Sign in

David Keith

@davidkeith.bsky.social
3.5K followers 133 following 169 posts

Climate science and technology policy since 1989. Building Climate Systems Engineering at UChicago. Founded Carbon Engineering. Work interferes with my climbing. Read about me and my work at davidkeith.earth

PostsRepliesMedia
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 27/04/2026
If you’re interested in how these ideas are evolving and how they might (or might not) fit into climate policy, I hope you’ll join us. Register and learn more here:
climateengineering.uchicago.edu
Frontiers in Climate Systems Engineering
Climate systems engineering — consisting of open-systems carbon removal, sunlight reflection, and interventions to slow glacial melting — is increasingly part of the global debate about how societies could reduce the risks of climate change, alongside efforts to rapidly reduce carbon emissions. While these approaches vary in maturity, uncertainty, and policy implications, together they represent Read more...
010
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 27/04/2026
May 18 starts with an introductory overview and policy discussions. Presentations on May 19 will be tilted towards science and technology with more expert-oriented discussions.
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 27/04/2026
On May 18–19, the UChicago Climate Systems Engineering initiative is bringing together researchers, policymakers, and practitioners for a public symposium we're calling "Frontiers in Climate Systems Engineering.” The goal is simple: rigorous analysis and open debate.
121
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
Enjoyed my conversation on SRM360's webinar/pod yesterday. Check it out here:
srm360.org
Live Discussion: Are Emissions Cuts on Track to Avoid Catastrophic Impacts?
Watch the recording of SRM360's live discussion on emissions cuts, projections, and the potential role of solar geoengineering (SRM).
022
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
Daniele Visioni and I explain our concerns about Stardust and the commercialization of climate engineering in Technology Review:
technologyreview.com
Why the for-profit race into solar geoengineering is bad for science and public trust
Two scientists argue that the growing commercial efforts to counter climate change by reflecting away sunlight will thwart responsible research in the field.
0285
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
We did approve the first headline, but we did not approve this one...
010
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Notice how much Ray leans on ad hominem arguments. Calling me a charlatan. So what. It's not about me or Ray. People typically resort to ad hominem attacks when their factual and ethical arguments are weak. Ray: you should do better.
131
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Zeke's sweet thread on our op-ed:
061
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
One can imagine this rule is simple enough to be useful in international negotiations over sunlight reflection. My prior NYT op-ed's on this topic: davidkeith.earth/the..., and www.nytimes.com/2008... 4/4
davidkeith.earth
The New York Times: What’s the Least Bad Way to Cool the Planet? - David Keith
By David Keith How to cool the planet? The energy infrastructure that powers our civilization must be rebuilt, replacing fossil fuels with carbon-free sources such as solar or nuclear. But even then, zeroing out emissions will not cool the planet. This is a direct consequence of the single most important fact about climate change:...
011
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
First, it ties use of SRM to clean up of pollution, and since this pollution is mostly from burning fossil fuels, this is roughly equivalent to tying use of SRM to cuts in fossil fuels; and second, it provides a non-arbitrary fixed upper limit on how much SRM can be deployed. 3/4
121
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Zeke and I propose a simple rule: limit use of SRM to maintaining Earth’s reflectivity against the decrease in reflectivity that will continue as pollution is cleaned up. This rule has two useful consequences. 2/4
111
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Zeke Hausfather and I have an NYT op-ed out today, www.nytimes.com/2025... Here's my short blog post on the topic: davidkeith.earth/pre... 1/4
nytimes.com
Opinion | A Responsible Way to Cool the Planet
A small, carefully scaled geoengineering program could compensate for the loss of cooling as we eliminate sulfur pollution.
133
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
I am particularly excited about research that explores the risks and uncertainties of hemispherically balanced deployment of stratospheric sulfates, which add cooling at no more than 0.1 degrees per decade for half a century.
020
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
Research on sunlight reflection is often driven by large or badly managed deployments. Ken Caldeira, Cael, and I invite submissions for an AGU session assessing potential harms from limited deployment. agu.confex.com/agu/agu25/pr...
163
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
And Holly Buck is a powerful writer on geoengineering. See her book "After Geoengineering." Also, her article "The Rise of Green MAGA" is essential reading for the current political environment: www.compactmag.com/a... Here's Holly on our pod: www.energyvsclimate....
compactmag.com
The Rise of Green MAGA
Geoengineering is “probably as dangerous to us as climate change itself,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated on his podcast last year.
010
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
Rose Mutiso is a great rising voice in the climate and energy space, and I recently spoke with her about the energy transition in Africa on my Energy vs Climate podcast: youtu.be/DjOcyXPxaoc... Rose's Ted Talk on the subject is also a must watch: youtu.be/77HUdJ7Tij0...
youtu.be
Energy Transition in Africa & its Climate Dilemma with Dr. Rose Mutiso
*David & Ed chat with Dr. Rose Mutiso (about the tension between energy, climate, and economic development in Africa and the global south.* They touch on many topics to do with sub-Saharan Africa, including energy production and consumption, electricity and power grids, and the vast economic inequ
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
The conversation focused on SRM in context, alongside carbon removal, adaptation, and emissions cuts. We need to evaluate how they might work together in our messy world, a topic that's on my mind every day as I write a book that tackles this question.
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
Enjoyed my time in Cape Town last month for the Degrees Forum 2025. I had the pleasure of joining @hollyjeanbuck.bsky.social and Rose Mutiso for a plenary session on how sunlight reflection methods (SRM) fit into the broader climate response toolbox. #DGF2025 youtu.be/jlUQl6YjIjc...
youtu.be
Fitting SRM into the wider landscape
Holly Buck led a session with Rose Mutiso and David Keith focused on how SRM fits into broader discussions of climate change solutions. The session began with a survey, engaging the audience to explore their own thoughts about SRM in the context of CDR, adaptation, and mitigation. Mutiso noted that
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 04/06/2025
Canada can’t just sit on the sidelines regarding SRM research and governance. Ignoring SRM means others will make the decisions. Here’s an old op-ed Ted Parson and I wrote for the Globe & Mail that makes this point: davidkeith.earth/the... (not our headline)
davidkeith.earth
The Globe and Mail: Solar geoengineering – Science fiction – or saviour? - David Keith
At the time of this post, David Keith was a professor in Harvard's Schools of Engineering and of Public Policy, and founder at Carbon Engineering. Edward Parson is professor and co-director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA, and senior research associate at the Centre for Global Studies,...
011
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 04/06/2025
Lisa Dilling leads SRM research at the Environmental Defense Fund and has written about the need to explore the potential impacts of SRM before any sort of deployment is considered: blogs.edf.org/climat...
blogs.edf.org
Why it’s time to explore the potential impacts of Solar Radiation Modification
The impacts from climate change will continue to escalate in the years ahead, and a growing number of scientists, philanthropies and companies have become interested in strategies to lower global temperatures more quickly. One of the options is reflecting some sunlight back into space.   Because
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 04/06/2025
This conversation grew out of meetings that several Canadian SRM leaders, including Ted Parson and Doug MacMartin, had with Canadian government officials and NGOs about a possible SRM research program in Canada.
120
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 04/06/2025
Can Canada afford to ignore sunlight reflection methods (SRM)? I'm joining @ldilling.bsky.social from the @envdefensefund.bsky.social for a discussion hosted by the Transition Accelerator, a major Canadian NGO focused on the climate. June 10, 12pm ET. Join the Live Q&A: transitionaccelerato...
transitionaccelerator.ca
Can We Afford to Ignore Solar Geoengineering?
Should Canada act now to build its SRM research capacity and leadership? How can we foster the local expertise and international partnerships we’ll need to control the technology should solar geoengineering become a reality?
221
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
Superb op-ed from Steven Pinker (@sapinker on X) calling out the right's absurd Harvard Derangement Syndrome. Harvard has some woke, but its peak has passed, and claims of many on the right are disconnected from the reality I saw as a faculty member. www.nytimes.com/2025...
030
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
I appreciate the way Andreas has made a careful case for strong actions such as civil disobedience to protect humans and nature. Looking fwd having Andreas join us on Energy vs Climate this morning. (Feel free to join us live) www.energyvsclimate....
energyvsclimate.com
You're Invited: Has the World Surrendered to Climate Breakdown? Andreas Malm, author of "How to Blow Up a Pipeline," on EvC May 23 at 10AM ET
"The climate crisis calls not for moderation, but for militant action." - Andreas Malm Join us for a live recording of Energy vs Climate with special guest Andreas Malm, author of How the World Surrendered to Climate Breakdown and How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a
032
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/05/2025
See, the concluding section of the article, "If not a negotiated moratorium, then what?” for practical thinking on how governance can move forward without halting research progress.
010
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/05/2025
States can begin research programs while making it clear that deployment is premature. This allows for bottom-up norm setting and transparency without the risks of a negotiated moratorium.
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/05/2025
Many people, including (sometimes) me, have argued that a moratorium could provide a safe space under which research can flourish. But a moratorium would not magically create research. And as Sue and Dan point out, there are many ways in which a moratorium might inhibit research.
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 22/05/2025
Smart argument against a moratorium for deployment of sunlight reflection SRM from Sue Biniaz (former top US climate negotiator) and @bodansk.bsky.social (environmental lawyer). www.justsecurity.org...
justsecurity.org
Why Global “Moratorium” on SRM Deployment Should Get a Chilly Reception
A bottom-up norm-setting approach would rectify the concerns of agreeing to a global moratorium on solar radiation management deployment.
131
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
New high-quality survey on public attitudes toward sunlight reflection in Great Britain: 16% support SAI deployment. 46% are unsure. Younger people are more supportive overall. Interesting signals on awareness and openness to geoengineering in general. yougov.co.uk/health/...
yougov.co.uk
Dimming the sun; brightening clouds; planting forests: would Britons support geoengineering to combat climate change? | YouGov
Most Britons say a drastic change in the steps taken to combat climate change is needed in order to avert its worst effects
121
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
What's your basis for confidence that the modelers are wrong? Economic or energy forecast half a century in the future are near meaningless, but near term forecasts have predictive power. Of course, it's a long way to zero, but an emissions peak is not insignificant.
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Will Trump inadvertently increase the chance of a 2025 peak by slowing the economy?
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
That is a nice plot, I missed this in the annual report. Helpful.
000
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Thanks, Glen -- I give a **lot** of weight to your analysis. Agreed that we will not know when the peak happens until a few years after it's passed. What do you make of the new @carbonbrief.org analysis showing a China decline? www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-cle...
carbonbrief.org
Analysis: Clean energy just put China’s CO2 emissions into reverse for first time - Carbon Brief
For the first time, the growth in China’s clean power generation has caused the nation’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to fall despite rapid power demand growth.
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Our UChicago program is supporting Edwin Kite's research on sunlight reflection that explores analogs between geoengineering on Earth and terraforming on Mars. climateengineering.u...
climateengineering.uchicago.edu
Planetary Aerosol Geoengineering Research Illuminates Earthbound Climate Engineering
For decades, insights from planetary aerosol research have pollinated geoscience research with ideas that carry significant societal relevance. Examples include how data from Mars dust storms helped inspire nuclear winter modeling—impacting Cold War arms control discussions—and how understanding the mechanisms linking asteroid impacts to mass extinctions motivated NASA’s successful Double Asteroid Redirection Test. Still, much Read more...
021
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
But I'm not opposed people thinking about it, and I'm impressed by the arguments and authors who just published a case for Mars terraforming research. Article link: www.nature.com/artic... Open access version: sseh.uchicago.edu/do...
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Terraforming makes me squirm. I don't want to see humans messing with another planet until we have done a much better job protecting Earth's environment.
120
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 19/05/2025
Is Global Cooperation on Climate Change Possible? An interesting conversation with Former Foreign Minister of Pakistan @HinaRKhar, former lead U.S. climate negotiator Sue Biniaz, and former climate advisor to Trump George Banks, moderated by Amy Harder. youtu.be/scYZzq3zVm0...
youtu.be
Is Global Cooperation on Climate Change Possible?
Experts debated the future of US climate diplomacy at an Institute event titled “Is Global Cooperation on Climate Change Possible?” on May 1. The panel featured former Foreign Minister of Pakistan Hina Rabbani Khar, former lead US climate lawyer and Principal Deputy Special Envoy for Climate Sue Bin
120
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 16/05/2025
Will CO2 emissions peak this year? Mainstream forecasters like @IEA, @RystadEnergy, @McKinsey, and @DNV_Group Det Norske Veritas suggest a peak in the next year or so. Climate advocates seem reluctant to embrace this good news. What do you think? Why might these forcasts be wrong?
350
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
That's an assertion not an argument
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Agreed. But physics cannot tell you about costs, physics alone cannot support your claim.
110
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 12/05/2025
How could you possibly know that? What was god wearing when you talked with her?
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 12/05/2025
Excited to be in Cape Town for degreesglobalforum.org/ I last visited this part of the world in 1990, when I ended up in Mozambique during the civil war. Despite all the troubles, it's a different (mostly better) world now. Ping me for meetings.
degreesglobalforum.org
Degrees Global Forum
The 2025 Degrees Global Forum on SRM will be the largest conference to date on solar radiation modification (SRM).
010
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
Looking forward to it. Weird how direct air capture (DAC) has become a synonym for carbon removal (CDR). DAC is but one of many CDR pathways.
111
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
You can read more about my founding of Carbon Engineering here: davidkeith.earth/top...
davidkeith.earth
Carbon engineering – David Keith
I founded Carbon Engineering (CE) in 2009 to develop technology for capturing CO₂ from ambient air. This was an unusual choice for me because I’d spent my career in academia and had no business experience nor any strong interest in becoming an entrepreneur. Amazingly, this company grew from a few employees to over 160 when it was bought in November 2023 by Oxy Low Carbon Ventures at a valuation of $1.6 billion. I am no longer involved with CE nor do I have any financial interest in CE or Oxy.   It all started with skepticism. In the late 90's, Klaus Lackner started publishing on direct air capture (DAC) to counter climate change. Klaus and I shared a physicist's love for first-principles thinking and a drive to tackle climate, but I thought Klaus was overly optimistic about the cost of DAC. It...
000
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
A credible mandate for carbon removal or sunlight reflection requires a new political agreement that is negotiated with due consideration of these options.
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
It is a particularly unseemly argument because it requires ignoring one technology (sunlight reflection) to derive a requirement for another (carbon removal), when the Paris target was crafted without serious consideration of either.
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
That calculation is linked to the 1.5-degree Paris Agreement target for limiting global temperature rise. But interpreting Paris as an objective mandate for large-scale carbon removal only works by ignoring sunlight reflection—a faster and cheaper way to get near-term cooling.
100
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
Excited to be on the RBC Disruptors podcast to discuss carbon removal and direct air capture. I did my best to deconstruct the mantra that we need to cut 10 billion tons of carbon emissions a year by 2050. thoughtleadership.rb...
thoughtleadership.rbc.com
Beyond Offsets: How to Build a Carbon Removal Industry - RBC Thought Leadership
Carbon offsets aren’t enough. To truly tackle climate change, we need a global industry dedicated to pulling carbon out of the air and at massive scale.
130
David Keith @davidkeith.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
"Donald Trump Tries to Run Harvard", here's an extract from this morning's op-ed in the woke Wall Street Journal:
021
Reposted by David Keith
The Degrees Initiative @degrees.ngo · 16/04/2025
25 days to go until #DGF2025... Rose Mutiso, @davidkeith.bsky.social and @hollyjeanbuck.bsky.social will be exploring how SRM fits into the wider landscape of climate mitigation, including direct air capture, adaptation and emission reductions: degreesglobalforum.org/sessions/fit...
degreesglobalforum.org
Fitting SRM into the wider landscape
112