Sign in

Dr Dean Knight

@drdeanknight.bsky.social
2.5K followers 2.8K following 1.8K posts

⟦ law + govt ⟧ ⟦ coffee + kai ⟧ ⟦ critic + conscience ⟧ ⟦ rugby + rugby ⟧ ⟦ rainbows + unicorns ⟧ — usual disclaimers apply

PostsRepliesMedia
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 7h
🤓
0212
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23h
Interesting application for a declaration of legislative inconsistency with the Bill of Rights Act — where the Crown has conceded the legislation is not a justified limitation on rights (as the Attorney reported during the parliamentary process).
0135
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
And another significant appointment in the pre-election period… 🤦🏼‍♂️
3155
Reposted by Dr Dean Knight
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
The Act/NZF manifesto proposals to abolish the Waitangi Tribunal or end its contemporary claims jurisdiction are concerning for a number of reasons. Esp troubling is the claim (here eg from NZF) that the tribunal is interfering in the law-making process in an undemocratic way.
34727
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
Folk may wish to note that the vetting of legislation for compliance with te Tiriti / the Treaty (and justification if not) is already hard-wired into the Cabinet processes for law-making, along with other higher-order norms etc.
021
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
To be clear also. I'm not intending to bark at every passing car this election. But this proposal has democratic and constitutional implications which are worthy of comment.
130
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
And I don't think we would expect the courts to sit still if that came either - but many things would start to unravel if we got that deep etc... #crisis
130
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
No surprise if the courts did the latter. The tribunal has been a key feature of our constitution ecosystem and infrastructure for decades -- and the ecosystem would inevitably evolve etc.
120
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
I suspect courts would be troubled by this. But hard to see what they could do other than calling abolition out as inconsistent with te Tiriti / the Treaty via a declaration. More likely is courts leaning into their declaratory jurisdiction to help fill the gap on Tiriti / Treaty consistency etc.
130
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
I think this would depend on the legislative detail etc. And hard to see any other pathway on this, as parliamentary sovereignty is pretty blunt.
110
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Ditto. It's rising to the level that it's become, I think, a real constitutional concern. On this, Vicki Jackson makes a cogent argument about the important contribution of "knowledge institutions" to constitutional democracy -- especially universities etc. www.cjccl.ca/wp-content/u...
cjccl.ca
030
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
And they need to be asked why regulatory standards advice-giving is to be heralded but the same style of advice-giving by the tribunal is condemned.
2141
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Folk should be asking these parties why they want to put their fingers in their ears when making policy and law — not wanting to receive expert advice offered to improve policy and legislative outcomes.
2152
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
And these parties know this. Because that was the conceptual basis of Act’s regulatory standards legislation: vetting and expert appraisal. (On that, folk like me welcomed the idea of legislative vetting but quibbled about the accuracy/constitutionality of the standards.)
1150
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Good governance and democratic process is about ensuring policy justifications/proposed laws are as strong and robust as they can be. Any responsible govt would welcome expert advice which vets laws against applicable law-making norms and signals how harmony might be achieved.
1213
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Answers to that rhetorical question are probably not needed on this thread — as we can infer etc.
1200
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
And that reveals the other concerning aspect: here the tribunal’s power is advice-giving and dialogical. Why would a govt and Parliament not want the benefit of advice from an expert body and one that has deep-dived evidentially into a particular policy or law?
1308
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Nonsense. In this context, the tribunal’s claims are only recommendatory. In other words, it is up to the Crown and Parliament (rightly or wrongly) whether it heeds the advice of the tribunal or not.
1234
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
The Act/NZF manifesto proposals to abolish the Waitangi Tribunal or end its contemporary claims jurisdiction are concerning for a number of reasons. Esp troubling is the claim (here eg from NZF) that the tribunal is interfering in the law-making process in an undemocratic way.
34727
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
🙌🏼
040
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Pleased to see policy here addressing scourge of urgency etc -- esp post-enactment scrutiny for expedited laws, which I've been promoting for a while. While I'm supportive of an elevated threshold for urgency, I'm disappointed 100-day plan policies are exempted. www.labour.org.nz/news/speech-...
1218
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
And, with that, Parliament is dissolved. #❤️democracy
140
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
#trainspotting #dissolution
052
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Ditto. Sigh.
031
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
👀
002
Reposted by Dr Dean Knight
Andrew Little @andrewlittlenz.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The government has announced the Head Start programme for local government amalgamation is not going ahead. The government is responsible for a total waste of ratepayers' money, and it's totally unacceptable 🤯
54218
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
👀
000
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Ditto.
021
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Another appointment during the pre-election period of restraint?
042
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
And it also ignores the adverse compressing effect of urgency, where different stages may happen in the same day thereby reducing attention and friction etc.
030
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Quite.
100
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
From Upston earlier today. Has anyone fact checked and filled in the gaps?
290
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
🙄
096
Reposted by Dr Dean Knight
Courts of New Zealand @courtsofnz.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Hoban v Attorney-General Hearing in the Supreme Court Wednesday 7 October – Thursday 8 October 2026 sen.nz/prqcmw
Hoban v Attorney-General (SC 8/2026)
011
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
However, the report of the Standing Orders committee is most notable for what has not been materially addressed: urgency and expedited law-making is a stain on our democracy and the report only tinkers around the edges. More should have been done to avoid rushed law-making.
12211
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
122
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
🙌🏼
152
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
252
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
👏🏼
292
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
👀 selectcommittees.parliament.nz/v/6/4e5a7157...
185
Reposted by Dr Dean Knight
RNZ News Feeds @rnzrss.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
Pity the Committee: 48 meeting days, 55 laws
rnz.co.nz
Pity the Committee: 48 meeting days, 55 laws
This Parliament has been inundated with a record number of new laws to consider, leading to massively increased debating time in the House, via both urgency and extended sittings.
013
Reposted by Dr Dean Knight
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
As the bill was passed unchanged — but with minister noting in that it was not intended to implicate lawful protest etc — there’s an interesting question of how the legislation might be interpreted given the Solicitor-General’s recent speech promoting a black letter law approach by the Crown. 🤷🏻‍♂️
166
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
As the bill was passed unchanged — but with minister noting in that it was not intended to implicate lawful protest etc — there’s an interesting question of how the legislation might be interpreted given the Solicitor-General’s recent speech promoting a black letter law approach by the Crown. 🤷🏻‍♂️
166
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
💯
000
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
On why that’s no comfort, see the IPCA’s findings re breach of peace and protest. www.ipca.govt.nz/download/168...
192
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
The minister basically says we can trust the Police’s discretion on these things.
260
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Belich has tabled an Amendment Paper proposing the carve out suggested by the NZCCL.
182
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Being debated at the moment.
160
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Also, while this is the expansion of of an existing power, the enlarging of the power beyond the closure of roads to closure of any accessible public place more likely and more seriously implicates the right to protest.
2193
Dr Dean Knight @drdeanknight.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
This is an ugly Trojan horse due to overbroad drafting: an amendment putatively about boy racers give power to Police to close any public place if disorder is imminent, direct people not to enter, arrest them if they try to do so or infringe them — all without any prospect of judicial supervision. 🤦🏼‍♂️
13317