iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Table of Contents - Standing Orders - ProceduralInfo - House of Commons of Canada

I already provided you with Chapter 7 - Special Debates from the HOC's Standing Orders Procedures, perhaps you need to review all 150 rules which pertain to such. www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/st...

ourcommons.ca

010

Centrists don't blindly support any given party. They examine and compare ideas from all of them and vote accordingly based on what's being advanced by each of them. I've voted for each one of those parties at different times in my life over the past 50 years.

000

As I said before, it likely had to do with her wanting an immediate debate which even the Speaker himself wasn't sure if it met the requirements of the standing orders. In other words, it's something he'd have to look into to advance it in the future. I'm a centrist, not a partisan.

220

Chapter 7 - Standing Orders - ProceduralInfo - House of Commons of Canada

I don't know everything that preceded her request so can't say definitely but these are the rules... www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/st...

ourcommons.ca

Did you even read the Treason sections of the Criminal Code I posted? It's not enough they went to the US & basically colluded with Republicans to help them in their desires, there needs to be actual evidence of them plotting violence, war, overthrowing the gov't, passing on state secrets, etc.

111

As he stated, he wasn't satisfied that her request for an immediate debate "meets the requirements of the standing order at this time." There's strict rules on how debates & question periods proceed in Parliament so it likely his decision had more to do with the immediacy request than anything else.

That's ridiculous. Most Liberals including governmental officials view Danielle Smith & her separatist allies' actions to be treasonous even if they may not rise to the strict legal definition of such under Sections 46(1) and 46(2) of the Criminal Code. laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-4...

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

Criminal Code

Federal laws of Canada

Debra Davidson @debralhd.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

No, that is speculation. The only logical conclusion is that the strict, specific thresholds outlined in the Criminal Code—Sections 46(1) & 46(2)—for a treason criminal prosecution to proceed haven't been met. I suggest you read those. laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-4...

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

Criminal Code

Federal laws of Canada

221

The Trump regime's been interfering in Brazil's politics/elections for years and even played a role in Bolsonaro's attempted coup in 2024.

070

While the offer may have been purely a general courtesy they offer to those attending their office, you were wise to turn it down as they could in fact — had they wanted — gain personal info off your phone if you'd used their WiFi such as domains you've used, IP address, your phone device, etc.

I can understand the offer while you waited in reception to be called in so you wouldn't have to use your own data while you scrolled your phone but not in the conference room. Did they require you to look anything up online while in there?

Was that offered to you while you were sitting in the waiting room before being called in or during the actual interview itself? What type of company were you interviewing with?

111

That's not micro-managing. Standing over someone while they perform their duties or being forced to report to them on everything you do is. Bringing a drink into an interview and sipping on while there demonstrates a lack of personal boundary setting & professionalism.

250

I've screened, interviewed & hired many during my career. It's fine if a person brings one to their interview & immediately places it into an backpack pouch when called in for their appointment but if they don't and leave it in hand and drink from it during such, that's an immediate disqualifier.

020

He did a lot of corrupt/sleazy things but can only be impeached for & convicted of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and Misdemeanors, though the Constitution doesn't define what those entail.

100

Trump was more constrained in his first term because he was surrounded by career professionals and experts that prevented him from indulging in his most corrupt/criminal instincts. He's gotten rid most of them now and replaced them loyalists that do his bidding.

111

He was impeached for abuse of power & obstruction of Congress in 2019 & then in 2021 for incitement of insurrection. The House presents their evidence and then went to the Senate for a vote. It takes 67 votes to convict. In both cases, Republicans had a majority of seats & voted to acquit him.

120

They successfully impeached Trump twice. It was Republican Senators who shamefully acquitted him.

120

Attempting to do so when they have no subpoena or other real power in the House is futile but it's literally their job to do so when they do have that power. If they can gain a Senate majority too, even better. The longer Republican voters are forced to endure economic pain the more they'll revolt.

Jimmy Kimmel already has his shield...

000

Debra Davidson @debralhd.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

If the Dems do regain the House but don't impeach, it demonstrates to the world yet again that the US is lawless and can never be trusted again no matter which party is in power. It's prior reputation will be completely destroyed.

160

Except you don't take a chance of potentially losing an election when you already have a majority without a very good reason.

000

Debra Davidson @debralhd.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

I agree. I'm Cdn and was thoroughly disgusted when I saw it the day it got posted thinking they were arrogant MAGA idiots.

000

Debra Davidson @debralhd.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

That's not the full story, this is... The photo's not real. It was AI that she posted privately on FB as a joke while enroute to Halifax. Her sister saw it & reposted it publicly. She claimed to her employer she was mocking Trump's renaming of the lake. www.culturealberta.com/articles/ceo...

culturealberta.com

CEO Behind Viral AI 'Lake America' Photo Is Out at Michigan Credit Union | Culture Alberta

Jane Smith is no longer employed by Family First Credit Union, less than a week after its board publicly rejected her AI-generated "Lake America" post and said it was determining its next steps. The c...

4154

She posted that pic/caption on FB Sept. 11th. It immediately went viral within Canada & people were pissed, going so far to track down her employer, etc. For There was no indication on it that it was AI. That was only found out 12 days later after her employer got involved and interrogated her.

000

I'm Canadian and know what is going on with all of those, even more so than most Americans.

020

Whatever moral standing the US thought it had in the world is completely gone. No one trusts them anymore.

000

That's why the US and Israel have never become members of the ICC and try to discredit it.

000

Because that wasn't known until two days ago after her company had taken action. What she posted on FB was her and 3 others at Detroit's airport on their way to Halifax in matching sweatshirts saying "Lake America" on them with her comment "Like our sweatshirts? Not sure Canada will. Lol lol"

100

CEO Behind Viral AI 'Lake America' Photo Is Out at Michigan Credit Union | Culture Alberta

"Like our sweat shirts? Not sure Canada will. Lol lol" Jane posted from Detroit's airport on their way to Halifax. Canada didn't find it funny but they sure do now that she's out as CEO of Family First Credit Union in Michigan. www.culturealberta.com/articles/ceo...

culturealberta.com

000

She apparently posted it privately. It was her sister who copied and posted it publicly.

011

Yep, he put up a picture of the autopen in place of Biden.

010

It won't happen in the US but if he ever travelled into any of the 125 countries that are ICC members, he would be.

000

Next video tell everyone about how every Republican Senator voted AGAINST ending the war in Congress today.

021

He was already tried and convicted in the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes & crimes against humanity in 2024 and an arrest warrant was issued.

100

Everyone DID NOT walk out but they should have.

000

Mamdani learned he didn't have the legal power or authority to do so after becoming Mayor. The US isn't a member of the ICC nor even recognizes them as a legitimate court, likely due to engaging in war crimes/crimes against humanity themselves for decades & don't want to be held to account for such.

000

Because he's on US soil and it is not a member of the ICC nor even recognizes them as a legitimate court (because they know they've engaged in war crimes & crimes against humanity themselves for decades and don't want to be held to account for such.)

000

Because he's on US soil and it's not a member of the ICC nor even recognizes them as a legitimate court (because the US knows they've engaged in war crimes & crimes against humanity themselves for decades and don't want to be held to account for such).

100

010

No, this is the first time he's spoken this session. The video that was circulating yesterday with masses walking out was actually from last year.

150

That's two years in a row. You'd think Netanyahu would get the hint by now that most of the international community are fully against his genocidal actions.

000

He's on the US soil and not only is the US not a member of the ICC, they refuse to acknowledge that court's legitimacy (because they know they've committed war crimes & crimes against humanity themselves for decades and don't want to be held to account for such).

1153