Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23hInteresting application for a declaration of legislative inconsistency with the Bill of Rights Act — where the Crown has conceded the legislation is not a justified limitation on rights (as the Attorney reported during the parliamentary process). 0135
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026And another significant appointment in the pre-election period… 🤦🏼♂️ 3155
Reposted by Dr Dean KnightDr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The Act/NZF manifesto proposals to abolish the Waitangi Tribunal or end its contemporary claims jurisdiction are concerning for a number of reasons. Esp troubling is the claim (here eg from NZF) that the tribunal is interfering in the law-making process in an undemocratic way. 34727
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026Folk may wish to note that the vetting of legislation for compliance with te Tiriti / the Treaty (and justification if not) is already hard-wired into the Cabinet processes for law-making, along with other higher-order norms etc. 021
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026To be clear also. I'm not intending to bark at every passing car this election. But this proposal has democratic and constitutional implications which are worthy of comment. 130
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026And I don't think we would expect the courts to sit still if that came either - but many things would start to unravel if we got that deep etc... #crisis 130
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026No surprise if the courts did the latter. The tribunal has been a key feature of our constitution ecosystem and infrastructure for decades -- and the ecosystem would inevitably evolve etc. 120
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I suspect courts would be troubled by this. But hard to see what they could do other than calling abolition out as inconsistent with te Tiriti / the Treaty via a declaration. More likely is courts leaning into their declaratory jurisdiction to help fill the gap on Tiriti / Treaty consistency etc. 130
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I think this would depend on the legislative detail etc. And hard to see any other pathway on this, as parliamentary sovereignty is pretty blunt. 110
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Ditto. It's rising to the level that it's become, I think, a real constitutional concern. On this, Vicki Jackson makes a cogent argument about the important contribution of "knowledge institutions" to constitutional democracy -- especially universities etc. www.cjccl.ca/wp-content/u...cjccl.ca 030
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026And they need to be asked why regulatory standards advice-giving is to be heralded but the same style of advice-giving by the tribunal is condemned. 2141
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Folk should be asking these parties why they want to put their fingers in their ears when making policy and law — not wanting to receive expert advice offered to improve policy and legislative outcomes. 2152
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026And these parties know this. Because that was the conceptual basis of Act’s regulatory standards legislation: vetting and expert appraisal. (On that, folk like me welcomed the idea of legislative vetting but quibbled about the accuracy/constitutionality of the standards.) 1150
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Good governance and democratic process is about ensuring policy justifications/proposed laws are as strong and robust as they can be. Any responsible govt would welcome expert advice which vets laws against applicable law-making norms and signals how harmony might be achieved. 1213
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Answers to that rhetorical question are probably not needed on this thread — as we can infer etc. 1200
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026And that reveals the other concerning aspect: here the tribunal’s power is advice-giving and dialogical. Why would a govt and Parliament not want the benefit of advice from an expert body and one that has deep-dived evidentially into a particular policy or law? 1308
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Nonsense. In this context, the tribunal’s claims are only recommendatory. In other words, it is up to the Crown and Parliament (rightly or wrongly) whether it heeds the advice of the tribunal or not. 1234
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The Act/NZF manifesto proposals to abolish the Waitangi Tribunal or end its contemporary claims jurisdiction are concerning for a number of reasons. Esp troubling is the claim (here eg from NZF) that the tribunal is interfering in the law-making process in an undemocratic way. 34727
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Pleased to see policy here addressing scourge of urgency etc -- esp post-enactment scrutiny for expedited laws, which I've been promoting for a while. While I'm supportive of an elevated threshold for urgency, I'm disappointed 100-day plan policies are exempted. www.labour.org.nz/news/speech-... 1218
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 30/09/2026And, with that, Parliament is dissolved. #❤️democracy 140
Reposted by Dr Dean KnightAndrew Little @andrewlittlenz.bsky.social · 24/09/2026The government has announced the Head Start programme for local government amalgamation is not going ahead. The government is responsible for a total waste of ratepayers' money, and it's totally unacceptable 🤯 54218
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Another appointment during the pre-election period of restraint? 042
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026And it also ignores the adverse compressing effect of urgency, where different stages may happen in the same day thereby reducing attention and friction etc. 030
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026From Upston earlier today. Has anyone fact checked and filled in the gaps? 290
Reposted by Dr Dean KnightCourts of New Zealand @courtsofnz.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Hoban v Attorney-General Hearing in the Supreme Court Wednesday 7 October – Thursday 8 October 2026 sen.nz/prqcmw 011
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026However, the report of the Standing Orders committee is most notable for what has not been materially addressed: urgency and expedited law-making is a stain on our democracy and the report only tinkers around the edges. More should have been done to avoid rushed law-making. 12211
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026👀 selectcommittees.parliament.nz/v/6/4e5a7157... 185
Reposted by Dr Dean KnightRNZ News Feeds @rnzrss.bsky.social · 20/09/2026Pity the Committee: 48 meeting days, 55 lawsrnz.co.nzPity the Committee: 48 meeting days, 55 lawsThis Parliament has been inundated with a record number of new laws to consider, leading to massively increased debating time in the House, via both urgency and extended sittings. 013
Reposted by Dr Dean KnightDr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 20/09/2026As the bill was passed unchanged — but with minister noting in that it was not intended to implicate lawful protest etc — there’s an interesting question of how the legislation might be interpreted given the Solicitor-General’s recent speech promoting a black letter law approach by the Crown. 🤷🏻♂️ 166
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 20/09/2026As the bill was passed unchanged — but with minister noting in that it was not intended to implicate lawful protest etc — there’s an interesting question of how the legislation might be interpreted given the Solicitor-General’s recent speech promoting a black letter law approach by the Crown. 🤷🏻♂️ 166
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026On why that’s no comfort, see the IPCA’s findings re breach of peace and protest. www.ipca.govt.nz/download/168... 192
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026The minister basically says we can trust the Police’s discretion on these things. 260
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026Belich has tabled an Amendment Paper proposing the carve out suggested by the NZCCL. 182
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026Also, while this is the expansion of of an existing power, the enlarging of the power beyond the closure of roads to closure of any accessible public place more likely and more seriously implicates the right to protest. 2193
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026This is an ugly Trojan horse due to overbroad drafting: an amendment putatively about boy racers give power to Police to close any public place if disorder is imminent, direct people not to enter, arrest them if they try to do so or infringe them — all without any prospect of judicial supervision. 🤦🏼♂️ 13317