Sign in

David Schultner

@davidschultner.bsky.social
195 followers 287 following 29 posts

Post-doctoral researcher at Karolinska Institute. I study social cognition and social learning using a mix of experiments, computational models and simulations.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by David Schultner
ISCON @iscon.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
ISCON now seeking nominations for the 2025 Best Social Cognition Paper Award! This award recognizes an outstanding article (theoretical or empirical) in the field of social cognition. Papers eligible if published in 2025. Deadline Nov 1. Full info here: www.socialcognition.net/best-paper-a...
socialcognition.net
Best Paper Award | Home
022
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
☀️ Excited to be part of this project! We investigate how language transmission (via written advice) can enable cumulative gains when observing another's behavior is insufficient
021
Reposted by David Schultner
Björn Lindström @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
Semantic knowledge is key for human innovation and cultural evolution! Our paper (thread in repost), led by fantastic @anilyaman.bsky.social & rising star @ts-brain.bsky.social is out in @pnas.org! www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... I will present this work at APS Barcelona (29/5), happy to chat!
pnas.org
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
35225
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
Very grateful that our paper was awarded ISCON’s Best 2024 Paper in Social Cognition!! Huge thanks to the fantastic team: Ben Stillerman, @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social , @leorhackel.bsky.social , Damaris Hagen, Nils Jostmann, and @davidamodio.bsky.social 🎊💐
1254
Reposted by David Schultner
Sepehr Razavi @srazavi.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
I am pleased to announce that @davidschultner.bsky.social will be our next guest as part of the SoCR Lab's Invited Talk Series. Dr. Schultner will present recent work that offers evidence for a parsimonious and mechanistic explanation of human social learning strategies via reward learning!
192
Reposted by David Schultner
Björn Lindström @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social · 16/10/2025
How do humans keep inventing tools and technologies that no single person could create alone? Our new preprint, led by @anilyaman.bsky.social & @ts-brain.bsky.social shows that semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution. 🧠📘 arxiv.org/abs/2510.12837
111139
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
Many thanks to the editor and reviewers! 🌷
020
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
If you want to read more about the nuts and bolts of our reward learning account of social learning—the Social Feature Learning (SFL) model—check out our recent @nathumbehav.nature.com paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategies - Nature Human Behaviour
This research advances a mechanistic reward learning account of social learning strategies. Through experiments and simulations, it shows how individuals learn to learn from others, dynamically shapin...
173
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
🎊 New paper out! In this @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social Forum, we (with @lucasmolleman.bsky.social and @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social) summarize how reward learning can lead to adaptive social learning. We also explore the broader consequences for cultural evolution: www.cell.com/trends/cogni... 🚄
2247
Reposted by David Schultner
Nature Human Behaviour @nathumbehav.nature.com · 23/07/2025
Through experiments and simulations, this study shows how individuals learn to learn from others, dynamically shaping the processes involved in cultural evolution. @davidschultner.bsky.social @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social @lucasmolleman.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategies - Nature Human Behaviour
This research advances a mechanistic reward learning account of social learning strategies. Through experiments and simulations, it shows how individuals learn to learn from others, dynamically shapin...
0239
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Many thanks to @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social & @lucasmolleman.bsky.social
030
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Altogether, we present a mechanistic account for the substantial flexibility and individual variability observed in social learning. A domain-general reward learning model shows that personal experience can shape social learning to render it adaptive. Thanks to the reviewers and editorial team! 💐
140
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Going beyond these experiments, we explore the implications of the SFL model for social learning under a variety of environmental contexts (such as spatial & environmental variability or dangerous environments, check out the full paper for these agent-based simulations and much much more).
130
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
In a final experiment (Exp. 6), we find evidence suggesting that learning about social- and non-social features follows the same principles. We do so by establishing feature competition (i.e., shared associative strength between social- and non-social features, see full text for details).
120
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
This suggests that SLS can be shaped by rewards. We show that among multiple available features, people pick out reward-predictive ones (Exp. 3), that this learning pattern also holds with 4 (instead of 2) choice options (Exp. 4), and that learning generalizes to dissimilar contexts (Exp. 5)
120
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Exps. 1 & 2: Consistent with our model, social learning was shaped by rewards: Having learnt that the majority (or minority) choice is reward predictive, pps copied the majority (or minority) when encountering novel targets. Exp. 2 replicates this with others' payoffs instead of choice behaviour.
110
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
☀️ We advance a domain-general reinforcement learning model—the Social Feature Learning (SFL) model—explaining SLS as the result of associating social features (e.g., others choices, their payoffs, or their age) with rewards. We test core assumptions and predictions across 6 experiments (n = 1941).
130
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Selective social learning is essential to navigate the vast and often contradictory forest of social information. At least 26 social learning strategies (SLS; such as 'follow the majority'; 'copy the prestigious') have been documented, but which mechanisms underlie the emergence of SLS? 🤔
120
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
💥 Our new paper (with ‪@lucasmolleman.bsky.social and ‪@bjornlindstrom.bsky.social‬) is now out in @nathumbehav.nature.com‬ 🥳 www.nature.com/articles/s41... 🧠 Here, we advance a novel RL account—the Social Feature Learning (SFL) model—that explains how people learn to learn from others! 🤝 🧵👇
1319
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 08/04/2025
Join our team as a Postdoc! 💐
020
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 14/03/2025
with @philipparnamets.bsky.social
000
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Thanks to my great team! w/ Philip Pärnamets, Ekatarina Yarmolenko & @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social
210
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Together, these findings show that fairness concerns & conformity jointly but independently shape moral norms. Understanding their interplay can help explain the successes & failures of third-party judgments regulating prosociality in social systems
110
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Having established these two separable factors, how may their interplay affect larger social systems? Using agent-based simulations, we find: 🔹 Inequality aversion helped societies move toward prosocial states (blue) 🔹 Commonness bias reinforced selfish defaults (red) instead of promoting fairness
130
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
How do both factors interact in a shared setting? In Study 2, we combined both Study 1 games into a novel game, manipulating inequality & commonness independently. Results closely track those of Study 1: Both motivations shaped moral judgments, but were only weakly related.
120
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
In Study 1, participants judged others’ behavior in economic games designed to isolate each motivation. Results show distinct effects of inequality aversion & commonness, however: only weak associations between both factors emerged, pointing to separate cognitive contributions
110
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Third-party judgments help regulate social life—as in cooperation & coordination problems—but which principles guide them? Past research has employed monocausal approaches, focused on 1) inequality aversion or 2) the common-is-moral heuristic, neglecting the complex nature of many moral judgments
110
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
🚨 New preprint out! 🚨 How do people make moral judgments as third parties? 👀 We show how two motivations—inequality aversion (fair = moral) ⚖️ and the common-is-moral heuristic (frequent = moral 👨‍👩‍👧‍👧—interact to shape evaluations 🧵👇 📄 osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
2258
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Thanks to my great team! w/ Philip Pärnamets, Ekatarina Yarmolenko & @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social
000
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Together, these findings show that fairness concerns & conformity jointly 🤝 but independently ◀️▶️ shape moral evaluations. Understanding their interplay can help explain the successes & failures of third-party judgments regulating prosociality in social systems.
100
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Having established separable factors, we asked: how may their interplay affect larger social systems? 🤔 Using agent-based simulations, we found: 🔹Inequality aversion helped societies move toward prosocial states (blue) 🔹Commonness bias reinforced selfish defaults (red) instead of promoting fairness
100
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
How do both factors interact in a shared setting? In Study 2, we combined both Study 1 games into a novel game, manipulating inequality & commonness independently. Results closely mirrored those of Study 1: Both motivations shaped moral judgments, but were only weakly related.
100
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
In Study 1, participants judged others’ behavior in economic games designed to isolate each motivation. Results show distinct effects of inequality aversion & commonness, however: only weak associations between both factors emerged, pointing to separate cognitive contributions.
100
David Schultner @davidschultner.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Third-party judgments help regulate social life—as in cooperation & coordination problems—but which principles guide them? Past research has employed monocausal approaches, focused on 1) inequality aversion or 2) the common-is-moral heuristic, neglecting the complex nature of many moral judgments
100
Reposted by David Schultner
David Amodio @davidamodio.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
A fantastic blog post on our recent PNAS paper! It elegantly describes our rather complex findings and discusses their implications for bias reduction. And I love the AI-generated podcast version, too. Thanks @thepeoplegeek.bsky.social! davehodges.substack.com/p/the-hidden...
davehodges.substack.com
The Hidden Game of Bias: How Prejudice Goes Viral Without Saying a Word
In the interest of providing multiple means of engaging with this blog, below is the podcast style conversation, using our AI friends Johnny and Joanne.
2144
Reposted by David Schultner
David Amodio @davidamodio.bsky.social · 01/07/2024
New paper from the lab! w/@davidschultner.bsky.social @bjornlindstrom.bsky.social & Mina Cikara We show that merely viewing a prejudiced person’s intergroup behavior induces bias in observers—a novel learning mechanism for prejudice formation and propagation science.org/doi/10.1126/...
23320