Sign in

duncanhosie.bsky.social

@duncanhosie.bsky.social
4 followers 1 following 0 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 27/08/2026
What is lost when the Supreme Court ignores facts established by lower courts and rules from a record that it—and Trump—chooses? Duncan Hosie explores:
bit.ly
The Supreme Court Isn’t Interested in Facts
In decision after decision, the conservative justices are ignoring the evidentiary record that lower courts have worked hard to establish.
48428
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
Post Edited: “The Supreme Court Isn’t Interested in Facts” electionlawblog.org/2026/the-suprem…
0266
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 30/06/2026
In case after case, the Supreme Court is gutting established precedents while saying that it is preserving them, Duncan Hosie argues.
bit.ly
A False Pretense of Judicial Modesty
The Supreme Court is remaking the law while claiming to preserve the status quo.
47413
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 30/06/2026
In case after case, the Supreme Court is gutting established precedents while saying that it is preserving them, Duncan Hosie argues.
bit.ly
A False Pretense of Judicial Modesty
The Supreme Court is remaking the law while claiming to preserve the status quo.
77029
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
Niko Bowie @nikobowie.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
This is great, but two friendly amendments. The consolidation of judicial supremacy began long before the 1990s. And even as the Court holds that Congress may not respond to its decisions, Congress *does not need this majority’s approval* to check the Court’s power and respond anyway.
theatlantic.com
Judicial Supremacy Has Arrived
Last week’s Supreme Court decision didn’t just undermine the Voting Rights Act. It foreclosed the possibility of any new Voting Rights Act in the future, too.
11706192
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
Marty Lederman @martylederman.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
A must-read, on the constitutional evisceration of voting rights. What City of Boerne + Callais have wrought. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...
theatlantic.com
Judicial Supremacy Has Arrived
Last week’s Supreme Court decision didn’t just undermine the Voting Rights Act. It foreclosed the possibility of any new Voting Rights Act in the future, too.
02311
Reposted by @duncanhosie.bsky.social
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
“The Last Voting Rights Act: Last week’s Supreme Court decision didn’t just undermine the Voting Rights Act. It foreclosed the possibility of any new Voting Rights Act in the future, too.” electionlawblog.org?p=155916
electionlawblog.org
"The Last Voting Rights Act: Last week’s Supreme Court decision didn’t just undermine the Voting Rights Act. It foreclosed the possibility of any new Voting Rights Act in the future, too." #ELB
Duncan Hosie at The Atlantic: But to view Callais as merely the final hit in the Voting Rights Act’s destruction is to miss its deeper ambition. The bigger shift is that Callais also closes off the po...
01811