iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Does that mean people will support Mike Rogers? Some have already expressed they will. I think most just won’t actively advocate for him. They may leave it blank and vote down the line or they may sit out entirely given people’s dismissal of their concerns. (end)

54310 43

Will he address the attack on the synagogue in his own state in a meaningful way? TBC: saying he “loves Jews and the Jewish people” doesn’t mean shit when there’s an attack on a synagogue, aimed at children and his response is to shrug his shoulders & try to justify/sanewash it.

45413 54

This is a wait and see moment. Will he continue to blame Israel for everything? Will he continue to say that Jews/Judiasm and Israel should all be separate (once again, casting Jews as either “good” if they reject this connection or “bad” if they don’t or don’t say they will)?

84316 43

🧵 some thoughts about Abdul El-Sayed: talking to Jews in Michigan and outside the state, there’s still a lot of hurt and harm he has done over the course of his primary that simple lip service cannot erase. There has to be real acknowledgment and accountability.

189637 96

And that's exactly what Jenny did: she told people about the alleged rape contemporaneously. She has been consistent with her story for years (again, before Platner was "known"). I believe Jenny. I believe Lyndsey. And other stories may still come to light. (END)

2354 35

Survivors may still be afraid of their attacker or they may not want to deal with it in that way. The shame, guilt, and psychological damage might make them want to bury this all down and forget it. But they WILL message friends and family or tell partners about it later (12/x)

1201 20

3. Survivors may never send their attacker a message that essentially says “hey, you attacked me” in the hopes of getting their attacker to confirm this. And this shouldn't be the bar for whether they should be believed or not. (11/x)

1232 23

1. Jenny told people about it contemporaneously in other ways. 2. People have been raped before the advent of social media/text messages/modern tech, and we have evidence or capacity to believe them (e.g. E. Jean Carroll) (10/x)

2252 25

The Politico reporter said on Morning Joe that Jenny tried to recover the IG messages with Platner but couldn't. However, this DOESN'T impugn her credibility in my eyes for several reasons. (9/x)

1212 21

Jenny's reasons for not wanting to go on the record with the NYT about the rape allegation is understandable given: She didn’t want to be known as a rape victim, she was scared, she agreed with his politics. All of which can be very confusing for a survivor to feel. (8/x)

1222 22

As many problems as I have with the NYT story about Platner (They left Lyndsey Fifield out to dry) they had enough corroboration to publish part of Jenny's story: there was a disturbing incident w/ Graham when he came over drunk. They wouldn't JUST take her word for it (7/x)

1202 20

Emphasizing this: Racicot told people the same story a couple of years before Platner was "known." (This knocks down the argument that this was all politically motivated or going after someone bc they're "famous") This speaks to credibility. (6/x)

2294 29

And of course, some survivors fear retaliation from their rapist or those around them. However, Jenny Racicot TOLD people contemporaneously about what happened. This includes her therapist, a bf, and an acquaintance BEFORE Graham Platner was "known" (5/x)

1327 32

Some survivors wrongly feel guilty that they “let it happen.” “Why did I pick up the phone? Why did I let him in the house? Why did I go to Bergdorf Goodman with him?” Etc. Which contributes to them not wanting to go to authorities or keep it to themselves (4/x)

1282 28

Survivors often feel like they won’t be taken seriously with any accusation of rape but ESPECIALLY when an intimate partner commits it. They worry cops will say “wait, he’s your boyfriend/husband? Is that really rape?” (3/x)

3284 28

One of the most common refrains from people who doubt survivors is to say: "Why didn't you call the police?" or "Why is there no police report?" - A lot of people don’t file police reports when incidents like this happen for multiple reasons (2/x)

2293 29

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 06/07/2026

🧵My POV as a reporter who has previously investigated allegations of rape and sexual assault to explain why Jenny Racicot's accusation that Graham Platner raped her is credible and to push back against people trying to discredit her (1/x)

17132 71

We will figure out who knew what when (Fight agency, podbros, MSNOW anchors, electeds) But for now the focus needs to be on two things: 1. Support for the survivors who came forward 2. Platner needs to drop out. Now.

0174 17

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 06/07/2026

And the fact that NYT dropped the ball on this: (2/x)

3369 36

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 06/07/2026

These details about Platner’s alleged sexual assault are absolutely sickening. (1/x)

1010336 103

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

MSNOW? More like MSNEVER amirite? (And yes, my cat laughed at that joke)

0111 11

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 17/06/2026

Let me be very clear: if you wander into my mentions being hateful towards anyone, you’re going to get bounced out of here. And a helpful suggestion to Sue Romulus, who thought it’d be a good idea to try to blame 9/11 on “Zionism”…keep your lies about Zionism and the Jews out of your filthy mouth.

1152 15

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 17/06/2026

It’s easy to hate people when it’s based on lies. Bigots are going to bigot though.

193 9

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 15/06/2026

Nope, you’re wrong. They’ll do things like conflate any Jewish donor with AIPAC.

120 2

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 14/06/2026

There are other PACs that spend way more than they do. But do they get as much attention from the “get dark money out of politics!” crowd?

010 1

Dan Przygoda @dprzygoda.bsky.social · 14/06/2026

Oh look, the bigot is back in the mentions! (Couldn’t stay away for long I see) AIPAC is an American PAC, so is J Street. So your assertion that it’s “Israeli money” is wrong. There are MANY American PACs that advocate support for other countries but how come you only focus on the Jewish ones? 🤔🤔🤔

100 1

Reposted by Dan Przygoda

Guardrails of Democracy @demguardrails.bsky.social · 14/06/2026

🚩TRACK AIPAC is clearly interfering in elections & spreading disinformation Example: TX Primary 🗳️Early Voting 2/17-2/27 🗳️Election Day 3/3/2026 Track AIPAC “strategy” *Circulated Crockett “Warning” *2/17 updated it-$86K+ *3/1 posted Talarico $23K+ *4/6 updated it-$148K+ 🤨Who do we vote for?

Red track aipac graphic of Jasmine Crockett that reads warning

Red trac aipac graphic dated 21/7 that shows $86,112 spent by pro Israel lobby to support her

Red track aipac graphic of James Talarico dated 3/1/2026 that say $23,250 donated by Pro- Israel lobby

Red AIPAC graphic of James Talarico dated 4/6 now showing $148,580 donated by pro- Israel donors

87144 71

Oh I was making a general statement about cowardly antisemites but obviously that hit close to home for you…

071 7

I’m tired of replies from cowardly antisemites. Go ahead, write out your definition of Zionist.

170 7

You’re the one tossing the term around. Are you scared to put it in writing?

170 7

Even 3rd grade math teachers tell their students to “show their work” so why can’t Track AIPAC do the same?

171 7

Lever News is not a serious outlet. And once again: if Track AIPAC is so good at distilling the numbers why do they constantly conflate J-Street with AIPAC or conflate Jewish donors with AIPAC?

041 4

100% wrong Annia bc according to Track AIPAC they HAVE the numbers, so why aren’t they clear about THEIR OWN methodology?

5174 17

REspect! - Report hate speech in Germany

The German government takes this very seriously and they have several open reporting systems that people can use: respectimnetz.de/en/ report-antisemitism.de/en/ www.polizei-bw.de/onlinewache/ Oh and all posts have been archived. (END)

respectimnetz.de

The reporting portal REspect! against hate speech in Germany. Easy. Online. Anonymous.

13618 36

There are countless other examples on their TL. Now, this is potentially a legal problem for Cory Archibald whether she contributed to these posts directly or materially supported them with with resources in Germany... (10/x)

2276 27

And here is Track AIPAC posting about Israel committing a Holocaust: (9/x)

1236 23

In these posts, Track AIPAC is referring to Israeli PM Netanyahu of being a "modern day Hitler": (8/x)

1239 23

Here is Track AIPAC attacking @pettersen.house.gov whose husband is the grandson of Holocaust survivors, of conducting a Holocaust: (7/x)

23111 31

Here is Track AIPAC accusing @schumer.senate.gov @senjackyrosen.govpeeps.us @repauchincloss.bsky.social all Jewish members of Congress of conducting a Holocaust: (6/x)

43415 34

Track AIPAC regularly refers to people as "Nazis" and accuses them of conducting another Holocaust. Here they are targeting @repdonbacon.bsky.social (5/x)

13112 31

German courts also ruled that comparing contemporary political situations to the systematic murder of six million Jews can constitute "grossly downplaying" the Holocaust, which is considered a crime. And here's why that's potentially a huge problem for Cory & Track AIPAC... (4/x)

14314 43

The German government has adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) and their working definition of antisemitism which says that "drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis" is an example of antisemitism (3/x)

24514 45