "exposure points" where someone can interact with one of your spambots. 120
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025ok so. imagine if bluesky was still invite-only, and they added a "block all accounts invited by this account" feature (and also made public who invited who). Wouldn't that make spamming much harder? cuz then everyone could just block the source of spambots...? 190
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025what does this song make me think of? it makes me think of loving my fellow queers despite all the ways we hurt each other... and maybe just a hint of love for the rest of humanity too, despite the horrors. idk i'll make art about this someday. 020
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 03/03/2025super unexpected addition to the 2025 playlist: www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zeo...youtube.comBuilt This Way Samantha Ronson lyrics (Mean Girls soundtrack)YouTube video by MeanGirlsFanatic 120
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)JienBirb @jienbirb.bsky.social · 01/03/2025What up bluesky it’s time to have ideas and follow through on none of them 191648504
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)ember @samarkandembers.bsky.social · 02/03/2025starting back on campus tomorrow 0181
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)AuThom🎃🏳️🌈 @mongreldog.bsky.social · 02/03/2025*imagines a dragon* holy shit that was good advice 2408
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)@fatTenderbitch.fartsky.hammer&.sickle @tenderloim.bsky.social · 03/03/2025Old people are awesome man they got like whole lives n’ shit. Tons of stories 011
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)CJ O'Mouse @healthpot.bsky.social · 28/02/2025Touches you with my sweet lil mousy paws 0163
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 28/02/2025wishing you well! i think this is a wise move honestly. 110
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 28/02/2025people generally like talking to other people tbh it's nothing to feel guilty about. the existential terror of eternal loneliness is much more worrying, so it's nice that we find comfort in each other 110
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 28/02/2025u have the power to change the writing i think. at least a little bit. butterfly effect and all that 040
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)Blue the Wyrd One @forestmageblue.bsky.social · 04/03/2024Hung out with some snakes while I ate my Hobbit lunch 🐍🧀🥖🍎 261
Reposted by dee (still a mouse)Blue the Wyrd One @forestmageblue.bsky.social · 14/05/2024Rainy days are also good for making fresh pasta and sauce 🤌✨ 1114
dee (still a mouse) @duskdishwasher.bsky.social · 28/02/2025i wouldn't mind living here a couple years i think 110